Neonatal lung diseases: lung ultrasound or chest x-ray

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Liu ◽  
Jovan Lovrenski ◽  
Arkar Ye Hlaing ◽  
Dalibor Kurepa
Keyword(s):  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Neonatal Lung ◽  
Chest X Ray

scholarly journals Limitations of bedside lung ultrasound in neonatal lung diseases

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolei Liu ◽  
Shuyu Si ◽  
Yiyi Guo ◽  
Hui Wu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Symptoms ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Ct Scanning ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Neonatal Lung ◽  
Chest X Ray

Lung ultrasound is a technique that has rapidly developed in recent years. It is a low-cost, radiation-free, and easy-to-operate tool that can be repeatedly performed at the bedside. Compared to chest X-ray, lung ultrasound has high sensitivity and specificity in the diagnosis of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome, transient tachypnoea of newborns and pneumothorax. Lung ultrasound has been widely used in neonatal intensive care units. However, it has limitations in some other lung diseases and cannot fully substitute for chest X-ray or CT. This review describes these limitations in detail and highlights that if clinical symptoms are not effectively alleviated after medical treatment or the clinical presentation is not compatible with the ultrasound appearances, then chest X-ray or CT scanning should be performed to avoid misdiagnosis and mistreatment.

Lung Ultrasound as a New Technique for Diagnosis of Neonatal Respiratory Diseases

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasser N. Elsayed
Keyword(s):  
Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Point Of Care ◽  
Point Of Care Ultrasound ◽  
Ultrasound Images ◽  
X Ray ◽  
The Past ◽  
Neonatal Lung ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
A New Technique

Point-of-care ultrasound in the NICU is becoming more commonplace and is now used for a number of indications. Over the past ten years, the use of ultrasound as an alternative to a chest x-ray for the diagnosis of neonatal lung disease has been explored, and protocols were developed to refine the interpretation of ultrasound images in neonatal lung disease. The purpose of this column is to briefly explain the physics of ultrasound and describe the application of ultrasound to neonatal lung assessment.

Use of Neonatal Lung Ultrasound for the Early Detection of Pneumothorax

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (09) ◽  
pp. 907-913 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bi-Ying Deng ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
Wen-Shen Wu ◽  
Xiao-Guang He ◽  
Jin-Feng Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Detection ◽  
Ct Scan ◽  
Neonatal Intensive Care ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Chest Drain ◽  
Reference Standard ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Neonatal Lung ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Review Study

Objective Pneumothorax (PTX) can be diagnosed using lung ultrasonography (LUS) in adult patients, but there are only a few reports of LUS in PTX diagnosis in neonates. The aim of the study was to assess the diagnostic accuracy for PTX. Study Design This was a retrospective review study performed in our neonatal intensive care unit (level III) between June 2015 and June 2018. All eligible patients underwent an LUS scan before undergoing a chest X-ray (CXR), which was considered the reference standard. When a diagnosis of PTX was inconsistent between LUS and CXR, a chest computed tomography (CT) scan or chest drain was considered the gold standard. Results Among 86 infants included in the study, 30 (34.9%) were diagnosed with PTX. In these 30 infants, 35 PTXs were detected by bedside LUS (five bilateral PTXs). Moreover, 11 infants with 14 PTXs were diagnosed only by LUS and were missed by CXR. Out of these 11 infants, 7 underwent a CT scan, whereas the remaining 4 underwent thoracentesis that confirmed PTX diagnosis. Conclusion In neonates with PTX, LUS was more sensitive and specific for the early detection of PTX compared with CXR.

scholarly journals Lung Ultrasound in Patients With Dyspnea From Infective Lung Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierluigi Bracciale ◽  
Salvatore Bellanova ◽  
Cristiana Cipriani
Keyword(s):  
Pleural Effusion ◽  
Lung Disease ◽  
Lung Diseases ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Chest Ct ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chest X Ray

Infective lung disease is a spectrum of pulmonary disorders with high prevalence in clinical practice. In the last decade, many studies focused on the clinical usefulness of lung ultrasound (LUS) in the management of patients presenting with dyspnea from infective lung disease. We report data on the methodological and standardized use of bedside LUS in the differential diagnosis of patients with acute dyspnea from infective lung diseases. We performed a cross-sectional study in 439 patients (160 women and 279 men, mean age 64.2 ± 11.5 years, age range 23–91 years) with infective lung diseases. A bedside LUS with a convex probe and chest X-ray were performed in all subjects. Chest CT was performed in a subgroup of patients, as clinically needed. We observed a statistically significant difference in the percentage of pleural effusion and pulmonary consolidation assessed by LUS, compared to X-ray (52.7 vs. 20%, respectively, p < 0.05; 93.6 vs. 48.2%, p < 0.001). The majority of the consolidations detected by LUS were mixed, hypo- and hyperechoic, lesions, with air bronchogram in 40% of cases. All findings assessed by LUS were confirmed by chest CT, when performed. We describe the actual role of LUS in the assessment of patients with infective lung disease. It has higher sensitivity compared to chest X-ray in the detection of pleural effusion. Consolidations from infective lung disease have mostly mixed echogenicity by LUS.

scholarly journals Lung Ultrasound vs. Chest X-ray for the Radiographic Diagnosis of COVID-19 Pneumonia in a High Prevalence Population

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryan C. Gibbons ◽  
Mark Magee ◽  
Harry Goett ◽  
James Murrett ◽  
Jessica Genninger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Radiographic Diagnosis ◽  
X Ray ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Chest X Ray

scholarly journals LUNG ULTRASOUND DURING COVID-19 PANDEMICS: WHY, HOW AND WHEN?

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
pp. 1783-1788
Author(s):  
Khrystyna O. Pronyuk ◽  
Liudmyla O. Kondratiuk ◽  
Andrii D. Vysotskyi ◽  
Olga A. Golubovska ◽  
Iryna M. Nikitina
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
Limited Resource ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Lung Damage ◽  
Dynamic Monitoring ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray

The aim: To optimize diagnostic of pathological processes in lungs affected by COVID-19, dynamic monitoring and clinical decision making using lung ultrasound in limited resources settings. Materials and methods: Between the onset of pandemics and January 2021, approximately 9000 patients have been treated for confirmed COVID-19 in the Olexandrivska Clinical Hospital. Assessment of all hospitalized patients included hematology, chemistries and proinflammatory cytokines – IL-6, CRP, procalcitonin, ferritin. Diagnosis was confirmed by PCR for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. Chest X-ray was performed in all hospitalized cases, while CT was available approximately in 30% of cases during hospital stay. Lung ultrasound was proactively utilized to assess the type and extent of lung damage and to monitor the progress of disease in patients hospitalized into the ICU and Infection Unit (n=135). Ultrasound findings were recorded numerically based on scales. Results: In the setting of СOVID-19, bedside lung ultrasound has been promptly recognized as a tool to diagnose and monitor the nature and extent of lung injury. Lung ultrasound is a real time assessment, which helps determine the nature of a pathologic process affecting lungs. In this paper the accuracy of bedside LUS, chest X-ray and computer tomography are compared based on clinical cases, typical for COVID-19 lung ultrasound appearance is evaluated. Described in article data is collected in one of the biggest facility that deals with COVID-19. Chest X-ray was performed in all hospitalized cases, while CT was available approximately in 30% of cases during hospital stay. The cases presented in the paper indicate potential advantages to the use of ultrasound in limited resource healthcare settings, especially when the risk of transportation to CT outweighs the value of information obtained. Conclusions: Grading of ultrasonographic findings in the lungs was sufficient for both initial assessment with identification of high risk patients, and routine daily monitoring. Hence, lung ultrsound may be used to predict deterioration, stratify risks and make clinical decisions.

scholarly journals Comparison of lung ultrasound and chest X-ray findings in children with bronchiolitis

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (74) ◽  
pp. 193-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sławomir Jaszczołt ◽  
◽  
Tomasz Polewczyk ◽  
Marta Dołęga-Kozierowska ◽  
Mariusz Woźniak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Ultrasound ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Chest X Ray
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document