1062 Are CT-KUB Requests Adequately Completed by Urologists in Emergency Settings?
Abstract Aim Imaging requests are an essential communication tool between urologists and radiologists. Poorly completed request forms, especially in acute settings, directly translates to substandard patient care. We aimed to evaluate and improve our request completion practice in emergency settings. Method 40 randomly selected CT-KUB images were reviewed to assess the completion of clinical background, question, patient data, location, and requester data. A multiple cycle audit followed by minor intra-departmental interventions were carried out over ten months to evaluate compliance. In December 2019, 55% and 52.5% of the requests lacked a good clinical history and question, respectively. The remaining three domains achieved the target of 100%. Subsequently, the literature and the audit data were shared and discussed, and a verbal agreement was made to improve practice. Result A re-audit revealed a 22.5% and 2.5% improvement in providing sufficient clinical background and questions. Findings were presented at an informal setting, and feedback was obtained on improving compliance. Simple posters or notices and occasional reminders were found as acceptable approaches. Following the implementation of feedback and orientation for joining junior doctors, a third audit cycle showed a significant improvement in compliance with 90% and 82.5%. A final cycle to assess the maintenance improvements in background and question provision was at a high of 97.5% and 90%. Conclusions CT-KUB request completion is essential in emergency settings to ensure optimal patient care. Improving compliance can be achieved using small interventions catered to the department, such as peer-to-peer discussions, reminder posters, and orientations.
