scholarly journals Timing of centrosome separation is important for accurate chromosome segregation

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
William T. Silkworth ◽  
Isaac K. Nardi ◽  
Raja Paul ◽  
Alex Mogilner ◽  
Daniela Cimini
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Intermediate Stage ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Cellular Space ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Centrosome Separation ◽  
Large Numbers ◽  
Close Proximity

Spindle assembly, establishment of kinetochore attachment, and sister chromatid separation must occur during mitosis in a highly coordinated fashion to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. In most vertebrate cells, the nuclear envelope must break down to allow interaction between microtubules of the mitotic spindle and the kinetochores. It was previously shown that nuclear envelope breakdown (NEB) is not coordinated with centrosome separation and that centrosome separation can be either complete at the time of NEB or can be completed after NEB. In this study, we investigated whether the timing of centrosome separation affects subsequent mitotic events such as establishment of kinetochore attachment or chromosome segregation. We used a combination of experimental and computational approaches to investigate kinetochore attachment and chromosome segregation in cells with complete versus incomplete spindle pole separation at NEB. We found that cells with incomplete spindle pole separation exhibit higher rates of kinetochore misattachments and chromosome missegregation than cells that complete centrosome separation before NEB. Moreover, our mathematical model showed that two spindle poles in close proximity do not “search” the entire cellular space, leading to formation of large numbers of syntelic attachments, which can be an intermediate stage in the formation of merotelic kinetochores.

scholarly journals Kinetochore-generated pushing forces separate centrosomes during bipolar spindle assembly

2009 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Toso ◽  
Jennifer R. Winter ◽  
Ainslie J. Garrod ◽  
Ana C. Amaro ◽  
Patrick Meraldi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Aurora A ◽  
Bipolar Spindle ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Centrosome Separation ◽  
Dependent Pathway

In animal somatic cells, bipolar spindle formation requires separation of the centrosome-based spindle poles. Centrosome separation relies on multiple pathways, including cortical forces and antiparallel microtubule (MT) sliding, which are two activities controlled by the protein kinase aurora A. We previously found that depletion of the human kinetochore protein Mcm21RCENP-O results in monopolar spindles, raising the question as to whether kinetochores contribute to centrosome separation. In this study, we demonstrate that kinetochores promote centrosome separation after nuclear envelope breakdown by exerting a pushing force on the kinetochore fibers (k-fibers), which are bundles of MTs that connect kinetochores to centrosomes. This force is based on poleward MT flux, which incorporates new tubulin subunits at the plus ends of k-fibers and requires stable k-fibers to drive centrosomes apart. This kinetochore-dependent force becomes essential for centrosome separation if aurora A is inhibited. We conclude that two mechanisms control centrosome separation during prometaphase: an aurora A–dependent pathway and a kinetochore-dependent pathway that relies on k-fiber–generated pushing forces.

scholarly journals TRIM37 prevents formation of condensate-organized ectopic spindle poles to ensure mitotic fidelity

2021 ◽  
Vol 220 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz Meitinger ◽  
Dong Kong ◽  
Midori Ohta ◽  
Arshad Desai ◽  
Karen Oegema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Mitotic Entry ◽  
Centriole Duplication ◽  
Mulibrey Nanism ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Pathological Mechanism ◽  
Pericentriolar Material ◽  
Centrosomal Proteins

Centrosomes are composed of a centriolar core surrounded by pericentriolar material that nucleates microtubules. The ubiquitin ligase TRIM37 localizes to centrosomes, but its centrosomal roles are not yet defined. We show that TRIM37 does not control centriole duplication, structure, or the ability of centrioles to form cilia but instead prevents assembly of an ectopic centrobin-scaffolded structured condensate that forms by budding off of centrosomes. In ∼25% of TRIM37-deficient cells, the condensate organizes an ectopic spindle pole, recruiting other centrosomal proteins and acquiring microtubule nucleation capacity during mitotic entry. Ectopic spindle pole–associated transient multipolarity and multipolar segregation in TRIM37-deficient cells are suppressed by removing centrobin, which interacts with and is ubiquitinated by TRIM37. Thus, TRIM37 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by preventing the formation of centrobin-scaffolded condensates that organize ectopic spindle poles. Mutations in TRIM37 cause the disorder mulibrey nanism, and patient-derived cells harbor centrobin condensate-organized ectopic poles, leading us to propose that chromosome missegregation is a pathological mechanism in this disorder.

scholarly journals Redistribution of centrosomal proteins by centromeres and Polo kinase controls nuclear envelope breakdown

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Bestul ◽  
Zulin Yu ◽  
Jay R. Unruh ◽  
Sue L. Jaspersen
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Ring Structure ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Structured Illumination ◽  
Structured Illumination Microscopy ◽  
Spindle Formation ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Polo Kinase

AbstractProper mitotic progression in Schizosaccharomyces pombe requires partial nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) and insertion of the spindle pole body (SPB – yeast centrosome) to build the mitotic spindle. Linkage of the centromere to the SPB is vital to this process, but why that linkage is important is not well understood. Utilizing high-resolution structured illumination microscopy (SIM), we show that the conserved SUNprotein Sad1 and other SPB proteins redistribute during mitosis to form a ring complex around SPBs, which is a precursor for NEBD and spindle formation. Although the Polo kinase Plo1 is not necessary for Sad1 redistribution, it localizes to the SPB region connected to the centromere, and its activity is vital for SPB ring protein redistribution and for complete NEBD to allow for SPB insertion. Our results lead to a model in which centromere linkage to the SPB drives redistribution of Sad1 and Plo1 activation that in turn facilitate NEBD and spindle formation through building of an SPB ring structure.SummaryNuclear envelope breakdown is necessary for fission yeast cells to go through mitosis. Bestul et al. show that the SUN protein, Sad1, is vital in carrying out this breakdown and is regulated by the centromere and Polo kinase.

scholarly journals Nsk1 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by promoting association of kinetochores to spindle poles during anaphase B

2011 ◽  
Vol 22 (23) ◽  
pp. 4486-4502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham J. Buttrick ◽  
John C. Meadows ◽  
Theresa C. Lancaster ◽  
Vincent Vanoosthuyse ◽  
Lindsey A. Shepperd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Growth Defect ◽  
Catalytic Subunits ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Anaphase B ◽  
Novel Protein

Type 1 phosphatase (PP1) antagonizes Aurora B kinase to stabilize kinetochore–microtubule attachments and to silence the spindle checkpoint. We screened for factors that exacerbate the growth defect of Δdis2 cells, which lack one of two catalytic subunits of PP1 in fission yeast, and identified Nsk1, a novel protein required for accurate chromosome segregation. During interphase, Nsk1 resides in the nucleolus but spreads throughout the nucleoplasm as cells enter mitosis. Following dephosphorylation by Clp1 (Cdc14-like) phosphatase and at least one other phosphatase, Nsk1 localizes to the interface between kinetochores and the inner face of the spindle pole body during anaphase. In the absence of Nsk1, some kinetochores become detached from spindle poles during anaphase B. If this occurs late in anaphase B, then the sister chromatids of unclustered kinetochores segregate to the correct daughter cell. These unclustered kinetochores are efficiently captured, retrieved, bioriented, and segregated during the following mitosis, as long as Dis2 is present. However, if kinetochores are detached from a spindle pole early in anaphase B, then these sister chromatids become missegregated. These data suggest Nsk1 ensures accurate chromosome segregation by promoting the tethering of kinetochores to spindle poles during anaphase B.

scholarly journals Formation of Spindle Poles by Dynein/Dynactin-Dependent Transport of Numa

2000 ◽  
Vol 149 (4) ◽  
pp. 851-862 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Merdes ◽  
Rebecca Heald ◽  
Kumiko Samejima ◽  
William C. Earnshaw ◽  
Don W. Cleveland
Keyword(s):  
Fluorescent Protein ◽  
Gel Filtration ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Assembly ◽  
Green Fluorescent ◽  
Dependent Transport ◽  
Dynactin Complex

NuMA is a large nuclear protein whose relocation to the spindle poles is required for bipolar mitotic spindle assembly. We show here that this process depends on directed NuMA transport toward microtubule minus ends powered by cytoplasmic dynein and its activator dynactin. Upon nuclear envelope breakdown, large cytoplasmic aggregates of green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged NuMA stream poleward along spindle fibers in association with the actin-related protein 1 (Arp1) protein of the dynactin complex and cytoplasmic dynein. Immunoprecipitations and gel filtration demonstrate the assembly of a reversible, mitosis-spe-cific complex of NuMA with dynein and dynactin. NuMA transport is required for spindle pole assembly and maintenance, since disruption of the dynactin complex (by increasing the amount of the dynamitin subunit) or dynein function (with an antibody) strongly inhibits NuMA translocation and accumulation and disrupts spindle pole assembly.

scholarly journals Localization of the Kinesin-like Protein Xklp2 to Spindle Poles Requires a Leucine Zipper, a Microtubule-associated Protein, and Dynein

1998 ◽  
Vol 143 (3) ◽  
pp. 673-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Torsten Wittmann ◽  
Haralabia Boleti ◽  
Claude Antony ◽  
Eric Karsenti ◽  
Isabelle Vernos
Keyword(s):  
Leucine Zipper ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Single Point Mutation ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Centrosome Separation ◽  
Egg Extracts ◽  
Xenopus Egg ◽  
Xenopus Egg Extracts

Xklp2 is a plus end–directed Xenopus kinesin-like protein localized at spindle poles and required for centrosome separation during spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts. A glutathione-S-transferase fusion protein containing the COOH-terminal domain of Xklp2 (GST-Xklp2-Tail) was previously found to localize to spindle poles (Boleti, H., E. Karsenti, and I. Vernos. 1996. Cell. 84:49–59). Now, we have examined the mechanism of localization of GST-Xklp2-Tail. Immunofluorescence and electron microscopy showed that Xklp2 and GST-Xklp2-Tail localize specifically to the minus ends of spindle pole and aster microtubules in mitotic, but not in interphase, Xenopus egg extracts. We found that dimerization and a COOH-terminal leucine zipper are required for this localization: a single point mutation in the leucine zipper prevented targeting. The mechanism of localization is complex and two additional factors in mitotic egg extracts are required for the targeting of GST-Xklp2-Tail to microtubule minus ends: (a) a novel 100-kD microtubule-associated protein that we named TPX2 (Targeting protein for Xklp2) that mediates the binding of GST-Xklp2-Tail to microtubules and (b) the dynein–dynactin complex that is required for the accumulation of GST-Xklp2-Tail at microtubule minus ends. We propose two molecular mechanisms that could account for the localization of Xklp2 to microtubule minus ends.

scholarly journals The half-bridge component Kar1 promotes centrosome separation and duplication during budding yeast meiosis

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 1798-1810
Author(s):  
Meenakshi Agarwal ◽  
Hui Jin ◽  
Melainia McClain ◽  
Jinbo Fan ◽  
Bailey A. Koch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Pole Body ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Pole Body ◽  
Centrosome Separation ◽  
Chromatid Segregation ◽  
Yeast Meiosis ◽  
Unique Mechanism

The budding yeast centrosome, often called the spindle pole body (SPB), nucleates microtubules for chromosome segregation during cell division. An appendage, called the half bridge, attaches to one side of the SPB and regulates SPB duplication and separation. Like DNA, the SPB is duplicated only once per cell cycle. During meiosis, however, after one round of DNA replication, two rounds of SPB duplication and separation are coupled with homologue segregation in meiosis I and sister-chromatid segregation in meiosis II. How SPB duplication and separation are regulated during meiosis remains to be elucidated, and whether regulation in meiosis differs from that in mitosis is unclear. Here we show that overproduction of the half-bridge component Kar1 leads to premature SPB separation during meiosis. Furthermore, excessive Kar1 induces SPB overduplication to form supernumerary SPBs, leading to chromosome missegregation and erroneous ascospore formation. Kar1-­mediated SPB duplication bypasses the requirement of dephosphorylation of Sfi1, another half-bridge component previously identified as a licensing factor. Our results therefore reveal an unexpected role of Kar1 in licensing meiotic SPB duplication and suggest a unique mechanism of SPB regulation during budding yeast meiosis.

scholarly journals Chiasmata and the kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous chromosome attachments and centromere oscillation at meiosis I

Open Biology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Misuzu Wakiya ◽  
Eriko Nishi ◽  
Shinnosuke Kawai ◽  
Kohei Yamada ◽  
Kazuhiro Katsumata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Oriented Attachment ◽  
Aurora B ◽  
Correction Factors ◽  
Homologous Chromosomes ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Potential Link ◽  
Meiosis I

Establishment of proper chromosome attachments to the spindle requires elimination of erroneous attachments, but the mechanism of this process is not fully understood. During meiosis I, sister chromatids attach to the same spindle pole (mono-oriented attachment), whereas homologous chromosomes attach to opposite poles (bi-oriented attachment), resulting in homologous chromosome segregation. Here, we show that chiasmata that link homologous chromosomes and kinetochore component Dam1 are crucial for elimination of erroneous attachments and oscillation of centromeres between the spindle poles at meiosis I in fission yeast. In chiasma-forming cells, Mad2 and Aurora B kinase, which provides time for attachment correction and destabilizes erroneous attachments, respectively, caused elimination of bi-oriented attachments of sister chromatids, whereas in chiasma-lacking cells, they caused elimination of mono-oriented attachments. In chiasma-forming cells, in addition, homologous centromere oscillation was coordinated. Furthermore, Dam1 contributed to attachment elimination in both chiasma-forming and chiasma-lacking cells, and drove centromere oscillation. These results demonstrate that chiasmata alter attachment correction patterns by enabling error correction factors to eliminate bi-oriented attachment of sister chromatids, and suggest that Dam1 induces elimination of erroneous attachments. The coincidental contribution of chiasmata and Dam1 to centromere oscillation also suggests a potential link between centromere oscillation and attachment elimination.

Changes in the metaphase transit times and the pattern of sister chromatid separation in stamen hair cells of Tradescantia after treatment with protein phosphatase inhibitors

1992 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 691-715 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.M. Wolniak ◽  
P.M. Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Transit Time ◽  
Okadaic Acid ◽  
Hair Cells ◽  
Protein Phosphatase ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Spindle Pole ◽  
Phosphatase Inhibitors ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Transit Times

Stamen hair cells from the spiderwort plant, Tradescantia virginiana, exhibit remarkably predictable metaphase transit times, making them uniquely suitable for temporal studies on mitotic regulation. In this study, we describe two kinds of experiments that test whether protein phosphatase activity is a necessary prerequisite for entry into anaphase in living, mitotic cells. We treated cells at specific points during prophase, prometaphase and metaphase with the broad-spectrum protein phosphatase inhibitor, alpha-naphthyl phosphate (administered by microinjection), or with the naturally occurring, potent phosphatase inhibitors okadaic acid, microcystin-LR or microcystin-RR (administered by perfusion), and we have observed changes in the metaphase transit time that are primarily dependent on the time of initial exposure to the inhibitor. Maximal extensions of the metaphase transit time result from alpha-naphthyl phosphate microinjections initiated in mid-metaphase, 10–20 min after nuclear envelope breakdown. Perfusions with okadaic acid started during a specific interval in mid-metaphase, 15–20 min after nuclear envelope breakdown, resulted in a statistically significant extension of the metaphase transit time. Perfusions with either microcystin-LR or microcystin-RR initiated 15–26 min after nuclear envelope breakdown extended the metaphase transit times significantly. Treatments of cells with okadaic acid or with either of the microcystins initiated outside this mid-metaphase interval either were without effect or, alternatively, resulted in a significant shortening of the metaphase transit time. In addition to their effects on the timing of anaphase onset, treatments with these protein phosphatase inhibitors also resulted in a remarkable change in the way in which these cells enter anaphase. Sister chromatid separation in stamen hair cells typically requires only 5 seconds, but after treatment with any of these inhibitors some, but not all, of the chromatids split apart at anaphase onset. Those that split begin to migrate toward the spindle pole regions, while those that fail to split remain at the metaphase plate. Later, more of the paired chromatids split apart and begin moving toward the spindle pole regions. Those that fail to separate remain at the metaphase plate. This process can be repeated several times before all of the chromatids have separated. Thus, entry into anaphase becomes extremely asynchronous, and as much as 30 min can transpire between the centromeric separation of the first and last chromosomes. Some of the chromosomes complete their anaphase movements before others have even split apart at the metaphase plate. Asynchronous separation did not result in a permanent segregation anomaly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals C. elegans Nuclear Envelope Proteins Emerin, MAN1, Lamin, and Nucleoporins Reveal Unique Timing of Nuclear Envelope Breakdown during Mitosis

2000 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 3089-3099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth K. Lee ◽  
Yosef Gruenbaum ◽  
Perah Spann ◽  
Jun Liu ◽  
Katherine L. Wilson
Keyword(s):  
Membrane Proteins ◽  
Nuclear Envelope ◽  
Integral Membrane Proteins ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Nuclear Envelope Breakdown ◽  
Spindle Poles ◽  
Sds Page ◽  
Early Anaphase ◽  
Extraction Properties ◽  
Pore Complexes

Emerin, MAN1, and LAP2 are integral membrane proteins of the vertebrate nuclear envelope. They share a 43-residue N-terminal motif termed the LEM domain. We found three putative LEM domain genes inCaenorhabditis elegans, designated emr-1,lem-2, and lem-3. We analyzedemr-l, which encodes Ce-emerin, andlem-2, which encodes Ce-MAN1. Ce-emerin and Ce-MAN1 migrate on SDS-PAGE as 17- and 52-kDa proteins, respectively. Based on their biochemical extraction properties and immunolocalization, both Ce-emerin and Ce-MAN1 are integral membrane proteins localized at the nuclear envelope. We used antibodies against Ce-MAN1, Ce-emerin, nucleoporins, and Ce-lamin to determine the timing of nuclear envelope breakdown during mitosis in C. elegans. The C. elegans nuclear envelope disassembles very late compared with vertebrates and Drosophila. The nuclear membranes remained intact everywhere except near spindle poles during metaphase and early anaphase, fully disassembling only during mid-late anaphase. Disassembly of pore complexes, and to a lesser extent the lamina, depended on embryo age: pore complexes were absent during metaphase in >30-cell embryos but existed until anaphase in 2- to 24-cell embryos. Intranuclear mRNA splicing factors disassembled after prophase. The timing of nuclear disassembly in C. elegans is novel and may reflect its evolutionary position between unicellular and more complex eukaryotes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document