scholarly journals 1319 Factors Associated with Mortality in Older Patients Sustaining Pelvic or Acetabular Fractures

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Harrison ◽  
A Ordas Bayon ◽  
M Chimutengwende-Gordon ◽  
M Fortune ◽  
D Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Potential Factors

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to investigate potential factors, including delay to surgical stabilisation, affecting mortality in older patients sustaining pelvic or acetabular (PA) fractures. Method A retrospective review of the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database was performed to identify older patients (aged 65 and over) sustaining PA fractures treated surgically in a UK Major Trauma Centre (MTC) between 2015 and 2019. Chi-squared and Fisher tests were used to compare 1-year mortality rates following operative intervention between patients treated within 72-hours and after 72-hours. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to visualise survival probability; significant predictors of survival were found using Cox proportional hazard models. Results Of 564 older patients with PA fractures, 70 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 76.1 years. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 20%. When patients were grouped by time to surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in 1-year mortality. Patients whose surgery was delayed more than 72-hours were more likely to have longer hospital stays (p = 0.002) or to have suffered from polytrauma (p = 0.025). Age, Charlson Co-morbidities Index and pre-op mobility status were associated with statistically significant differences in overall mortality. Patient gender, mechanism of injury, polytrauma and head injury were not significant predictors of mortality. Conclusions Surgical intervention within 72-hours of injury did not result in decreased mortality in older patients with PA fractures. The 1–year mortality rate between older PA fractures and hip fractures was comparable. Consideration should be given to a combined multidisciplinary approach to managing these patients.

scholarly journals Factors associated with mortality in older patients sustaining pelvic or acetabular fractures

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Harrison ◽  
Alejandro Ordas-Bayon ◽  
Mukai Chimutengwende-Gordon ◽  
Mary Fortune ◽  
Daud Chou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Older Patients ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards Model ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Introduction This study aimed to investigate potential factors, including delay to surgical stabilisation, affecting mortality in older patients sustaining pelvic or acetabular (PA) fractures. Materials and methods A retrospective review of the Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) database was performed to identify older patients (aged 65 and over) sustaining PA fractures treated surgically in a UK Major Trauma Centre (MTC) between 2015 and 2019. Chi-squared and Fisher tests were used to compare 1-year mortality rates following operative intervention between patients treated within 72 h and after 72 h. Kaplan–Meier curves were used to visualise survival probability; significant predictors of survival were found using Cox proportional hazard models. Results Of 564 older patients with PA fractures, 70 met the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 76.1 years. The overall 1-year mortality rate was 20%. When patients were grouped by time to surgery (fracture fixation within or greater than 72 h), there was no statistically significant difference in 1-year mortality. Patients whose surgery was delayed more than 72 h were more likely to have longer hospital stays (p = 0.002) or to have suffered from polytrauma (p = 0.025). Age, Charlson Co-morbidities Index (CCI) and pre-op mobility status were associated with statistically significant differences in overall mortality. The same factors were associated with a significantly increased hazard of death in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Patient gender, mechanism of injury, Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 and head injury were not significant predictors of mortality. Conclusion Surgical intervention within 72 h of injury did not result in decreased mortality in older patients with PA fractures. The 1-year mortality rate between older PA fractures and hip fractures was comparable. Consideration should be given to a combined multidisciplinary approach between orthogeriatric and expert PA surgeons for these patients.

scholarly journals Frequency and severity of general surgical emergencies during the COVID-19 pandemic: single-centre experience from a large metropolitan teaching hospital

2020 ◽  
Vol 102 (6) ◽  
pp. 457-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Patel ◽  
AJ Hainsworth ◽  
K Devlin ◽  
JH Patel ◽  
A Karim
Keyword(s):  
Teaching Hospital ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Emergency General Surgery ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has put significant stress on healthcare systems globally. This study focuses on emergency general surgery services at a major trauma centre and teaching hospital. We aimed to identify whether the number of patients and the severity of their presentation has significantly changed since the implementation of a national lockdown. Materials and methods This study is a retrospective review of acute referrals (from general practice and accident and emergency) to the emergency general surgery team over a 14-day period before (group 1) and during (group 2) lockdown. Results A total of 151 patients were reviewed by the general surgical team in group 1 and 75 in group 2 (a 50.3% reduction). The number of days with symptoms prior to presentation was significantly shorter in group 1 compared with group 2 (3 vs 4, p = 0.04). There was no significant difference in the National Early Warning Score, white blood cell count, lymphocytes and C-reactive protein on admission between the two groups of patients. There were significantly fewer patients admitted after lockdown compared with pre-lockdown (66% vs 48%, p = 0.01). Length of hospital stay was significantly shorter during lockdown compared with pre-lockdown (5 days vs 4 days, p = 0.04). Conclusion Fewer patients were referred and admitted during lockdown compared with pre-lockdown, and the length of stay was also significantly reduced. There was also a delay in presentation to hospital, although these patients were not more unwell based on the scoring criteria used within this study.

scholarly journals Primary repair of duodenal injuries: a retrospective cohort study from a major trauma centre in South Africa

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 280-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. D. Weale ◽  
V. Y. Kong ◽  
W. Bekker ◽  
J. L. Bruce ◽  
G. V. Oosthuizen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Primary Repair ◽  
Significant Risk ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Duodenal Injury ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Retrospective Audit ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duodenal Injuries

Background and Aims:The management of duodenal trauma remains controversial. This retrospective audit of a prospectively maintained database was intended to clarify the operative management of duodenal injury at our institution and to assess the risk factors for leak following primary duodenal repair.Materials and Methods:This was a retrospective study undertaken at the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. Operative techniques used for duodenal repair were recorded. Our primary outcome was duodenal leak in the postoperative period. Patients from January 2012 to December 2016 were included. All duodenal injuries were graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading. Only patients who had a primary repair were included in the final analysis.Results:During the five-year data collection period, a total of 562 patients underwent a trauma laparotomy; of which 94 patients sustained a duodenal injury. A primary pyloric exclusion and gastro-jejunostomy (PEG) was performed in three patients. These three were then excluded from further analysis. Of the 91 primary duodenal repairs, seven (8%) subsequently leaked. These were managed by PEG in three and by secondary repair and para-duodenal drainage in four. The two physiological parameters most associated with subsequent leak were lactate and pH level. There was a significantly higher mortality rate for those who leaked vs those who did not leak. Chi-squared test revealed a significant difference in the leak rate between AAST I (0%), AAST-II (1.6%) and AAST-3 (66.7%) grade injuries (p <0.01).Conclusion:The trend towards primary repair of duodenal injuries appears to be justified. However duodenal leak remains a significant risk in certain high risk patients and strategies to manage injuries in this subset requires further work.

scholarly journals Comparison of Survival Rates of Stainless-Steel Crowns Placed with and without Pulpotomy: A Two-Year Retrospective Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Fatmah N. AlMotawah ◽  
Sharat Chandra Pani ◽  
Tala AlKharashi ◽  
Saleh AlKhalaf ◽  
Mohammed AlKhathlan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stainless Steel ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Survival Outcome ◽  
Survival Outcomes ◽  
Proximal Caries ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Squared

Aim. This study aimed to retrospectively compare the survival outcomes over two years between teeth with proximal dental caries that were restored with stainless-steel crowns to those that were pulpotomized and then restored with a stainless-steel crown in patients who were rehabilitated under general anesthesia. Participants and Methods. The records of 131 patients aged between two to six years who had stainless-steel crowns placed under general anesthesia and had two-year follow-up were screened. 340 teeth with moderate proximal caries on the radiograph (D2) were included in the study. Of these, 164 teeth were treated with a pulpotomy and stainless-steel crown, while 176 teeth were crowned without a pulpotomy. The type of each tooth was compared using the Chi-squared test and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, and curves were plotted based on the two-year outcomes. Results. Treatment: the sample comprised 59 males (mean age 4.73 years, SD ± 1.4 years) and 72 females (mean age 5.2 years, SD ± 2.0 years). The Kaplan–Meier regression model showed no significant difference in survival outcomes between teeth that had been pulpotomized and those that had not ( p  = 0.283). Conclusion. Within the limitations of the current study, we can conclude that performing a pulpotomy does not influence the survival outcome of mild/moderate proximal caries restored with stainless-steel crowns under general anesthesia.

scholarly journals The effect of systematic factors on the outcome of trauma laparotomy at a major trauma centre in South Africa

2017 ◽  
Vol 99 (7) ◽  
pp. 540-544 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Steenkamp ◽  
VY Kong ◽  
DL Clarke ◽  
B Sartorius ◽  
JL Bruce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
South Africa ◽  
Electronic Medical Record System ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Record System ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Medical Record System ◽  
Public Holidays

Introduction The aim of this study was to examine and interrogate outcomes in trauma laparotomy in a South African trauma centre to determine whether systematic factors were associated with any discrepancies in outcome. Methods This was a retrospective review of a prospectively entered trauma registry undertaken at the Pietermaritzburg Metropolitan Trauma Service, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa. The service has developed a hybrid electronic medical record system (HEMR) where clinical data were captured in real time, which were incorporated this into a database. Results During the period from December 2012 to July 2016, 562 patients underwent emergency laparotomy for trauma and the time and date of surgery was recorded in the HEMR. The mean age of all patients was 29.5 years. There were 256 operations during the weekend or over a public holiday, with a mortality of 8% (n = 21) compared with 306 during the week (mortality of 10%, n = 31). This difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.237). A total of 327 operations were performed at night (18:00 – 08:00) and 235 operations were performed during the day (08:00-18:00 Hours). This was a significant difference in mortality (10% (33) vs 7 % (16), P=0.013) These differences persisted if weekends and public holidays were separated out from normal working days. A total of 188 operations were performed on a week night, with a mortality of 11% (n = 20) and 121 operations were performed during a week day, with a mortality of 8% (n = 10). There were 139 operations on a weekend or public holiday night, with a mortality of 9% (n = 13). A total of 114 operations were performed on a weekend or public holiday day with a mortality of 7% (n = 8). A total of 208 procedures were performed with an consultant present. Of these, 32 patients (15%) died. A total of 368 procedures were performed without a consultant present and 8 (2%) died. Conclusions This study demonstrated a discrepancy in outcome for trauma laparotomy, depending on whether the operation was performed at night or during the day. The reasons for this are unclear, although the lack of consultant presence at night in comparison to during the day appears to be implicated.

scholarly journals 1065 Exposing the Incidence of Ileus in Pelvic and Acetabular Fractures: A Retrospective Case Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Ward ◽  
R Ahmed ◽  
J Adedeji ◽  
J McGregor-Riley
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Acetabular Fractures ◽  
Retrospective Case ◽  
Visceral Injury ◽  
Bowel Surgery ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Fracture Management

Abstract Background Paralytic ileus is a temporary inhibition of gastrointestinal mobility in the absence of mechanical obstruction. Ileus has previously been observed in up to 40% of patients undergoing bowel surgery, leading to increased morbidity and length of stay. Pelvic and acetabular fractures are often caused by high energy trauma and are associated with a risk of visceral injury. This is the first study to report the incidence of and risk factors for ileus following admission with pelvic and/or acetabular fractures. Method All patients over the age of 16 presenting to a major trauma centre throughout 2019 were included. Data included patient demographics, injury pattern, fracture management and presence of ileus. Previous studies identified patients as having ileus if they failed to tolerate an oral diet and open their bowels for more than three days (GI-2). Analysis assessed risk factors for ileus as well as its effect on length of stay. Results An incidence of ileus of 40.35% was observed in the 57 included patients. Ileus was three times more common in patients with a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (p = 0.56) and 2.5 times more common in the presence of an open pelvic/acetabular fracture (p = 0.73). Length of stay was significantly longer in patients under 65 years identified as having ileus (p = 0.046). Gender, age, opiate use, fracture management and surgical approach were not identified as risk factors. Conclusions The authors have identified the essentiality of early risk factor identification and hope to encourage further research to create a prognostic tool.

scholarly journals 92 Increased Proportion of Alcohol-Related Trauma in A South London Major Trauma Centre During Lockdown, A Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Brown ◽  
T Smith ◽  
A Gaukroger ◽  
P Tsinaslanidis ◽  
C Hing
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Blood Alcohol ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Electronic Patient Records ◽  
Staffing Levels ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Background Alcohol has been associated with 10-35% trauma admissions and 40% trauma-related deaths globally. In response to the Covid-19 pandemic, the United Kingdom (UK) entered a state of ‘lockdown’ on 23rd March 2020. Restrictions were most significantly eased on 1st June 2020, when shops and schools re-opened. The purpose of this study was to quantify the effect of lockdown on alcohol-related trauma admissions. Method All adult patients admitted as ‘trauma calls’ to a London Major Trauma Centre (MTC) during April 2018 and April 2019 (pre-lockdown; N = 316), and 1st April – 31st May 2020 (lockdown; N = 191) had electronic patient records analysed. Patients’ blood alcohol level and records of intoxication were used to identify alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions from pre- and post-lockdown cohorts were compared using multiple regression analyses. Results Alcohol-related trauma was present in a significantly higher proportion of adult trauma calls during lockdown (lockdown 60/191 (31.4%), versus pre-lockdown 62/316 (19.6%); (Odds Ratio (OR) 0.83, 95% CI 0.38 to 1.28, p &lt; 0.001). Lockdown was also associated with increased weekend admissions of trauma (lockdown 125/191 weekend (65.5%) vs pre-lockdown 179/316 (56.7%); OR -0.40, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.02, p = 0.041). No significant difference existed in the age, gender, or mechanism between pre-lockdown and lockdown cohorts (p &gt; 0.05). Conclusions UK lockdown was independently associated with an increased proportion of alcohol-related trauma. Trauma admissions were increased during the weekend when staffing levels are reduced. With the possibility of subsequent global ‘waves’ of Covid-19, the risk of long-term repercussions of dangerous alcohol-related behaviour to public health must be addressed.

scholarly journals 1403 Leadership and Teamwork in The Major Trauma Service – Implementation of A New Approach to Secondary Surveys

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
O Jefferies ◽  
A Walls ◽  
P McKeag ◽  
R Houston ◽  
D Kealey
Keyword(s):  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Major Trauma ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Orthopaedic Care ◽  
Trauma Service ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Secondary Survey ◽  
Group 2

Abstract Aim Trauma Audit and Research Network (TARN) guidelines at a Major Trauma Centre in Northern Ireland state that all patients admitted with Major Trauma should have a secondary survey completed and documented within 24 hours of admission. Method All patients admitted with major trauma had their medical notes reviewed on discharge to look for evidence of a documented secondary survey. Two audit cycles were completed. The first from January 2018 to April 2018 (n = 38). Following a quality improvement project with specific interventions to improve compliance, including improved communication behaviours and the implementation of a revised trauma booklet, a second cycle was performed from October 2019 to January 2019 (n = 44) Results 58% of group 1 and 75% of group 2 had a documented secondary survey within 24 hours of admission. The interventions therefore resulted in an overall 17% increase in the number of secondary surveys completed within 24 hours. Patients admitted under Orthopaedic care had a significant improvement of 26% between cycles to 89% compliance. Cardiothoracics (33% to 40%), Neurosurgery (14% to 43%) and General Surgery (75% to 66%). Conclusions A quality improvement drive led by the Orthopaedic team involving the education of doctors, improving communication channels and the introduction of revised trauma documentation, resulted in a significant increase in the number of secondary surveys completed within 24 hours. Patients under the care of Orthopaedics were more likely to have a survey completed compared with other specialties. This highlights the need for more education and engagement of other specialities to increase compliance in secondary surveys.

The sensitivity of pre-hospital and in-hospital tools for the identification of major trauma patients presenting to a major trauma centre.

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-19
Author(s):  
D Potter ◽  
A Kehoe ◽  
JE Smith
Keyword(s):  
Major Trauma ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Trauma Centre ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Trauma Network ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Major Trauma Centre ◽  
Injury Assessment ◽  
Trauma Response ◽  
Retrospective Database

AbstractThe identification of major trauma patients before arrival in hospital allows the activation of an appropriate trauma response. The Wessex triage tool (WTT) uses a combination of anatomical injury assessment and physiological criteria to identify patients with major trauma suitable for triage direct to a major trauma centre (MTC), and has been adopted by the South-West Peninsula Trauma Network (PTN). A retrospective database review, using the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) database, was undertaken to identify a population of patients presenting to Derriford Hospital with an injury severity score (ISS) > 15. The WTT was then applied to this population to identify the sensitivity of the tool. The sensitivity of the WTT at identifying patients with an ISS>15 was 53%. One of the reasons for this finding was that elderly patients who are defined as having major trauma due to the nature of their injuries, but who did not have a mechanism to suggest they had sustained major trauma (such as a fall from standing height), were not identified by these triage tools. The implications of this are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document