scholarly journals A longitudinal follow-up study of a type 2 diabetes “lost to follow-up” cohort – positive effect on glycaemic control after changes in medication

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 1773127
Author(s):  
Timo Kauppila ◽  
Merja K. Laine ◽  
Mikko Honkasalo ◽  
Marko Raina ◽  
Johan G. Eriksson
Author(s):  
Sopio Tatulashvili ◽  
Gaelle Gusto ◽  
Beverley Balkau ◽  
Emmanuel Cosson ◽  
Fabrice Bonnet ◽  
...  

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 453-P
Author(s):  
MONIA GAROFOLO ◽  
ELISA GUALDANI ◽  
DANIELA LUCCHESI ◽  
LAURA GIUSTI ◽  
VERONICA SANCHO-BORNEZ ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna M. Lucas Martín ◽  
Elena Guanyabens ◽  
R. Zavala-Arauco ◽  
Joaquín Chamorro ◽  
Maria Luisa Granada ◽  
...  

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) exists in 25–40% of hospitalized patients. Therapeutic inertia is the delay in the intensification of a treatment and it is frequent in T2D. The objectives of this study were to detect patients admitted to surgical wards with hyperglycaemia (HH; fasting glycaemia > 140 mg/dL) as well as those with T2D and suboptimal chronic glycaemic control (SCGC) and to assess the midterm impact of treatment modifications indicated at discharge. A total of 412 HH patients were detected in a period of 18 months; 86.6% (357) had a diagnosed T2D. Their preadmittanceHbA1cwas 7.7 ± 1.5%; 47% (189) hadHbA1c≥ 7.4% (SCGC) and were moved to the upper step in the therapeutic algorithm at discharge. Another 15 subjects (3.6% of the cohort) had T2D according to their currentHbA1c. Ninety-four of the 189 SCGC patients were evaluated 3–6 months later. TheirHbA1cbefore in-hospital-intervention was 8.6 ± 1.2% and 7.5 ± 1.2% at follow-up (P<0.004). Active detection of hyperglycaemia in patients admitted in conventional surgical beds permits the identification of T2D patients with SCGC as well as previously unknown cases. A shift to the upper step in the therapeutic algorithm at discharge improves this control. Hospitalization is an opportunity to break therapeutic inertia.


Diabetologia ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 58-65 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. van den Berg ◽  
◽  
Y. D. Reijmer ◽  
J. de Bresser ◽  
R. P. C. Kessels ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth Höld ◽  
Johanna Grüblbauer ◽  
Martin Wiesholzer ◽  
Daniela Wewerka-Kreimel ◽  
Stefan Stieger ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: the context and purpose of the studyDiabetes mellitus is one of the four priority non-communicable diseases worldwide. It can lead to serious long-term complications and produces significant costs. Due to the chronicle character of the disease, it requires continuous medical treatment and good therapy adherence of those suffering. Therefore, diabetes self-management education (DSME) (and support DSMES) plays a significant role to increase patient’s self-management capacity and improve diabetes therapy. Research indicates that these outcomes might be difficult to maintain. Consequently, effective strategies to preserve the positive effects of DSMES are needed. Preliminary results show that peer support, which means support from a person who has experiential knowledge of a specific behaviour or stressor and similar characteristics as the target population, is associated with better outcomes in terms of HbA1c, cardiovascular disease risk factors or self-efficacy at lower cost compared to standard therapy. Peer-supported instant messaging services (IMS) approaches have significant potential for diabetes management because support can be provided easily and prompt, is inexpensive, and needs less effort to attend compared to standard therapy. The major objective of the study is to analyse the impact of a peer-supported IMS intervention in addition to a standard diabetes therapy on the glycaemic control of type 2 diabetic patients. Methods: how the study will be performedA total of 205 participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus will be included and randomly assigned to intervention or control group. Both groups will receive standard therapy, but the intervention group will participate in the peer-supported IMS intervention, additionally. The duration of the intervention will last for seven months, followed by a follow-up of seven months. Biochemical, behavioural and psychosocial parameters will be measured before, in the middle, and after the intervention as well as after the follow-up.Discussion: a brief summary and potential implicationsDiabetes mellitus type 2 and other non-communicable diseases put healthcare systems worldwide to the test. Peer-supported IMS interventions in addition to standard therapy might be part of new and cost-effective approaches to support patients independent from time and place.Trial registration: If your article reports the results of a health care intervention on human participants, it must be registered in an appropriate registry and the registration number and date of registration should be in stated in this section. If it was not registered prospectively (before enrollment of the first participant), you should include the words 'retrospectively registered'. See our editorial policies for more information on trial registration.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04797429Date of registration: 15 March 2021


2017 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 377-384 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley Shoemaker ◽  
Peiyao Cheng ◽  
Robin L. Gal ◽  
Craig Kollman ◽  
William V. Tamborlane ◽  
...  

Background/Aims: Youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D) have poor compliance with medical care. This study aimed to determine which demographic and clinical factors differ between youth with T2D who receive care in a pediatric diabetes center versus youth lost to follow-up for >18 months. Methods: Data were analyzed from 496 subjects in the Pe­diatric Diabetes Consortium registry. Enrollment variables were selected a priori and analyzed with univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: After a median of 1.3 years from enrollment, 55% of patients were lost to follow-up. The final model included age, race/ethnicity, parent education, and estimated distance to study site. The odds ratio (99% confidence interval) of loss to follow-up was 2.87 (1.34, 6.16) for those aged 15 to <18 years versus those aged 10 to <13 years and 6.57 (2.67, 16.15) for those aged ≥18 years versus those aged 10 to <13 years. Among patients living more than 50 miles from the clinic, the odds ra tio of loss to follow-up was 3.11 (1.14, 8.49) versus those living within 5 miles of the site. Conclusion: Older adolescents with T2D are more likely to be lost to follow-up, but other socioeconomic factors were not significant predictors of clinic follow-up.


2021 ◽  
pp. 101282
Author(s):  
Diego Moriconi ◽  
Maria Laura Manca ◽  
Marco Anselmino ◽  
Eleni Rebelos ◽  
Rosario Bellini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document