scholarly journals 825 Hip Fractures in the Emergency Department: Are we keeping to the Big Six Standard?

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Fraser
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Acute Management ◽  
Serious Injury ◽  
Big Six

Abstract Introduction Hip fractures are the most common serious injury in older people (1) with 7364 patients attending the Emergency Department (ED) with a hip fracture in Scotland in 2019 (2). The “Big Six” are key areas in the acute management of hip fractures as outlined in standard 2 of the Scottish Hip Fracture Audit (SHFA): New Early Warning Score; cognition; Water Low Pressure Score; intravenous (IV) access and bloods; nil-by-mouth and IV fluids; and analgesia. In 2019, Ayr ED had a compliance rate of approximately 37.5% with the “Big Six” (2). Method One month of hip fracture data (n = 20) relating to the “Big Six” was collected from the Symphony software and audited. Areas where improvements could be made were highlighted to staff, and a further one-month data collection (n = 17) was carried out. Results From the first to second round the “Big Six” checklist completion rate increased from 30% to 41% (p = 0.68) and the “Big Six” compliance increased from 60% to 71% (p = 0.5). Conclusions In conclusion, compliance increased by 11% with the “Big Six”, however, not to the defined standards identified in the SHFA. Further long-lasting interventions have now been made to ensure that compliance rates continue to improve along with our standard of care.

scholarly journals Bilateral occult hip fracture

CJEM ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 14 (06) ◽  
pp. 372-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Willis B. Grad ◽  
Nicholas M. Desy
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Plain Radiographs ◽  
Diagnostic Studies ◽  
Acute Injuries ◽  
Occult Hip Fracture ◽  
Occult Hip Fractures

ABSTRACTOne of the most common acute injuries seen in the emergency department is the hip fracture. This injury is usually diagnosed by plain radiographs, however these fractures are sometimes not obviously apparent. Occult hip fractures present a pitfall for emergency department physicians. We present a case of a patient who sustained bilateral occult hip fractures. We review the epidemiology of the condition, examine what diagnostic studies are available that may help the physician avoid missing the occult hip fracture and what the literature tells us about the utility of each of these modalities. The prognosis of the occult hip fracture along with options for treatment is also discussed.

scholarly journals The Benefits of Streamlined Hip Fracture Management in a Regional Hospital

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. C. Mow ◽  
Jen Lukeis ◽  
A. G. Sutherland
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Performance Indicator ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Regional Hospital ◽  
Time To Surgery ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
The Impact

Introduction: Hip fracture is an increasingly common injury in the growing elderly population. The morbidity and mortality associated with this injury can be reduced by minimizing delays to surgical treatment. We describe the impact of a regional hospital service redesign project that utilized the principles of smart simplicity, a management strategy that lays emphasis on collaboration to achieve desired goals. Methods: Prior to the redesign, patients with hip fractures were taking an average of 72 hours for surgical treatment. A hip fracture working group was created to examine closely the process of hip fracture care, and a single key performance indicator (KPI) of “surgery within 48 hours” was adopted. This allowed identification of processes that could be clarified and streamlined, with the agreement of relevant stakeholders, in the creation of a new hip fracture pathway. Results: In the first 3 months of the pathway’s implementation, 16 of 18 patients had surgery within 48 hours of presentation. In a 6-month follow-up audit after 2 years of implementation, 36 of 39 patients were treated within 48 hours. This was significantly different to the time to surgery seen in the 12 months prior to the redesign ( P < .001, Student t test). The mean time to surgery was reduced from 72 hours to 36 hours, a saving in an annual acute bed stay cost of A$152 000. Discussion: Decreased time to the operating room, the cost savings inherent to this, can be achieved with the introduction of the best standard of care. A redesign that mandates collaboration in achieving a single KPI has allowed a significant culture shift in the treatment of hip fractures in our institution in the months following its institution. Conclusion: Collaborative, multidisciplinary collaboration has facilitated a higher standard of care and demonstrated significant cost benefit.

scholarly journals 896 Improving Intravenous Fluid Therapy to Reduce the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Hip Fracture Patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
C McCann ◽  
A Hall ◽  
J M Leow ◽  
A Harris ◽  
N Hafiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Data Collection ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Fluid Therapy ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Ward Staff ◽  
Intravenous Fluid Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) in hip fracture patients is associated with morbidity, mortality, and increased length of stay. To avoid this our unit policy recommends maintenance crystalloid IV fluids of &gt; 62.5mL/Hr for hip fracture patients. Method Three prospective audits, each including 100 consecutive acute hip fracture patients, were completed with interventional measures employed between each cycle. Data collection points included details of IV fluid administration and pre/post-operative presence of AKI. Interventions between cycles included implementation of admission/post-take checklist tools and various educational measures for Emergency Department, nursing and admitting team staff with dissemination of infographic posters, respectively. Results In cycle one and two, many patients received inadequate fluids (46/100 and 56/100 respectively). There was no significant difference in the incidence of AKI between patients receiving adequate or inadequate fluid in either cycle (p &lt; 0.05). In cycle three, more patients received adequate fluids (79/100, p &lt; 0.05). Patients prescribed adequate fluids were less likely to develop post-operative AKI (2/79, 2.5% vs 3/21, 14.3%; p &lt; 0.05). Discussion This audit demonstrates the importance of administering appropriate IV fluid in hip fracture patients to avoid AKI. Improving coordination with Emergency Department and ward nursing/medical ward staff was a critical step in improving our unit’s adherence to policy.

scholarly journals LO12: The utility of femoral nerve blocks in the emergency department; a national survey of practice

CJEM ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (S1) ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
J. Ringaert ◽  
J. Broughton ◽  
M. Pauls ◽  
I. Laxdal ◽  
N. Ashmead
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Femoral Nerve ◽  
Comfort Level ◽  
Emergency Physicians ◽  
First Line ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
The University

Introduction: Approximately 30,000 hip fractures occur annually in Canada, and the incidence will increase with an aging population. Pain control remains a challenge with these patients, as many are elderly and prone to delirium. Regional anesthesia has shown to be very effective with minimal risks, but it is not clear how often emergency physicians are using this technique to provide analgesia for patients with proximal hip fractures. This is the first Canada-wide survey to evaluate the use of regional anaesthesia in the emergency department for hip fractures. It also evaluates physician comfort level with performing these blocks, perceived educational needs in this area, and barriers to performing nerve blocks. Methods: A 13-question survey was sent to 1041 members of the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians via email in January and February of 2016. Data was collected and analysed using an online collection program called “Survey Monkey”. Ethics approval was obtained through the University of Manitoba Research Ethics Board. Results: 272 Emergency physicians and residents took part in the survey. The majority of respondents (75.9%) choose intravenous opioids as their first line of analgesia and only 7.6% use peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) as their first line choice for analgesia in hip fracture. In response to practitioner comfort with PNBs for hip fractures, most were not at all confident (45.0%) in their ability and many respondents have never performed a nerve block for a hip fracture (53.9%). The most commonly identified barriers to performing PNBs include lack of training, the time to perform the procedure and a lack of confidence. A larger percentage of respondents (34.2%), identified having had no training and no knowledge of how to perform PNBs for hip fractures. Conclusion: The vast majority of Canadian emergency physicians who took part in this survey do not utilize PNBs as a method of pain management for hip fractures. Over half have never performed one of these procedures and many have never received training in how to do so. Future efforts should focus on improving access to education, disseminating information regarding the effectiveness of PNB, and addressing logistical barriers in the ED.

scholarly journals 287 Streamlining Patients With Isolated Hip Fractures from the Emergency Department to the Operating Room Utilizing a Novel Hip Fracture Pathway

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. S101-S102
Author(s):  
A. Bastani ◽  
D. Donaldson ◽  
D. Cloutier ◽  
A. Forbes ◽  
A. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Operating Room ◽  
Hip Fractures

scholarly journals 441 Management of Intracapsular Hip Fractures During Unprecedented COVID Times In A DGH

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Zafar ◽  
E Galloway
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Hip Replacement ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
National Statistics ◽  
Fracture Management ◽  
New Guidelines ◽  
Acute Admissions

Abstract Aim NICE published eligibility criteria for Total Hip Replacement (THR) vs Hemiarthroplasty for intracapsular hip fractures. COVID-19 resulted in the BOA publishing emergency guidelines regarding management of patients eligible for THR. If the available surgeon does not routinely perform hip arthroplasty, the patient should undergo a hemiarthroplasty to maximise theatre efficiency and minimise hospital stay. This project will compare Kings Mill Hospitals compliance with these new guidelines. Method Retrospective data was collected over a two-month period (24/03/20 – 22/05/20) from patients with intracapsular hip fractures. Notes and records allowed us to determine suitability for THR using NICE guidelines. National statistics were taken from the National Hip Fracture Database. The standards for this project consist of the NICE guidelines for Hip Fracture management and the BOA standards for Trauma and Orthopaedics - Management of patients with urgent orthopaedic conditions and trauma during the coronavirus pandemic’. Results 51 patients were included in this audit. THR compliance dropped during the peak months of COVID 35% to 21.4%. Length of acute admissions stay decreased from 10 days to 8 days. Compared to the national averages, Kings Mills THR compliance rate was 27.3% vs 18.3%. 54.5% of eligible patients were operated on by THR performing consultants but received Hemiarthroplasty's Conclusions Some patients were eligible for THR according to the BOA guidelines (1) however received Hemiarthroplasty’s. Better identification may increase guideline compliance. Introduction of a new table in the clerking booklet will be implemented and Re-audited to evaluate effectiveness.

HIP FRACTURES IN 5 YEARS AT HUE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

2014 ◽  
pp. 47-50
Author(s):  
Duy Binh Ho ◽  
Nghi Thanh Nhan Le ◽  
Maasalu Katre ◽  
Koks Sulev ◽  
Märtson Aare
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Femoral Fractures ◽  
Femoral Neck Fractures ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Intertrochanteric Fractures ◽  
Significant Difference

Aim: This study aimed to review the clinical findings and surgical intervention of the hip fracture at the Hue University Hospital in Vietnam. Methods:The data of proximal femoral fractures was collected retrospectively. All patients, in a period of 5 years, from Jan 2008 to December 2012, suffered either from intertrochanteric or femoral neck fractures. The numbers of patients were gathered separately for each year, by age groups (under 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, older) and by sex. We analyzed what kind of treatment options were used for the hip fracture. Results:Of 224 patients (93 men and 131 women) studied, 71% patients are over 70 years old, 103 women and 56 men (p<0.05). For patients under 40 years, there were 1 woman and 11 men (p<0.05). There were 88 intertrochanteric and 136 femoral neck fractures. There was no significant difference in the two fractures between men and women. The numbers of hip fracture increased by each year, 29/224 cases in 2010, 63/224 cases in 2011, 76/224 cases in 2012. Treatment of 88 intertrochanteric fractures: 49 cases (55.7%) of dynamic hip screw (DHS), 14 cases of hemiarthroplasty (15.9%), 2 cases of total hip replacement (2.3%). Treatment of 136 femoral neck fractures: 48 cases of total replacement (35.3%), 43 cases of hemiarthroplasty (31.6%), 15 cases of screwing (11%). In cases of 40 patients (17.9%) hip fracture was managed conservatively, 23 were femoral neck fractures and 17 were intertrochanteric fractures. Conclusions: Hip fracture is growing challenge in Hue medical university hospital. The conservative approach is still high in people who could not be operable due to severe medical conditions as well as for patients with economic difficulties. Over 70% of the hip fractures in people 70+ are caused by osteoporosis. The number of hip fracture is increasing in the following years, most likely due to the increase in the prevalence of osteoporosis. Early detection and prevention of osteoporosis should be addressed, particularly in high risk population. More aggressive surgical approach should be implemented in order to improve the quality of life in patients with hip fractures. Key words:Hip fracture.

The effects of information platform-based nursing on preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with hip fractures (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Gao ◽  
Xiaojie Fu ◽  
Mingxing Lei ◽  
Pengbin Yin ◽  
Qingmei Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Nursing Intervention ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Study Group ◽  
Drug Compliance ◽  
Information Platform ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Length Of Hospitalization

BACKGROUND Mobile apps are becoming increasingly relevant to health care. Apps have been used to improve symptoms, quality of life, and adherence for oral drugs in patients with cancers, pregnancy, or chronic diseases, and the results were satisfying . OBJECTIVE This study aims to develop an information platform with the help of a mobile app and then evaluate whether information platform-based nursing can improve patient’s drug compliance and reduce the incidence of VTE in patients with hip fractures. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed hip fracture patients performed with traditional prevention and intervention of VTE (control group) between January 2008 and November 2012, and prospectively analyzed hip fracture patients conducted with nursing intervention based on the information platform (study group) between January 2016 and September 2017. The information platform can be divided into medical and nursing care end and the patient’s end. Based on the information platform, we could implement risk assessments, monitoring management and early warnings, preventions and treatments, health educations, follow-up and other aspects of nursing interventions for patients. We compared basic characteristics, outcomes including drug compliance, VTE occurrence, and mean length of hospitalization between the two groups. Besides, a subgroup analysis was performed in the study group according to different drug compliances. RESULTS Regarding baseline data, patients in the study group had more morbidities than those in the control group (P<0.05). The difference of drug compliance between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.001): 64.7% of the patients in the control group had poor drug compliance and only 6.1% patients had poor drug compliance in the study group. In terms of VTE, 126 patients (10.7%) in the control group had VTE, while only 35 patients (7.1%) in the study group had VTE, and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.024). Moreover, the average length of hospitalization in the study group was also significantly lower than that in the control group (10.4 d vs. 13.7 d, P=0.000). Subgroup analysis of the study group showed that the incidence of VTE in patients with non-compliance, partial compliance, and good compliance was 56.7%, 5.8% and 2.8%, respectively (P=0.000). CONCLUSIONS Poor drug compliance leads to higher VTE occurrence. The information platform-based nursing can effectively improve the compliance of patients with hip fracture and thus significantly reduce the incidence of VTE.

scholarly journals Prior Admissions as a Risk Factor for Readmission in Patients Surgically Treated for Femur Fractures: Implications for a Potential Hip Fracture Bundle

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 215145932199616
Author(s):  
Robert Erlichman ◽  
Nicholas Kolodychuk ◽  
Joseph N. Gabra ◽  
Harshitha Dudipala ◽  
Brook Maxhimer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Fracture Care ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Payment Models

Introduction: Hip fractures are a significant economic burden to our healthcare system. As there have been efforts made to create an alternative payment model for hip fracture care, it will be imperative to risk-stratify reimbursement for these medically comorbid patients. We hypothesized that patients readmitted to the hospital within 90 days would be more likely to have a recent previous hospital admission, prior to their injury. Patients with a recent prior admission could therefore be considered higher risk for readmission and increased cost. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 598 patients who underwent surgical fixation of a hip or femur fracture. Data on readmissions within 90 days of surgical procedure and previous admissions in the year prior to injury resulting in surgical procedure were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine if recent prior admission had increased risk of 90-day readmission. A subgroup analysis of geriatric hip fractures and of readmitted patients were also performed. Results: Having a prior admission within one year was significantly associated (p < 0.0001) for 90-day readmission. Specifically, logistic regression analysis revealed that a prior admission was significantly associated with 90-day readmission with an odds ratio of 7.2 (95% CI: 4.8-10.9). Discussion: This patient population has a high rate of prior hospital admissions, and these prior admissions were predictive of 90-day readmission. Alternative payment models that include penalties for readmissions or fail to apply robust risk stratification may unjustly penalize hospital systems which care for more medically complex patients. Conclusions: Hip fracture patients with a recent prior admission to the hospital are at an increased risk for 90-day readmission. This information should be considered as alternative payment models are developed for hip fracture care.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 infection on hip fracture 30-day mortality

Trauma ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 146040862094972
Author(s):  
Ahmed Fadulelmola ◽  
Rob Gregory ◽  
Gavin Gordon ◽  
Fiona Smith ◽  
Andrew Jennings
Keyword(s):  
Hip Fracture ◽  
Hip Fractures ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Primary Outcome Measure ◽  
Time To Death ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Mean Time

Introduction: A novel virus, SARS-CoV-2, has caused a fatal global pandemic which particularly affects the elderly and those with comorbidities. Hip fractures affect elderly populations, necessitate hospital admissions and place this group at particular risk from COVID-19 infection. This study investigates the effect of COVID-19 infection on 30-day hip fracture mortality. Method: Data related to 75 adult hip fractures admitted to two units during March and April 2020 were reviewed. The mean age was 83.5 years (range 65–98 years), and most (53, 70.7%) were women. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality associated with COVID-19 infection. Results: The COVID-19 infection rate was 26.7% (20 patients), with a significant difference in the 30-day mortality rate in the COVID-19-positive group (10/20, 50%) compared to the COVID-19-negative group (4/55, 7.3%), with mean time to death of 19.8 days (95% confidence interval: 17.0–22.5). The mean time from admission to surgery was 43.1 h and 38.3 h, in COVID-19-positive and COVID-19-negative groups, respectively. All COVID-19-positive patients had shown symptoms of fever and cough, and all 10 cases who died were hypoxic. Seven (35%) cases had radiological lung findings consistent of viral pneumonitis which resulted in mortality (70% of mortality). 30% ( n = 6) contracted the COVID-19 infection in the community, and 70% ( n = 14) developed symptoms after hospital admission. Conclusion: Hip fractures associated with COVID-19 infection have a high 30-day mortality. COVID-19 testing and chest X-ray for patients presenting with hip fractures help in early planning of high-risk surgeries and allow counselling of the patients and family using realistic prognosis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document