scholarly journals BJS.04PreciSSIon: A collaborative initiative to reduce incidence of SSI after elective colorectal surgery

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Clayphan ◽  
Sarah Biggs ◽  
Lauren Dixon ◽  
Lesley Jordan ◽  
Stephen Dalton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Patient Questionnaire ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Collaborative Approach ◽  
Questionnaire Response ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Mean Compliance

Abstract Aims Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is common after colorectal surgery where rates are reported as high as 30%. The aim of this project was to assess whether a collaborative approach to implement a 4-point care bundle could reduce SSI rates across a group of hospitals. Methods PreciSSIon is a Quality Improvement Project (QIP) involving 7 NHS hospitals, with a design based on the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s Breakthrough Series collaborative model. The Public Health England SSI surveillance questionnaire was used to measure patient-reported SSI at 30 days post-op. An evidence based bundle of care was introduced including: 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation; dual ring wound protectors; triclosan-coated sutures for wound closure; and a second dose of antibiotics after 4 hours. Results All hospitals had implemented the care bundle by February 2020.  By December 2020 6/7 hospitals had reduced SSI. Mean patient questionnaire response rate = 84.8%. Mean compliance with each of the above bundle components are as follows: 91%; 72%; 85%; and 92% respectively. Conclusions Implementing an evidence based care bundle, using a collaborative approach to QIP, was effective in reducing the rates of patient-reported SSI following colorectal surgery. The success of this project in the West of England suggests that similar methodology could be used to improve patient outcomes in other regions.

scholarly journals SP3.1.3 Use of a Care Bundle to reduce Surgical Site Infection after Emergency Laparotomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Swain ◽  
J Rogers ◽  
D Gane ◽  
M Quinn ◽  
J Hopkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Emergency Laparotomy ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Skin Preparation ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Changing Practice ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Surgical Teams

Abstract Aim Surgical Site Infection (SSI) is common after abdominal surgery. A care bundle was introduced to sustainably reduce SSI after elective colorectal surgery. This study aimed to implement an expanded care bundle after emergency laparotomy. Methods Quality improvement methodology was used. SSI was measured by direct assessment of the wound in patients in hospital at 30 days. For discharged patients, the PHE SSI surveillance questionnaire was used to measure patient-reported SSI 30 days post-operatively. The care bundle included: 2% chlorhexidine skin preparation; dual ring wound protectors; triclosan-coated sutures for wound closure; second dose of antibiotics >4 hours, betadine to the wound and glove change before closure. Bundle compliance was measured and fed back to surgical teams. Results Baseline SSI was 13.5% (178 patients) which reduced to 8.5% (118 patients) following bundle introduction. Response rate was 60%. Compliance with antibacterial sutures was measured for patients whose wounds were closed; 10% received negative pressure dressings. Mortality within 30 days was 9%. Length of stay reduced from mean 22.6 to 12.45, median 13.5 to 9 days. Conclusion The care bundle reduced SSI after emergency laparotomy. Measuring SSI is more difficult after emergency surgery due to higher death rate, longer length of stay and use of laparostomy. Other challenges include difficulty using wound protectors for some procedures e.g. adhesiolysis and changing practice from use of skin clips.

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) Initiative to Reduce Infection in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Which Performance Measures Affect Outcome?

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 1012-1016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nhien Nguyen ◽  
Sara Yegiyants ◽  
Carolyn Kaloostian ◽  
Maher A. Abbas ◽  
L. Andrew Difronzo
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Care ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Prophylactic Antibiotics ◽  
Timely Manner ◽  
Improvement Project ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Surgical Care Improvement Project ◽  
Care Improvement

One component of the Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) is the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) by: 1) timing the administration of prophylactic antibiotics (PAs) within 1 hour of incision; 2) using approved PA regimens; and 3) discontinuing PA within 24 hours. We sought to evaluate institutional compliance with SCIP recommendations in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery and determine whether they affected the incidence of SSI. One hundred four elective colorectal cases were reviewed. In 58 patients (56%), PAs were administered within 1 hour of incision. In 71 cases (68%), the PA choice was considered compliant. There were a total of 12 SSIs (11.5%) overall. The incidence of SSI was significantly higher in cases in which PAs were not administered within 1 hour of incision (10 of 46 or 22% vs two of 58 or 3.5%, P = 0.005). There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSI in patients who received compliant versus noncompliant PA (12.7% vs 9.1%, P = 0.75). Timely PA administration significantly reduces the incidence of SSI in patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery. Efforts should focus on ensuring that PAs are given in a timely manner to reduce SSI in colorectal surgery.

Improving Outcomes in Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Single-institution Retrospective Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 325-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lindsay K. Rumberger ◽  
Debra Vittetoe ◽  
Lorene Cathey ◽  
Harriet Bennett ◽  
Robert E. Heidel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Site Infections ◽  
Supplemental Oxygen ◽  
Care Bundle ◽  
Early Enteral Nutrition ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Improvement Program ◽  
Surgical Quality ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Before And After

Our hospital, a Tennessee Surgical Quality Collaborative (TSQC) member, adopted a statewide colorectal care bundle intended to reduce surgical site infections (SSI) in elective colorectal cases. The bundle includes proper antibiotics/dosing, normoglycemia, normothermia, supplemental oxygen six hours postoperatively, and early enteral nutrition. A single-institution retrospective study of our National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for the rates of SSI before and after the colorectal bundle. We compared our SSI rates to TSQC hospitals as well as NSQIP datasets. Because of low case numbers in the NSQIP data, National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) data collected at our institution was used to compare our colorectal SSI before and after our colorectal bundle. From January 2010 to December 2011, 188 patients underwent nonemergent colorectal surgery in the NSQIP data. Of these, 5.4 per cent (10/188) developed superficial SSIs. During this same time, the rate of the TSQC superficial SSI was 7.1 per cent and NSQIP was 7.8 per cent. From January 2013 to October 2014, after the colorectal bundle started, 76 patients in NSQIP underwent nonemergent colorectal surgery. Of these, 6.5 per cent (5/76) developed superficial SSI, compared with 5.5 per cent in TSQC and 5.5 per cent in NSQIP. NHSN data showed a prebundle rate of 11 per cent and a postbundle rate of 3.5 per cent ( P < 00.1, χ2). After adopting a colorectal bundle aimed at reducing SSIs, we did not improve our SSI rates in NSQIP; however, our NHSN data demonstrated considerable improvement. Differences in data collection may affect SSI rates, and ultimately “quality” based reimbursement. Implementation of the bundle did improve outcomes in colorectal surgery.

THE FEASIBILITY OF FAST TRACK PROTOCOL FOR ELDERELY PATIENTS WITH COLORECTAL CANCER

2016 ◽  
pp. 26-29
Author(s):  
D. . Zitta ◽  
V. . Subbotin ◽  
Y. . Busirev
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Blood Loss ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Conventional Group ◽  
Intraoperative Blood Loss ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Complications Rate

Fast track protocol is widely used in major colorectal surgery. It decreases operative stress, shortens hospital stay and reduces complications rate. However feasibility and safety of this approach is still controversial in patients older than 70 years. The AIM of the study was to estimate the safety and effectiveness of fast track protocol in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Prospective randomized study included 138 elective colorectal resectionfor cancer during period from 1.01.10 till 1.06.15. The main criteria for the patients selection were age over 70 years and diagnosis of colorectal cancer. 82 of these patients received perioperative treatment according to fast track protocol, other 56 had conventional perioperative care. Patients underwent following procedures: right hemicolectomy (n=7), left hemicolectomy (n=12), transverse colectomy (n=1), sigmoidectomy (n=23), abdomeno-perineal excision (n=19) and low anterior resection of rectum (n=76). Following data were analized: duration of operation, intraoperative blood loss, time offirst flatus and defecation, complications rates. RESULTS. Mean age was 77,4 ± 8 years. There were no differences in gender, co morbidities, body mass index, types of operations between groups. Duration of operations didn't differ significantly between 2 groups. Intraoperative blood loss was higher in conventional group. The time of first flatus and defecation were better in FT-group. There was no mortality in FT-group vs 1,8 %o mortality in conventional group. Complications rate was lower in FT-group: wound infections 3,6% vs 9 %, anastomotic leakage 4,8 %o vs 9 %o, ileus 1,2 vs 5,4 %o, peritonitis 2,4 %o vs 3,6%o, bowel obstruction caused by the adhesions 6 % vs 5,3 %. Reoperation rate was similar 4,8 % vs 3,6 %. CONCLUSION. Fast track protocol in major elective colorectal surgery can be safely applied in elderly patients. The application of fast track protocol in elderly patients improves the restoration of bowel function and reduces the risk of postoperative complication.

Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Colorectal Surgery: Construction of Core Measures Using Open-Source Research Method

2021 ◽  
pp. 155335062199887
Author(s):  
Alaa El-Hussuna ◽  
Ines Rubio-Perez ◽  
Monica Millan ◽  
Gianluca Pellino ◽  
Ionut Negoi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Short Form ◽  
Wide Spectrum ◽  
Core Outcome Set ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome Measures ◽  
Patient Reported Outcome ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Eortc Qlq

Purpose. The primary aim of the study was to review the existing literature about patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in colorectal cancer and IBD. The secondary aim was to present a road map to develop a core outcome set via opinion gathering using social media. Method. This study is the first step of a three-step project aimed at constructing simple, applicable PROMs in colorectal surgery. This article was written in a collaborative manner with authors invited both through Twitter via the #OpenSourceResearch hashtag. The 5 most used PROMs were presented and discussed as slides/images on Twitter. Inputs from a wide spectrum of participants including researchers, surgeons, physicians, nurses, patients, and patients’ organizations were collected and analyzed. The final draft was emailed to all contributors and 6 patients’ representatives for proofreading and approval. Results. Five PROM sets were identified and discussed: EORTC QLQ-CR29, IBDQ short health questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30, ED-Q5-5L, and Short Form-36. There were 315 tweets posted by 50 tweeters with 1458 retweets. Awareness about PROMs was generally limited. The general psycho-physical well-being score (GPP) was suggested and discussed, and then a survey was conducted in which more than 2/3 of voters agreed that GPP covers the most important aspects in PROMs. Conclusion. Despite the limitations of this exploratory study, it offered a new method to conduct clinical research with opportunity to engage patients. The general psycho-physical well-being score suggested as simple, applicable PROMs to be eventually combined procedure-specific, disease-specific, or symptom-specific PROMs if needed.

scholarly journals P7: ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY AFTER ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL CLOSED-LOOP AUDIT

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to re-audit the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) after elective colorectal surgery, following local presentations of results. Method Outcomes After Kidney injury in Surgery (OAKS) and Ileus Management International (IMAGINE), were prospective multicentre audits on consecutive elective colorectal resections, in the UK and Ireland. These were performed over 3-month periods in 2015 and 2018 respectively. During the interim period, results were presented at participating centres to stimulate local quality improvement initiatives. Risk-adjusted 7-day postoperative AKI rates were calculated through multilevel logistic regression based on the OAKS prognostic score. Result Of the 4,917 patients included, 3,133 (63.7%) originated from OAKS and 1,784 (36.3%) from IMAGINE. On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference (p=0.737) in the 7-day AKI rate between OAKS (n=346, 11.8%) and IMAGINE (n=205, 11.5%). However, the risk-adjusted AKI rate in IMAGINE was significantly lower compared to OAKS (-1.8%, 95% CI: -2.3% to -1.3%, p&lt;0.001). Of 47 centres (40.1%) with a recorded local presentation, there was no significant difference in the subsequent AKI rate in IMAGINE (-0.7%, -2.0% to 0.6%, p=0.278). Conclusion Rates of AKI after elective colorectal surgery significantly reduced on re-audit. However, this may be related to increased awareness from participation or national quality improvement initiatives, rather than local presentation of results. Abbrev. AKI - Acute Kidney Injury, OAKS - Outcomes After Kidney injury in Surgery, IMAGINE - Ileus Management International Take-home message Risk-adjusted AKI rates significantly reduced on re-audit, however, this was most likely due to factors separate from the local presentation of initial results.

scholarly journals Defining standards in colorectal optimisation: a Delphi study protocol to achieve international consensus on key standards for colorectal surgery prehabilitation

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. e047235
Author(s):  
Iona Pearson ◽  
Sue Blackwell ◽  
Rebecca Fish ◽  
Sarah Daniels ◽  
Malcolm West ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Public Involvement ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Patient And Public Involvement ◽  
International Consensus ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Patient Related Outcome

IntroductionPrehabilitation in colorectal surgery is evolving and may minimise postoperative morbidity and mortality. With many different healthcare professionals contributing to the prehabilitation literature, there is significant variation in reported primary endpoints that restricts comparison. In addition, there has been limited work on patient-related outcome measures suggesting that patients with colorectal cancer needs and issues are being overlooked. The Defining Standards in Colorectal Optimisation Study aims to achieve international consensus from all stakeholders on key standards to provide a framework for reporting future prehabilitation research.Methods and analysisA systematic review will identify key standards reported in trials of prehabilitation in colorectal surgery. Standards that are important to patients will be identified by a patient and public involvement (PPI) event. The longlist of standards generated from the systematic review and PPI event will be used to develop a three-round online Delphi process. This will engage all stakeholders (healthcare professionals and patients) both nationally and internationally. The results of the Delphi will be followed by a face-to-face interactive consensus meeting that will define the final standards for prehabilitation for elective colorectal surgery.Ethics and disseminationThe University of Glasgow College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences Ethics Committee has approved this protocol, which is registered as a study (200190120) with the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative. Publication of the standards developed by all stakeholders will increase the potential for comparative research that advances understanding of the clinical application of prehabilitation.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019120381.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document