Nosocomial Infections in a Children's Hospital in Argentina: Impact of a Unique Infection Control Intervention Program

2001 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 762-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela de Gentile ◽  
Noemi Rivas ◽  
Ronda L. Sinkowitz-Cochran ◽  
Teresa Momesso ◽  
Emilio Martinez Iriart ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Parental Education ◽  
Intervention Program ◽  
Parental Assistance ◽  
Nosocomial Infection Rate ◽  
Control Education

AbstractObjective:To assess the efficacy of parental education and use of parents as nursing assistants on reducing nosocomial infections.Design:Prospective study.Methods:Active surveillance for nosocomial infections was performed on two wards. On ward A, parents were educated about infection control practices and assisted nursing staff with routine tasks, so that nursing personnel could focus their efforts on procedures with higher risk of infection. Parental assistance was not sought on ward B, the comparison ward.Results:From October 1990 through September 1991, 1,081 patients were admitted to wards A (470) or B (611). The overall nosocomial infection rate was 7.1 per 100 admissions; the nosocomial infection rate was significantly higher on ward B than ward A (63/611 vs 14/470; P<.001). Multivariate analysis identified risk factors for nosocomial infection on the two wards as age <2 years (P=.01), malnutrition (P=.005), duration of hospitalization (P<.001), ward B hospitalization (P=.003), and ward cleanliness score (P=.009); the distribution of patients with these factors was similar on the two wards.Conclusions:Our data suggest that parental infection control education and recruitment to relieve nursing staff of routine low-risk procedures are economical and easily implemented measures to reduce nosocomial infections in hospitals with limited personnel resources in the developing world.

scholarly journals 807. Effect of Inter-Hospital Transfer on Nosocomial Infection Rates in Patients Receiving Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S446-S447
Author(s):  
Joseph E Marcus ◽  
Jason Okulicz ◽  
Valerie Sams ◽  
Andriy Batchinsky ◽  
Alice Barsoumian
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Life Support ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Nosocomial Infection Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hospital Transfer ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Extracorporeal Oxygenation (ECMO) has been increasingly used as a life support modality for cardiac and pulmonary failure. Due to improved survival in patients treated in high volume ECMO centers, inter-hospital transport of these critically ill patients is on the rise. These patients may be transported via ambulance locally, or by aircraft over long distances. However, potential risks of nosocomial infectious complications associated with transfers has not been reported. We evaluated the impact of transfers on nosocomial infections for patients who received ECMO at Brooke Army Medical Center (BAMC). Methods All patients who received ECMO for ≥48 hours at BAMC between May 2012 and October 2019 were included. Chart review was performed to determine transport status, infectious complications while on ECMO, and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolated organisms. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, or Mann-Whitney U tests as appropriate. Factors associated with nosocomial infections were evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. Results Compared to patients who were cannulated locally (n=33), patients who underwent cannulation at referral facility and inter-hospital transfer (n=76) had no difference in infections per 1000 ECMO days (33.1 vs. 30.5, p=0.74) or in infections with multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO) (50% vs. 55%, p=1). Of transferred patients, those transferred by aircraft (n=11) had no difference in infection rate (22.4 vs. 31.8 per 1000 ECMO days, p= 0.39) or MDRO incidence (52% vs 75%, p=0.61) compared to those only transferred by ambulance (n=65). Multivariate analysis showed the greatest risk factor for nosocomial infection was time on ECMO (OR 12.2 for longest tertile time on ECMO vs. shortest tertile, p=0.0001); transport was not significantly associated with infection (OR 2.1, p=0.06). Nosocomial infection rate by site of ECMO cannulation Conclusion This study did not find a significant difference in nosocomial infection rate or recovery of MDROs between transported and non-transported patients on ECMO, regardless of transport modality. This study suggests that transportation is not the primary driver of nosocomial infections in this cohort. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Assessment of the Value of Repeated Point-Prevalence Surveys for Analyzing the Trend in Nosocomial Infections

2005 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 369-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Catherine Sartor ◽  
Anne Delchambre ◽  
Laurence Pascal ◽  
Michel Drancourt ◽  
Philippe De Micco ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Downward Trend ◽  
Case Mix ◽  
Infection Rates ◽  
Indwelling Catheters ◽  
Nosocomial Infection Rate ◽  
Significant Downward Trend

AbstractObjective:To assess the value of repeated point-prevalence surveys in measuring the trend in nosocomial infections after adjustment for case mix.Setting:A 3,500-bed teaching facility composed of 4 acute care hospitals.Methods:From May 1992 to June 1996, eight point-prevalence surveys of nosocomial infections were performed in the hospitals using a sampling process. The trend of adjusted nosocomial infection rates was studied for the four surveys that collected data on indwelling catheters. Adjusted rates were calculated using a logistic regression model and a direct standardization method.Results:From 1992 to 1996, a total of 20,238 patients were included in the 8 point-prevalence surveys. The nosocomial infection rate decreased from 8.6% in 1992 to 5% in 1996 (P< .001). The analysis of adjusted nosocomial infection rates included 9,600 patients. Four independent risk factors were identified; length of stay greater than 12 days, hospitalization in an intensive care unit, presence of an indwelling urinary catheter, and history of a surgical procedure. After adjustment for case mix, the nosocomial infection rate still showed a downward trend (from 7.2% in 1993 to 5.1% in 1996;P= .02).Conclusion:Adjusted prevalence rates of nosocomial infections showed a significant downward trend during the period of this study.

scholarly journals The Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Nosocomial Infection Rate: A Case of Iran

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Maryam Jabarpour ◽  
Mahlagha Dehghan ◽  
Giti Afsharipour ◽  
Elham Hajipour Abaee ◽  
Parvin Mangolian Shahrbabaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Total Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Nosocomial Infection Rate ◽  
Global Pandemic ◽  
Surgical Units ◽  
The Impact

Background. Coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a new type of coronavirus that has caused a global pandemic. The disease is highly contagious, and all people are susceptible to the disease. Therefore, extensive measures were taken to prevent the spread of the disease at the community and hospitals. This study aimed to investigate the impact of COVID-19 outbreak on nosocomial infection rate. Methods. This cross-sectional study was conducted in an educational hospital, southeast Iran. The nosocomial infection rates of critical/intensive care units (CCU/ICUs) and medical-surgical units were assessed during and before the COVID-19 outbreak. Results. There was a 19.75-point decrease in the total rate of nosocomial infection during the COVID-19 outbreak ( P  = 0.02). In addition, there was a 39.12-point decrease in the total rate of CCU/ICUs’ nosocomial infection during the COVID-19 outbreak ( P  < 0.001). A 19.23-point decrease was also observed in the total rate of medical-surgical units’ nosocomial infection during the COVID-19 outbreak ( P  = 0.13). All kinds of CCU/ICUs’ nosocomial infections had between 31.22- and 100-point decreases during the COVID-19 outbreak. Among medical-surgical units, 33.33- and 30.70-point decreases were observed only in UTI and SSI, respectively, during the COVID-19 outbreak, while BSI had a 40-point increase during the COVID-19 outbreak. Conclusions. Proper implementation of infection control protocols during the COVID-19 pandemic seems to reduce nosocomial infections.

Risk assessment and standardized nosocomial infection rate in critically ill children

2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 2069-2075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nalini Singh-Naz ◽  
Bruce M. Sprague ◽  
Kantilal M. Patel ◽  
Murray M. Pollack
Keyword(s):  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Critically Ill Children ◽  
Nosocomial Infection Rate

Evaluation of a New Method of Detection of Nosocomial Infection in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: The Infection Control Sentinel Sheet System

1989 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. 515-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
E.L. Ford-Jones ◽  
C.M. Mindorff ◽  
E. Pollock ◽  
R. Milner ◽  
D. Bohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Full Time

AbstractTo improve the efficiency of nosocomial infection detection, a highly structured system combining initial reporting by the bedside night nurse of symptoms possibly related to infection with follow-up by the infection control nurse (ICN) was developed: The Infection Control Sentinel Sheet System (ICSSS).Between July 1, 1987 and February 28, 1988, a prospective comparison of results obtained through ICSSS and daily bedside observation/chart review by a full-time trained intensivist was undertaken in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Ratios of nosocomial infections and nosocomially-infected patients were 15.8 and 7.0 respectively among 685 admissions; included are seven infections identified only through the ICSSS so that the “gold standard” became an amalgamation of the two systems. The sensitivity for detection of nosocomially-infected patients by bedside observation/chart review and ICSSS was 100% and 87% respectively. The sensitivity for detection of standard infections (blood, wound and urine) was 88% and 85% respectively. The sensitivity for detection of nosocomial infections at all sites was 94% and 72% respectively. Missed infections were minor (e.g., drain, skin, eye), required physician diagnosis (e.g., pneumonia), were not requested on the sentinel sheet (SS) (e.g., otitis media), related to follow-up of deceased patients or were minor misclassifications or failures to associate with device (e.g., central-line related). Daily PICU surveillance by the ICN required only 20 minutes a day. The ICSSS appears highly promising and has many unmeasured benefits.

Impact of International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium’s multidimensional approach on central line–associated bloodstream infection rates in Bahrain

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 481-489
Author(s):  
Safaa Alkhawaja ◽  
Nermeen Kamal Saeed ◽  
Victor Daniel Rosenthal ◽  
Sana Abdul-Aziz ◽  
Ameena Alsayegh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infection ◽  
Infection Control ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Infection Rate ◽  
Bloodstream Infections ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Multidimensional Approach ◽  
Infection Rates

Background: Central line–associated bloodstream infections are serious life-threatening infections in the intensive care unit setting. Methods: To analyze the impact of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) Multidimensional Approach (IMA) and INICC Surveillance Online System (ISOS) on central line–associated bloodstream infection rates in Bahrain from January 2013 to December 2016, we conducted a prospective, before-after surveillance, cohort, observational study in one intensive care unit in Bahrain. During baseline, we performed outcome and process surveillance of central line–associated bloodstream infection on 2320 intensive care unit patients, applying Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s National Healthcare Safety Network definitions. During intervention, we implemented IMA through ISOS, including (1) a bundle of infection prevention interventions, (2) education, (3) outcome surveillance, (4) process surveillance, (5) feedback on central line–associated bloodstream infection rates and consequences, and (6) performance feedback of process surveillance. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to estimate the effect of the intervention on the central line–associated bloodstream infection rate. Results: During baseline, 672 central line days and 7 central line–associated bloodstream infections were recorded, accounting for 10.4 central line–associated bloodstream infections per 1000 central line days. During intervention, 13,020 central line days and 48 central line–associated bloodstream infections were recorded. After the second year, there was a sustained 89% cumulative central line–associated bloodstream infection rate reduction to 1.2 central line–associated bloodstream infections per 1000 central line days (incidence density rate, 0.11; 95% confidence interval 0.1–0.3; p, 0.001). The average extra length of stay of patients with central line–associated bloodstream infection was 23.3 days, and due to the reduction of central line–associated bloodstream infections, 367 days of hospitalization were saved, amounting to a reduction in hospitalization costs of US$1,100,553. Conclusion: Implementing IMA was associated with a significant reduction in the central line–associated bloodstream infection rate in Bahrain.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document