The article challenges the first premise of ?speculative realism?, according
to which, with Kant, the contact with the outside world was lost. Instead, it
will be shown that the possibility of realism received its major impulse from
two grand figures of German Idealism, from Kant as a precursor of the
Romantic period and from Hegel as its, albeit critical, philosophical
culmination. Based on three possible relations of knowledge to its outside,
three ontologies will be distinguished, the ontology of immediacy, stretching
from rationalists to the last empiricists, Kant?s ontology of totalization,
and, finally, Hegel?s ?ontology of release? or ?de-totalization?. As opposed
to Descartes?s thing being constantly doubted in its existence, as opposed to
Malebranche?s occasion being invariably induced by God, as opposed to
Leibniz?s monad being an immediate embodiment of an idea, as opposed to
Berkeley?s object vanishing when not perceived, and as opposed to Hume?s
world lacking necessity, Kant philosophically warranted a world that does not
have to be perpetually verified and can, hence, exist devoid of ideas
produced by God and outside the constancy of the human gaze. Kant secured the
normal and necessary existence of the world behind our backs and procured us
with the common-sense normality of the world, but it was only Hegel?s
absolute subjectivism that granted us the first glimpses into the radical
meaninglesness of the facticity. It was not until Hegel?s logic of
indifference of the notion to its immediate content that an egress of the
circle of Kant?s totalization was made possible.
QUENTINAS MEILLASSOUX IR RADIKALI MENO (NE)GALIMYBĖ
