Evidence-Based Duplicate Order Alerts Promote Effective Test Utilization and Reduce Unnecessary Laboratory Testing

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S149
Author(s):  
Jared Coberly ◽  
Emily Coberly ◽  
Katie Dettenwanger ◽  
Brandi Ross ◽  
Robert Pierce
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Complete Blood Count ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Thyroid Stimulating Hormone ◽  
Blood Product Transfusion ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Introduction Unnecessary and inappropriate laboratory testing contributes to increased health care costs, increases length of stay, and increases odds for blood product transfusion. The Choosing Wisely campaign recommends a judicious use of laboratory blood testing to combat iatrogenic anemia. Reducing the number of duplicate test orders may help address these issues. We evaluated duplicate order alert thresholds in our electronic health record for 10 common laboratory tests at an academic medical center. Methods In January 2019, alert intervals for 10 common inpatient laboratory tests (thyroid stimulating hormone, complete blood count, hemoglobin A1c, troponin, lactic acid, hemoglobin and hematocrit, urinalysis, vitamin D, urine beta HCG, and triglycerides) were adjusted to evidence-based, disease-specific thresholds. If a test was ordered within a timeframe shorter than this threshold, an alert interrupted the provider’s workflow. The provider was allowed to override the alert based on clinical judgment. This is a change from the previous settings, which alerted any test if ordered more frequently than 8 hours. Postintervention duplicate order alerts were compared to baseline rates and adjusted for number of inpatient discharges. Results In total, 914 orders were cancelled in 1 month as a result of tailored duplicate order alerts versus the baseline mean of 710 (95% CI, 633-786) and a predicted 552 (95% CI, 475-628) when adjusted for number of inpatient discharges, with the majority of cancelled orders being for CBC (530 accepted alerts). Overall, this reduction in unnecessary duplicate tests is equivalent to 3,092 mL of blood not collected from patients per month. Conclusion Tailoring duplicate order alert interval thresholds to evidence-based criteria helps reduce unnecessary testing, reduces costs, and may play an important role in reducing hospital-acquired anemia.

scholarly journals Utility and Pitfalls of Stepwise Laboratory Testing for Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia: Retrospective Review from an Academic Medical Center

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2371-2371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joshua Kra ◽  
Helen Horng
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Suspicion ◽  
Functional Assay ◽  
Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Elisa Testing ◽  
4T Score

Introduction: Heparin induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in up to 5% of adults exposed to heparin due to formation of heparin-dependent antibodies to the heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complex. Patients develop thrombocytopenia and are at risk for severe thrombotic complications. Mortality rates can be as high as 20%, but are often much lower with prompt recognition, cessation of heparin, and treatment with alternative anticoagulants. However, these alternative medications are often both labor-intensive drips and expensive, highlighting the need for quick decision making in such challenging cases. The classic workup of HIT involves assessing clinical suspicion (often using the "4T score" on a scale of 0-8), followed by lab testing for detection of the heparin-dependent antibody and then a functional assay to confirm pathogenicity of the antibody. Our institution uses an in-house rapid Particle ImmunoFiltration Assay (PIFA), which is a same-day test and reported as "positive" or "negative." Other testing available includes send-out tests for Enzyme-Linked Immunoassay (ELISA) to IgG, A, and M of the PF4 antibody as well as the C-14 Serotonin Release Assay (SRA) functional assay. The goal of this retrospective review is to analyze the utility of an algorithmic approach to laboratory testing in aiding the rapidity of diagnosis of HIT without missing possible critical cases. Methods: This was a single institutional study at a large urban academic medical center. We reviewed inpatient charts from 2015-2018 of patients who had any lab testing for HIT. As per institutional guidelines, first-line testing is recommended by using the in-house same-day testing PIFA. If positive, a sample is automatically reflexed and sent-out for PF4 ELISA testing and SRA. Furthermore, clinicians are able to directly order ELISA and SRA testing at their medical discretion. Our analysis looked at those patients with at least two different "HIT-related" laboratory tests to best analyze the concordance and discordance rates of the above testing to assess for sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of using a stepwise testing approach. We used a cutoff value of >0.4 optical density (OD) for ELISA testing, and >20% release at low-dose heparin concentration for SRA testing. Results: There were 118 patients who had at least two different HIT-related laboratory tests sent. 91 patients had both PIFA and ELISA testing, with 37/79 (47%) positive concordance rate and 6/12 (50%) negative concordance rate, for a sensitivity of 86% and specificity of 13%. 3 patients with positive PIFA also had positive SRA, and there were 2 patients with negative PIFA with positive SRA testing (see attached Table). When comparing ELISA testing to SRA, 4/41 (10%) had concordant positive testing, while no patient with a negative ELISA test had a positive SRA (28 concordant negative cases). Overall, of 94 SRA tests run, 5 were positive, of which 2/5 had negative PIFA and 0/4 had negative ELISA testing. Conclusions: While PIFA testing had a high sensitivity compared to ELISA, the overall accuracy compared to ELISA was low, while ELISA testing was 100% sensitive in this analysis. Furthermore, there was still a risk of missing cases of HIT using PIFA testing alone. In both cases of positive SRA with a negative PIFA, patients had a high 4T score of >6, consistent with a high clinical suspicion for HIT. We conclude that PIFA testing is not equivalent to ELISA testing, and that use of a laboratory "algorithm only" approach would be inappropriate in the diagnosis of HIT. Our results highlight the importance of using both clinical scoring systems and appropriate lab testing together in the workup and diagnosis of HIT. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery/Foundation Reg-ent Registry: Purpose, Properties, and Priorities

2021 ◽  
pp. 019459982098413
Author(s):  
Cecelia E. Schmalbach ◽  
Jean Brereton ◽  
Cathlin Bowman ◽  
James C. Denneny
Keyword(s):  
American Academy ◽  
Head And Neck ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Quality Care ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Neck Surgery ◽  
Performance Measure ◽  
Head And Neck Surgery ◽  
Evidence Based

Objective (1) To describe the patient and membership cohort captured by the otolaryngology-based specialty-specific Reg-ent registry. (2) To outline the capabilities of the Reg-ent registry, including the process by which members can access evidence-based data to address knowledge gaps identified by the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery/Foundation and ultimately define “quality” for our field of otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. Methods Data analytics was performed on Reg-ent (2015-2020) Results A total of 1629 participants from 239 practices were enrolled in Reg-ent, and 42 health care specialties were represented. Reg-ent encompassed 6,496,477 unique patients and 24,296,713 encounters/visits: the 45- to 64-year age group had the highest representation (n = 1,597,618, 28.1%); 3,867,835 (60.3%) patients identified as Caucasian; and “private” was the most common insurance (33%), followed by Blue Cross/Blue Shield (22%). Allergic rhinitis–unspecified and sensorineural hearing loss–bilateral were the top 2 diagnoses (9% each). Overall, 302 research gaps were identified from 17 clinical practice guidelines. Discussion Reg-ent benefits are vast—from monitoring one’s practice to defining otolaryngology–head and neck surgery quality, participating in advocacy, and conducting research. Reg-ent provides mechanisms for benchmarking, quality assessment, and performance measure development, with the objective of defining and guiding best practice in otolaryngology–head and neck surgery. To be successful, patient diversity must be achieved to include ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Increasing academic medical center membership will assist in achieving diversity so that the quality domain of equitable care is achieved. Implications for Practice Reg-ent provides the first ever registry that is specific to otolaryngology–head and neck surgery and compliant with HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) to collect patient outcomes and define evidence-based quality care.

Physician Survey of a Laboratory Medicine Interpretive Service and Evaluation of the Influence of Interpretations on Laboratory Test Ordering

2004 ◽  
Vol 128 (12) ◽  
pp. 1424-1427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha E. Laposata ◽  
Michael Laposata ◽  
Elizabeth M. Van Cott ◽  
Dion S. Buchner ◽  
Mohammed S. Kashalo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Physician Satisfaction ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
Reference Laboratory ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Coagulation Testing ◽  
Test Ordering

Abstract Context.—Complex coagulation test panels ordered by clinicians are typically reported to clinicians without a patient-specific interpretive paragraph. Objectives.—To survey clinicians regarding pathologist-generated interpretations of complex laboratory testing panels and to assess the ability of the interpretations to educate test orderers. Design.—Surveys were conducted of physicians ordering complex coagulation laboratory testing that included narrative interpretation. Evaluation of order requisitions was performed to assess the interpretation's influence on ordering practices. Setting.—Physicians ordering coagulation testing at a large academic medical center hospital in Boston, Mass, and physicians from outside hospitals using the academic medical center as a reference laboratory for coagulation testing. Outcome Measures.—Physician surveys and evaluation of laboratory requisition slips. Results.—In nearly 80% of responses, the ordering clinicians perceived that the interpretive comments saved them time and improved the diagnostic process. Moreover, the interpretations were perceived by ordering clinicians to help prevent a misdiagnosis or otherwise impact the differential diagnosis in approximately 70% of responses. In addition, interpretations appeared to be able to train the ordering clinicians as to the standard ordering practices. Conclusions.—The results demonstrate physician satisfaction with an innovative information delivery approach that provides laboratory diagnostic interpretation and test-ordering education to clinicians in the context of their daily workflow.

scholarly journals Impact of add-on laboratory testing at an academic medical center: a five year retrospective study

2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Louis S. Nelson ◽  
Scott R. Davis ◽  
Robert M. Humble ◽  
Jeff Kulhavy ◽  
Dean R. Aman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical

scholarly journals 1064. Antimicrobial Stewardship Program at a Large Academic Medical Center, Impact Over 12 Years

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S376-S377
Author(s):  
Susan E Kline ◽  
Kimberly Boeser ◽  
Jeana Houseman ◽  
Samantha Saunders ◽  
Shawnda Johnson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antimicrobial Stewardship ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Downward Trend ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Antimicrobial Stewardship Program ◽  
Stewardship Program ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Abstract Background The University of Minnesota Medical Center (UMMC) is a tertiary care facility, which has had a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) for 12 years. Methods The antimicrobial stewardship team is comprised of a full-time PharmD and ID staff physicians. Recommendations are placed in the electronic medical record as a progress note. Verbal recommendations may also be made. Results There was a downward trend in Hospital-acquired (HA) C. difficile diarrhea from 2007 to 2014 from 1.2 to 0.5/1000 patient-days (pt day). Rates appear stable from 2014 to 2019 with adjustment for change to NHSN lab-based CDI surveillance (Figure 1). From 2009 to 2019 a decrease was seen in VRE hospital-acquired infections (HAI) from 0.53 to 0.21/1,000 patient-days and in MRSA HAIs from 0.2 to 0.14/1,000 patient-days. Newly acquired ESBL HAIs have remained relatively stable from 2009 to 2019 at 0.09 to 0.05/1,000 patient-days. CRE HAIs are low but stable rates at 0.02/1,000 patient-days (Figure 2). We track antimicrobial utilization for internal and national reporting (starting in July 2017). A SAAR for all Antibacterial agents (ICUs, wards, and oncology units) of 1.33 in 2018. Our top four agents average DOT; piperacillin/tazobactam (66.81), cefepime (34.40), oral levofloxacin (23.56) and intravenous meropenem (21.49). We demonstrate lower average DOT for our restricted antimicrobials (206.21) as compared with our nonrestricted antimicrobials (236.74) (Figure 3). Cost savings continued from year to year. After adjusting for inflation annually, our expected costs ($84.08) compared with actual costs ($40.12 ytd 2019), demonstrates effective cost management of antimicrobial agents. (Figure 4) Conclusion We observed a decrease in HAIs VRE and C. difficile infections after 3 years of operation, and MRSA after 5 years. This downward trend has continued. ESBL HAIs remain relatively stable and CRE are stable at low rates but remain emerging HAIs of concern. We are now focusing efforts on limiting unneeded fluoroquinolone and carbapenem use. We continue to analyze our SAAR data and internal DOT data to identify areas of opportunity to improve antimicrobial use. The ASP outcomes have continued to cost justify ongoing efforts. The effects of the program and the Infection Prevention Department appear to be synergistic. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.

scholarly journals Epidemiology of Hospital-Acquired Urinary Tract–Related Bloodstream Infection at a University Hospital

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 1127-1129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Chang ◽  
M. Todd Greene ◽  
Carol E. Chenoweth ◽  
Latoya Kuhn ◽  
Emily Shuman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Urinary Tract ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Case Fatality Rate ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Case Fatality ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Hospital Acquired

Little is known about the epidemiology of nosocomial urinary tract-related bloodstream infection. In a case series from an academic medical center, Enterococcus (28.7%) and Candida (19.6%) species were the predominant microorganisms, which suggests a potential shift from gram-negative microorganisms. A case-fatality rate of 32.8% highlights the severity of this condition.

scholarly journals Estimated SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence in Children and Adolescents in Mississippi, May Through September 2020

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte V. Hobbs ◽  
Jan Drobeniuc ◽  
Theresa Kittle ◽  
John Williams ◽  
Paul Byers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
Department Of Health ◽  
Academic Medical ◽  
Seroprevalence Data ◽  
Race Ethnicity ◽  
Hispanic White

AbstractCase-based tracking of COVID-19 in children and adolescents may underestimate infection, and compared with adults there is little pediatric SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence data. To assess evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infections among children and adolescents in Mississippi, serologic testing for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 was conducted on a convenience sample of residual serum specimens collected for routine laboratory testing by an academic medical center laboratory during May 17 through September 19, 2020. Seroprevalence by calendar month was standardized to the state population by race/ethnicity; cumulative numbers of infections were estimated by extrapolating seroprevalence to all those aged <18 years in Mississippi. Serum specimens from 1,603 individuals were tested; 175 (10.9%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Among 1,579 (98.5%) individuals for whom race/ethnicity was known, the number testing positive was 16 (23.2%) of 69 Hispanic individuals, 117 (13.0%) of 901 non-Hispanic Black individuals and 30 (5.3%) of 565 non-Hispanic White individuals. Population-weighted seroprevalence estimates among those aged <18 years increased from 2.6% in May to 16.9% in September 2020. Cumulative numbers of infections extrapolated from seroprevalence data, however, were estimated at 117,805 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 68,771–168,708), suggesting that cases in children and adolescents are much higher than what was reported to the Mississippi State Department of Health (9,044 cases during this period). Further data to appreciate the burden of pediatric disease to inform public health policy is urgently needed.

scholarly journals International practice variation in perioperative laboratory testing in glioblastoma patients—a retrospective cohort study

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joeky T. Senders ◽  
Sybren L. N. Maas ◽  
Kaspar Draaisma ◽  
John J. McNulty ◽  
Joanna L. Ashby ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laboratory Testing ◽  
Laboratory Tests ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Perioperative Period ◽  
Practice Variation ◽  
Survival Status ◽  
Clinical Consequences ◽  
Abnormal Test Result ◽  
Test Result

Abstract Purpose Although standard-of-care has been defined for the treatment of glioblastoma patients, substantial practice variation exists in the day-to-day clinical management. This study aims to compare the use of laboratory tests in the perioperative care of glioblastoma patients between two tertiary academic centers—Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH), Boston, USA, and University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, the Netherlands. Methods All glioblastoma patients treated according to standard-of-care between 2005 and 2013 were included. We compared the number of blood drawings and laboratory tests performed during the 70-day perioperative period using a Poisson regression model, as well as the estimated laboratory costs per patient. Additionally, we compared the likelihood of an abnormal test result using a generalized linear mixed effects model. Results After correction for age, sex, IDH1 status, postoperative KPS score, length of stay, and survival status, the number of blood drawings and laboratory tests during the perioperative period were 3.7-fold (p < 0.001) and 4.7-fold (p < 0.001) higher, respectively, in BWH compared to UMCU patients. The estimated median laboratory costs per patient were 82 euros in UMCU and 256 euros in BWH. Furthermore, the likelihood of an abnormal test result was lower in BWH (odds ratio [OR] 0.75, p < 0.001), except when the prior test result was abnormal as well (OR 2.09, p < 0.001). Conclusions Our results suggest a substantially lower clinical threshold for ordering laboratory tests in BWH compared to UMCU. Further investigating the clinical consequences of laboratory testing could identify over and underuse, decrease healthcare costs, and reduce unnecessary discomfort that patients are exposed to.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document