scholarly journals Outcomes Research on Telemedicine-Delivered Gender-Affirming Health Care for Transgender Youth Is Needed Now: A Call to Action

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Kathryn Stewart ◽  
Mary Kathryn Allison ◽  
Myca S. Grant Hunthrop ◽  
Sarah Alexandra Marshall ◽  
Carol E. Cornell
The Lancet ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 377 (9767) ◽  
pp. 760-768 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Srinath Reddy ◽  
Vikram Patel ◽  
Prabhat Jha ◽  
Vinod K Paul ◽  
AK Shiva Kumar ◽  
...  

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-114
Author(s):  
Jerry Avorn

The article from the Vermont-Oxford Neonatal Network1 in this issue of Pediatrics comparing two surfactant preparations represents an important case study of a central issue in contemporary medicine: the need for rigorous, even-handed evaluation of competing therapies. Even at a time in which patients and payers are expecting ever-higher standards for clinical outcomes, and policymakers and insurers are demanding more and more stringent cost containment, the American health care system lacks a coherent mechanism for assembling and analyzing the data needed to meet these goals. For pharmacologic therapies, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prefers that mew agents be tested against placebos whenever possible, unless this would result in harm to experimental subjects.


2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 262-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Goldberg ◽  
Neal Rosenburg ◽  
Jean Watson

Although health care institutions continue to address the importance of diversity initiatives, the standard(s) for treatment remain historically and institutionally grounded in a sociocultural privileging of heterosexuality. As a result, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) communities in health care remain largely invisible. This marked invisibility serves as a call to action, a renaissance of thinking within redefined boundaries and limitations. We must therefore refocus our habits of attention on the wholeness of persons and the diversity of their storied experiences as embodied through contemporary society. By rethinking current understandings of LGBTQ+ identities through innovative representation(s) of the media, music industry, and pop culture within a caring science philosophy, nurses have a transformative opportunity to render LGBTQ+ visible and in turn render a transformative opportunity for themselves.


2016 ◽  
Vol 215 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shari E. Gelber ◽  
Amos Grünebaum ◽  
Frank A. Chervenak

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 01-02
Author(s):  
Virginia E. Koenig

Health literacy is the ability to access, understand, evaluate, and communicate information that promotes, maintains, and improves health care in a variety of settings across the lifespan. Unlike general literacy, health literacy is considered a more dynamic and context-reliant ability because it is comprised of reading comprehension, reasoning, and numeracy skills.


2021 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-93
Author(s):  
Mary Jo Kreitzer

The Covid-19 pandemic is having a significant impact on the well-being of nurses and has exacerbated long-standing issues of stress and burnout. Expecting or hoping that nurses will recover quickly or bounce back from the stress and deep trauma of the pandemic is not realistic. Each nurse has a story, and while these stories may have similar themes, they are all different. It is important to reflect on our stories, identify the myriad of emotions we are experiencing, and find ways to work through our feelings. Ignoring, denying, or suppressing feelings does not serve us well in the long run. Stifling negative emotions does not make them go away. A Call to Action is needed to address the impact of the pandemic, clinician burnout, and systemic racism on health-care organizations and educational institutions. Strategies are identified that will support personal and organizational well-being.


Author(s):  
David Cork ◽  
Emilie Kottenmeier ◽  
Sarah Mollenkopf ◽  
Candace Gunnarsson ◽  
Patrick Verta ◽  
...  

Background: Mitral Regurgitation (MR) is associated with significant health care costs. This study aims to quantify the financial healthcare burden of Medicare Advantage (MA) patients across all MR patients from the Medical Outcomes Research for Effectiveness and Economics (MORE2) Registry. Methods: MA patients with a minimum of 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims for MR from 2008-2014 were reviewed. The index date was defined as a first inpatient claim or second outpatient claim. A 6-month pre-period (baseline) and 6-month post (washout) after index was used to define baseline etiology and severity. Three MR cohorts were defined: (1) Functional MR (FMR) was defined by the presence of heart failure during washout; (2) Degenerative MR (DMR) was defined by presence of chordal rupture or the absence of both heart failure and ischemia; and (3) Uncharacterized MR (UMR) was defined by patients otherwise not meeting the criteria for FMR or DMR. sMR was defined by a history of MR surgery, a diagnosis of atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension, chordal rupture (DMR only), or record of two or more echocardiograms (per clinical guidelines) during washout. Demographics, comorbidities, healthcare utilization, and all-cause expenditures were summarized. Results: Of the 164,682 MA patients with MR who met inclusion criteria, 70,452 (43%) had FMR, 51,399 (31%) had DMR, and 42,831 (26%) had UMR. Average age (SD) was similar across cohorts: 74 (7.95), 72 (8.46), and 74 (7.45) years for FMR, DMR, and UMR, respectively. Proportion of severe patients and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) indicates that the FMR cohort was “sicker” as compared to the others: FMR (41,325 [59% of 70,452]; CCI 4.56), DMR (16,169 [32% of 51,399]; CCI 1.67), and UMR (16,131 [38% of 42,831]; CCI 2.80). 2,079 patients (1.26% of total 164,682) received mitral valve surgery at index or washout with the highest occurrence in FMR patients (1,663), followed by UMR (327) and DMR (89). When comparing across the MR cohorts, the FMR cohort had higher rates of hospital admission, but length of stay was similar between cohorts (FMR [19.9%, 4-days], DMR [9.4%, 4-days], and UMR [13.6%, 3-days]). FMR had the highest annual all-cause healthcare costs (SD) ($22,569, [$59,876]), followed by UMR ($14,735 [$32,070]) and DMR ($10,485 [$23,934]). Conclusions: MR in the Medicare Advantage population is associated with a substantial health care burden, with FMR patients having the highest cost and utilization patterns. This population should, therefore, have access to innovative treatment options that relieve symptoms and reduce economic burden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document