scholarly journals Bundle Approach to Reduce Bloodstream Infections in Neutropenic Hematologic

2015 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 474
Author(s):  
Jose Manuel Martinez ◽  
Luís Leite ◽  
Daniela França ◽  
Rita Capela ◽  
Luísa Viterbo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Relative Risk ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Mechanical Valve ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Positive Pressure ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Central Venous

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> The objective of the study was to reduce, by a bundle of interventions, the global bloodstream infections and catheterrelated bloodstream infections rates in neutropenic hematology patients with a long-term central venous catheter.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> This was a non-randomized prospective study. It was conducted in a 20-bed hematology oncology unit (Portuguese Institute of Oncology, Porto, Portugal) between 1st of August 2010 and 31st of January 2012. In this period we introduced a bundle of interventions (study group) and compared the results with the six months prior to implementation (control group). The interventions consisted in the use of a neutral pressure mechanical valve connector instead of a positive pressure mechanical valve connector, a more frequent change of this connector and a more efficient clean solution. One hundred and sixteen hematology patients with a long-term central venous catheter at time superior of 72 h, with 8 867 central venous catheter days [6 756 central venous catheter days in the study group and 2 111 central venous catheter days in the control group] were included in the study.<br /><strong>Results:</strong> A significant reduction in bloodstream infections rates and catheter-related bloodstream infections rates was achieved. Bloodstream infections rates: [32.69 (control group) vs. 9.43 (study group)], incidence reduction 71% [relative risk 0.2886, CI 95% (0.1793 – 0.4647), p &lt; 0.001] and catheter-related bloodstream infections rates: [17.53 (control group) vs. 4.73 (study group)], incidence reduction 71% [relative risk 0.2936, CI 95% (0.1793 – 0.5615), p &lt; 0.014]. No significant difference (p &gt; 0.05) was found in the neutrophil count at the time of blood culture samples between groups: 69% (&lt; 500 neutrophils/mm3) [71% (study group) vs. 68% (control group)].<br /><strong>Conclusions:</strong> The introduction of this bundle of interventions based on the variables of patient, product and practice, supported by the Healthcare and Technology Synergy framework, quickly resulted in a significant reduction of bloodstream infections and catheterrelated bloodstream infections rates.</p>

Surveillance of Hemodialysis-Associated Primary Bloodstream Infections: The Experience of Ten Hospital-Based Centers

2002 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 721-724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Margaret Dopirak ◽  
Connie Hill ◽  
Marylee Oleksiw ◽  
Diane Dumigan ◽  
Jean Arvai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Descriptive Analysis ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Hemodialysis Access ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Coagulase Negative Staphylococci ◽  
Large Pool

Objective:To determine baseline rates of primary bloodstream infection (BSI) among a large pool of patients receiving hemodialysis using standardized surveillance tools and methodology.Design:Prospective, descriptive analysis of primary BSI rates.Setting:Ten hospital-based hemodialysis centers in Connecticut.Patients:All patients receiving long-term hemodialysis in the participating facilities.Results:A total of 158 BSIs occurred during 142,525 dialysis sessions within a 12-month study period. Of the BSIs, 15.2% occurred in patients with fistula or graft access and 84.8% in patients with central venous catheter access (P < .001). Rates per 100 patient-years in centers ranged from 0 to 30.8, with a mean of 16.6. Rates per 1,000 dialysis sessions ranged from 0 to 2.1, with a mean of 1.1. Coagulase-negative staphylococci and Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant S. aureus) accounted for 61% and Klebsiella or Enterobacter species for 14.6% of infections. Of the patients, 63.3% received vancomycin, 24.7% received cefazolin, and 41.7% received aminoglycosides. Rates declined in the second 6 months of the study from 1.4 to 0.8 infections per 1,000 dialysis sessions (P < .001).Conclusions:Primary BSI rates varied widely among participating centers and declined during the study period. BSIs were strongly associated with central venous catheter access. Further studies are needed to determine the reasons for variance in rates between centers and among various types of hemodialysis access.

scholarly journals Care of Peripheral Venous Catheter Sites: Advantages of Transparent Film Dressings Over Tape and Gauze

2014 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 256-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stéphanie F. Bernatchez
Keyword(s):  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
The United States ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Peripheral Venous Catheter ◽  
Care Facilities ◽  
Review Current ◽  
Peripheral Venous Line

AbstractPeripheral intravenous (PIV) catheters are the most commonly used catheters in hospitals, with up to 70% of patients requiring a peripheral venous line during their hospital stay. This represents 200 million PIV catheters used per year in acute-care hospitals in the United States alone. These medical devices are also used in other health care settings, such as long-term care facilities and nursing homes, and common indications include the administration of medications, nutrients, and fluids. These catheters require proper maintenance and care to avoid complications such as phlebitis, infiltration, occlusion, local infection, and bloodstream infection. Recently it has been suggested that PIV catheter use may lead to a higher rate of complications than previously thought. This is important because some studies have claimed that the rate of bloodstream infections due to PIV catheters is actually comparable to the rates observed with central venous catheters, rather than much lower as previously thought. Moreover, catheter-related infections are now seen as largely preventable. Our goal was to review the current literature and provide an overview of the various approaches used to manage PIV catheter sites as well as review current recommendations.

Precision in Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement: A Review of the Literature

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Hostetter ◽  
Nadine Nakasawa ◽  
Kim Tompkins ◽  
Bradley Hill
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
Landmark Technique ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract Background: Long term venous catheters have been used to deliver specialized therapies since 1968. The ideal tip position of a central venous catheter provides reliable venous access with optimal therapeutic delivery, while minimizing short-and long-term complications. Ideal position limits have evolved and narrowed over time, making successful placement difficult and unreliable when depending exclusively on the landmark technique. Objective: To review and analyze contemporary literature and calculate an overall accuracy rate for first attempt placement of a PICC catheter in the ideal tip position. Methods: Key PICC placement terms were used to search the database PubMED-indexed for MEDLINE in June and October, 2009. The selection of studies required: a patient cohort without tip placement guidance technology; a documented landmark technique to place catheter tips; data documenting initial catheter placement and, that the lower third of the SVC and the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) were included in the placement criteria. With few exceptions, articles written between 1993 and 2009 met the stated selection criteria. A composite of outcomes associated with tip placement was analyzed, and an overall percent proficiency of accurate catheter tip placement calculated. Results: Nine studies in eight articles met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. Rates of first placement success per study ranged from 39% to 75%, with the majority (7/9) being single center studies. The combined overall proficiency of these studies calculated as a weighted average was 45.87%.

scholarly journals Bedside ultrasound as a screening test for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBI)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara de Sio ◽  
Mario Venafro ◽  
Giampiero Foccillo ◽  
Riccardo Nevola ◽  
Lucio Monaco
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Roc Curve Analysis ◽  
Suspected Infection ◽  
Intravascular Devices ◽  
A Prospective Study

Abstract Purpose Between 15 and 30% of all nosocomial bacteremias and sepsis are associated with the use of intravascular devices. Catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBI) are infections in which the organism identified in the blood is also present on the tip of the catheter itself or in a blood sample taken through it. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of infections related to the use of central catheters. Methods Between January 2018 and June 2019, we carried out a prospective study on 36 patients with a central catheter, such as a central venous catheter (CVC), a central catheter with peripheral insertion (PICC), or a fully implanted central venous catheter (PORT-a-cath) and who had signs and symptoms of infection. These patients were submitted to an ultrasound of the catheter upon arrival in the ward in case of suspected infection, or at the time of the onset of signs and symptoms of infection (if these arose during hospitalization). Patients with a central catheter but without signs and symptoms of infection were not included in the study. The end point of the study was to evaluate sensitivity (SENS), specificity (SPEC), positive and negative predictive value (PPV-NPV) and overall diagnostic accuracy (ODA) of ultrasound in the diagnosis of CRBI through Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results US showed a SENS of 94%, a SPEC of 84%, a PPV of 84%, an NPV of 94% and an ODA of 88.8% for the diagnosis of CRBI. Conclusions Preliminary data from our study show that US of intravascular devices has a high SENS and SPEC in the diagnosis of CRBI, and can, therefore, be used as a valid tool to decide whether to remove the device early or leave it in place.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document