scholarly journals Formation of a functional ribosome-membrane junction during translocation requires the participation of a GTP-binding protein.

1986 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
pp. 2253-2261 ◽  
Author(s):  
T Connolly ◽  
R Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Secretory Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Gtp Binding Protein ◽  
Gtp Binding ◽  
Protease Digestion ◽  
Nascent Chain

The requirement for ribonucleotides and ribonucleotide hydrolysis was examined at several distinct points during translocation of a secretory protein across the endoplasmic reticulum. We monitored binding of in vitro-assembled polysomes to microsomal membranes after removal of ATP and GTP. Ribonucleotides were not required for the initial low salt-insensitive attachment of the ribosome to the membrane. However, without ribonucleotides the nascent secretory chains were sensitive to protease digestion and were readily extracted from the membrane with either EDTA or 0.5 M KOAc. In contrast, nascent chains resisted extraction with either EDTA or 0.5 M KOAc and were insensitive to protease digestion after addition of GTP or nonhydrolyzable GTP analogues. Translocation of the nascent secretory polypeptide was detected only when ribosome binding was conducted in the presence of GTP. Thus, translocation-competent binding of the ribosome to the membrane requires the participation of a novel GTP-binding protein in addition to the signal recognition particle and the signal recognition particle receptor. The second event we examined was translocation and processing of a truncated secretory polypeptide. Membrane-bound polysomes bearing an 86-residue nascent chain were generated by translation of a truncated preprolactin mRNA. Ribonucleotide-independent translocation of the polypeptide was detected by cleavage of the 30-residue signal sequence after puromycin termination. Nascent chain transport, per se, is apparently dependent upon neither ribonucleotide hydrolysis nor continued elongation of the polypeptide once a functional ribosome-membrane junction has been established.

Recruitment of the Earliest Component of the Bacterial Flagellum to the Old Cell Division Pole by a Membrane-Associated Signal Recognition Particle Family GTP-Binding Protein

2009 ◽  
Vol 391 (4) ◽  
pp. 679-690 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johnathan C.D. Green ◽  
Christina Kahramanoglou ◽  
Alamgir Rahman ◽  
Alexandra M.C. Pender ◽  
Nicolas Charbonnel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Gtp Binding Protein ◽  
Bacterial Flagellum ◽  
Gtp Binding

scholarly journals The signal sequence receptor, unlike the signal recognition particle receptor, is not essential for protein translocation

1992 ◽  
Vol 117 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Migliaccio ◽  
CV Nicchitta ◽  
G Blobel
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Chain Complex ◽  
Secretory Protein ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Ribosome Binding ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle Receptor ◽  
Nascent Chain

Detergent extracts of canine pancreas rough microsomal membranes were depleted of either the signal recognition particle receptor (SR), which mediates the signal recognition particle (SRP)-dependent targeting of the ribosome/nascent chain complex to the membrane, or the signal sequence receptor (SSR), which has been proposed to function as a membrane bound receptor for the newly targeted nascent chain and/or as a component of a multi-protein translocation complex responsible for transfer of the nascent chain across the membrane. Depletion of the two components was performed by chromatography of detergent extracts on immunoaffinity supports. Detergent extracts lacking either SR or SSR were reconstituted and assayed for activity with respect to SR dependent elongation arrest release, nascent chain targeting, ribosome binding, secretory precursor translocation, and membrane protein integration. Depletion of SR resulted in the loss of elongation arrest release activity, nascent chain targeting, secretory protein translocation, and membrane protein integration, although ribosome binding was unaffected. Full activity was restored by addition of immunoaffinity purified SR before reconstitution of the detergent extract. Surprisingly, depletion of SSR was without effect on any of the assayed activities, indicating that SSR is either not required for translocation or is one of a family of functionally redundant components.

scholarly journals Ligand crowding at a nascent signal sequence

2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gottfried Eisner ◽  
Hans-Georg Koch ◽  
Konstanze Beck ◽  
Joseph Brunner ◽  
Matthias Müller
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Secretory Protein ◽  
Trigger Factor ◽  
Cross Linking ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Nascent Chain

We have systematically analyzed the molecular environment of the signal sequence of a growing secretory protein from Escherichia coli using a stage- and site-specific cross-linking approach. Immediately after emerging from the ribosome, the signal sequence of pOmpA is accessible to Ffh, the protein component of the bacterial signal recognition particle, and to SecA, but it remains attached to the surface of the ribosome via protein L23. These contacts are lost upon further growth of the nascent chain, which brings the signal sequence into sole proximity to the chaperone Trigger factor (TF). In its absence, nascent pOmpA shows extended contacts with L23, and even long chains interact in these conditions proficiently with Ffh. Our results suggest that upon emergence from the ribosome, the signal sequence of an E. coli secretory protein gradually becomes sequestered by TF. Although TF thereby might control the accessibility of pOmpA's signal sequence to Ffh and SecA, it does not influence interaction of pOmpA with SecB.

scholarly journals Real-time observation of signal recognition particle binding to actively translating ribosomes

eLife ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas R Noriega ◽  
Jin Chen ◽  
Peter Walter ◽  
Joseph D Puglisi
Keyword(s):  
Real Time ◽  
Single Molecule ◽  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Initial Step ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Fluorescence Measurements ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Time Observation

The signal recognition particle (SRP) directs translating ribosome-nascent chain complexes (RNCs) that display a signal sequence to protein translocation channels in target membranes. All previous work on the initial step of the targeting reaction, when SRP binds to RNCs, used stalled and non-translating RNCs. This meant that an important dimension of the co-translational process remained unstudied. We apply single-molecule fluorescence measurements to observe directly and in real-time E. coli SRP binding to actively translating RNCs. We show at physiologically relevant SRP concentrations that SRP-RNC association and dissociation rates depend on nascent chain length and the exposure of a functional signal sequence outside the ribosome. Our results resolve a long-standing question: how can a limited, sub-stoichiometric pool of cellular SRP effectively distinguish RNCs displaying a signal sequence from those that are not? The answer is strikingly simple: as originally proposed, SRP only stably engages translating RNCs exposing a functional signal sequence.

scholarly journals Reconstitution in vitro of a membrane-fusion event involved in constitutive exocytosis. A role for cytosolic proteins and a GTP-binding protein, but not for Ca2+

1992 ◽  
Vol 285 (2) ◽  
pp. 383-385 ◽  
Author(s):  
J M Edwardson ◽  
P U Daniels-Holgate
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Fusion ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Fusion Event ◽  
Gtp Binding Protein ◽  
In Vitro System ◽  
Cytosolic Proteins ◽  
Golgi Transport ◽  
Gtp Binding ◽  
Transport Vesicles

The fusion of post-Golgi transport vesicles with the plasma membrane is perhaps the least well understood step in the network of intracellular membrane traffic. We have used an ‘in vitro’ system to study this membrane-fusion event. We show here that fusion requires the presence of cytosolic proteins, but not Ca2+, and is inhibited by the non-hydrolysable GTP analogue guanosine 5′-[gamma-thio]triphosphate, which indicates the involvement of a GTP-binding protein.

scholarly journals A nascent membrane protein is located adjacent to ER membrane proteins throughout its integration and translation.

1991 ◽  
Vol 112 (5) ◽  
pp. 809-821 ◽  
Author(s):  
R N Thrift ◽  
D W Andrews ◽  
P Walter ◽  
A E Johnson
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Membrane Protein ◽  
Transmembrane Domain ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Secretory Protein ◽  
In Vitro Translation ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Transmembrane Sequence ◽  
Er Membrane

The immediate environment of nascent membrane proteins undergoing integration into the ER membrane was investigated by photocrosslinking. Nascent polypeptides of different lengths, each containing a single IgM transmembrane sequence that functions either as a stop-transfer or a signal-anchor sequence, were synthesized by in vitro translation of truncated mRNAs in the presence of N epsilon-(5-azido-2-nitrobenzoyl)-Lys-tRNA, signal recognition particle, and microsomal membranes. This yielded nascent chains with photoreactive probes at one end of the transmembrane sequence where two lysine residues are located. When irradiated, these nascent chains reacted covalently with several ER proteins. One prominent crosslinking target was a glycoprotein similar in size to a protein termed mp39, shown previously to be situated adjacent to a secretory protein during its translocation across the ER membrane (Krieg, U. C., A. E. Johnson, and P. Walter. 1989. J. Cell Biol. 109:2033-2043; Wiedmann, M., D. Goerlich, E. Hartmann, T. V. Kurzchalia, and T. A. Rapoport. 1989. FEBS (Fed. Eur. Biochem. Soc.) Lett. 257:263-268) and likely to be identical to a protein previously designated the signal sequence receptor (Wiedmann, M., T. V. Kurzchalia, E. Hartmann, and T. A. Rapoport. 1987. Nature (Lond.). 328:830-833). Changing the orientation of the transmembrane domain in the bilayer, or making the transmembrane domain the first topogenic sequence in the nascent chain instead of the second, did not significantly alter the identities of the ER proteins that were the primary crosslinking targets. Furthermore, the nascent chains crosslinked to the mp39-like glycoprotein and other microsomal proteins even after the cytoplasmic tail of the nascent chain had been lengthened by nearly 100 amino acids beyond the stop-transfer sequence. Yet when the nascent chain was allowed to terminate normally, the major photocrosslinks were no longer observed, including in particular that to the mp39-like glycoprotein. These results show that the transmembrane segment of a nascent membrane protein is located adjacent to the mp39-like glycoprotein and other ER proteins during the integration process, and that at least a portion of the nascent chain remains in close proximity to these ER proteins until translation has been completed.

scholarly journals Signal sequence recognition and targeting of ribosomes to the endoplasmic reticulum by the signal recognition particle do not require GTP.

1994 ◽  
Vol 5 (8) ◽  
pp. 887-897 ◽  
Author(s):  
P J Rapiejko ◽  
R Gilmore
Keyword(s):  
Protein Translocation ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Beta Subunits ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Binding Assays ◽  
Nascent Polypeptide ◽  
Sequence Recognition ◽  
Gtp Binding ◽  
Microsomal Membranes

The identification of GTP-binding sites in the 54-kDa subunit of the signal recognition particle (SRP) and in both the alpha and beta subunits of the SRP receptor has complicated the task of defining the step in the protein translocation reaction that is controlled by the GTP-binding site in the SRP. Ribonucleotide binding assays show that the purified SRP can bind GDP or GTP. However, crosslinking experiments show that SRP54 can recognize the signal sequence of a nascent polypeptide in the absence of GTP. Targeting of SRP-ribosome-nascent polypeptide complexes, formed in the absence of GTP, to microsomal membranes likewise proceeds normally. To separate the GTPase cycles of SRP54 and the alpha subunit of the SRP receptor (SR alpha), we employed an SR alpha mutant that displays a markedly reduced affinity for GTP. We observed that the dissociation of SRP54 from the signal sequence and the insertion of the nascent polypeptide into the translocation site could only occur when GTP binding to SR alpha was permitted. These data suggest that the GTP binding and hydrolysis cycles of both SRP54 and SR alpha are initiated upon formation of the SRP-SRP receptor complex.

scholarly journals NAC functions as a modulator of SRP during the early steps of protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 3027-3040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying Zhang ◽  
Uta Berndt ◽  
Hanna Gölz ◽  
Arlette Tais ◽  
Stefan Oellerer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endoplasmic Reticulum ◽  
Protein Targeting ◽  
Signal Sequence ◽  
Signal Recognition Particle ◽  
Signal Recognition ◽  
Signal Sequences ◽  
Chain Complexes ◽  
Ribosomal Tunnel ◽  
Nascent Chain ◽  
Combined Data

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) was initially found to bind to any segment of the nascent chain except signal sequences. In this way, NAC is believed to prevent mistargeting due to binding of signal recognition particle (SRP) to signalless ribosome nascent chain complexes (RNCs). Here we revisit the interplay between NAC and SRP. NAC does not affect SRP function with respect to signalless RNCs; however, NAC does affect SRP function with respect to RNCs targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). First, early recruitment of SRP to RNCs containing a signal sequence within the ribosomal tunnel is NAC dependent. Second, NAC is able to directly and tightly bind to nascent signal sequences. Third, SRP initially displaces NAC from RNCs; however, when the signal sequence emerges further, trimeric NAC·RNC·SRP complexes form. Fourth, upon docking to the ER membrane NAC remains bound to RNCs, allowing NAC to shield cytosolically exposed nascent chain domains not only before but also during cotranslational translocation. The combined data indicate a functional interplay between NAC and SRP on ER-targeted RNCs, which is based on the ability of the two complexes to bind simultaneously to distinct segments of a single nascent chain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document