scholarly journals The chromatin remodeler p400 ATPase facilitates Rad51-mediated repair of DNA double-strand breaks

2012 ◽  
Vol 199 (7) ◽  
pp. 1067-1081 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Courilleau ◽  
Catherine Chailleux ◽  
Alain Jauneau ◽  
Fanny Grimal ◽  
Sébastien Briois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Dependent Processes

DNA damage signaling and repair take place in a chromatin context. Consequently, chromatin-modifying enzymes, including adenosine triphosphate–dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes, play an important role in the management of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Here, we show that the p400 ATPase is required for DNA repair by homologous recombination (HR). Indeed, although p400 is not required for DNA damage signaling, DNA DSB repair is defective in the absence of p400. We demonstrate that p400 is important for HR-dependent processes, such as recruitment of Rad51 to DSB (a key component of HR), homology-directed repair, and survival after DNA damage. Strikingly, p400 and Rad51 are present in the same complex and both favor chromatin remodeling around DSBs. Altogether, our data provide a direct molecular link between Rad51 and a chromatin remodeling enzyme involved in chromatin decompaction around DNA DSBs.

scholarly journals Physical interaction between the histone acetyl transferase Tip60 and the DNA double-strand breaks sensor MRN complex

2010 ◽  
Vol 426 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Chailleux ◽  
Sandrine Tyteca ◽  
Christophe Papin ◽  
François Boudsocq ◽  
Nadine Puget ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Physical Interaction ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Reporter System ◽  
Histone Acetyl Transferase ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs

Chromatin modifications and chromatin-modifying enzymes are believed to play a major role in the process of DNA repair. The histone acetyl transferase Tip60 is physically recruited to DNA DSBs (double-strand breaks) where it mediates histone acetylation. In the present study, we show, using a reporter system in mammalian cells, that Tip60 expression is required for homology-driven repair, strongly suggesting that Tip60 participates in DNA DSB repair through homologous recombination. Moreover, Tip60 depletion inhibits the formation of Rad50 foci following ionizing radiation, indicating that Tip60 expression is necessary for the recruitment of the DNA damage sensor MRN (Mre11–Rad50–Nbs1) complex to DNA DSBs. Moreover, we found that endogenous Tip60 physically interacts with endogenous MRN proteins in a complex which is distinct from the classical Tip60 complex. Taken together, our results describe a physical link between a DNA damage sensor and a histone-modifying enzyme, and provide important new insights into the role and mechanism of action of Tip60 in the process of DNA DSB repair.

scholarly journals Histone chaperone Anp32e removes H2A.Z from DNA double-strand breaks and promotes nucleosome reorganization and DNA repair

2015 ◽  
Vol 112 (24) ◽  
pp. 7507-7512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ozge Gursoy-Yuzugullu ◽  
Marina K. Ayrapetov ◽  
Brendan D. Price
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Histone H4 ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Nucleosome Dynamics ◽  
Chromatin Template ◽  
End Resection

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) requires open, flexible chromatin domains. The NuA4–Tip60 complex creates these flexible chromatin structures by exchanging histone H2A.Z onto nucleosomes and promoting acetylation of histone H4. Here, we demonstrate that the accumulation of H2A.Z on nucleosomes at DSBs is transient, and that rapid eviction of H2A.Z is required for DSB repair. Anp32e, an H2A.Z chaperone that interacts with the C-terminal docking domain of H2A.Z, is rapidly recruited to DSBs. Anp32e functions to remove H2A.Z from nucleosomes, so that H2A.Z levels return to basal within 10 min of DNA damage. Further, H2A.Z removal by Anp32e disrupts inhibitory interactions between the histone H4 tail and the nucleosome surface, facilitating increased acetylation of histone H4 following DNA damage. When H2A.Z removal by Anp32e is blocked, nucleosomes at DSBs retain elevated levels of H2A.Z, and assume a more stable, hypoacetylated conformation. Further, loss of Anp32e leads to increased CtIP-dependent end resection, accumulation of single-stranded DNA, and an increase in repair by the alternative nonhomologous end joining pathway. Exchange of H2A.Z onto the chromatin and subsequent rapid removal by Anp32e are therefore critical for creating open, acetylated nucleosome structures and for controlling end resection by CtIP. Dynamic modulation of H2A.Z exchange and removal by Anp32e reveals the importance of the nucleosome surface and nucleosome dynamics in processing the damaged chromatin template during DSB repair.

Detecting, signalling and repairing DNA double-strand breaks

2001 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 655-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. P. Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Model Organisms ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Site Specific ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Recombination Processes

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) can be generated by a variety of genotoxic agents, including ionizing radiation and radiomimetic chemicals. They can also occur when DNA replication complexes encounter other forms of DNA damage, and are produced as intermediates during certain site-specific recombination processes. It is crucial that cells recognize DSBs and bring about their efficient repair, because a single unrepaired cellular DSB can induce cell death, and defective DSB repair can lead to mutations or the loss of significant segments of chromosomal material. Eukaryotic cells have evolved a variety of systems to detect DNA DSBs, repair them, and signal their presence to the transcription, cell cycle and apoptotic machineries. In this review, I describe how work on mammalian cells and also on model organisms such as yeasts has revelaed that such systems are highly conserved throughout evolution, and has provided insights into the molecular mechanisms by which DNA DSBs are recognized, signalled and repaired. I also explain how defects in the proteins that function in these pathways are associated with a variety of human pathological states.

scholarly journals The Role of Drosophila CtIP in Homology-Directed Repair of DNA Double-Strand Breaks

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 1430
Author(s):  
Ian Yannuzzi ◽  
Margaret A. Butler ◽  
Joel Fernandez ◽  
Jeannine R. LaRocque
Keyword(s):  
Direct Repeat ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Homology Directed Repair ◽  
Dna End Resection ◽  
The Impact ◽  
End Resection

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a particularly genotoxic type of DNA damage that can result in chromosomal aberrations. Thus, proper repair of DSBs is essential to maintaining genome integrity. DSBs can be repaired by non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), where ends are processed before joining through ligation. Alternatively, DSBs can be repaired through homology-directed repair, either by homologous recombination (HR) or single-strand annealing (SSA). Both types of homology-directed repair are initiated by DNA end resection. In cultured human cells, the protein CtIP has been shown to play a role in DNA end resection through its interactions with CDK, BRCA1, DNA2, and the MRN complex. To elucidate the role of CtIP in a multicellular context, CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing was used to create a DmCtIPΔ allele in Drosophila melanogaster. Using the DSB repair reporter assay direct repeat of white (DR-white), a two-fold decrease in HR in DmCtIPΔ/Δ mutants was observed when compared to heterozygous controls. However, analysis of HR gene conversion tracts (GCTs) suggests DmCtIP plays a minimal role in determining GCT length. To assess the function of DmCtIP on both short (~550 bp) and long (~3.6 kb) end resection, modified homology-directed SSA repair assays were implemented, resulting in a two-fold decrease in SSA repair in both short and extensive end resection requirements in the DmCtIPΔ/Δ mutants compared to heterozygote controls. Through these analyses, we affirmed the importance of end resection on DSB repair pathway choice in multicellular systems, described the function of DmCtIP in short and extensive DNA end resection, and determined the impact of end resection on GCT length during HR.

scholarly journals The Determinant of DNA Repair Pathway Choices in Ionising Radiation-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Zhao ◽  
Chengyu Bao ◽  
Yuxuan Shang ◽  
Xinye He ◽  
Chiyuan Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Ionising Radiation ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Dsbs ◽  
Repair Pathways

Ionising radiation- (IR-) induced DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are considered to be the deleterious DNA lesions that pose a serious threat to genomic stability. The major DNA repair pathways, including classical nonhomologous end joining, homologous recombination, single-strand annealing, and alternative end joining, play critical roles in countering and eliciting IR-induced DSBs to ensure genome integrity. If the IR-induced DNA DSBs are not repaired correctly, the residual or incorrectly repaired DSBs can result in genomic instability that is associated with certain human diseases. Although many efforts have been made in investigating the major mechanisms of IR-induced DNA DSB repair, it is still unclear what determines the choices of IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathways. In this review, we discuss how the mechanisms of IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices can operate in irradiated cells. We first briefly describe the main mechanisms of the major DNA DSB repair pathways and the related key repair proteins. Based on our understanding of the characteristics of IR-induced DNA DSBs and the regulatory mechanisms of DSB repair pathways in irradiated cells and recent advances in this field, We then highlight the main factors and associated challenges to determine the IR-induced DSB repair pathway choices. We conclude that the type and distribution of IR-induced DSBs, chromatin state, DNA-end structure, and DNA-end resection are the main determinants of the choice of the IR-induced DNA DSB repair pathway.

scholarly journals RSC Mobilizes Nucleosomes To Improve Accessibility of Repair Machinery to the Damaged Chromatin

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (5) ◽  
pp. 1602-1613 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Yong Shim ◽  
Soo Jin Hong ◽  
Ji-Hyun Oum ◽  
Yvonne Yanez ◽  
Yu Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Genome Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Base Pairs ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Free Dna ◽  
Key Questions

ABSTRACT Repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) protects cells and organisms, as well as their genome integrity. Since DSB repair occurs in the context of chromatin, chromatin must be modified to prevent it from inhibiting DSB repair. Evidence supports the role of histone modifications and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in repair and signaling of chromosome DSBs. The key questions are, then, what the nature of chromatin altered by DSBs is and how remodeling of chromatin facilitates DSB repair. Here we report a chromatin alteration caused by a single HO endonuclease-generated DSB at the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MAT locus. The break induces rapid nucleosome migration to form histone-free DNA of a few hundred base pairs immediately adjacent to the break. The DSB-induced nucleosome repositioning appears independent of end processing, since it still occurs when the 5′-to-3′ degradation of the DNA end is markedly reduced. The tetracycline-controlled depletion of Sth1, the ATPase of RSC, or deletion of RSC2 severely reduces chromatin remodeling and loading of Mre11 and Yku proteins at the DSB. Depletion of Sth1 also reduces phosphorylation of H2A, processing, and joining of DSBs. We propose that RSC-mediated chromatin remodeling at the DSB prepares chromatin to allow repair machinery to access the break and is vital for efficient DSB repair.

scholarly journals Screen identifies DYRK1B network as mediator of transcription repression on damaged chromatin

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (29) ◽  
pp. 17019-17030 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Dong ◽  
Kirk L. West ◽  
Xin Yi Tan ◽  
Junshi Li ◽  
Toyotaka Ishibashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Gene Silencing ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Active Chromatin ◽  
Chemical Library ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Damage Response

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) trigger transient pausing of nearby transcription, an emerging ATM-dependent response that suppresses chromosomal instability. We screened a chemical library designed to target the human kinome for new activities that mediate gene silencing on DSB-flanking chromatin, and have uncovered the DYRK1B kinase as an early respondent to DNA damage. We showed that DYRK1B is swiftly and transiently recruited to laser-microirradiated sites, and that genetic inactivation of DYRK1B or its kinase activity attenuated DSB-induced gene silencing and led to compromised DNA repair. Notably, global transcription shutdown alleviated DNA repair defects associated with DYRK1B loss, suggesting that DYRK1B is strictly required for DSB repair on active chromatin. We also found that DYRK1B mediates transcription silencing in part via phosphorylating and enforcing DSB accumulation of the histone methyltransferase EHMT2. Together, our findings unveil the DYRK1B signaling network as a key branch of mammalian DNA damage response circuitries, and establish the DYRK1B–EHMT2 axis as an effector that coordinates DSB repair on transcribed chromatin.

scholarly journals Changes in chromatin structure and mobility in living cells at sites of DNA double-strand breaks

2006 ◽  
Vol 172 (6) ◽  
pp. 823-834 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Kruhlak ◽  
Arkady Celeste ◽  
Graham Dellaire ◽  
Oscar Fernandez-Capetillo ◽  
Waltraud G. Müller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Living Cells ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Integrity ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Limited Mobility ◽  
Energy Filtering ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Cell Biol

The repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) is facilitated by the phosphorylation of H2AX, which organizes DNA damage signaling and chromatin remodeling complexes in the vicinity of the lesion (Pilch, D.R., O.A. Sedelnikova, C. Redon, A. Celeste, A. Nussenzweig, and W.M. Bonner. 2003. Biochem. Cell Biol. 81:123–129; Morrison, A.J., and X. Shen. 2005. Cell Cycle. 4:568–571; van Attikum, H., and S.M. Gasser. 2005. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:757–765). The disruption of DNA integrity induces an alteration of chromatin architecture that has been proposed to activate the DNA damage transducing kinase ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM; Bakkenist, C.J., and M.B. Kastan. 2003. Nature. 421:499–506). However, little is known about the physical properties of damaged chromatin. In this study, we use a photoactivatable version of GFP-tagged histone H2B to examine the mobility and structure of chromatin containing DSBs in living cells. We find that chromatin containing DSBs exhibits limited mobility but undergoes an energy-dependent local expansion immediately after DNA damage. The localized expansion observed in real time corresponds to a 30–40% reduction in the density of chromatin fibers in the vicinity of DSBs, as measured by energy-filtering transmission electron microscopy. The observed opening of chromatin occurs independently of H2AX and ATM. We propose that localized adenosine triphosphate–dependent decondensation of chromatin at DSBs establishes an accessible subnuclear environment that facilitates DNA damage signaling and repair.

scholarly journals The chromatin remodeler Chd1 supports MRX and Exo1 functions in resection of DNA double-strand breaks

PLoS Genetics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (9) ◽  
pp. e1009807
Author(s):  
Marco Gnugnoli ◽  
Erika Casari ◽  
Maria Pia Longhese
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Atpase Activity ◽  
Long Range ◽  
Chromatin Remodeling ◽  
Short Range ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dsb Repair ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Strands

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by homologous recombination (HR) requires that the 5’-terminated DNA strands are resected to generate single-stranded DNA overhangs. This process is initiated by a short-range resection catalyzed by the MRX (Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2) complex, which is followed by a long-range step involving the nucleases Exo1 and Dna2. Here we show that the Saccharomyces cerevisiae ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling protein Chd1 participates in both short- and long-range resection by promoting MRX and Exo1 association with the DSB ends. Furthermore, Chd1 reduces histone occupancy near the DSB ends and promotes DSB repair by HR. All these functions require Chd1 ATPase activity, supporting a role for Chd1 in the opening of chromatin at the DSB site to facilitate MRX and Exo1 processing activities.

Persistent DNA damage signaling and DNA polymerase theta promote broken chromosome segregation

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Delisa E. Clay ◽  
Heidi S. Bretscher ◽  
Erin A. Jezuit ◽  
Korie B. Bush ◽  
Donald T. Fox
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Double Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Double Strand Breaks ◽  
End Joining ◽  
Strand Breaks ◽  
Dna Damage Signaling ◽  
Alternative End Joining

Cycling cells must respond to DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) to avoid genome instability. Missegregation of chromosomes with DSBs during mitosis results in micronuclei, aberrant structures linked to disease. How cells respond to DSBs during mitosis is incompletely understood. We previously showed that Drosophilamelanogaster papillar cells lack DSB checkpoints (as observed in many cancer cells). Here, we show that papillar cells still recruit early acting repair machinery (Mre11 and RPA3) and the Fanconi anemia (FA) protein Fancd2 to DSBs. These proteins persist as foci on DSBs as cells enter mitosis. Repair foci are resolved in a stepwise manner during mitosis. DSB repair kinetics depends on both monoubiquitination of Fancd2 and the alternative end-joining protein DNA polymerase θ. Disruption of either or both of these factors causes micronuclei after DNA damage, which disrupts intestinal organogenesis. This study reveals a mechanism for how cells with inactive DSB checkpoints can respond to DNA damage that persists into mitosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document