Cracking of selected hydrocarbon gases in a low-power, low-pressure RF plasma

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 015013
Author(s):  
Charles Q Jiao ◽  
Biswa N Ganguly ◽  
Alan Garscadden
2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 030702 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Jandovitz ◽  
C. Swanson ◽  
J. Matteucci ◽  
R. Oliver ◽  
J. Pearcy ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajani K. Vijayaraghavan ◽  
Sean Kelly ◽  
David Coates ◽  
Cezar Gaman ◽  
Niall MacGearailt ◽  
...  

Abstract We demonstrate that a passive non-contact diagnostic technique, radio emission spectroscopy (RES), provides a sensitive monitor of currents in a low pressure radio frequency (RF) plasma. A near field magnetic loop antenna was used to capture RF emissions from the plasma without perturbing it. The analysis was implemented for a capacitively coupled RF plasma with an RF supply at a frequency of 13.56 MHz. Real-time measurements are captured in scenarios relevant to contemporary challenges faced during semiconductor fabrication (e.g. window coating and wall disturbance). Exploration of the technique for key equipment parameters including applied RF power, chamber pressure, RF bias frequencies and chamber wall cleanliness shows sensitive and repeatable function. In particular, the induced RES signal was found to vary sensitively to pressure changes and we were able to detect pressure and power variations as low as ~2.5 %/mtorr and ~3.5 %/watt, respectively, during the plasma processing during a trial generic plasma process. Finally, we explored the ability of RES to monitor the operation of a multiple frequency low-pressure RF plasma system (f1 = 2 MHz, f2 = 162 MHz) and intermixing products which suggests strongly that the plasma sheaths are the primary source of this non-linear diode mixing effect.


2000 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 278-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Riccardi ◽  
R. Barni ◽  
F. de Colle ◽  
M. Fontanesi
Keyword(s):  

2004 ◽  
Vol 30 (8) ◽  
pp. 687-697 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. V. Vavilin ◽  
A. A. Rukhadze ◽  
M. Kh. Ri ◽  
V. Yu. Plaksin
Keyword(s):  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuya Hayashi ◽  
Akari Nakahigashi ◽  
Ryutaro Kawaguchi ◽  
Masaaki Goto ◽  
Akira Kobayashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 542 ◽  
pp. 148684
Author(s):  
Jordi Fraxedas ◽  
Max Schütte ◽  
Guillaume Sauthier ◽  
Massimo Tallarida ◽  
Salvador Ferrer ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Hiroichi Nagumo ◽  
Yasuhiro Sasaki ◽  
Michio Murase ◽  
Yoshitaka Yoshida

The loss of RHR during mid-loop operation in PWR is relatively high risk event. More confident analysis of the event is desirable to develop better counter measures and increase plant safety. The analysis methodology with statistical method using a best estimate analysis code to increase confidence of analysis result is under development. The method employs the RELAP5/MOD3.2 code as a best estimate code and is being developed along the CSAU methodology. One of the most important steps in the CSAU methodology is development of PIRT (Phenomena Identification and Ranking Table) for the event. The PIRT is developed for the loss of RHR event during mid-loop operation with mitigation measure of reflux cooling and gravity injection from RWST and important models of the RELAP5/MOD3.2 related to high ranked phenomena are identified. Verification matrix is also developed for the important models. One of the important models identified is void model. This model affects two phase water level of the reactor vessel and how much water is transported with vapor from reactor vessel. Verification of void model is especially focused on low power and low pressure conditions which are characteristics of the loss of RHR event under mid-loop operation. Prediction error of void model was quantified for both heated rod bundle channel and non-heated channels. Experiment with rod bundle core geometry under low power and low pressure conditions used for verification analysis is the THETIS experiment. The experiment was performed under quasi-steady condition. Two phase level under specified collapsed level was measured with varying power and pressure. Analysis results with pressure 0.5 to 1.0 MPa predict two phase level within 10% error. Void prediction analyses with non-heated channels were conducted against both steam-water experiment and air-water experiment with various pressure and hydraulic diameter. Most of data are predicted within 30% error.


2006 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1846-1852 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Hancock ◽  
R Peverall ◽  
G A D Ritchie ◽  
L J Thornton

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document