Increased Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Rates After the Introduction of a New Mechanical Valve Intravenous Access Port

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-70 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa L. Maragakis ◽  
Karen L. Bradley ◽  
Xiaoyan Song ◽  
Claire Beers ◽  
Marlene R. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Intravenous Catheter ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Intravenous Access ◽  
Mechanical Valves ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

The technology of intravenous catheter access ports has evolved from open ports covered by removable caps to more-sophisticated, closed versions containing mechanical valves. We report a significant increase in catheter-related bloodstream infections after the introduction of a new needle-free positive-pressure mechanical valve intravenous access port at our institution.

Increased Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Rates After the Introduction of a New Mechanical Valve Intravenous Access Port

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (01) ◽  
pp. 67-70
Author(s):  
Lisa L. Maragakis ◽  
Karen L. Bradley ◽  
Xiaoyan Song ◽  
Claire Beers ◽  
Marlene R. Miller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Access Port ◽  
Intravenous Access ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

scholarly journals Targeting COVID-19 prevention in hemodialysis facilities is associated with a drastic reduction in central venous catheter-related infections

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Heidempergher ◽  
Gianmarco Sabiu ◽  
Maria Antonietta Orani ◽  
Giovanni Tripepi ◽  
Maurizio Gallieni
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Chronic Hemodialysis ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Exit Site ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Exit Site Infection ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

Abstract Background In hemodialysis (HD) patients, central venous catheter (CVC) related bloodstream infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Hygienic precautions are a key aspect of dialysis care for infection prevention, but they are not sufficient to completely avoid the occurrence of CVC related infections. During the COVID-19 pandemic, hygienic precautions for preventing viral transmission have been markedly reinforced. We evaluated their effects on CVC-related infection rates. Methods An observational retrospective study was conducted in two hemodialysis units of the same institution treating 215 chronic hemodialysis patients, 71 of whom are currently (33%) using a CVC. In the CVC cohort, we compared data on catheter-related infection rates during the maximum spread of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy (February to May 2020) with data from the same period of the previous year and with the whole of 2019. Results In 2019, we recorded a catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) rate of 1.19 (95% CI 0.81–1.68)/1000 days [2.07 (95% CI 1.12–3.52)/1000 days in the Feb-May 2019 period] and a tunnel and exit-site infection rate of 0.82 (95% CI 0.51–1.24)/1000 days [1.04 (95% CI 0.41–2.15)/1000 days in the Feb–May 2019 period]. Infection rates drastically decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic, with just one catheter-related bloodstream infection being recorded. Catheter-related bloodstream infection rates showed a significant reduction to 0.20 (95% CI 0.01–0.9)/1000 days (p < 0.05 and p < 0.005 compared to 2019 and to Feb-May 2019, respectively) and a non-significant reduction in tunnel and exit-site infections to 0.6 (95% CI 0.15–1.6)/1000 days. Conclusions The observed 91% reduction in catheter-related bloodstream infections compared to the same period in 2019 [IRR 0.09 (95% CI 0.002–0.64)] and the 83% reduction compared to the whole of 2019 [IRR 0.17 (95% CI 0.004–1.009)] suggest that a stricter implementation of hygienic precautions in the dialysis setting can markedly improve the problem of CVC-related infections. Graphic abstract

scholarly journals Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kylie Martin ◽  
Yves S Poy Lorenzo ◽  
Po Yee Mia Leung ◽  
Sheri Chung ◽  
Emmet O’flaherty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Jugular Vein ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Left Internal Jugular Vein ◽  
Hemodialysis Catheter ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Reduced Risk

Abstract Diabetes and left internal jugular vein insertion site were significantly associated with increased risk of a catheter-related bloodstream infection from a tunneled hemodialysis catheter. Ex-smoker status was significantly associated with reduced risk.

scholarly journals Bundle Approach to Reduce Bloodstream Infections in Neutropenic Hematologic

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 474
Author(s):  
Jose Manuel Martinez ◽  
Luís Leite ◽  
Daniela França ◽  
Rita Capela ◽  
Luísa Viterbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Central Venous

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> The objective of the study was to reduce, by a bundle of interventions, the global bloodstream infections and catheterrelated bloodstream infections rates in neutropenic hematology patients with a long-term central venous catheter.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> This was a non-randomized prospective study. It was conducted in a 20-bed hematology oncology unit (Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal) between 1st of August 2010 and 31st of January 2012. In this period we introduced a bundle of interventions (study group) and compared the results with the six months prior to implementation (control group). The interventions consisted in the use of a neutral pressure mechanical valve connector instead of a positive pressure mechanical valve connector, a more frequent change of this connector and a more efficient clean solution. One hundred and sixteen hematology patients with a long-term central venous catheter at time superior of 72 h, with 8 867 central venous catheter days [6 756 central venous catheter days in the study group and 2 111 central venous catheter days in the control group] were included in the study.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> A significant reduction in bloodstream infections rates and catheter-related bloodstream infections rates was achieved. Bloodstream infections rates: [32.69 (control group) vs. 9.43 (study group)], incidence reduction 71% [relative risk 0.2886, CI 95% (0.1793 – 0.4647), p &lt; 0.001] and catheter-related bloodstream infections rates: [17.53 (control group) vs. 4.73 (study group)], incidence reduction 71% [relative risk 0.2936, CI 95% (0.1793 – 0.5615), p &lt; 0.014]. No significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) was found in the neutrophil count at the time of blood culture samples between groups: 69% (&lt; 500 neutrophils/mm3) [71% (study group) vs. 68% (control group)].<br /><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The introduction of this bundle of interventions based on the variables of patient, product and practice, supported by the Healthcare and Technology Synergy framework, quickly resulted in a significant reduction of bloodstream infections and catheterrelated bloodstream infections rates.</p>

Impact of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium’s multidimensional approach on central line–associated bloodstream infection rates in Bahrain

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-489
Author(s):  
Safaa Alkhawaja ◽  
Nermeen Kamal Saeed ◽  
Victor Daniel Rosenthal ◽  
Sana Abdul-Aziz ◽  
Ameena Alsayegh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Multidimensional Approach ◽  
Infection Rates

Background: Central line–associated bloodstream infections are serious life-threatening infections in the intensive care unit setting. Methods: To analyze the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Multidimensional Approach (IMA) and INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS) on central line–associated bloodstream infection rates in Bahrain from January 2013 to December 2016, we conducted a prospective, before-after surveillance, cohort, observational study in one intensive care unit in Bahrain. During baseline, we performed outcome and process surveillance of central line–associated bloodstream infection on 2320 intensive care unit patients, applying Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Network definitions. During intervention, we implemented IMA through ISOS, including (1) a bundle of infection prevention interventions, (2) education, (3) outcome surveillance, (4) process surveillance, (5) feedback on central line–associated bloodstream infection rates and consequences, and (6) performance feedback of process surveillance. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to estimate the effect of the intervention on the central line–associated bloodstream infection rate. Results: During baseline, 672 central line days and 7 central line–associated bloodstream infections were recorded, accounting for 10.4 central line–associated bloodstream infections per 1000 central line days. During intervention, 13,020 central line days and 48 central line–associated bloodstream infections were recorded. After the second year, there was a sustained 89% cumulative central line–associated bloodstream infection rate reduction to 1.2 central line–associated bloodstream infections per 1000 central line days (incidence density rate, 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.1–0.3; p, 0.001). The average extra length of stay of patients with central line–associated bloodstream infection was 23.3 days, and due to the reduction of central line–associated bloodstream infections, 367 days of hospitalization were saved, amounting to a reduction in hospitalization costs of US$1,100,553. Conclusion: Implementing IMA was associated with a significant reduction in the central line–associated bloodstream infection rate in Bahrain.

Central Catheter-related Bloodstream Infection Rates in Children on Home Parenteral Nutrition

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. e59-e62
Author(s):  
Ivana Trivić ◽  
Zrinjka Mišak ◽  
Višnjica Kerman ◽  
Hrvoje Prlić ◽  
Sanja Kolaček ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Home Parenteral Nutrition ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

Increased Rate of Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection Associated With Use of a Needleless Mechanical Valve Device at a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 684-688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cassandra D. Salgado ◽  
Libby Chinnes ◽  
Tammy H. Paczesny ◽  
J. Robert Cantey
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Acute Care Hospital ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Relative Risks ◽  
Gram Negative Organisms ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

Objective.To determine whether introduction of a needleless mechanical valve device (NMVD) at a long-term acute care hospital was associated with an increased frequency of catheter-related bloodstream infection (BSI).Design.For patients with a central venous catheter in place, the catheter-related BSI rate during the 24-month period before introduction of the NMVD, a period in which a needleless split-septum device (NSSD) was being used (hereafter, the NSSD period), was compared with the catheter-related BSI rate during the 24-month period after introduction of the NMVD (hereafter, the NMVD period). The microbiological characteristics of catheter-related BSIs during each period were also compared. Comparisons and calculations of relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were performed using χ2 analysis.Results.Eighty-six catheter-related BSIs (3.86 infections per 1,000 catheter-days) occurred during the study period. The rate of catheter-related BSI during the NMVD period was significantly higher than that during the NSSD period (5.95 vs 1.79 infections per 1,000 catheter-days; RR, 3.32 [95% CI, 2.88–3.83]; P < .001). A significantly greater percentage of catheter-related BSIs during the NMVD period were caused by gram-negative organisms, compared with the percentage recorded during the NSSD period (39.5% vs 8%; P = .007). Among catheter-related BSIs due to gram-positive organisms, the percentage caused by enterococci was significantly greater during the NMVD period, compared with the NSSD period (54.8% vs 13.6%; P = .004). The catheter-related BSI rate remained high during the NMVD period despite several educational sessions regarding proper use of the NMVD.Conclusions.An increased catheter-related BSI rate was temporally associated with use of a NMVD at the study hospital, despite several educational sessions regarding proper NMVD use. The current design of the NMVD may be unsafe for use in certain patient populations.

scholarly journals Tsukamurella catheter-related bloodstream infection in a pediatric patient with pulmonary hypertension

2010 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Kristen A. Wendorf ◽  
Claudia M. Espinosa ◽  
William D. LeBar ◽  
Jason B. Weinberg
Keyword(s):  
Pulmonary Hypertension ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Pediatric Patient ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Immunocompetent Patients

Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) are important complications in patients with long-term indwelling central venous catheters. In this report, we present the case of a 14-year-old male with pulmonary hypertension treated with continuous treprostinil infusion, who presented with a CR-BSI caused by a Tsukamurella species. This case highlights the potential for this unusual organism to cause infection in immunocompetent patients.

Clinical usefulness of catheter-drawn blood samples and catheter-tip cultures for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infections in neonates

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (7) ◽  
pp. 854-856
Author(s):  
Janita Ferreira ◽  
Paulo Augusto Moreira Camargos ◽  
Viviane Rosado ◽  
Leni Márcia Anchieta ◽  
Roberta Maia de Castro Romanelli
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Efficient Method ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Blood Sampling ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Blood Samples ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Catheter Related Bloodstream Infection

AbstractCatheter-drawn blood sampling is an efficient method of diagnosing catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) in neonates; it has greater sensitivity and accuracy than methods using catheter-tip cultures. No association was detected between catheter-drawn blood sampling and the occurrence of adverse events with central venous catheters.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document