HartWacht telemonitoring effectively reduces blood pressure in a real-life setting

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
B.G.S Abeln ◽  
S Blok ◽  
B.J Van Den Born ◽  
G.A Somsen ◽  
I.I Tulevski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Resistant Hypertension ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Blood Pressure Reduction ◽  
Monitoring Program ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Home Monitoring ◽  
Mean Blood Pressure ◽  
Real Life Setting

Abstract Introduction Telemedicine platforms have the potential to reduce costs and improve outcomes in blood pressure reduction. Although results in the literature are promising, evidence remains limited and few home monitoring programs have successfully been integrated into daily clinical practice. The HartWacht home monitoring program is set-up for remote monitoring and treatment of patients with therapy resistant hypertension (systolic blood pressure>140 mmHg and >1 antihypertensive drugs). HartWacht is fully integrated into clinical care and is reimbursed by the majority of Dutch healthcare insurers. Purpose The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the HartWacht program in blood pressure treatment in a real-life setting, and evaluate the number of interventions necessary to reach normotension. Methods In this single center retrospective cohort study, we included all patients with therapy resistant hypertension that were included in the HartWacht program by their treating physician. At baseline, all patients measure blood pressure twice a day for the duration of one week, after which blood pressure measurements were performed once a week. Two pre-set alarms informed a team of designate nurses if blood pressures exceeded 140/90 mmHg (orange alarm) or 180/110 mmHg (red alarm). After one red or two successive orange alarms, the patient was contacted by telephone for guideline driven lifestyle advice or medication adjustment in consultation with a cardiologist. After every intervention, a blanking period of four weeks was set in which no orange alarms were visible. Results The cohort consisted of 161 patients (mean age 63±9.8 years; 54% male). The median follow up time was 318 days. At baseline, the mean blood pressure was 155/91 mmHg. During follow-up mean blood pressure decreased significantly to 134/83 mmHg (p<0.001 for both systolic and diastolic blood pressure). At follow up, 102 (62%) patients were normotensive. During follow up participants received a mean of 0.46 lifestyle advices and 0.74 medication changes in 1.07 consultations. Conclusion Home monitoring and treatment of patients therapy resistant hypertension with HartWacht resulted in a significant overall reduction of blood pressure, with >60% of patients being normotensive at last follow-up. Normotension in HartWacht patients Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

P582Real-world experience with ehealth telemonitoring in patients with hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Blok ◽  
G A Somsen ◽  
B Stavrov ◽  
I I Tulevski ◽  
B J H Van Den Born ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Home Monitoring ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Healthcare Team ◽  
Therapeutic Action ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Target Values ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Background Hypertension is the strongest modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease worldwide, while incidence and prevalence remain high. Home-monitoring is known to improve blood pressure in patients with hypertension. Despite promising results, few home monitoring programs have successfully been integrated into daily care and little evidence exists on their cost-effectiveness. The Dutch HartWacht eHealth program, initiated in June 2016, is one of the first eHealth programs that is fully reimbursed and integrated into clinical practice. Purpose The purpose of the study is to demonstrate the effect of an integrated and cost-effective telemonitoring program in a real-life setting. Methods In the HartWacht program patients with uncontrolled hypertension (office BP >140/90) receive a blood pressure monitor that is connected to their smartphone and integrated with their personal electronic patient file. Measurements are checked by a dedicated health care team. If values exceed pre-defined thresholds, patients are contacted by the team for swift therapeutic action. In this study, the first results of the program are evaluated. Comparisons were made between last office blood pressure before the program; average blood pressure of first week of home measurement (twice daily, morning and evening); and blood pressure of home measurement at three, six and twelve months after start. Results 122 patients started the HartWacht program for hypertension (female: 57 (46.7%); mean age: 61.2 (±9.5) years; mean follow-up: 13.4 (±7.6) months; mean number of anti-hypertensive drugs at start of HartWacht: 1.8 (±0.9); mean number of medication changes per year during follow-up (including changes in dose): 1.0 (±1.6); mean number of contact moments per year during follow-up (including calls with nurse or cardiologist): 4.9 (±5.0)). At final follow-up, 67 patients participated at least one year. Others started later or stopped the program, mainly because of reaching normotensive values (n=22; home BP <135/85). The mean last office systolic blood pressure (SBP) measurement (n=122) was 157.9 mmHg (±19.2). The mean home SBP in the first week (n=120) was 139.9 mmHg (±13.9). After 3 months the mean home SBP lowered to 133.8 mmHg (±14.9), a significant decrease compared to week 1 (mean: 6.1 (±13.8), p<0.001). After this moment the mean home SBP was stable: 132.5 mmHg (±12.6) at six months (n=99) and 132.2 mmHg (±12.4) at 12 months (n=67). No correlation was found between the number of medication adaptations and/or contact moments with the healthcare team and reaching target values. Conclusion This integrated eHeatlh telemonitoring program demonstrates significant and persistent blood pressure reduction in a real-life setting. As measurements are continuously monitored, swift therapeutic action is guaranteed. The Dutch HartWacht program has proven to be cost-effective, is reimbursed, and has the potential to be scaled up (inter-)nationally.

scholarly journals THE EFFECTS OF TRANSCATHETER RENAL DENERVATION ON BLOOD PRESSURE AND BRAIN STRUCTURAL CHANGES IN RESISTANT HYPERTENSION

2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 256-262 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. L. Afanasieva ◽  
S. E. Pekarskiy ◽  
V. F. Mordovin ◽  
G. V. Semke ◽  
T. M. Ripp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Resistant Hypertension ◽  
Renal Denervation ◽  
Single Case ◽  
Blood Pressure Reduction ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Tomography ◽  
Lateral Ventricles ◽  
The Brain

Objective.To study the changes of 24-hour blood pressure parameters and brain structure at follow-up after transcatheter renal denervation in resistant hypertension.Design and methods.We enrolled patients with verified resistant hypertension undergoing an intervention that included 4–8 applications of radiofrequency discharge in both renal arteries using a standard catheter5 F under the controlled temperature regimen (60 С0, 8 Watt, 2-minute application). The efficiency of the intervention was assessed by the office and 24-hour blood pressure decrease within 6 months after intervention. All subjects underwent magnetic resonance tomography («Magnetom-OPEN», «Siemens AG», Germany).Results.By the time of statistical analysis 45 subjects underwent renal denervation, there was not a single case of renal artery damage. At six-month follow-up a significant reduction of office blood pressure (-34,8/-17,2 mmHg; p < 0,00001/0,00001), and mean 24-hour blood pressure (-11,1/-7,1 mmHg; p < 0,001/0,001) was found. No increase of encephalopathy signs by magnetic resonance tomography was found. At the same time there was a reduction of the linear size of lateral ventricles of the brain, subarachnoid space, III ventricle of the brain, liquor volume in the lateral ventricles of the brain.Conclusions.Renal denervation is a safe method resulting in effective blood pressure reduction in resistant hypertension. It is associated with the positive changes of encephalopathy and liquor dynamics according to the magnetic resonance tomography. 

scholarly journals POS0693 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF BELIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH LUPUS NEPHRITIS IN REAL-LIFE SETTING: RESULTS FROM A LARGE, NATIONWIDE, MULTICENTRIC, PROSPECTIVE COHORT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 594-595
Author(s):  
F. Saccon ◽  
M. Gatto ◽  
M. Zen ◽  
M. Fredi ◽  
F. Regola ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Rescue Therapy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Baseline Serum ◽  
Renal Response ◽  
Real Life Setting

Background:LN is still a severe manifestation of Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multitarget therapy is needed to control the disease especially in refractory cases.Objectives:To evaluate renal response in SLE patients with glomerulonephritis (GN) treated with Belimumab in real-life setting.Methods:Patients with proteinuria >0.5 g/24 h and/or active sediment at baseline enrolled in a multicentre Italian cohort of SLE patients (BeRLiSS study), treated with monthly iv Belimumab 10 mg/kg plus standard of care were considered in this study. Complete renal response (CRR) was defined as proteinuria <0.5 g/24 h, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)≥90ml/min/1.73m2 and no rescue therapy. Primary efficacy renal response (PERR) was defined as proteinuria ≤0.7 g/24 h, eGFR ≥60ml/min/1.73m2 and no rescue therapy. Prevalence and predictive factors of CRR and PERR at 12 and 24 months after Belimumab initiation were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.Results:A total of 91 patients were considered in this study, 79 female, mean age 40.51±9.03 years, mean disease duration 12.18±8.15 years, median follow-up time after Belimumab initiation 22 months. Twenty patients had baseline proteinuria ≥0.5 <1 g/day, 17 ≥1 <2 g/day, 13 ≥2 g/day. Belimumab was started at GN onset in 20 (22%) patients and at the time of a renal flare in all other cases. Seventy-five patients underwent a renal biopsy: 1 class I, 4 class II, 14 class III, 47 class IV and 9 class V. Baseline serum creatinine was 82.44±29.26 umol/L; 15 patients showed eGFR<60ml/min/1.73m2 at baseline. Immunosuppresants were taken by 70 (76.9%) patients: 47 micofenolate, 15 azathioprine and 5 ciclosporine. Sixty patients (65.9%) were on antimalarials. During follow-up 34 (37.4%) patients achieved CRR. Among them 5 (14.7%) patients relapsed and 29 (85.3%) patients maintained remission. Mean time to achieved CRR was 9.71±5.91 months.High levels of baseline proteinuria were a negative independent predictor of CRR and PERR at 6 months (OR 0.044 CI95% 0.006-0.320 p=0.002 and OR 0.232 CI95% 0.091-0.596 p=0.002) and 12 months (OR 0.029 CI95% 0.002-0.556 p=0.019 and OR 0.056 CI95% 0.009-0.327 p=0.001). High levels of baseline creatinine were a negative independent predictor of renal response. Renal response at 6 months was a strong predictive factor of renal response at 12 and 24 months.Conclusion:Belimumab is an effective add-on therapy in the treatment of GN in real-life practice setting.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0369 EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF RITUXIMAB ORIGINATOR AND BIOSIMILAR IN PRIMARY SJÖGREN’S SYNDROME IN A REAL-LIFE SETTING

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1485.3-1485
Author(s):  
F. Carubbi ◽  
A. Alunno ◽  
P. Cipriani ◽  
V. Pavlych ◽  
C. DI Muzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Activity ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Primary Sjögren’S Syndrome ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Real Life Setting ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Time Point

Background:Over the last 2 decades rituximab (RTX) has been widely used, albeit off-label, in primary Sjögren’s syndrome (pSS). Several studies reported that B-lymphocyte depletion with RTX is effective in this disease not only by reducing disease activity but also by affecting the inflammation and the lymphoid organization that occur in target tissues. With the recent release of several RTX biosimilars (bRTX) on the market, the demonstration of their interchangeability with RTX originator (oRTX) is required.Objectives:To compare efficacy and safety of oRTX and bRTX in pSS patients in a real-life setting.Methods:Clinical records of pSS patients referring to a tertiary rheumatology clinic were retrospectively evaluated. Patients having received at least 2 courses of either oRTX or bRTX (1000 mg IV infusion, repeated after 2 weeks -1 course- and the course repeated after 24 weeks) with complete data at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months of treatment were enrolled. Disease activity was assessed with the EULAR SS disease activity index (ESSDAI) and its clinical version without the biological domain (ClinESSDAI). Patient-reported symptoms were assessed with the EULAR SS Patient Reported Index (ESSPRI).Results:Seven patients that received oRTX and 7 patients that received bRTX were enrolled. Baseline clinical features, including ESSDAI and ESSPRI were similar in the 2 treatment groups. Both compounds significantly reduced ESSDAI and ESSPRI as early as 3 months and no difference between the groups was observed at any time point (Figure 1). Of interest, ESSDAI slowly decreased until month 6 when the most pronounced reduction was observed. Conversely, ESSPRI dropped to its lowest values already at month 3. With regard to safety, at 12 months of follow-up no adverse event was observed in any of the treatment groups.Conclusion:At 12 months of follow-up, oRTX and bRTX display similar efficacy and safety profiles. The improvement of patient reported outcomes is faster than the improvement of disease activity with both compounds. Our data support interchangeability of oRTX and bRTX in pSS.References:[1]Carubbi F et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2013;15(5):R172[2]Carubbi F et al. Lupus. 2014;23(13):1337-49Figure 1 ESSDAI and ESSPRI values at every time point in the 2 treatment groups. Asterisks indicate p values <0.05 compared to the other treatment group at the same time pointDisclosure of Interests:Francesco Carubbi Speakers bureau: Francesco Carubbi received speaker honoraria from Abbvie and Celgene outside this work., Alessia Alunno: None declared, Paola Cipriani Grant/research support from: Actelion, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Actelion, Pfizer, Viktoriya Pavlych: None declared, claudia di muzio: None declared, Roberto Gerli: None declared, Roberto Giacomelli Grant/research support from: Actelion, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Roche, Actelion, BMS, MSD, Ely Lilly, SOBI, Pfizer

Abstract P494: Long-term Outcomes of a Cluster-randomized Trial Testing the Effects Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management

Hypertension ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L Margolis ◽  
Stephen E Asche ◽  
Anna R Bergdall ◽  
Steven P Dehmer ◽  
Beverly B Green ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Randomized Trial ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Cluster Randomized Trial ◽  
Home Blood Pressure ◽  
Uncontrolled Hypertension ◽  
Routine Clinical Care ◽  
Differential Reduction ◽  
Cluster Randomized

Background/Aims: Hypertension is a common condition and leading cause of cardiovascular disease. We previously reported results of a cluster-randomized trial evaluating a home blood pressure (BP) telemonitoring and pharmacist management intervention, with significant reductions in BP favoring the intervention arm over 18 months. This analysis examined the durability of the intervention effect on BP through 54 months of follow-up and compared BP measurements performed in the research clinic and in routine clinical care. Methods: The Hyperlink trial randomized 16 primary care clinics having 450 study-enrolled patients with uncontrolled hypertension to either Telemonitoring Intervention (TI) or usual care (UC) study arms. BP was measured as the mean of 3 measurements obtained at each research clinic visit. General linear mixed models utilizing a direct likelihood-based ignorable approach for missing data were used to examine change from baseline to 54 months in systolic and diastolic BP (SBP and DBP). Results: Research clinic BP measurements were obtained from 326 (72%) study patients at the 54 month follow-up visit. Routine clinical care BP measurements were obtained from 444 (99%) of study patients from 7025 visits during the follow-up period. For TI patients, based on research clinic measurements baseline SBP was 148.2 mm Hg and 54 month follow-up was 131.2 mm Hg (-17.0 mm Hg, p<.001). For UC patients, baseline SBP was 147.7 mm Hg and 54 month follow-up was 131.7 mm Hg ( -16.0 mm Hg, p<.001). The differential reduction by study arm in SBP from baseline to 54 months was -1.0 mm Hg (95% CI: -5.4 to 3.4, p=0.63). For TI patients, baseline DBP was 84.4 mm Hg and 54 month follow-up was 77.8 (-6.6 mm Hg, p<.001). For UC patients, baseline DBP was 85.1 mm Hg and 54 month follow-up was 79.1 mm Hg (-6.0 mm Hg, p<.001). The differential reduction by study arm in DBP from baseline to 54 months was -0.6 mm Hg (95% CI: -3.5 to 2.4, p=0.67). SBP and DBP results from routine clinical measurements closely approximated the pattern of results from research clinic measurements. Conclusion: Significant BP reductions in the TI arm relative to UC were no longer seen at 54 month follow-up. To maintain intervention benefits over a longer period of time additional intervention is needed.

scholarly journals Comparative effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide in Asian type 2 diabetes patients: a multi-institutional cohort study and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai-Cheng Chang ◽  
Shih-Chieh Shao ◽  
Shihchen Kuo ◽  
Chen-Yi Yang ◽  
Hui-Yu Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Comparative Effectiveness ◽  
Blood Pressure Reduction ◽  
Renal Functions ◽  
Diabetes Patients

Abstract Background Head-to-head comparison of clinical effectiveness between dulaglutide and liraglutide in Asia is limited. This study was aimed to assess the real-world comparative effectiveness of dulaglutide versus liraglutide. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study by utilizing multi-institutional electronic medical records to identify real-world type 2 diabetes patients treated with dulaglutide or liraglutide during 2016-2018 in Taiwan and followed up until 2019. Effectiveness outcomes were assessed at every three months in the one-year follow-up. Propensity score techniques were applied to enhance between-group comparability. Significant differences in changes of effectiveness outcomes between treatment groups during the follow-up were examined and further analyzed using mixed-model repeated-measures approaches. Results A total of 1,512 subjects receiving dulaglutide and 1,513 subjects receiving liraglutide were identified. At 12 months, significant HbA1c changes from baseline were found in both treatments (dulaglutide: -1.06%, p<0.001; liraglutide: -0.83%, p<0.001), with a significant between-group difference (-0.23%, 95% confidence interval: -0.38 to -0.08%, p<0.01). Both treatments yielded significant declines in weight, alanine aminotransferase level, and estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline (dulaglutide: -1.14 kg, -3.08 U/L and -2.08 ml/min/1.73 m2, p<0.01; liraglutide: -1.64 kg, -3.65 U/L and -2.33 ml/min/1.73 m2, p<0.001), whereas only dulaglutide yielded a significant systolic blood pressure reduction (-2.47 mmHg, p<0.001). Between-group differences in changes of weight, blood pressure, and liver and renal functions at 12 months were not statistically significant. Conclusions In real-world T2D patients, dulaglutide versus liraglutide was associated with better glycemic control and comparable effects on changes of weight, blood pressure, and liver and renal functions.

scholarly journals OPtimising Treatment for MIld Systolic hypertension in the Elderly (OPTiMISE): protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (9) ◽  
pp. e022930 ◽  
Author(s):  
James P Sheppard ◽  
Jenni Burt ◽  
Mark Lown ◽  
Eleanor Temple ◽  
John Benson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Systolic Blood Pressure ◽  
Usual Care ◽  
Antihypertensive Medication ◽  
Clinical Care ◽  
Economic Modelling ◽  
Host Institution ◽  
South Central ◽  
Randomised Controlled

IntroductionRecent evidence suggests that larger blood pressure reductions and multiple antihypertensive drugs may be harmful in older people, particularly frail individuals with polypharmacy and multimorbidity. However, there is a lack of evidence to support deprescribing of antihypertensives, which limits the practice of medication reduction in routine clinical care. The aim of this trial is to examine whether antihypertensive medication reduction is possible in older patients without significant changes in blood pressure control at follow-up.Methods and analysisThis trial will use a primary care-based, open-label, randomised controlled trial design. A total of 540 participants will be recruited, aged ≥80 years, with systolic blood pressure <150 mm Hg and receiving ≥2 antihypertensive medications. Participants will have no compelling indication for medication continuation and will be considered to potentially benefit from medication reduction due to existing polypharmacy, comorbidity and frailty. Following a baseline appointment, individuals will be randomised to a strategy of medication reduction (intervention) with optional self-monitoring or usual care (control). Those in the intervention group will have one antihypertensive medication stopped. The primary outcome will be to determine if a reduction in medication can achieve a proportion of participants with clinically safe blood pressure levels at 12-week follow-up (defined as a systolic blood pressure <150 mm Hg), which is non-inferior (within 10%) to that achieved by the usual care group. Qualitative interviews will be used to understand the barriers and facilitators to medication reduction. The study will use economic modelling to predict the long-term effects of any observed changes in blood pressure and quality of life.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol, informed consent form, participant information sheet and all other participant facing material have been approved by the Research Ethics Committee (South Central—Oxford A; ref 16/SC/0628), Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (ref 21584/0371/001–0001), host institution(s) and Health Research Authority. All research outputs will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberEudraCT 2016-004236-38;ISRCTN97503221; Pre-results.

Abstract 65: Effects of Immediate Blood Pressure Reduction on Two-Year Mortality and Major Disability in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang He ◽  
Yonghong Zhang ◽  
Tan Xu ◽  
Dali Wang ◽  
Chung-Shiuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Treatment Group ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Antihypertensive Treatment ◽  
Blood Pressure Reduction ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Antihypertensive Medications ◽  
Vascular Events

Although elevated blood pressure (BP) is very common in patients with acute ischemic stroke, the management of hypertension among them remains controversial. We tested the effect of immediate BP reduction on two-year mortality and major disability in acute ischemic stroke patients. The China Antihypertensive Trial in Acute Ischemic Stroke, a randomized, single-blind, blinded end-points trial, was conducted in 4,071 patients with ischemic stroke within 48 hours of onset and elevated systolic BP (SBP). Patients were randomly assigned to receive antihypertensive treatment (n=2,038) or to discontinue all antihypertensive medications (n=2,033) during hospitalization. Post-treatment follow-ups were conducted at 3, 12, and 24 months after hospital discharge. The primary outcome was a composite of death and major disability at the two-year follow-up visit. Mean SBP was reduced by 21.8 in the treatment group and 12.7 mm Hg in the control group within 24 hours after randomization (P<0.001). Mean SBP was 137.3 mm Hg in the treatment group and 146.5 in the control group at day 7 after randomization (P<0.001). At two-year follow-up, study outcomes were obtained in 1945 (95.4%) participants in the treatment group and 1925 (94.7%) in the control group. 78.8% of the patients in the treatment group and 72.6% in the control group reported the use of antihypertensive medications (p<0.001). SBP was 138.8 mmHg in the antihypertensive treatment group and 139.7 in the control group (p=0.02). Among patients in the antihypertensive treatment group, 24.5% (476/1945) died or had a major disability, compared with 22.1% (425/1925) in the control group (odds ratio 1.14 [95% CI 0.99 to 1.33], p=0.078). Hazard ratios for all-cause mortality (1.01 [0.81, 1.25], p=0.95), recurrent stroke (0.91 [0.73, 1.13], p=0.40), and vascular events (0.97 [0.79, 1.19], p=0.76) were not statistically significant comparing the antihypertensive treatment group to the control group. The effect of antihypertensive treatment did not differ by pre-defined subgroups. In conclusion, among patients with acute ischemic stroke, BP reduction with antihypertensive medications during hospitalization did not reduce or increase the composite outcome of death and major disability over two years.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document