scholarly journals Regulation of Kinetochore Recruitment of Two Essential Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Proteins by Mps1 Phosphorylation

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quanbin Xu ◽  
Songcheng Zhu ◽  
Wei Wang ◽  
Xiaojuan Zhang ◽  
William Old ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Kinase ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Signaling Cascade ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Anaphase Onset

Mps1 is a protein kinase that plays essential roles in spindle checkpoint signaling. Unattached kinetochores or lack of tension triggers recruitment of several key spindle checkpoint proteins to the kinetochore, which delays anaphase onset until proper attachment or tension is reestablished. Mps1 acts upstream in the spindle checkpoint signaling cascade, and kinetochore targeting of Mps1 is required for subsequent recruitment of Mad1 and Mad2 to the kinetochore. The mechanisms that govern recruitment of Mps1 or other checkpoint proteins to the kinetochore upon spindle checkpoint activation are incompletely understood. Here, we demonstrate that phosphorylation of Mps1 at T12 and S15 is required for Mps1 recruitment to the kinetochore. Mps1 kinetochore recruitment requires its kinase activity and autophosphorylation at T12 and S15. Mutation of T12 and S15 severely impairs its kinetochore association and markedly reduces recruitment of Mad2 to the kinetochore. Our studies underscore the importance of Mps1 autophosphorylation in kinetochore targeting and spindle checkpoint signaling.

scholarly journals The ESCRT protein Chmp4c regulates mitotic spindle checkpoint signaling

2018 ◽  
Vol 217 (3) ◽  
pp. 861-876 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eleni Petsalaki ◽  
Maria Dandoulaki ◽  
George Zachos
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Metaphase Plate ◽  
Membrane Remodeling ◽  
Mitotic Progression ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Endosomal Sorting ◽  
Anaphase Onset

The mitotic spindle checkpoint delays anaphase onset in the presence of unattached kinetochores, and efficient checkpoint signaling requires kinetochore localization of the Rod–ZW10–Zwilch (RZZ) complex. In the present study, we show that human Chmp4c, a protein involved in membrane remodeling, localizes to kinetochores in prometaphase but is reduced in chromosomes aligned at the metaphase plate. Chmp4c promotes stable kinetochore–microtubule attachments and is required for proper mitotic progression, faithful chromosome alignment, and segregation. Depletion of Chmp4c diminishes localization of RZZ and Mad1-Mad2 checkpoint proteins to prometaphase kinetochores and impairs mitotic arrest when microtubules are depolymerized by nocodazole. Furthermore, Chmp4c binds to ZW10 through a small C-terminal region, and constitutive Chmp4c kinetochore targeting causes a ZW10-dependent checkpoint metaphase arrest. In addition, Chmp4c spindle functions do not require endosomal sorting complex required for transport–dependent membrane remodeling. These results show that Chmp4c regulates the mitotic spindle checkpoint by promoting localization of the RZZ complex to unattached kinetochores.

scholarly journals Bub3p Facilitates Spindle Checkpoint Silencing in Fission Yeast

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (24) ◽  
pp. 5096-5105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vincent Vanoosthuyse ◽  
John C. Meadows ◽  
Sjaak J.A. van der Sar ◽  
Jonathan B.A. Millar ◽  
Kevin G. Hardwick
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Aurora Kinase ◽  
Yeast Cells ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Checkpoint Recovery

Although critical for spindle checkpoint signaling, the role kinetochores play in anaphase promoting complex (APC) inhibition remains unclear. Here we show that spindle checkpoint proteins are severely depleted from unattached kinetochores in fission yeast cells lacking Bub3p. Surprisingly, a robust mitotic arrest is maintained in the majority of bub3Δ cells, yet they die, suggesting that Bub3p is essential for successful checkpoint recovery. During recovery, two defects are observed: (1) cells mis-segregate chromosomes and (2) anaphase onset is significantly delayed. We show that Bub3p is required to activate the APC upon inhibition of Aurora kinase activity in checkpoint-arrested cells, suggesting that Bub3p is required for efficient checkpoint silencing downstream of Aurora kinase. Together, these results suggest that spindle checkpoint signals can be amplified in the nucleoplasm, yet kinetochore localization of spindle checkpoint components is required for proper recovery from a spindle checkpoint-dependent arrest.

scholarly journals Systematic Analysis in Caenorhabditis elegans Reveals that the Spindle Checkpoint Is Composed of Two Largely Independent Branches

2009 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 1252-1267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Essex ◽  
Alexander Dammermann ◽  
Lindsay Lewellyn ◽  
Karen Oegema ◽  
Arshad Desai
Keyword(s):  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Systematic Analysis ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Epistasis Analysis ◽  
Kinetochore Assembly ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Monopolar Spindle ◽  
Spindle Microtubules

Kinetochores use the spindle checkpoint to delay anaphase onset until all chromosomes have formed bipolar attachments to spindle microtubules. Here, we use controlled monopolar spindle formation to systematically define the requirements for spindle checkpoint signaling in the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo. The results, when interpreted in light of kinetochore assembly epistasis analysis, indicate that checkpoint activation is coordinately directed by the NDC-80 complex, the Rod/Zwilch/Zw10 complex, and BUB-1—three components independently targeted to the outer kinetochore by the scaffold protein KNL-1. These components orchestrate the integration of a core Mad1MDF-1/Mad2MDF-2-based signal, with a largely independent Mad3SAN-1/BUB-3 pathway. Evidence for independence comes from the fact that subtly elevating Mad2MDF-2 levels bypasses the requirement for BUB-3 and Mad3SAN-1 in kinetochore-dependent checkpoint activation. Mad3SAN-1 does not accumulate at unattached kinetochores and BUB-3 kinetochore localization is independent of Mad2MDF-2. We discuss the rationale for a bipartite checkpoint mechanism in which a core Mad1MDF-1/Mad2MDF-2 signal generated at kinetochores is integrated with a separate cytoplasmic Mad3SAN-1/BUB-3–based pathway.

scholarly journals Two Complexes of Spindle Checkpoint Proteins Containing Cdc20 and Mad2 Assemble during Mitosis Independently of the Kinetochore in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 867-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atasi Poddar ◽  
P. Todd Stukenberg ◽  
Daniel J. Burke
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
In Cells

ABSTRACT Favored models of spindle checkpoint signaling propose that two inhibitory complexes (Mad2-Cdc20 and Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20) must be assembled at kinetochores in order to inhibit mitosis. We have directly tested this model in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The proteins Mad2, Mad3, Bub3, Cdc20, and Cdc27 in yeast were quantified, and there are sufficient amounts to form stoichiometric inhibitors of Cdc20 and the anaphase-promoting complex. Mad2 is present in two separate complexes in cells arrested in mitosis with nocodazole. There is a small amount of Mad2-Mad3-Bub3-Cdc20 and a much larger amount of a complex that contains Mad2-Cdc20. We use conditional mutants to show that both Mad2 and Mad3 are essential for establishment and maintenance of the spindle checkpoint. Both spindle checkpoint complexes containing Mad2 form in mitosis, not in response to checkpoint activation. The kinetochore is not required to form either complex. We propose that the conversion of Mad1-Mad2 to Cdc20-Mad2, a key step in generating inhibitory checkpoint complexes, is limited to mitosis by the availability of Cdc20 and is kinetochore independent.

scholarly journals Reovirus-Induced Alterations in Gene Expression Related to Cell Cycle Regulation

2002 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 2585-2594 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Poggioli ◽  
Roberta L. DeBiasi ◽  
Ryan Bickel ◽  
Robert Jotte ◽  
Aaron Spalding ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Differential Expression ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cdc2 Kinase ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Reovirus Infection ◽  
Serotype 1

ABSTRACT Mammalian reovirus infection results in perturbation of host cell cycle progression. Since reovirus infection is known to activate cellular transcription factors, we investigated alterations in cell cycle-related gene expression following HEK293 cell infection by using the Affymetrix U95A microarray. Serotype 3 reovirus infection results in differential expression of 10 genes classified as encoding proteins that function at the G1-to-S transition, 11 genes classified as encoding proteins that function at G2-to-M transition, and 4 genes classified as encoding proteins that function at the mitotic spindle checkpoint. Serotype 1 reovirus infection results in differential expression of four genes classified as encoding proteins that function at the G1-to-S transition and three genes classified as encoding proteins that function at G2-to-M transition but does not alter any genes classified as encoding proteins that function at the mitotic spindle checkpoint. We have previously shown that serotype 3, but not serotype 1, reovirus infection induces a G2-to-M transition arrest resulting from an inhibition of cdc2 kinase activity. Of the differentially expressed genes encoding proteins regulating the G2-to-M transition, chk1, wee1, and GADD45 are known to inhibit cdc2 kinase activity. A hypothetical model describing serotype 3 reovirus-induced inhibition of cdc2 kinase is presented, and reovirus-induced perturbations of the G1-to-S, G2-to-M, and mitotic spindle checkpoints are discussed.

scholarly journals Microtubule-dependent Changes in Assembly of Microtubule Motor Proteins and Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint Proteins at PtK1 Kinetochores

2001 ◽  
Vol 12 (7) ◽  
pp. 1995-2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
David B. Hoffman ◽  
Chad G. Pearson ◽  
Tim J. Yen ◽  
Bonnie J. Howell ◽  
E.D. Salmon
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Motor Proteins ◽  
Inner Core ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Cytoplasmic Dynein ◽  
Microtubule Depolymerization ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Proteins ◽  
Outer Domain

The ability of kinetochores to recruit microtubules, generate force, and activate the mitotic spindle checkpoint may all depend on microtubule- and/or tension-dependent changes in kinetochore assembly. With the use of quantitative digital imaging and immunofluorescence microscopy of PtK1 tissue cells, we find that the outer domain of the kinetochore, but not the CREST-stained inner core, exhibits three microtubule-dependent assembly states, not directly dependent on tension. First, prometaphase kinetochores with few or no kinetochore microtubules have abundant punctate or oblate fluorescence morphology when stained for outer domain motor proteins CENP-E and cytoplasmic dynein and checkpoint proteins BubR1 and Mad2. Second, microtubule depolymerization induces expansion of the kinetochore outer domain into crescent and ring morphologies around the centromere. This expansion may enhance recruitment of kinetochore microtubules, and occurs with more than a 20- to 100-fold increase in dynein and relatively little change in CENP-E, BubR1, and Mad2 in comparison to prometaphase kinetochores. Crescents disappear and dynein decreases substantially upon microtubule reassembly. Third, when kinetochores acquire their full metaphase complement of kinetochore microtubules, levels of CENP-E, dynein, and BubR1 decrease by three- to sixfold in comparison to unattached prometaphase kinetochores, but remain detectable. In contrast, Mad2 decreases by 100-fold and becomes undetectable, consistent with Mad2 being a key factor for the “wait-anaphase” signal produced by unattached kinetochores. Like previously found for Mad2, the average amounts of CENP-E, dynein, or BubR1 at metaphase kinetochores did not change with the loss of tension induced by taxol stabilization of microtubules.

scholarly journals A sequential multi-target Mps1 phosphorylation cascade promotes spindle checkpoint signaling

eLife ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhejian Ji ◽  
Haishan Gao ◽  
Luying Jia ◽  
Bing Li ◽  
Hongtao Yu
Keyword(s):  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Microtubule Attachment ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Phosphorylation Cascade ◽  
Mitotic Checkpoint Complex

The master spindle checkpoint kinase Mps1 senses kinetochore-microtubule attachment and promotes checkpoint signaling to ensure accurate chromosome segregation. The kinetochore scaffold Knl1, when phosphorylated by Mps1, recruits checkpoint complexes Bub1–Bub3 and BubR1–Bub3 to unattached kinetochores. Active checkpoint signaling ultimately enhances the assembly of the mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC) consisting of BubR1–Bub3, Mad2, and Cdc20, which inhibits the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome bound to Cdc20 (APC/CCdc20) to delay anaphase onset. Using in vitro reconstitution, we show that Mps1 promotes APC/C inhibition by MCC components through phosphorylating Bub1 and Mad1. Phosphorylated Bub1 binds to Mad1–Mad2. Phosphorylated Mad1 directly interacts with Cdc20. Mutations of Mps1 phosphorylation sites in Bub1 or Mad1 abrogate the spindle checkpoint in human cells. Therefore, Mps1 promotes checkpoint activation through sequentially phosphorylating Knl1, Bub1, and Mad1. This sequential multi-target phosphorylation cascade makes the checkpoint highly responsive to Mps1 and to kinetochore-microtubule attachment.

scholarly journals Merotelic Kinetochore Orientation Is a Major Mechanism of Aneuploidy in Mitotic Mammalian Tissue Cells

2001 ◽  
Vol 153 (3) ◽  
pp. 517-528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniela Cimini ◽  
Bonnie Howell ◽  
Paul Maddox ◽  
Alexey Khodjakov ◽  
Francesca Degrassi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
Confocal Immunofluorescence Microscopy ◽  
Anaphase Onset ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Lagging Chromosome ◽  
Single Chromatid

In mitotic cells, an error in chromosome segregation occurs when a chromosome is left near the spindle equator after anaphase onset (lagging chromosome). In PtK1 cells, we found 1.16% of untreated anaphase cells exhibiting lagging chromosomes at the spindle equator, and this percentage was enhanced to 17.55% after a mitotic block with 2 μM nocodazole. A lagging chromosome seen during anaphase in control or nocodazole-treated cells was found by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy to be a single chromatid with its kinetochore attached to kinetochore microtubule bundles extending toward opposite poles. This merotelic orientation was verified by electron microscopy. The single kinetochores of lagging chromosomes in anaphase were stretched laterally (1.2–5.6-fold) in the directions of their kinetochore microtubules, indicating that they were not able to achieve anaphase poleward movement because of pulling forces toward opposite poles. They also had inactivated mitotic spindle checkpoint activities since they did not label with either Mad2 or 3F3/2 antibodies. Thus, for mammalian cultured cells, kinetochore merotelic orientation is a major mechanism of aneuploidy not detected by the mitotic spindle checkpoint. The expanded and curved crescent morphology exhibited by kinetochores during nocodazole treatment may promote the high incidence of kinetochore merotelic orientation that occurs after nocodazole washout.

Modulation of Eg5 activity contributes to mitotic spindle checkpoint activation and Tat-mediated apoptosis in CD4-positive T-lymphocytes

2014 ◽  
Vol 233 (2) ◽  
pp. 138-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Min Liu ◽  
Dengwen Li ◽  
Lei Sun ◽  
Jie Chen ◽  
Xiaodong Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Mitotic Spindle Checkpoint

scholarly journals Ubc1 turnover contributes to the spindle assembly checkpoint in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather E Arsenault ◽  
Julie M Ghizzoni ◽  
Cassandra M Leech ◽  
Anne R Diers ◽  
Stephane Gesta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Spindle Assembly Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Spindle Assembly ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Checkpoint Activation ◽  
Checkpoint Signaling ◽  
Cycle Arrest ◽  
Microtubule Poisons

Abstract The spindle assembly checkpoint protects the integrity of the genome by ensuring that chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindle before they are segregated during anaphase. Activation of the spindle checkpoint results in inhibition of the Anaphase Promoting Complex (APC), an E3 ubiquitin ligase that triggers the metaphase-anaphase transition. Here we show that levels of Ubc1, an E2 enzyme that functions in complex with the APC, modulate the response to spindle checkpoint activation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Overexpression of Ubc1 increased resistance to microtubule poisons, whereas Ubc1 shut-off sensitized cells. We also found that Ubc1 levels are regulated by the spindle checkpoint. Checkpoint activation or direct APC inhibition led to a decrease in Ubc1 levels, charging and half-life. Additionally, stabilization of Ubc1 prevented its downregulation by the spindle checkpoint and increased resistance to checkpoint-activating drugs. These results suggest that downregulation of Ubc1 in response to spindle checkpoint signaling is necessary for a robust cell cycle arrest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document