scholarly journals The use of participatory visual methods with community health workers: A systematic scoping review of the literature

2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 722-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O’Donovan ◽  
Andrew Thompson ◽  
Chinelo Onyilofor ◽  
Taylor Hand ◽  
Natalie Rosseau ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. e021467 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O’Donovan ◽  
Charles O’Donovan ◽  
Isla Kuhn ◽  
Sonia Ehrlich Sachs ◽  
Niall Winters

2020 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 152-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gayenell S. Magwood ◽  
Michelle Nichols ◽  
Carolyn Jenkins ◽  
Ayaba Logan ◽  
Suparna Qanungo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen W. Li ◽  
Michael L. Scanlon ◽  
Nicholas Kisilu ◽  
Debra K. Litzelman

Abstract Background Community health workers (CHWs) can increase access to various primary healthcare services; however, their potential for improving surgical care is under-explored. We sought to assess the role of CHWs in the surgical cascade, defined as disease screening, linkage to operative care, and post-operative care. Given the well-described literature on CHWs and screening, we focused on the latter two steps of the surgical cascade. Methods We conducted a scoping review of the peer-reviewed literature. We searched for studies published in any language from January 1, 2000 to May 1, 2020 using electronic literature databases including Pubmed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. We included articles on CHW involvement in linkage to operative care and/or post-operative surgical care. Narrative and descriptive methods were used to analyze the data. Results The initial search identified 145 articles relevant to steps in the surgical cascade. Ten studies met our inclusion criteria and were included for review. In linkage to care, CHWs helped increase surgical enrollment, provide resources for vulnerable patients, and build trust in healthcare services. Post-operatively, CHWs acted as effective monitors for surgical-site infections and provided socially isolated patients with support and linkage to additional services. The complex and wide-ranging needs of surgical patients illustrated the need to view surgical care as a continuum rather than a singular operative event. Conclusion While the current literature is limited, CHWs were able to maneuver complex medical, cultural, and social barriers to surgical care by linking patients to counseling, education, and community resources, as well as post-operative infection prevention services. Future studies would benefit from more rigorous study designs and larger sample sizes to further elucidate the role CHWs can serve in the surgical cascade.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e65772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Braun ◽  
Caricia Catalani ◽  
Julian Wimbush ◽  
Dennis Israelski

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e001141 ◽  
Author(s):  
James O'Donovan ◽  
Misha Verkerk ◽  
Niall Winters ◽  
Shelly Chadha ◽  
Mahmood F Bhutta

IntroductionCommunity health workers (CHWs) have the potential to improve access to ear and hearing services for people across low-income or middle-income countries, remote, underserved, or resource-poor areas of the world. We performed a systematic scoping review to identify evidence on how CHWs are currently deployed in the prevention, screening, diagnosis, treatment and management of ear disease and hearing loss; methods to train and support CHWs in this context; and cost-effectiveness of CHWs.MethodsWe performed a systematic search of the literature from September 1978 to 18 March 2018 from 11 major databases and the grey literature.ResultsWe identified 38 original studies that met the inclusion criteria, taking place across South Asia (n=13), Oceania (n=7), North America (n=7), South America (n=6) and Africa (n=5). 23 studies showed CHWs can increase community participation in screening. They can conduct screening using whispered voice tests, noisemakers for neonatal screening, automated audiological tests and otoscopy. Eight studies focused specifically on the evaluation of programmes to train CHWs, and three provided a general programme description. Three studies documented a role of CHWs in the treatment of ear disease or hearing loss, such as performing ear washouts, instillation of topical antibiotics or fitting of hearing aids. Only one study provided an indepth cost-utility analysis regarding the use of CHWs to conduct hearing screening, and no studies commented on the role of CHWs in the prevention of hearing loss.ConclusionCHWs have been employed in diverse ways to address the global burden of ear disease and hearing loss. Future research needs to explore the role of CHWs in preventative strategies, identify optimum methods to train and support CHWs, and explore their cost-effectiveness.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document