scholarly journals TRIM37 prevents formation of condensate-organized ectopic spindle poles to ensure mitotic fidelity

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Meitinger ◽  
Dong Kong ◽  
Midori Ohta ◽  
Arshad Desai ◽  
Karen Oegema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Centriole Duplication ◽  
Mulibrey Nanism ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pathological Mechanism ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
Centrosomal Proteins

Centrosomes are composed of a centriolar core surrounded by pericentriolar material that nucleates microtubules. The ubiquitin ligase TRIM37 localizes to centrosomes, but its centrosomal roles are not yet defined. We show that TRIM37 does not control centriole duplication, structure, or the ability of centrioles to form cilia but instead prevents assembly of an ectopic centrobin-scaffolded structured condensate that forms by budding off of centrosomes. In ∼25% of TRIM37-deficient cells, the condensate organizes an ectopic spindle pole, recruiting other centrosomal proteins and acquiring microtubule nucleation capacity during mitotic entry. Ectopic spindle pole–associated transient multipolarity and multipolar segregation in TRIM37-deficient cells are suppressed by removing centrobin, which interacts with and is ubiquitinated by TRIM37. Thus, TRIM37 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by preventing the formation of centrobin-scaffolded condensates that organize ectopic spindle poles. Mutations in TRIM37 cause the disorder mulibrey nanism, and patient-derived cells harbor centrobin condensate-organized ectopic poles, leading us to propose that chromosome missegregation is a pathological mechanism in this disorder.

scholarly journals Centriole number and the reproductive capacity of spindle poles.

1985 ◽  
Vol 100 (3) ◽  
pp. 887-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Sluder ◽  
C L Rieder
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Reproductive Capacity ◽  
Centriole Duplication ◽  
Voltage Electron ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Mother And Daughter ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
History Of ◽  
Bipolar Spindles

The reproduction of spindle poles is a key event in the cell's preparation for mitosis. To gain further insight into how this process is controlled, we systematically characterized the ultrastructure of spindle poles whose reproductive capacity had been experimentally altered. In particular, we wanted to determine if the ability of a pole to reproduce before the next division is related to the number of centrioles it contains. We used mercaptoethanol to indirectly induce the formation of monopolar spindles in sea urchin eggs. We followed individually treated eggs in vivo with a polarizing microscope during the induction and development of monopolar spindles. We then fixed each egg at one of three predetermined key stages and serially semithick sectioned it for observation in a high-voltage electron microscope. We thus know the history of each egg before fixation and, from earlier studies, what that cell would have done had it not been fixed. We found that spindle poles that would have given rise to monopolar spindles at the next mitosis have only one centriole whereas spindle poles that would have formed bipolar spindles at the next division have two centrioles. By serially sectioning each egg, we were able to count all centrioles present. In the twelve cells examined, we found no cases of acentriolar spindle poles or centriole reduplication. Thus, the reproductive capacity of a spindle pole is linked to the number of centrioles it contains. Our experimental results also show, contrary to existing reports, that the daughter centriole of a centrosome can acquire pericentriolar material without first becoming a parent. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that the splitting apart of mother and daughter centrioles is an event that is distinct from, and not dependent on, centriole duplication.

scholarly journals Nsk1 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by promoting association of kinetochores to spindle poles during anaphase B

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 4486-4502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. Buttrick ◽  
John C. Meadows ◽  
Theresa C. Lancaster ◽  
Vincent Vanoosthuyse ◽  
Lindsey A. Shepperd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Catalytic Subunits ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Anaphase B ◽  
Novel Protein

Type 1 phosphatase (PP1) antagonizes Aurora B kinase to stabilize kinetochore–microtubule attachments and to silence the spindle checkpoint. We screened for factors that exacerbate the growth defect of Δdis2 cells, which lack one of two catalytic subunits of PP1 in fission yeast, and identified Nsk1, a novel protein required for accurate chromosome segregation. During interphase, Nsk1 resides in the nucleolus but spreads throughout the nucleoplasm as cells enter mitosis. Following dephosphorylation by Clp1 (Cdc14-like) phosphatase and at least one other phosphatase, Nsk1 localizes to the interface between kinetochores and the inner face of the spindle pole body during anaphase. In the absence of Nsk1, some kinetochores become detached from spindle poles during anaphase B. If this occurs late in anaphase B, then the sister chromatids of unclustered kinetochores segregate to the correct daughter cell. These unclustered kinetochores are efficiently captured, retrieved, bioriented, and segregated during the following mitosis, as long as Dis2 is present. However, if kinetochores are detached from a spindle pole early in anaphase B, then these sister chromatids become missegregated. These data suggest Nsk1 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by promoting the tethering of kinetochores to spindle poles during anaphase B.

scholarly journals Aster-free spindle poles in insect spermatocytes: evidence for chromosome-induced spindle formation?

1986 ◽  
Vol 102 (5) ◽  
pp. 1679-1687 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Steffen ◽  
H Fuge ◽  
R Dietz ◽  
M Bastmeyer ◽  
G Müller
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Serial Sections ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Microtubule Polymerization ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
Lysis Buffer ◽  
Bipolar Spindles

Tipulid spermatocytes form normally functioning bipolar spindles after one of the centrosomes is experimentally dislocated from the nucleus in late diakinesis (Dietz, R., 1959, Z. Naturforsch., 14b:749-752; Dietz, R., 1963, Zool. Anz. Suppl., 23:131-138; Dietz, R., 1966, Heredity, 19:161-166). The possibility that dissociated pericentriolar material (PCM) is nevertheless responsible for the formation of the spindle in these cells cannot be ruled out based on live observation. In studying serial sections of complete cells and of lysed cells, it was found that centrosome-free spindle poles in the crane fly show neither pericentriolar-like material nor aster microtubules, whereas the displaced centrosomes appear complete, i.e., consist of a centriole pair, aster microtubules, and PCM. Exposure to a lysis buffer containing tubulin resulted in an increase of centrosomal asters due to aster microtubule polymerization. Aster-free spindle poles did not show any reaction, also indicating the absence of PCM at these poles. The results favor the hypothesis of chromosome-induced spindle pole formation at the onset of prometaphase and the dispensability of PCM in Pales.

scholarly journals Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous chromosome attachments and centromere oscillation at meiosis I

Open Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Misuzu Wakiya ◽  
Eriko Nishi ◽  
Shinnosuke Kawai ◽  
Kohei Yamada ◽  
Kazuhiro Katsumata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Oriented Attachment ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Potential Link ◽  
Meiosis I

Establishment of proper chromosome attachments to the spindle requires elimination of erroneous attachments, but the mechanism of this process is not fully understood. During meiosis I, sister chromatids attach to the same spindle pole (mono-oriented attachment), whereas homologous chromosomes attach to opposite poles (bi-oriented attachment), resulting in homologous chromosome segregation. Here, we show that chiasmata that link homologous chromosomes and kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous attachments and oscillation of centromeres between the spindle poles at meiosis I in fission yeast. In chiasma-forming cells, Mad2 and Aurora B kinase, which provides time for attachment correction and destabilizes erroneous attachments, respectively, caused elimination of bi-oriented attachments of sister chromatids, whereas in chiasma-lacking cells, they caused elimination of mono-oriented attachments. In chiasma-forming cells, in addition, homologous centromere oscillation was coordinated. Furthermore, Dam1 contributed to attachment elimination in both chiasma-forming and chiasma-lacking cells, and drove centromere oscillation. These results demonstrate that chiasmata alter attachment correction patterns by enabling error correction factors to eliminate bi-oriented attachment of sister chromatids, and suggest that Dam1 induces elimination of erroneous attachments. The coincidental contribution of chiasmata and Dam1 to centromere oscillation also suggests a potential link between centromere oscillation and attachment elimination.

scholarly journals Centriole and PCM cooperatively recruit CEP192 to spindle poles to promote bipolar spindle assembly

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Chinen ◽  
Kaho Yamazaki ◽  
Kaho Hashimoto ◽  
Ken Fujii ◽  
Koki Watanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
A549 Cells ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Scaffold Proteins ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
Mitotic Cells

The pericentriolar material (PCM) that accumulates around the centriole expands during mitosis and nucleates microtubules. Here, we show the cooperative roles of the centriole and PCM scaffold proteins, pericentrin and CDK5RAP2, in the recruitment of CEP192 to spindle poles during mitosis. Systematic depletion of PCM proteins revealed that CEP192, but not pericentrin and/or CDK5RAP2, was crucial for bipolar spindle assembly in HeLa, RPE1, and A549 cells with centrioles. Upon double depletion of pericentrin and CDK5RAP2, CEP192 that remained at centriole walls was sufficient for bipolar spindle formation. In contrast, through centriole removal, we found that pericentrin and CDK5RAP2 recruited CEP192 at the acentriolar spindle pole and facilitated bipolar spindle formation in mitotic cells with one centrosome. Furthermore, the perturbation of PLK1, a critical kinase for PCM assembly, efficiently suppressed bipolar spindle formation in mitotic cells with one centrosome. Overall, these data suggest that the centriole and PCM scaffold proteins cooperatively recruit CEP192 to spindle poles and facilitate bipolar spindle formation.

scholarly journals Relief of the Dma1-mediated checkpoint requires Dma1 autoubiquitination and dynamic localization

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (18) ◽  
pp. 2176-2189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine M. Jones ◽  
Jun-Song Chen ◽  
Alyssa E. Johnson ◽  
Zachary C. Elmore ◽  
Sierra N. Cullati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Septation Initiation Network ◽  
Anaphase B

Chromosome segregation and cell division are coupled to prevent aneuploidy and cell death. In the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, the septation initiation network (SIN) promotes cytokinesis, but upon mitotic checkpoint activation, the SIN is actively inhibited to prevent cytokinesis from occurring before chromosomes have safely segregated. SIN inhibition during the mitotic checkpoint is mediated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase Dma1. Dma1 binds to the CK1-phosphorylated SIN scaffold protein Sid4 at the spindle pole body (SPB), and ubiquitinates it. Sid4 ubiquitination antagonizes the SPB localization of the Pololike kinase Plo1, the major SIN activator, so that SIN signaling is delayed. How this checkpoint is silenced once spindle defects are resolved has not been clear. Here we establish that Dma1 transiently leaves SPBs during anaphase B due to extensive autoubiquitination. The SIN is required for Dma1 to return to SPBs later in anaphase. Blocking Dma1 removal from SPBs by permanently tethering it to Sid4 prevents SIN activation and cytokinesis. Therefore, controlling Dma1’s SPB dynamics in anaphase is an essential step in S. pombe cell division and the silencing of the Dma1-dependent mitotic checkpoint.

scholarly journals Timing of centrosome separation is important for accurate chromosome segregation

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Silkworth ◽  
Isaac K. Nardi ◽  
Raja Paul ◽  
Alex Mogilner ◽  
Daniela Cimini
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Cellular Space ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Centrosome Separation ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Close Proximity

Spindle assembly, establishment of kinetochore attachment, and sister chromatid separation must occur during mitosis in a highly coordinated fashion to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. In most vertebrate cells, the nuclear envelope must break down to allow interaction between microtubules of the mitotic spindle and the kinetochores. It was previously shown that nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) is not coordinated with centrosome separation and that centrosome separation can be either complete at the time of NEB or can be completed after NEB. In this study, we investigated whether the timing of centrosome separation affects subsequent mitotic events such as establishment of kinetochore attachment or chromosome segregation. We used a combination of experimental and computational approaches to investigate kinetochore attachment and chromosome segregation in cells with complete versus incomplete spindle pole separation at NEB. We found that cells with incomplete spindle pole separation exhibit higher rates of kinetochore misattachments and chromosome missegregation than cells that complete centrosome separation before NEB. Moreover, our mathematical model showed that two spindle poles in close proximity do not “search” the entire cellular space, leading to formation of large numbers of syntelic attachments, which can be an intermediate stage in the formation of merotelic kinetochores.

scholarly journals Centriole and PCM cooperatively recruit CEP192 to spindle poles to promote bipolar spindle assembly

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Chinen ◽  
Kaho Yamazaki ◽  
Kaho Hashimoto ◽  
Ken Fujii ◽  
Koki Watanabe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Lines ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Human Cells ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Chemical Perturbation

The pericentriolar material (PCM) that accumulates around the centriole expands during mitosis and nucleates microtubules. While centrosomes facilitate bipolar spindle formation, the individual functions of the centriole and PCM in mitosis remain elusive. Herein, we show the redundant roles of the centriole and PCM in bipolar spindle formation in human cells. Upon depletion of the PCM scaffold components, pericentrin and CDK5RAP2, centrioles remained able to recruit CEP192 onto their walls, which was sufficient for bipolar spindle formation. In contrast, through centriole removal, we found that pericentrin and CDK5RAP2 recruited CEP192 at the acentriolar spindle pole and facilitated bipolar spindle formation in mitotic cells with one centrosome. Furthermore, the chemical perturbation of polo-like kinase 1, a critical kinase for PCM assembly, efficiently suppressed the proliferation of various cancer cell lines from which centrioles were removed. Overall, these data suggest that the centriole and PCM cooperatively recruit CEP192 to spindle poles and facilitate bipolar spindle formation in human cells.

scholarly journals A novel mitosis-specific Cep215 domain interacts with Cep192 and phosphorylated Aurora A for organization of spindle poles

2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (24) ◽  
pp. jcs240267
Author(s):  
Ryoko Kuriyama ◽  
Cody R. Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Structural Integrity ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Minor Role ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pericentriolar Material

ABSTRACTThe centrosome, which consists of centrioles and pericentriolar material (PCM), becomes mature and assembles mitotic spindles by increasing the number of microtubules (MTs) emanating from the PCM. Among the molecules involved in centrosome maturation, Cep192 and Aurora A (AurA, also known as AURKA) are primarily responsible for recruitment of γ-tubulin and MT nucleators, whereas pericentrin (PCNT) is required for PCM organization. However, the role of Cep215 (also known as CDK5RAP2) in centrosome maturation remains elusive. Cep215 possesses binding domains for γ-tubulin, PCNT and MT motors that transport acentrosomal MTs towards the centrosome. We identify a mitosis-specific centrosome-targeting domain of Cep215 (215N) that interacts with Cep192 and phosphorylated AurA (pAurA). Cep192 is essential for targeting 215N to centrosomes, and centrosomal localization of 215N and pAurA is mutually dependent. Cep215 has a relatively minor role in γ-tubulin recruitment to the mitotic centrosome. However, it has been shown previously that this protein is important for connecting mitotic centrosomes to spindle poles. Based on the results of rescue experiments using versions of Cep215 with different domain deletions, we conclude that Cep215 plays a role in maintaining the structural integrity of the spindle pole by providing a platform for the molecules involved in centrosome maturation.

scholarly journals Mitotic Chromosome Biorientation in Fission Yeast Is Enhanced by Dynein and a Minus-end–directed, Kinesin-like Protein

2007 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 2216-2225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekaterina L. Grishchuk ◽  
Ilia S. Spiridonov ◽  
J. Richard McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Mitotic Chromosome ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Ultrastructural Analysis ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Mitotic Spindles ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Chromosome biorientation, the attachment of sister kinetochores to sister spindle poles, is vitally important for accurate chromosome segregation. We have studied this process by following the congression of pole-proximal kinetochores and their subsequent anaphase segregation in fission yeast cells that carry deletions in any or all of this organism's minus end–directed, microtubule-dependent motors: two related kinesin 14s (Pkl1p and Klp2p) and dynein. None of these deletions abolished biorientation, but fewer chromosomes segregated normally without Pkl1p, and to a lesser degree without dynein, than in wild-type cells. In the absence of Pkl1p, which normally localizes to the spindle and its poles, the checkpoint that monitors chromosome biorientation was defective, leading to frequent precocious anaphase. Ultrastructural analysis of mutant mitotic spindles suggests that Pkl1p contributes to error-free biorientation by promoting normal spindle pole organization, whereas dynein helps to anchor a focused bundle of spindle microtubules at the pole.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document