Temperature-dependent Young's modulus, shear modulus and Poisson's ratio ofp-type Ce0.9Fe3.5Co0.5Sb12andn-type Co0.95Pd0.05Te0.05Sb3skutterudite thermoelectric materials

Author(s):  
Robert D. Schmidt ◽  
Eldon D. Case ◽  
Jennifer E. Ni ◽  
Jeffrey S. Sakamoto ◽  
Rosa M. Trejo ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 170 (1-3) ◽  
pp. 58-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer E. Ni ◽  
Eldon D. Case ◽  
Kristen N. Khabir ◽  
Ryan C. Stewart ◽  
Chun-I. Wu ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 160-162 ◽  
pp. 1691-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi Xin Huang ◽  
Cai Fu Qian ◽  
Peng Liu ◽  
Xu Liang Deng ◽  
Qing Cai ◽  
...  

This study aimed at investigating the effects of the post material properties on the maximum stress in the root and maximum deformation of the restorative system. Effects of material properties of fiber post on the maximum equivalent stress in the root and the maximum deformation of the restorative system were numerically investigated. Results show that the maximum equivalent stress in the root can be decreased by 8.3% and the maximum deformation of the restorative system decreased by 10% compared with corresponding maximum values if changing Young’s modulus, Shear modulus and Poisson’s ratio in the range studied here. The maximum equivalent stress in the root is more sensitive to Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio while the deformation of the restorative system is more seriously affected by the Shear modulus of the post material.


2010 ◽  
Vol 504 (2) ◽  
pp. 303-309 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Schmidt ◽  
Jennifer E. Ni ◽  
Eldon D. Case ◽  
Jeffery S. Sakamoto ◽  
Daniel C. Kleinow ◽  
...  

Polymers ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (16) ◽  
pp. 2831
Author(s):  
Naresh Kakur ◽  
Kamran A. Khan ◽  
Rehan Umer

Thermomechanical modeling of epoxy/graphene oxide under quasi-static and dynamic loading requires thermo-mechanical properties such as Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, thermal conductivity, and frequency-temperature dependent viscoelastic properties. In this study, the effects of different graphene oxide (GO) concentrations (0.05, 0.1, and 0.2 wt%) within an epoxy matrix on several mechanical and thermal properties were investigated. The distribution of GO fillers in the epoxy was investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The digital image correlation (DIC) technique was employed during the tensile testing to determine Young’s modulus and Poisson’s ratio. Analytical models were used to predict Young’s modulus and thermal conductivity, with an error of less than 13% and 9%, respectively. Frequency–temperature dependent phenomenological models were proposed to predict the storage moduli and loss tangent, with a reasonable agreement with experimental data. A relatively high storage modulus, heat-resistance index (THRI), and thermal conductivity were observed in 0.2 wt% nanocomposite samples compared with pure epoxy and other lower concentration GO nanocomposites. A high THRI and derivative of thermogravimetric analysis peak temperatures (Tm1 and Tm2) were exhibited by adding nano-fillers in the epoxy, which confirms higher thermal stability of nanocomposites than that of pristine epoxy.


1967 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-97
Author(s):  
J. R. Asay

The longitudinal and shear wave velocities in a polycrystalline sample of magnesium thorium alloy were measured by a pulse transmission technique as a function of temperature. Temperatures ranged from 25 C to about 350 deg C for longitudinal wave measurements and to about 220 deg C for shear measurements. The resulting velocity data were used to calculate various elastic properties of the material, including Young’s modulus, shear modulus, bulk modulus, and Poisson’s ratio. The resulting least squares fits for these data are: Longitudinal velocity, cl = 5.749 − 3.987 × 10−4T − 1.139 × 10−6T2mm/μsec; shear velocity, ct = 3.108 − 1.421 × 10−4T − 2.588 × 10−6T2mm/μsec; bulk modulus, B = 3.576 × 10″ − 2.744 × 107T + 1.187 × 105T2 dynes/cm2; Young’s modulus, E = 4.435 × 10″ − 1.415 × 107T = 6.037 × 105T2 dynes/cm2; shear modulus, G = 1.716 × 10″ − 7.994 × 106T − 2.619 × 105T2 dynes/cm2; Poisson’s ratio, σ = 0.293 − 6.459 × 10−6T + 3.392 × 10−7T2.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document