“Dance Dance Revolution” Used by 7- and 8-Year-Olds to Boost Physical Activity: Is Coaching Necessary for Adherence to an Exercise Prescription?

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sadye Paez Errickson ◽  
Ann E. Maloney ◽  
Deborah Thorpe ◽  
Carol Giuliani ◽  
Angela M. Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
Dance Dance Revolution

scholarly journals ABC of prescribing exercise as medicine: a narrative review of the experiences of general practitioners and patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e001050
Author(s):  
Andrew O'Regan ◽  
Michael Pollock ◽  
Saskia D'Sa ◽  
Vikram Niranjan
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
General Practice ◽  
General Practitioners ◽  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
System Support ◽  
Physician Characteristics ◽  
Cochrane Reviews ◽  
Type Of Exercise ◽  
User Friendly

BackgroundExercise prescribing can help patients to overcome physical inactivity, but its use in general practice is limited. The purpose of this narrative review was to investigate contemporaneous experiences of general practitioners and patients with exercise prescribing.MethodPubMed, Scopus, Science Direct and Cochrane reviews were reviewed using the terms ‘exercise prescription’, ‘exercise prescribing’, ‘family practice’, ‘general practice’, ‘adults’ and ‘physical activity prescribing’.ResultsAfter screening by title, abstract and full paper, 23 studies were selected for inclusion. Qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies revealed key experiences of general practitioners and patients. Barriers identified included: physician characteristics, patients’ physical and psychosocial factors, systems and cultural failures, as well as ambiguity around exercise prescribing. We present a synthesis of the key strategies to overcome these using an ABC approach: A: assessment of physical activity: involves asking about physical activity, barriers and risks to undertaking an exercise prescription; B: brief intervention: advice, written prescription detailing frequency, intensity, timing and type of exercise; and C: continued support: providing ongoing monitoring, accountability and progression of the prescription. Multiple supports were identified: user-friendly resources, workshops for doctors, guidelines for specific illnesses and multimorbidity, electronic devices, health system support and collaboration with other healthcare and exercise professionals.DiscussionThis review has identified levers for facilitating exercise prescribing and adherence to it. The findings have been presented in an ABC format as a guide and support for general practitioners to prescribe exercise.

A pilot study of individualized exercise prescription to improve physical activity in cancer survivors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24030-e24030
Author(s):  
Priyanka Avinash Pophali ◽  
Urshila Durani ◽  
John Shin ◽  
Melissa C. Larson ◽  
Adam Shultz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
Exercise Session ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Time Points ◽  
Supervised Exercise

e24030 Background: Physical activity (PA) in cancer survivors improves quality of life (QOL), functioning, fatigue, and reduces the risk of treatment complications, cancer recurrence and death. However, the optimal intervention for increasing PA is not established. Most prospective studies have shown a 6-12-week program to be an effective intervention but this is often not feasible. Therefore, we piloted a one-time individualized exercise prescription in our cardiac rehabilitation center to improve PA in cancer survivors. Methods: We prospectively enrolled cancer survivors who had completed curative intent treatment, with no evidence of active disease in this pilot study. Survivors who consented underwent a consultation with an exercise physiologist for needs assessment followed by a supervised exercise session with a tailored exercise prescription. Survivors also filled out surveys assessing their PA and QOL at baseline (bl), 3, 6 and 12 months after intervention. Clinical information was collected via chart review. We estimated longitudinal PA score and change in PA using mixed models incorporating scores from all available time points using SAS (v 9.4). Results: Between May 2018 and January 2020, 50 participants (26 lymphoma and 24 solid tumor survivors) completed the intervention. 20% participants were on maintenance therapy during the study. Clinical characteristics of 42 evaluable participants are summarized in Table. The survey response rate was 82%, 58%, 58%, 46% at bl, 3, 6 and 12 months respectively. The level of PA improved with time [mean (SE) PA score: 58.5 (4.3) bl, 63.9 (4.8) at 3, 57.6 (4.8) at 6, 62.6 (5.3) at 12 months]. The change in PA from baseline to follow-up time-points [bl vs 3m p=0.41; bl vs 6m p=0.88; bl vs 12m p=0.55] or between the lymphoma and solid tumor survivors was not statistically significant and limited by sample size. No significant trend in QOL was seen. Conclusions: Individualized exercise prescription using the cardiac rehabilitation program may be a feasible, widely applicable tool to implement a PA intervention among cancer survivors. The trend towards improvement in PA in this novel one-time intervention provides intriguing evidence and deserves future study in larger sample sizes to understand if it can improve and create sustainable PA change comparable to longer term exercise interventions.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals Effects of Exercise on Cognitive Performance in Older Adults: A Narrative Review of the Evidence, Possible Biological Mechanisms, and Recommendations for Exercise Prescription

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adria Quigley ◽  
Marilyn MacKay-Lyons ◽  
Gail Eskes
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Cognitive Performance ◽  
Vascular Function ◽  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
Biological Mechanisms ◽  
Cognitive Improvement ◽  
Physical Activity And Exercise

Physical activity and exercise have emerged as potential methods to improve brain health among older adults. However, there are currently no physical activity guidelines aimed at improving cognitive function, and the mechanisms underlying these cognitive benefits are poorly understood. The purpose of this narrative review is to present the current evidence regarding the effects of physical activity and exercise on cognition in older adults without cognitive impairment, identify potential mechanisms underlying these effects, and make recommendations for exercise prescription to enhance cognitive performance. The review begins with a summary of evidence of the effect of chronic physical activity and exercise on cognition. Attention then turns to four main biological mechanisms that appear to underlie exercise-induced cognitive improvement, including the upregulation of growth factors and neuroplasticity, inhibition of inflammatory biomarker production, improved vascular function, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis regulation. The last section provides an overview of exercise parameters known to optimize cognition in older adults, such as exercise type, frequency, intensity, session duration, and exercise program duration.

scholarly journals Physical Activity, Exercise Prescription for Health and Home-Based Rehabilitation

2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (24) ◽  
pp. 10230
Author(s):  
Herbert Loellgen ◽  
Petra Zupet ◽  
Norbert Bachl ◽  
Andre Debruyne
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Sports Medicine ◽  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
European Federation ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Discharged Patients ◽  
Prospective Cohorts ◽  
Positive Results ◽  
Individual Training

The aim of this overview was to recommend individual training plans using exercise prescriptions for adults and older adults during home-based rehabilitation. Over the last decade, many regular physical activity studies with large prospective cohorts have been conducted. Taken together, more than a million subjects have been included in these exercise studies. The risk of morbidity and mortality has been reduced by 30% to 40% as a result of exercise. These risk reductions hold true for many diseases, as well as for prevention and rehabilitation. Physical activity has also been in the treatment of many diseases, such as cardiopulmonary, metabolic or neurologic/psychiatric diseases, all with positive results. Based on these results, the prescription of exercise was developed and is now known as the exercise prescription for health in many European countries. Details have been published by the European Federation of Sports Medicine Associations (EFSMA). The exercise prescription is strongly recommended for inpatients, discharged patients and outpatients who have recovered from severe diseases. Rehabilitation improves general health, physical fitness, quality of life and may increase longevity of life.

scholarly journals A PRESCRIPTION FOR WELLNESS: EXERCISE REFERRALS FOR PATIENTS AT A FEDERALLY QUALIFIED HEALTH CENTER

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S519-S519
Author(s):  
Gabriel Benavidez ◽  
Kelly Ylitalo
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Chronic Disease ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Exercise Prescription ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Coaching ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Federally Qualified Health Center ◽  
Personalized Health

Abstract Physical activity improves quality of life and prevents or delays chronic disease, but most adults in the United States are inactive. Consultation and planning with a health care provider, specifically with an exercise “prescription,” may increase physical activity, but utilization patterns and success of such programs are not well understood. This study assessed the initial 6 months of an exercise prescription program at a large, federally-qualified health center during 2018 whereby adult patients were referred via prescription to personalized health coaching by a fitness advisor. A census of all adults (n=512) who received an exercise prescription was combined with attendance data from the on-site exercise facility to classify patients as never attended, 1 to 3 visits, and ≥4 visits. Ordinal logistic regression was used to examine patient characteristics from the electronic health record that influenced exercise facility attendance. Only 30.2% of adults (mean age 44.7 years (SD 14.4)) completed ≥1 visit and 21.7% completed ≥4 visits. We identified no significant utilization differences by sex, race/ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, hypertension, or coronary artery disease, but adults aged ≥60 years had almost twice the odds of ≥4 visits (OR=1.97; 95% CI: 1.18, 3.33; p=0.01) compared to younger patients. Many adult patients did not participate in the exercise prescription program, but older adults were more likely to participate. Exercise prescription programs with personalized health coaching may be useful for older adult patients receiving care at a federally-qualified health center. Future work will examine if or how exercise prescriptions impact chronic disease self-management.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document