Lung Ultrasound as a New Technique for Diagnosis of Neonatal Respiratory Diseases

2018 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 224-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasser N. Elsayed

Point-of-care ultrasound in the NICU is becoming more commonplace and is now used for a number of indications. Over the past ten years, the use of ultrasound as an alternative to a chest x-ray for the diagnosis of neonatal lung disease has been explored, and protocols were developed to refine the interpretation of ultrasound images in neonatal lung disease. The purpose of this column is to briefly explain the physics of ultrasound and describe the application of ultrasound to neonatal lung assessment.

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nehal M El Raggal ◽  
laila A Hegazy ◽  
Hossam M Sakr ◽  
Yasmin A Farid ◽  
Osama A Eldafrawy ◽  
...  

Abstract lung ultrasound (LUS) was used traditionally in the assessment of pleural effusions and masses but LUS has moved towards the imaging of the pulmonary parenchyma, mainly as a point-of-care technique. Objective To assess the agreement between LUS and CXR for the diagnosis of RD in neonates. Methods This prospective cross sectional study was conducted on 100 neonates presents with RD in the first 24 hours of life in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) of the Ain Shams University. All enrolled neonates underwent LUS and CXR initially and on day 7. Neonatologists were blind to the LUS diagnosis and the clinical decisions were driven by CXR findings. Lung score was applied to describe lung aeration, interstitial, alveolar, or consolidation patterns for each lung area. Results 125 different diagnoses were reported in 100 patients. The total agreement between LUS and CXR diagnosis was 96% (95% CI 88–98%) with a κ statistic of 0.94 (95% CI 0.86– 1.00). The agreement for RDS, Pneumonia, TTN, MAS, CDH, PE, Pnumothorax and atelectasis were 99%, 96%,98%, 99%,100%,100%,98% and 98% consequently. Conclusion LUS is a safe, low coast, easy to operate and has high agreement with CXR for the diagnosis of RD in neonates in the first week of life. Key words Neonatal intensive care, Point-of-care ultrasound, Chest X-ray Abbreviations: NICU: Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, LUS: Lung ultrasound, CXR: Chest X ray, RDS: respiratory distress syndrome, TTN: Transient Tachypnea of Newborn, MAS: Meconium Aspiration, PE: pleural effusion, CDH: cong. diaphragmatic hernia.


Critical Care ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arif Hussain ◽  
Gabriele Via ◽  
Lawrence Melniker ◽  
Alberto Goffi ◽  
Guido Tavazzi ◽  
...  

AbstractCOVID-19 has caused great devastation in the past year. Multi-organ point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) including lung ultrasound (LUS) and focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) as a clinical adjunct has played a significant role in triaging, diagnosis and medical management of COVID-19 patients. The expert panel from 27 countries and 6 continents with considerable experience of direct application of PoCUS on COVID-19 patients presents evidence-based consensus using GRADE methodology for the quality of evidence and an expedited, modified-Delphi process for the strength of expert consensus. The use of ultrasound is suggested in many clinical situations related to respiratory, cardiovascular and thromboembolic aspects of COVID-19, comparing well with other imaging modalities. The limitations due to insufficient data are highlighted as opportunities for future research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 180 (1) ◽  
pp. 137-146
Author(s):  
Nora Tusor ◽  
Angela De Cunto ◽  
Yousef Basma ◽  
John L. Klein ◽  
Virginie Meau-Petit

AbstractNo consensus exists regarding the definition of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in neonates and reliability of chest X-ray (CXR) is low. Lung ultrasound (LU) is a potential alternative diagnostic tool. The aim was to define characteristics of VAP in our patient population and propose a multiparameter score, incorporating LU, for VAP diagnosis. Between March 25, 2018, and May 25, 2019, infants with VAP were identified. Clinical, laboratory and microbiology data were collected. CXRs and LU scans were reviewed. A multiparameter VAP score, including LU, was calculated on Day 1 and Day 3 for infants with VAP and for a control group and compared with CXR. VAP incidence was 10.47 episodes/1000 ventilator days. LU and CXR were available for 31 episodes in 21 infants with VAP, and for six episodes in five patients without VAP. On Day 1, a VAP score of > 4, and on Day 3 a score of > 5 showed sensitivity of 0.94, and area under the curve of 0.91 and 0.97, respectively. AUC for clinical information only was 0.88 and for clinical and CXR 0.85.Conclusion: The multiparameter VAP score including LU could be useful in diagnosing VAP in neonates with underlying lung pathology. What is Known:• Ventilator associated pneumonia (VAP) is common in infants on the neonatal unit and is associated with increased use of antibiotics, prolonged ventilation and higher incidence of chronic lung disease.• Commonly used definitions of VAP are difficult to apply in neonates and interpretation of chest X-ray is challenging with poor inter-rater agreement in patients with underlying chronic lung disease. What is New:• The multiparameter VAP score combining clinical, microbiology and lung ultrasound (LU) data is predictive for VAP diagnosis in preterm infants with chronic lung disease.• LU findings of VAP in neonates showed high inter-rater agreement and included consolidated lung areas, dynamic bronchograms and pleural effusion.


CJEM ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 391-394
Author(s):  
Michael Romano ◽  
Tomislav Jelic ◽  
Jordan Chenkin

AbstractThere is evidence to suggest that point-of-care ultrasound assessment of the lungs has a higher sensitivity and specificity than chest radiography for the diagnosis of pneumonia. It is unknown if the same is true for pneumonia complications. We present and discuss the case of a 61-year-old woman who presented to the emergency department with confusion, decreased level of consciousness, and signs of sepsis. A chest x-ray revealed a right sided infiltrate. An ultrasound of the patient’s lungs was performed, and revealed a complex loculated fluid collection consistent with an empyema. A chest CT confirmed the diagnosis, and immediate percutaneous drainage was performed.


Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hasse Møller-Sørensen ◽  
Jakob Gjedsted ◽  
Vibeke Lind Jørgensen ◽  
Kristoffer Lindskov Hansen

The COVID-19 pandemic has increased the need for an accessible, point-of-care and accurate imaging modality for pulmonary assessment. COVID-19 pneumonia is mainly monitored with chest X-ray, however, lung ultrasound (LUS) is an emerging tool for pulmonary evaluation. In this study, patients with verified COVID-19 disease hospitalized at the intensive care unit and treated with ventilator and extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were evaluated with LUS for pulmonary changes. LUS findings were compared to C-reactive protein (CRP) and ventilator settings. Ten patients were included and scanned the day after initiation of ECMO and thereafter every second day until, if possible, weaned from ECMO. In total 38 scans adding up to 228 cineloops were recorded and analyzed off-line with the use of a constructed LUS score. The study indicated that patients with a trend of lower LUS scores over time were capable of being weaned from ECMO. LUS score was associated to CRP (R = 0.34; p < 0.03) and compliance (R = 0.60; p < 0.0001), with the strongest correlation to compliance. LUS may be used as a primary imaging modality for pulmonary assessment reducing the use of chest X-ray in COVID-19 patients treated with ventilator and ECMO.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S464-S464
Author(s):  
Ingrid Y Camelo ◽  
Rachel Pieciak ◽  
Ilse castro-aragon ◽  
Bindu Setty ◽  
Lauren Etter ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pediatric pneumonia is the leading cause of child mortality in low-income countries. Pneumonia diagnosis is a challenge. Chest x-ray (CXR) is considered the gold standard, but it exposes children to ionizing radiation, and access to CXR is limited to hospital settings. Lung Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is a portable and non-radiating alternative to CXR. Methods We enrolled 200 children aged 1-59 months from the University Teaching Hospital (UTH) Emergency Department (ED) in Lusaka, Zambia who met the WHO (World Health Organization) case definition for severe pneumonia. From each child, we collected demographic and clinical data, a CXR, and a set of ultrasound images using a Butterfly ultrasound probe. Images were independently interpreted by two radiologists blinded to the results of the other imaging modality. Using CXR as the gold standard, we determined the sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and likelihood ratios for pneumonia using lung POCUS. Results This preliminary analysis included 50 children seen between May-October 2020. Median age (9 months) (Range 4-15). 58% were male, (29/50). Median temperature was 37.3⁰C (range 36.5-38.0); median respiratory and pulse rates were 41 breaths/min (range 31-50) and 139 beats/min (range 124-160) respectively; median SpO2 on RA was 91% (range 89-95). 50% of cases had difficulty breathing (82%, 41/50); chest retractions (70%, 35/50) and grunting (62%, 31/50). Ultrasound images for 49/50 (98%) cases and CXRs for 50/50 (100%) of cases we analyzed. Sensitivity of lung POCUS in the detection of CAP was 61% (95% Cl: 0.52-0.84). The specificity was 77% (95% Cl: 0.56-0.91). Positive predictive value (PPV) 70% (95% CI: 0.62-0.94) and negative predictive value (NPV) 69% (95% CI: 0.56-0.79). Conclusion Preliminary findings of this study demonstrated the lower diagnostic accuracy of lung POCUS versus CXR in the detection of pneumonia in children 1- 59 months. The high specificity of the test will aid in ruling out severe pneumonia in children. Due to its availability, ease of interpretation, and absence of radiation exposure, lung POCUS should still be considered as an important initial imaging tool for the diagnosis of CAP in children in limited-resource settings. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures


Respiration ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Vizioli ◽  
Federica Ciccarese ◽  
Paola Forti ◽  
Anna Maria Chiesa ◽  
Marco Giovagnoli ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 102490792096932
Author(s):  
Ruiting Li ◽  
Hong Liu ◽  
Hong Qi ◽  
Yin Yuan ◽  
Xiaojing Zou ◽  
...  

Background: An outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) took place in Wuhan, China, by the end of 2019, and the disease continues to spread all over the world. The number of patients is increasing rapidly, a large number of infected patients is critically ill, and the mortality is high. However, information on COVID-19 patients is limited, and its clinical characteristics have not been fully studied. Objectives: To compare the performances of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) and bedside chest X-ray in assessing the condition of COVID-19 patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Methods: This observational study enrolled 42 COVID-19 patients with ARDS who were admitted to the Department of Critical Care Medicine of the Wuhan Union Hospital from February to April 2020. The point-of-care LUS characteristics of the COVID-19 patients with ARDS were summarized, and the performances of LUS and bedside chest X-ray in assessing the patient’s condition were compared. Results: Most of the 42 patients were elderly individuals with chronic clinical diseases. The proportion of patients older than 60 years old was 85.7%. All patients were given invasive mechanical ventilation; eight (19.0%) of them received venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. LUS has evident advantages in detecting lung consolidation, patchy shadows, and pleural thickening, and pleural line changes in particular. The receiver operating characteristic analysis indicated that the sensitivity, Youden index, and kappa value for detecting COVID-19 patients with ARDS were higher for LUS than the chest X-ray. Conclusion: LUS has better diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity in COVID-19 patients with ARDS than the chest X-ray.


2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-20
Author(s):  
Re'em Sadeh ◽  
Tomer Gat ◽  
Omer Kaplan ◽  
Tzvika Porges ◽  
Lior Zeller ◽  
...  

Background: As point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) becomes a standard of care procedure, medical schools around the world have started to seek the integration of POCUS courses into their curricula. This puts medical students in a unique position as they are trained in an area in which many physicians lack knowledge. This case series provides a glimpse into the capabilities of POCUS even when used by medical students. Methods: Fourth-year medical students at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev performed numerous POCUS exams during their first clinical rotation at Soroka University Medical Center in Israel. All students completed a course in basic POCUS training and were evaluated in a brief practical exam before entering their first clinical rotation. Four of the cases in which the students took part are presented in this case series. Results: The POCUS exam in the first case discovered pulmonary embolism in addition to the diagnosis of Cushing disease. In the second case, endocarditis could have been diagnosed three days earlier had a POCUS exam been performed. Case 3 demonstrates the additional contribution of POCUS to the decision-making process carried out by physicians and its superiority in quantifying and diagnosing pleural effusion compared to chest X-Ray. Case 4 indicated that POCUS is preferable over chest X-ray and auscultation for the diagnosis of pulmonary edema. Conclusion: This case series may emphasize the capabilities POCUS has when utilized in the standard physical examination and the importance of incorporating POCUS instruction in medical schools for new physicians to acquire this skill.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document