Nose Picking and Nasal Carriage of Staphylococcus aureus

2006 ◽  
Vol 27 (08) ◽  
pp. 863-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heiman F. L. Wertheim ◽  
Menno van Kleef ◽  
Margreet C. Vos ◽  
Alewijn Ott ◽  
Henri A. Verbrugh ◽  
...  

Objective.Nasal carriage ofStaphylococcus aureusis an important risk factor forS. aureusinfection and a reservoir for methicillin-resistantS. aureus. We investigated whether nose picking was among the determinants ofS. aureusnasal carriage.Setting and Participants.The study cohort comprised 238 patients who visited the ear, nose, and throat (ENT) disease outpatient clinic of a tertiary care hospital and did not have a nose-specific complaint (defined as ENT patients) and 86 healthy hospital employees (including medical students and laboratory personnel).Measurements.All participants completed a questionnaire on behavior regarding the nose and were screened forS. aureusnasal carriage; only ENT patients underwent nasal examination by an ear, nose, and throat physician for clinical signs of nose picking.Results.Among ENT patients, nose pickers were significantly more likely than non–nose pickers to carryS. aureus(37 [53.6%] of 69 vs 60 [35.5%] of 169 patients; relative risk, 1.51 [95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.19]). Among healthy volunteers, there was a statistically significant positive correlation between the self-perceived frequency of nose picking and both the frequency of positive culture results (R= 0.31;P= .004) and the load ofS. aureuspresent in the nose (R= 0.32;P= .003).Conclusion.Nose picking is associated withS. aureusnasal carriage. The role of nose picking in nasal carriage may well be causal in certain cases. Overcoming the habit of nose picking may aidS. aureusdecolonization strategies.

2012 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 224-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara E. Cosgrove ◽  
Polly Ristaino ◽  
Anne Caston-Gaa ◽  
Donna P. Fellerman ◽  
Elaine F. Nowakowski ◽  
...  

Objective.To describe a pseudo-outbreak associated with loose bronchoscope biopsy ports caused by inadequate bronchoscope repair practices by third-party vendors and to alert healthcare personnel to assess bronchoscope repair practices.Design.Outbreak investigation.Setting.A 925-bed tertiary care hospital in Baltimore, Maryland.Patients.Patients who underwent bronchoscopy with certain bronchoscopes after they had been repaired by a third-party vendor.Methods.An epidemiologic investigation was conducted to determine the cause ofPseudomonas putidagrowth in 4 bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) specimens within a 3-day period in May 2008. All bronchoscopes were inspected, and cultures were obtained from bronchoscopes and the environment. Bronchoscope cleaning and maintenance practices were reviewed. Microbiologic results from BAL specimens and medical records were reviewed to find additional cases.Results.All 4 case patients had undergone bronchoscopy with one of 2 bronchoscopes, both of which had loose biopsy ports. Bronchoscope cultures grewP. putida, Pseudomonas aeruginosa,andStenotrophomonas.TheP. putidastrains from the bronchoscopes matched those from the patients. Specimens from 12 additional patients who underwent bronchoscopy with these bronchoscopes grewP. putida, P. aeruginosa,orStenotrophomonas.No patients developed clinical signs or symptoms of infection, but 7 were treated with antibiotics. Investigation revealed that the implicated bronchoscopes had been sent to an external vendor for repair; examination by the manufacturer revealed irregularities in repairs and nonstandard part replacements.Conclusions.Third-party vendors without access to proprietary information may contribute to mechanical malfunction of medical devices, which can lead to contamination and incomplete disinfection.Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol2012;33(3):224-229


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document