scholarly journals Regulation of Initiation of S Phase, Replication Checkpoint Signaling, and Maintenance of Mitotic Chromosome Structures during S Phase by Hsk1 Kinase in the Fission Yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1257-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadayuki Takeda ◽  
Keiko Ogino ◽  
Kazuo Tatebayashi ◽  
Hideo Ikeda ◽  
Ken-ichi Arai ◽  
...  

Hsk1, Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cdc7-related kinase in Shizosaccharomyces pombe, is required for G1/S transition and its kinase activity is controlled by the regulatory subunit Dfp1/Him1. Analyses of a newly isolated temperature-sensitive mutant, hsk1-89, reveal that Hsk1 plays crucial roles in DNA replication checkpoint signaling and maintenance of proper chromatin structures during mitotic S phase through regulating the functions of Rad3 (ATM)-Cds1 and Rad21 (cohesin), respectively, in addition to expected essential roles for initiation of mitotic DNA replication through phosphorylating Cdc19 (Mcm2). Checkpoint defect inhsk1-89 is indicated by accumulation ofcut cells at 30°C. hsk1-89 displays synthetic lethality in combination with rad3 deletion, indicating that survival of hsk1-89 depends on Rad3-dependent checkpoint pathway. Cds1 kinase activation, which normally occurs in response to early S phase arrest by nucleotide deprivation, is largely impaired in hsk1-89. Furthermore, Cds1-dependent hyperphosphorylation of Dfp1 in response to hydroxyurea arrest is eliminated in hsk1-89, suggesting that sufficient activation of Hsk1-Dfp1 kinase is required for S phase entry and replication checkpoint signaling.hsk1-89 displays apparent defect in mitosis at 37°C leading to accumulation of cells with near 2C DNA content and with aberrant nuclear structures. These phenotypes are similar to those ofrad21-K1 and are significantly enhanced in ahsk1-89 rad21-K1 double mutant. Consistent with essential roles of Rad21 as a component for the cohesin complex, sister chromatid cohesion is partially impaired in hsk1-89, suggesting a possibility that infrequent origin firing of the mutant may affect the cohesin functions during S phase.

1999 ◽  
Vol 112 (6) ◽  
pp. 927-937 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.W. Wang ◽  
C. Norbury ◽  
A.L. Harris ◽  
T. Toda

The replication checkpoint (or ‘S-M checkpoint’) control prevents progression into mitosis when DNA replication is incomplete. Caffeine has been known for some time to have the capacity to override the S-M checkpoint in animal cells. We show here that caffeine also disrupts the S-M checkpoint in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe. By contrast, no comparable effects of caffeine on the S. pombe DNA damage checkpoint were seen. S. pombe cells arrested in early S phase and then exposed to caffeine lost viability rapidly as they attempted to enter mitosis, which was accompanied by tyrosine dephosphorylation of Cdc2. Despite this, the caffeine-induced loss of viability was not blocked in a temperature-sensitive cdc2 mutant incubated at the restrictive temperature, although catastrophic mitosis was prevented under these conditions. This suggests that, in addition to S-M checkpoint control, a caffeine-sensitive function may be important for maintenance of cell viability during S phase arrest. The lethality of a combination of caffeine with the DNA replication inhibitor hydroxyurea was suppressed by overexpression of Cds1 or Chk1, protein kinases previously implicated in S-M checkpoint control and recovery from S phase arrest. In addition, the same combination of drugs was specifically tolerated in cells overexpressing either of two novel S. pombe genes isolated in a cDNA library screen. These findings should allow further molecular investigation of the regulation of S phase arrest, and may provide a useful system with which to identify novel drugs that specifically abrogate the checkpoint control.


2000 ◽  
Vol 113 (23) ◽  
pp. 4341-4350 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Borgne ◽  
P. Nurse

Spd1p (for S phase delayed) is a cell cycle inhibitor in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Spd1p overexpression blocks the onset of both S phase and mitosis. In this study, we have investigated the mechanisms by which Spd1p overexpression blocks cell cycle progression, focussing on the block over mitotic onset. High levels of Spd1p lead to an increase in Y15 phosphorylation of Cdc2p and we show that the block over G(2) requires the Wee1p kinase and is dependent on the rad and chk1/cds1 checkpoint genes. We propose that high levels of Spd1p in G(2) cells activate the DNA replication checkpoint control, which leads to a Wee1p-dependent increase of Cdc2p Y15 phosphorylation blocking onset of mitosis. The Spd1p block at S phase onset may act by interfering directly with DNA replication, and also activates the G(2)rad/hus checkpoint pathway to block mitosis.


Genes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diletta Ciardo ◽  
Arach Goldar ◽  
Kathrin Marheineke

DNA replication in eukaryotes is achieved by the activation of multiple replication origins which needs to be precisely coordinated in space and time. This spatio-temporal replication program is regulated by many factors to maintain genome stability, which is frequently threatened through stresses of exogenous or endogenous origin. Intra-S phase checkpoints monitor the integrity of DNA synthesis and are activated when replication forks are stalled. Their activation leads to the stabilization of forks, to the delay of the replication program by the inhibition of late firing origins, and the delay of G2/M phase entry. In some cell cycles during early development these mechanisms are less efficient in order to allow rapid cell divisions. In this article, we will review our current knowledge of how the intra-S phase checkpoint regulates the replication program in budding yeast and metazoan models, including early embryos with rapid S phases. We sum up current models on how the checkpoint can inhibit origin firing in some genomic regions, but allow dormant origin activation in other regions. Finally, we discuss how numerical and theoretical models can be used to connect the multiple different actors into a global process and to extract general rules.


Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (1) ◽  
pp. 17-33
Author(s):  
Matthew D Jacobson ◽  
Claudia X Muñoz ◽  
Kirstin S Knox ◽  
Beth E Williams ◽  
Lenette L Lu ◽  
...  

Abstract SIC1 encodes a nonessential B-type cyclin/CDK inhibitor that functions at the G1/S transition and the exit from mitosis. To understand more completely the regulation of these transitions, mutations causing synthetic lethality with sic1Δ were isolated. In this screen, we identified a novel gene, SID2, which encodes an essential protein that appears to be required for DNA replication or repair. sid2-1 sic1Δ strains and sid2-21 temperature-sensitive strains arrest preanaphase as large-budded cells with a single nucleus, a short spindle, and an ~2C DNA content. RAD9, which is necessary for the DNA damage checkpoint, is required for the preanaphase arrest of sid2-1 sic1Δ cells. Analysis of chromosomes in mutant sid2-21 cells by field inversion gel electrophoresis suggests the presence of replication forks and bubbles at the arrest. Deleting the two S phase cyclins, CLB5 and CLB6, substantially suppresses the sid2-1 sic1Δ inviability, while stabilizing Clb5 protein exacerbates the defects of sid2-1 sic1Δ cells. In synchronized sid2-1 mutant strains, the onset of replication appears normal, but completion of DNA synthesis is delayed. sid2-1 mutants are sensitive to hydroxyurea indicating that sid2-1 cells may suffer DNA damage that, when combined with additional insult, leads to a decrease in viability. Consistent with this hypothesis, sid2-1 rad9 cells are dead or very slow growing even when SIC1 is expressed.


2005 ◽  
Vol 168 (7) ◽  
pp. 999-1012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeff Bachant ◽  
Shannon R. Jessen ◽  
Sarah E. Kavanaugh ◽  
Candida S. Fielding

The budding yeast S phase checkpoint responds to hydroxyurea-induced nucleotide depletion by preventing replication fork collapse and the segregation of unreplicated chromosomes. Although the block to chromosome segregation has been thought to occur by inhibiting anaphase, we show checkpoint-defective rad53 mutants undergo cycles of spindle extension and collapse after hydroxyurea treatment that are distinct from anaphase cells. Furthermore, chromatid cohesion, whose dissolution triggers anaphase, is dispensable for S phase checkpoint arrest. Kinetochore–spindle attachments are required to prevent spindle extension during replication blocks, and chromosomes with two centromeres or an origin of replication juxtaposed to a centromere rescue the rad53 checkpoint defect. These observations suggest that checkpoint signaling is required to generate an inward force involved in maintaining preanaphase spindle integrity during DNA replication distress. We propose that by promoting replication fork integrity under these conditions Rad53 ensures centromere duplication. Replicating chromosomes can then bi-orient in a cohesin-independent manner to restrain untimely spindle extension.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe de La Roche Saint-André ◽  
Vincent Géli

AbstractDNA replication is a highly regulated process that occurs in the context of chromatin structure and is sensitive to several histone post-translational modifications. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone methylase Set1 is responsible for the transcription-dependent deposition of H3K4 methylation (H3K4me) throughout the genome. Here we show that a combination of a hypomorphic replication mutation (orc5-1) with the absence of Set1 (set1Δ) compromises the progression through S phase, and this is associated with a large increase in DNA damage. The ensuing DNA damage checkpoint activation, in addition to that of the spindle assembly checkpoint, restricts the growth of orc5-1 set1Δ. Interestingly, orc5-1 set1Δ is sensitive to the lack of RNase H activity while a reduction of histone levels is able to counterbalance the loss of Set1. We propose that the recently described Set1-dependent mitigation of transcription-replication conflicts becomes critical for growth when the replication forks accelerate due to decreased origin firing in the orc5-1 background. Furthermore, we show that an increase of reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, likely a consequence of the elevated DNA damage, is partly responsible for the lethality in orc5-1 set1Δ.Author summaryDNA replication, that ensures the duplication of the genetic material, starts at discrete sites, termed origins, before proceeding at replication forks whose progression is carefully controlled in order to avoid conflicts with the transcription of genes. In eukaryotes, DNA replication occurs in the context of chromatin, a structure in which DNA is wrapped around proteins, called histones, that are subjected to various chemical modifications. Among them, the methylation of the lysine 4 of histone H3 (H3K4) is carried out by Set1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, specifically at transcribed genes. We report that, when the replication fork accelerates in response to a reduction of active origins, the absence of Set1 leads to accumulation of DNA damage. Because H3K4 methylation was recently shown to slow down replication at transcribed genes, we propose that the Set1-dependent becomes crucial to limit the occurrence of conflicts between replication and transcription caused by replication fork acceleration. In agreement with this model, stabilization of transcription-dependent structures or reduction histone levels, to limit replication fork velocity, respectively exacerbates or moderates the effect of Set1 loss. Last, but not least, we show that the oxidative stress associated to DNA damage is partly responsible for cell lethality.


Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (4) ◽  
pp. 1051-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Hayashi

DNA replication in G2 does not normally occur due to the checkpoint control. To elucidate its mechanism, the functions of the escargot and Dmcdc2 genes of Drosophila were studied. When escargot function was eliminated, diploid imaginal cells that were arrested in G2 lost Cyclin A, a regulatory subunit of G2/M cdk, and entered an endocycle. escargot genetically interacted with Dmcdc2 which encodes a catalytic subunit of G2/M cdk. The mutant phenotypes of Dmcdc2 itself was similar to those of escargot: many diploid cells in imaginal discs, salivary glands and the central nervous system entered an endocycle and sometimes formed polytene chromosomes. Since mitotically quiescent abdominal histoblasts still required Dmcdc2 to remain diploid, the inhibitory activity of G2/M cdk on DNA replication appeared to be separable from its activity as the mitosis promoting factor. These results suggest that in G2, escargot is required to maintain a high level of G2/M cdk that actively inhibits the entry into S phase.


1998 ◽  
Vol 111 (20) ◽  
pp. 3101-3108 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Greenwood ◽  
H. Nishitani ◽  
P. Nurse

The DNA replication checkpoint is required to maintain the integrity of the genome, inhibiting mitosis until S phase has been successfully completed. The checkpoint preventing premature mitosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe relies on phosphorylation of the tyrosine-15 residue on cdc2p to prevent its activation and hence mitosis. The cdc18 gene is essential for both generating the DNA replication checkpoint and the initiation of S phase, thus providing a key role for the overall control and coordination of the cell cycle. We show that the C terminus of the protein is capable of both initiating DNA replication and the checkpoint function of cdc18p. The C terminus of cdc18p acts upstream of the DNA replication checkpoint genes rad1, rad3, rad9, rad17, hus1 and cut5 and requires the wee1p/mik1p tyrosine kinases to block mitosis. The N terminus of cdc18p can also block mitosis but does so in the absence of the DNA replication checkpoint genes and the wee1p/mik1p kinases therefore acting downstream of these genes. Because the N terminus of cdc18p associates with cdc2p in vivo, we suggest that by binding the cdc2p/cdc13p mitotic kinase directly, it exerts an effect independently of the normal checkpoint control, probably in an unphysiological manner.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 2687-2687
Author(s):  
Hengyou Weng ◽  
Huilin Huang ◽  
Xi Qin ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Okwang Kwon ◽  
...  

Abstract DNA cytosine methylation is one of the best-characterized epigenetic modifications that play important roles in diverse cellular and pathological processes. The mechanism underlying the dynamic regulation of the level and distribution of 5-methylcytosine (5mC) as well as the biological consequence of DNA methylation deregulation have been interesting research topics in recent years. TET1, first identified as a fusion partner of the histone H3 Lys4 (H3K4) methyltransferase MLL (mixed-lineage leukemia) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), is the founding member of the Ten-Eleven-Translocation (TET) family of DNA hydroxylases which are capable of converting 5mC to 5hmC (5-hydroxymethylcytosine) and lead to gene activation. Our group has previously demonstrated that TET1 plays an oncogenic role in MLL-rearranged leukemia (Huang H, et al. PNAS 2013; 110(29):11994-9). The expression of the TET1 protein and the global level of its enzymatic product, 5hmC, are significantly up-regulated in MLL-rearranged leukemia, whereas the opposite has been reported in other cancers where TET1 functions as a tumor suppressor. Therefore, a global understanding of the targets of TET1 in MLL-rearranged leukemia would greatly help to understand the role of TET1 in this specific type of AML. To this end, we performed proteomics study in parallel with RNA-seq to systematically explore the functional targets of TET1 in a genome-wide and unbiased way. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC)-based proteomic profiling showed that when Tet1 was knocked down in MLL-ENL-estrogen receptor inducible (ERtm) mouse myeloid leukemia cells, a total of 123 proteins were down-regulated whereas 191 were up-regulated with a fold-change cutoff of 1.2 (Fig. 1A and B), representing positively and negatively regulated targets of TET1, respectively. Most of the proteins with altered expression upon Tet1 knock-down showed a corresponding change at the mRNA level as reflected by the RNA-seq data. Interestingly, gene ontology (GO) analysis indicated enrichment on genes associated with DNA replication and cell cycle progression. Among these genes, the minichromosome maintenance complex genes, including MCM2, MCM3, MCM4, MCM5, MCM6, and MCM7, showed significant downregulation when Tet1 expression was depleted. We further conducted chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays and demonstrated that TET1 binds directly to the CpG islands in the promoters of these MCM genes, suggesting that the regulation of the MCM genes by TET1 may occur at the transcriptional level. The six main minichromosome maintenance proteins (MCM2-7) are recruited to DNA replication origins in early G1 phase of the cell cycle and constitute the core of the replicative DNA helicase. We showed that not only the total levels of the MCM2-7 proteins, but also their binding to chromatin (Fig. 1C), were decreased by shRNAs against TET1 in human leukemia cell lines. Examination on cell cycle distribution revealed a significant decrease in the S phase population upon TET1 knockdown (Fig. 1D), which could be phenocopied by silencing of individual MCM genes. Consistently, incorporation of 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine (EdU) into newly synthesized DNA in the S phase can be inhibited by TET1 shRNAs (Fig. 1E), indicating the inhibition on DNA replication by TET1 silencing. Furthermore, DNA combing assays suggest that TET1 knockdown inhibits new origin firing (Fig. 1F) but does not influence replication fork speed. Collectively, our findings reveal a novel role of TET1 on regulating DNA replication in MLL-rearranged leukemia through targeting of MCM genes and highlight the therapeutic implication of targeting the TET1/MCM signaling. Figure 1 Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Figure 1. Role of TET1 in regulate DNA replication by controlling expression of MCM genes Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 926-940 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. A. Frum ◽  
S. Singh ◽  
C. Vaughan ◽  
N. D. Mukhopadhyay ◽  
S. R. Grossman ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document