scholarly journals Scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging and analysis of magnetic minerals of lake Diatas peatland section DD REP B 693

2020 ◽  
Vol 1481 ◽  
pp. 012025
Author(s):  
Nur Aisyah ◽  
Hamdi Rifai ◽  
Caroline Bouvet De La Maisonneuve ◽  
Jeffrey Oalmann ◽  
Francesca Forni ◽  
...  
1999 ◽  
Vol 5 (S2) ◽  
pp. 518-519
Author(s):  
Dale E. Newbury ◽  
David S. Bright

X-ray mapping is one of the most popular modes for displaying information obtained with x-ray spectrometry performed in the scanning electron microscope. This popularity arises from the ready accessibility and apparent simplicity of information presented in a pictorial fashion, especially when used in conjunction with other SEM imaging modes, such as backscattered, secondary, and specimen current electron images. Further, the rise of powerful, inexpensive computer systems capable of image processing and display has given the analyst a dedicated, on-line tool with the capacity and flexibility needed for problem solving. Figure 1 shows a typical example of mapping. Although the interpretation of x-ray images obtained with a modern digital control and recording system would seem to be straightforward and relatively trivial, there are significant pitfalls and limitations that can easily fool the unwary. In Figure 1, within an individual x-ray map, the observer can reasonably judge where the concentration is lower or higher, at least for a group of contiguous pixels. Can such judgments be made among a set of maps of the same region for different elements, or even for the same element from different regions of the same specimen? With current x-ray processing and display systems, the answers are generally no. In fact, problems that can influence interpretation can arise at each stage of x-ray generation/emission, x-ray spectral collection, processing, and display.


Acarologia ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-114
Author(s):  
Lucia Montes-Ortiz ◽  
Tom Goldschmidt ◽  
Manuel Elías-Gutiérrez

For the first time a parasitic relationship between a water mite larva and a Cladocera is found and documented by scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging. A Unionicolidae larva (cf. Unionicola) has been found attached to a Bosmina tubicen (Cladocera) collected in a karst sinkhole (cenote) in the southeast of the Yucatán Peninsula (México).


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (S2) ◽  
pp. 1800-1801
Author(s):  
Yonghe Li ◽  
Erich Müller ◽  
Christian Sprau ◽  
Alexander Colsmann ◽  
Dagmar Gerthsen

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 063702 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rhiannon Heard ◽  
John E. Huber ◽  
Clive Siviour ◽  
Gary Edwards ◽  
Ed Williamson-Brown ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 22-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Greif ◽  
Daniel Wesner ◽  
Dario Anselmetti ◽  
Jan Regtmeier

When studying highly resolved scanning electron microscope images of cell surfaces, the question arises, whether the observed patterns are real or just artifacts of the cell preparation process. The following steps are usually necessary for preparation: fixation, drying, and metal coating. Each step might introduce different artifacts. Clever techniques have been developed to dry cells as gently as possible, for example critical point drying with different organic solvents and CO2. Instrument manufacturers also have taken account of this issue, for example, through the realization of the environmental scanning electron microscope (ESEM), operating with a low-vacuum environment saturated with water so that samples might stay hydrated. Another approach is the extreme high-resolution scanning electron microscope (XHR SEM), where the electron beam is decelerated shortly before reaching the sample. This technique requires no metal coating of the sample. Cryo-SEM also may be used, where no sample preparation is required beyond freezing in a high-pressure freezer or other cryo-fixation device. Then the cell can be examined in the frozen, hydrated state using a cryostage. However, at least some kind of preparation is necessary for SEM imaging, and we wanted to find out what changes the preparation makes on the cell surface.


Author(s):  
K. Ogura ◽  
A. Ono ◽  
M. M. Kersker

In general, various improvements have been made to SEM vacuum systems, and clean high vacuum specimen chambers are now routinely available. However, in the ultra high resolution scanning electron microscope, the prevention or reduction of contamination on the specimen surface has recently become an important subject when SEM imaging is done at higher than 200,000x magnification using a very fine electron probe. Typically, the specimen carries hydrocarbon gas molecules which are the source of the contamination, into the SEM. They adhere not only to the specimen surface but may also incorporated in the specimen, most typically in biological specimens, and cannot be reduced by the anti-contamination device of the SEM. Recently, a specimen heating holder was used in a JSM-890 ultra high resolution SEM, to reduce the contamination deposition on the specimen surface during SEM imaging. Using this holder, the specimen can be heated up to 300°C inside the SEM. Images 1 to 4 in Fig. 1 are the secondary electron images showing the cone-shaped deposition of contamination on a platinum-coated carbon film at different heating temperatures. This platinum-coated film, which had been kept in wet and oily atmosphere for several weeks to insure it was well covered with hydro carbon gas molecules, was irradiated by an electron probe in a spot mode for 30sec. with 1×10−11 Amp. of probe current at 20kV. After the electron probe irradiation, the platinum-coated carbon film was tilted 45° for imaging. Image 1 in Fig. 1 shows the cone-shaped deposition of contamination when the specimen was not heated. Image 2 was at 35°C, Image 3 was at 55°C, and Image 4 in Fig. 1 was at 115°C. At higher than 120°C specimen heating temperature, the cone-shaped deposition of contamination could not be observed any more. On the other hand, we can heat up the specimen outside the SEM before we put the specimen into the SEM. Image 5 in Fig. 1 shows the results of specimen heating by a hair dryer. The same platinum- coated carbon film was heated by a hair dryer for 1 minute before it was intro- duced into the SEM, and was irradiated by the electron probe for 15, 30, and 45sec. in a spot mode. This 1 min. heating by a hair dryer shows almost same result as 55°C specimen heating in the SEM.


2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 2446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Muri ◽  
Linh Hoang ◽  
Dag Hjelme

The distribution of noble metal nanoparticles (NMNPs) in hydrogels influences their nanoplasmonic response and signals used for biosensor purposes. By controlling the particle distribution in NMNP-nanocomposite hydrogels, it is possible to obtain new nanoplasmonic features with new sensing modalities. Particle positions can be characterized by using volume-imaging methods such as the focused ion beam-scanning electron microscope (FIB-SEM) or the serial block-face scanning electron microscope (SBFSEM) techniques. The pore structures in hydrogels are contained by the water absorbed in the polymer network and may pose challenges for volume-imaging methods based on electron microscope techniques since the sample must be in a vacuum chamber. The structure of the hydrogels can be conserved by choosing appropriate preparation methods, which also depends on the composition of the hydrogel used. In this paper, we have prepared low-weight-percentage hydrogels, with and without gold nanorods (GNRs), for conventional scanning electron microscope (SEM) imaging by using critical point drying (CPD) and hexamethyldisilazane (HMDS) drying. The pore structures and the GNR positions in the hydrogel were characterized. The evaluation of the sample preparation techniques elucidate new aspects concerning the drying of hydrogels for SEM imaging. The results of identifying GNRs positioned in a hydrogel polymer network contribute to the development of mapping metal particle positions with volume imaging methods such as FIB-SEM or SBFSEM for studying nanoplasmonic properties of NMNP-nanocomposite hydrogels.


2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 40-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gan Phay Fang

Specimen preparation techniques for Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) imaging of condoms as reported by Rosenzweig et al revealed a variety of artifacts. The artifacts were classified as ridging, cracking and melting. The purpose of this article is to introduce a simple specimen preparation technique for condoms to be evaluated via SEM without any surface artifacts. This technique involves the use of two chrome washers to sandwich the condom. The sandwiched condom specimen is then subjected to coating before mounting on an aluminium stub. The execution of this technique requires patience and practice so as not to damage the condom. The method may be applied to any similar polymer material.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document