scholarly journals The Roles of Bud-Site-Selection Proteins during Haploid Invasive Growth in Yeast

2002 ◽  
Vol 13 (9) ◽  
pp. 2990-3004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul J. Cullen ◽  
George F. Sprague
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Growth Response ◽  
Invasive Growth ◽  
Glucose Limitation ◽  
Glucose Depletion ◽  
Distal Pole ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Bud Site ◽  
Site Marker

In haploid strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, glucose depletion causes invasive growth, a foraging response that requires a change in budding pattern from axial to unipolar-distal. To begin to address how glucose influences budding pattern in the haploid cell, we examined the roles of bud-site-selection proteins in invasive growth. We found that proteins required for bipolar budding in diploid cells were required for haploid invasive growth. In particular, the Bud8p protein, which marks and directs bud emergence to the distal pole of diploid cells, was localized to the distal pole of haploid cells. In response to glucose limitation, Bud8p was required for the localization of the incipient bud site marker Bud2p to the distal pole. Three of the four known proteins required for axial budding, Bud3p, Bud4p, and Axl2p, were expressed and localized appropriately in glucose-limiting conditions. However, a fourth axial budding determinant, Axl1p, was absent in filamentous cells, and its abundance was controlled by glucose availability and the protein kinase Snf1p. In thebud8 mutant in glucose-limiting conditions, apical growth and bud site selection were uncoupled processes. Finally, we report that diploid cells starved for glucose also initiate the filamentous growth response.

scholarly journals Interaction between bud-site selection and polarity-establishment machineries in budding yeast

2013 ◽  
Vol 368 (1629) ◽  
pp. 20130006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chi-Fang Wu ◽  
Natasha S. Savage ◽  
Daniel J. Lew
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Site Selection ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Bud Emergence ◽  
Ras Family ◽  
Polarity Establishment ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Bud Site ◽  
Time Lapse Imaging

Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast cells polarize in order to form a single bud in each cell cycle. Distinct patterns of bud-site selection are observed in haploid and diploid cells. Genetic approaches have identified the molecular machinery responsible for positioning the bud site: during bud formation, specific locations are marked with immobile landmark proteins. In the next cell cycle, landmarks act through the Ras-family GTPase Rsr1 to promote local activation of the conserved Rho-family GTPase, Cdc42. Additional Cdc42 accumulates by positive feedback, creating a concentrated patch of GTP-Cdc42, which polarizes the cytoskeleton to promote bud emergence. Using time-lapse imaging and mathematical modelling, we examined the process of bud-site establishment. Imaging reveals unexpected effects of the bud-site-selection system on the dynamics of polarity establishment, raising new questions about how that system may operate. We found that polarity factors sometimes accumulate at more than one site among the landmark-specified locations, and we suggest that competition between clusters of polarity factors determines the final location of the Cdc42 cluster. Modelling indicated that temporally constant landmark-localized Rsr1 would weaken or block competition, yielding more than one polarity site. Instead, we suggest that polarity factors recruit Rsr1, effectively sequestering it from other locations and thereby terminating landmark activity.

scholarly journals Interactions among Rax1p, Rax2p, Bud8p, and Bud9p in Marking Cortical Sites for Bipolar Bud-site Selection in Yeast

2004 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 5145-5157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pil Jung Kang ◽  
Elizabeth Angerman ◽  
Kenichi Nakashima ◽  
John R. Pringle ◽  
Hay-Oak Park
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Type I ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Division Site ◽  
Distal Pole ◽  
Mother And Daughter ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Bud Site

In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, selection of the bud site determines the axis of polarized cell growth and eventual oriented cell division. Bud sites are selected in specific patterns depending on cell type. These patterns appear to depend on distinct types of marker proteins in the cell cortex; in particular, the bipolar budding of diploid cells depends on persistent landmarks at the birth-scar-distal and -proximal poles that involve the proteins Bud8p and Bud9p, respectively. Rax1p and Rax2p also appear to function specifically in bipolar budding, and we report here a further characterization of these proteins and of their interactions with Bud8p and Bud9p. Rax1p and Rax2p both appear to be integral membrane proteins. Although commonly used programs predict different topologies for Rax2p, glycosylation studies indicate that it has a type I orientation, with its long N-terminal domain in the extracytoplasmic space. Analysis of rax1 and rax2 mutant budding patterns indicates that both proteins are involved in selecting bud sites at both the distal and proximal poles of daughter cells as well as near previously used division sites on mother cells. Consistent with this, GFP-tagged Rax1p and Rax2p were both observed at the distal pole as well as at the division site on both mother and daughter cells; localization to the division sites was persistent through multiple cell cycles. Localization of Rax1p and Rax2p was interdependent, and biochemical studies showed that these proteins could be copurified from yeast. Bud8p and Bud9p could also be copurified with Rax1p, and localization studies provided further evidence of interactions. Localization of Rax1p and Rax2p to the bud tip and distal pole depended on Bud8p, and normal localization of Bud8p was partially dependent on Rax1p and Rax2p. Although localization of Rax1p and Rax2p to the division site did not appear to depend on Bud9p, normal localization of Bud9p appeared largely or entirely dependent on Rax1p and Rax2p. Taken together, the results indicate that Rax1p and Rax2p interact closely with each other and with Bud8p and Bud9p in the establishment and/or maintenance of the cortical landmarks for bipolar budding.

scholarly journals SEC3 Mutations Are Synthetically Lethal With Profilin Mutations and Cause Defects in Diploid-Specific Bud-Site Selection

Genetics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 144 (2) ◽  
pp. 495-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
B K Haarer ◽  
A Corbett ◽  
Y Kweon ◽  
A S Petzold ◽  
P Silver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Secretory Pathway ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Synthetic Lethal ◽  
Abnormal Growth ◽  
Colony Color ◽  
Synthetically Lethal ◽  
Homozygous Diploid ◽  
Bud Site ◽  
Wild Type Yeast

Abstract Replacement of the wild-type yeast profilin gene (PFY1) with a mutated form (pfy1-111) that has codon 72 changed to encode glutamate rather than arginine results in defects similar to, but less severe than, those that result from complete deletion of the profilin gene. We have used a colony color-sectoring assay to identify mutations that cause pfy1-111, but not wild-type, cells to be inviable. These profilin synthetic lethal (psl) mutations result in various degrees of abnormal growth, morphology, and temperature sensitivity in PFY1 cells. We have examined psl1 strains in the most detail. Interestingly, these strains display a diploid-specific defect in bud-site selection; haploid strains bud normally, while homozygous diploid strains show a dramatic increase in random budding. We discovered that PSL1 is the late secretory gene, SEC3, and have found that mutations in several other late secretory genes are also synthetically lethal with pfy1-111. Our results are likely to reflect an interdependence between the actin cytoskeleton and secretory processes in directing cell polarity and growth. Moreover, they indicate that the secretory pathway is especially crucial for maintaining budding polarity in diploids.

scholarly journals A Role for the Actin Cytoskeleton of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in Bipolar Bud-Site Selection

1997 ◽  
Vol 136 (1) ◽  
pp. 111-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Yang ◽  
Kathryn R. Ayscough ◽  
David G. Drubin
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Actin Cytoskeleton ◽  
Site Selection ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Spatial Cues ◽  
Genes Encoding ◽  
Mother And Daughter ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Bud Site

Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells select bud sites according to one of two predetermined patterns. MATa and MATα cells bud in an axial pattern, and MATa/α cells bud in a bipolar pattern. These budding patterns are thought to depend on the placement of spatial cues at specific sites in the cell cortex. Because cytoskeletal elements play a role in organizing the cytoplasm and establishing distinct plasma membrane domains, they are well suited for positioning bud-site selection cues. Indeed, the septin-containing neck filaments are crucial for establishing the axial budding pattern characteristic of MATa and MATα cells. In this study, we determined the budding patterns of cells carrying mutations in the actin gene or in genes encoding actin-associated proteins: MATa/α cells were defective in the bipolar budding pattern, but MATa and MATα cells still exhibit a normal axial budding pattern. We also observed that MATa/α actin cytoskeleton mutant daughter cells correctly position their first bud at the distal pole of the cell, but mother cells position their buds randomly. The actin cytoskeleton therefore functions in generation of the bipolar budding pattern and is required specifically for proper selection of bud sites in mother MATa/α cells. These observations and the results of double mutant studies support the conclusion that different rules govern bud-site selection in mother and daughter MATa/α cells. A defective bipolar budding pattern did not preclude an sla2-6 mutant from undergoing pseudohyphal growth, highlighting the central role of daughter cell bud-site selection cues in the formation of pseudohyphae. Finally, by examining the budding patterns of mad2-1 mitotic checkpoint mutants treated with benomyl to depolymerize their microtubules, we confirmed and extended previous evidence indicating that microtubules do not function in axial or bipolar bud-site selection.

scholarly journals Glucose depletion causes haploid invasive growth in yeast

2000 ◽  
Vol 97 (25) ◽  
pp. 13619-13624 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. J. Cullen ◽  
G. F. Sprague
Keyword(s):  
Invasive Growth ◽  
Glucose Depletion

scholarly journals Interaction of SNF1 Protein Kinase with Its Activating Kinase Sak1

2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 313-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Liu ◽  
Xinjing Xu ◽  
Marian Carlson
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Catalytic Subunit ◽  
Glucose Limitation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Snf1 Kinase ◽  
Phosphorylation State ◽  
Glucose Depletion ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Amp Activated Protein Kinase

ABSTRACT The Saccharomyces cerevisiae SNF1 protein kinase, a member of the SNF1/AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) family, is activated by three kinases, Sak1, Tos3, and Elm1, which phosphorylate the Snf1 catalytic subunit on Thr-210 in response to glucose limitation and other stresses. Sak1 is the primary Snf1-activating kinase and is associated with Snf1 in a complex. Here we examine the interaction of Sak1 with SNF1. We report that Sak1 coimmunopurifies with the Snf1 catalytic subunit from extracts of both glucose-replete and glucose-limited cultures and that interaction occurs independently of the phosphorylation state of Snf1 Thr-210, Snf1 catalytic activity, and other SNF1 subunits. Sak1 interacts with the Snf1 kinase domain, and nonconserved sequences C terminal to the Sak1 kinase domain mediate interaction with Snf1 and augment the phosphorylation and activation of Snf1. The Sak1 C terminus is modified in response to glucose depletion, dependent on SNF1 activity. Replacement of the C terminus of Elm1 (or Tos3) with that of Sak1 enhanced the ability of the Elm1 kinase domain to interact with and phosphorylate Snf1. These findings indicate that the C terminus of Sak1 confers its function as the primary Snf1-activating kinase and suggest that the physical association of Sak1 with SNF1 facilitates responses to environmental change.

scholarly journals Different Domains of the Essential GTPase Cdc42p Required for Growth and Development of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 235-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans-Ulrich Mösch ◽  
Tim Köhler ◽  
Gerhard H. Braus
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Nitrogen Starvation ◽  
Effector Proteins ◽  
Single Amino Acid ◽  
Invasive Growth ◽  
Cell Morphogenesis ◽  
Mutant Proteins ◽  
Diploid Cells ◽  
Regulatory Functions

ABSTRACT In budding yeast, the Rho-type GTPase Cdc42p is essential for cell division and regulates pseudohyphal development and invasive growth. Here, we isolated novel Cdc42p mutant proteins with single-amino-acid substitutions that are sufficient to uncouple functions of Cdc42p essential for cell division from regulatory functions required for pseudohyphal development and invasive growth. In haploid cells, Cdc42p is able to regulate invasive growth dependent on and independent of FLO11 gene expression. In diploid cells, Cdc42p regulates pseudohyphal development by controlling pseudohyphal cell (PH cell) morphogenesis and invasive growth. Several of the Cdc42p mutants isolated here block PH cell morphogenesis in response to nitrogen starvation without affecting morphology or polarity of yeast form cells in nutrient-rich conditions, indicating that these proteins are impaired for certain signaling functions. Interaction studies between development-specific Cdc42p mutants and known effector proteins indicate that in addition to the p21-activated (PAK)-like protein kinase Ste20p, the Cdc42p/Rac-interactive-binding domain containing Gic1p and Gic2p proteins and the PAK-like protein kinase Skm1p might be further effectors of Cdc42p that regulate pseudohyphal and invasive growth.

scholarly journals A Cdc24p-Far1p-Gβγ Protein Complex Required for Yeast Orientation during Mating

1999 ◽  
Vol 144 (6) ◽  
pp. 1187-1202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aljoscha Nern ◽  
Robert A. Arkowitz
Keyword(s):  
Site Selection ◽  
Morphological Changes ◽  
External Signal ◽  
Polarized Growth ◽  
The Third ◽  
Pairwise Interactions ◽  
Complex Functions ◽  
A Site ◽  
Bud Site ◽  
Two Hybrid

Oriented cell growth requires the specification of a site for polarized growth and subsequent orientation of the cytoskeleton towards this site. During mating, haploid Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells orient their growth in response to a pheromone gradient overriding an internal landmark for polarized growth, the bud site. This response requires Cdc24p, Far1p, and a heterotrimeric G-protein. Here we show that a two- hybrid interaction between Cdc24p and Gβ requires Far1p but not pheromone-dependent MAP-kinase signaling, indicating Far1p has a role in regulating the association of Cdc24p and Gβ. Binding experiments demonstrate that Cdc24p, Far1p, and Gβ form a complex in which pairwise interactions can occur in the absence of the third protein. Cdc24p localizes to sites of polarized growth suggesting that this complex is localized. In the absence of CDC24-FAR1-mediated chemotropism, a bud site selection protein, Bud1p/Rsr1p, is essential for morphological changes in response to pheromone. These results suggest that formation of a Cdc24p-Far1p-Gβγ complex functions as a landmark for orientation of the cytoskeleton during growth towards an external signal.

scholarly journals Bud8p and Bud9p, Proteins That May Mark the Sites for Bipolar Budding in Yeast

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (8) ◽  
pp. 2497-2518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi A. Harkins ◽  
Nicolas Pagé ◽  
Laura R. Schenkman ◽  
Claudio De Virgilio ◽  
Sidney Shaw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Double Mutant ◽  
Previous Analysis ◽  
Integral Membrane Proteins ◽  
Cell Cortex ◽  
Daughter Cells ◽  
Distal Pole ◽  
Bud Position ◽  
Bud Site ◽  
Hydrophilic Domain

The bipolar budding pattern of a /α Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells appears to depend on persistent spatial markers in the cell cortex at the two poles of the cell. Previous analysis of mutants with specific defects in bipolar budding identifiedBUD8 and BUD9 as potentially encoding components of the markers at the poles distal and proximal to the birth scar, respectively. Further genetic analysis reported here supports this hypothesis. Mutants deleted for BUD8 orBUD9 grow normally but bud exclusively from the proximal and distal poles, respectively, and the double-mutant phenotype suggests that the bipolar budding pathway has been totally disabled. Moreover, overexpression of these genes can cause either an increased bias for budding at the distal (BUD8) or proximal (BUD9) pole or a randomization of bud position, depending on the level of expression. The structures and localizations of Bud8p and Bud9p are also consistent with their postulated roles as cortical markers. Both proteins appear to be integral membrane proteins of the plasma membrane, and they have very similar overall structures, with long N-terminal domains that are both N- andO-glycosylated followed by a pair of putative transmembrane domains surrounding a short hydrophilic domain that is presumably cytoplasmic. The putative transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains of the two proteins are very similar in sequence. When Bud8p and Bud9p were localized by immunofluorescence and tagging with GFP, each protein was found predominantly in the expected location, with Bud8p at presumptive bud sites, bud tips, and the distal poles of daughter cells and Bud9p at the necks of large-budded cells and the proximal poles of daughter cells. Bud8p localized approximately normally in several mutants in which daughter cells are competent to form their first buds at the distal pole, but it was not detected in abni1 mutant, in which such distal-pole budding is lost. Surprisingly, Bud8p localization to the presumptive bud site and bud tip also depends on actin but is independent of the septins.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document