scholarly journals Reliability and repeatability of a smartphone-based 6-min walk test as a patient-centred outcome measure

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan Mak ◽  
Neil Rens ◽  
Dasha Savage ◽  
Helle Nielsen-Bowles ◽  
Doran Triggs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
High Reliability ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Reliability Test ◽  
Walk Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Implementation Challenges ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
At Home

Abstract Aims  The 6-min-walk test (6MWT) is a validated proxy for frailty and a predictor of clinical outcomes, yet is not widely used due to implementation challenges. This comparative effectiveness study assesses the reliability and repeatability of a home-based 6MWT compared to in-clinic 6MWTs in patients with cardiovascular disease. Methods and results  One hundred and ten (110) patients scheduled for cardiac or vascular surgery were enrolled during a study period from June 2018 to December 2019 at the Palo Alto VA Hospital. Subjects were provided with an Apple iPhone 7 and Apple Watch Series 3 loaded with the VascTrac research study application and performed a supervised in-clinic 6MWT during enrolment, at 2 weeks, 1, 3, and 6 months post-operatively. Subjects also received notifications to perform at-home smartphone-based 6MWTs once a week for a duration of 6 months. Test–retest reliability of in-clinic measurements and at-home measurements was assessed with an industry standard Cronbach’s alpha reliability test. Test–retest reliability for in-clinic ground truth 6MWT steps vs. in-clinic iPhone 6MWT steps was 0·99, showing high reliability between the two tested measurements. When comparing for in-clinic ground truth 6MWT steps vs. neighbouring at-home iPhone 6MWT steps, reliability was 0·74. Conclusion  Running the test–reliability test on both measurements shows that an iPhone 6MWT test is reliable compared to an in-clinic ground truth measurement in patients with cardiovascular disease.

The Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test: Reliability, Validity and Reference Values Studies with Healthy Elderly People

1997 ◽  
Vol 64 (5) ◽  
pp. 270-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Johanne Desrosiers ◽  
Annie Rochette ◽  
Réjean Hébert ◽  
Gina Bravo
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Reference Values ◽  
Intraclass Correlation ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Manual Dexterity ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Healthy Elderly ◽  
Block Test ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Several dexterity tests have been developed, including the Minnesota Rate of Manipulation Test (MRMT) and a new version, the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT). The objectives of the study were: a) to verify the test-retest reliability of the MMDT; b) to compare the MRMT and the MMDT; c) to study the concurrent validity of the MMDT; and d) to establish reference values for elderly people with the MMDT. Two hundred and forty-seven community-living healthy elderly were evaluated with the MMDT, and two other dexterity tests, the Box and Block Test (BBT) and the Purdue Pegboard (PP). Thirty-five of them were evaluated twice with the MMDT and 44 were evaluated with both the MMDT and MRMT. The results show that the test-retest reliability of the MMDT is acceptable to high (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.79 to 0.87, depending on the subtest) and the validity of the test is demonstrated by significant correlations between the MMDT, the BBT and the PP (0.63 to 0.67). There is a high correlation (0.85 to 0.95) between the MMDT and the MMRT in spite of different results. The reference values will help occupational therapists to differentiate better between real dexterity difficulties and those that may be attributed to normal aging.

scholarly journals AB0882 RELIABILITY OF THE 3-M BACKWARDS WALK TEST IN PATIENTS WITH REVISION TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1746.2-1746
Author(s):  
B. Unver ◽  
K. Sevik ◽  
V. Karatosun
Keyword(s):  
Total Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Knee Arthroplasty ◽  
Fall Risk ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Walk Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Background:Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment for patients suffering from end-stage osteoarthritis with 10- to 15-year implant survivorship rates exceeding 90%. Infection, osteolysis due to polyethylene wear, loosening, stiffness and instability may cause to implant failure and revision of the TKA (rTKA). However, up to 20% of patients continue to have postoperative pain, functional limitations and low treatment satisfaction and 24% of patients were not able to walk unaided with no limp or a slight limp after TKA [1].Falls and related traumas can produce “fracture, dislocation, crushing, and other injuries” [2]. Falls often occur due to impaired physical function which includes changes in lower knee joint angle, weakened lower limb muscles, peripheral nerve blockade, deformity of the foot limited balance and gait.Several measures of fall risk have been previously developed however, recent research has demonstrated that backwards walking is more sensitive at identifying changes in mobility and balance compared to forward walking. Backwards walking is necessary to perform such tasks as backing up to a chair, opening up a door or getting out of the way of a sudden obstacle.3-M Backwards Walk Test (3MBWT) is used to evaluate walking skills, fall risk and dynamic balance. The 3MBWT demonstrated similar or better diagnostic accuracy for falls in the past year than the most commonly used measures and found to be reliable in healthy subjects. [3] However, its reliability in rTKA has not been investigated.Objectives:The purposes of this study were to determine the test-retest reliability and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the 3MBWT in patients with rTKAMethods:Twenty-two patients with rTKA, operated on by the same surgeon, were included. For the 3MBWT, a distance of 3 meters was marked with tape and participants were asked to align their heels with the black tape. They were instructed to walk backwards as quickly. Patients performed trials for 3MBWT twice on the same day. Between the trials, patients waited for an hour on sitting position to prevent fatigue.Results:The 3MBWT showed an excellent test-retest reliability. Intraclass correlation coefficient ICC for 3MBWT was 0.97. The standard error of measurement and MCID at the 95% confidence level for 3MBWT were 1,08 and 2,99 respectively.Conclusion:The 3MBWT has an excellent test-retest reliability in patients with rTKA. It is an effective and reliable tool for measuring fall risk, dynamic balance and walking skills. As a clinical test, the 3MBWT is easy to score, has no cost, needs no special equipment and can be applied in a short time as part of the routine medical examination.References:[1]Shan L, Shan B, Suzuki A et al. Intermediate and long-term quality of life after total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JBJS 2015; 97: 156-168.[2]Johnson RL, Duncan CM, Ahn KS et al. Fall-Prevention Strategies and Patient Characteristics That Impact Fall Rates After Total Knee Arthroplasty. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2014; 119: 1113-1118.[3]Carter V, Jain T, James J et al. The 3-m Backwards Walk and Retrospective Falls: Diagnostic Accuracy of a Novel Clinical Measure. J Geriatr Phys Ther 2017.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Computerized Symbol Digit Modalities Test in a Swiss Pediatric Cohort Part 1: Validation

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Céline Hochstrasser ◽  
Sarah Rieder ◽  
Ursina Jufer-Riedi ◽  
Marie-Noëlle Klein ◽  
Anthony Feinstein ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Reliability ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Reliable Change Index ◽  
Information Processing Speed ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Norm Values ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
The University ◽  
Mean Time

ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to validate the computerized Symbol Digit Modalities Test (c-SDMT) in a Swiss pediatric cohort, in comparing the Swiss sample to the Canadian norms. Secondly, we evaluated sex effects, age-effects, and test–retest reliability of the c-SDMT in comparison to values obtained for the paper and pencil version of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT).MethodsThis longitudinal observational study was conducted in a single-center setting at the University Children’s Hospital of Bern. Our cohort consisted of 86 children (45 male and 41 female) aged from 8 to 16 years. The cohort included both healthy participants (n = 38) and patients (n = 48) hospitalized for a non-neurological disease. Forty eight participants were assessed during two testing sessions with the SDMT and the c-SDMT.ResultsTest–retest reliability was high in both tests (SDMT: ICC = 0.89, c-SDMT: ICC = 0.90). A reliable change index was calculated for the SDMT (RCIp = −3.18, 14.01) and the c-SDMT (RCIp = −5.45, 1.46) corrected for practice effects. While a significant age effect on information processing speed was observed, no such effect was found for sex. When data on the c-SDMT performance of the Swiss cohort was compared with that from a Canadian cohort, no significant difference was found for the mean time per trial in any age group. Norm values for age groups between 8 and 16 years in the Swiss cohort were established.ConclusionNorms for the c-SDMT between the Swiss and the Canadian cohort were comparable. The c-SDMT is a valid alternative to the SDMT. It is a feasible and easy to administer bedside tool due to high reliability and the lack of motor demands.

Test–retest reliability and developmental evolution of the 6-min walk test in Caucasian boys aged 5–12years

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Goemans ◽  
Katrijn Klingels ◽  
Marleen van den Hauwe ◽  
Anneleen Van Orshoven ◽  
Sofie Vanpraet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Walk Test ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Developmental Evolution ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

scholarly journals A-058 Test–Retest Reliability of the Grooved Pegboard Test in a Pediatric Medical Population

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 848-848
Author(s):  
David C ◽  
Vasserman M ◽  
Brooks B ◽  
Macallister W
Keyword(s):  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Practice Effects ◽  
Fine Motor ◽  
Limited Data ◽  
Motor Tasks ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Medical Population ◽  
Test Retest Reliability ◽  
Grooved Pegboard Test

Abstract Objective The Grooved Pegboard Test (GPT) is among the most commonly used fine motor tasks, though there is limited data on its basic psychometric properties in children and adolescents with medical conditions. The purpose of this study was to establish test reliability for the GPT within this group. Method Participants (N = 44; 22 males, 22 females) were children and adolescents clinically referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Diagnoses included epilepsy (n = 24), cardiac conditions (n = 13), other (n = 5). Each completed the GPT twice: once in the morning and once in the afternoon, ranging from 64-390 minutes apart (x-=263 min., SD = 60 min.). Spearman correlations assessed test–retest reliability for speed of completion for both dominant (DH) and non-dominant hands (NDH) trials and number of peg drops. Paired sample t-test assessed for practice effects between administrations. Results Ages ranged between 6.11 to 18.10 years (x-=12.52 yrs., SD = 3.19 yrs.). GPT raw scores for first presentation ranged from 25-296 seconds (DH x-=80.91, SD = 25.1; NDH x-=95.34, SD = 49.42). The GPT showed high test–retest reliability for DH (ρ = 0.80, p < 0.001) and NDH (ρ = 0.83, p < 0.001). Number of drops showed non-significant correlations across trials (DH ρ = −0.03, p = 0.87; NDH ρ = 0.11, p = 0.49). Practice effects were identified for the DH (t = −3.25, p = 0.002) but not NDH (t = −1.83, p = 0.074). Conclusion Strong test–retest reliability of the GPT speed of completion in this population supports stability of test results over time, though practice effects are seen at short intervals. Number of pegs dropped, however, lacks sufficient retest reliability and may be of lesser clinical utility. Overall, this study provides increased confidence for continued use of the GPT.

scholarly journals Measuring Food-Related Attentional Bias

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefania Franja ◽  
Anna E. McCrae ◽  
Tina Jahnel ◽  
Ashley N. Gearhardt ◽  
Stuart G. Ferguson
Keyword(s):  
Reaction Time ◽  
Attentional Bias ◽  
Reaction Times ◽  
Test Reliability ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Retest Reliability ◽  
Probe Task ◽  
Visual Probe ◽  
The Stability ◽  
Test Retest Reliability

Objective: Food-related attentional bias has been defined as the tendency to give preferential attention to food-related stimuli. Attentional bias is of interest as studies have found that increased attentional bias is associated with obesity; others, however, have not. A possible reason for mixed results may be that there is no agreed upon measure of attentional bias: studies differ in both measurement and scoring of attentional bias. Additionally, little is known about the stability of attentional bias over time. The present study aims to compare attentional bias measures generated from commonly used attentional bias tasks and scoring protocols, and to test re-test reliability.Methods: As part of a larger study, 69 participants (67% female) completed two food-related visual probe tasks at baseline: lexical (words as stimuli), and pictorial (pictures as stimuli). Reaction time bias scores (attentional bias scores) for each task were calculated in three different ways: by subtracting the reaction times for the trials where probes replaced (1) neutral stimuli from the trials where the probes replaced all food stimuli, (2) neutral stimuli from the trials where probes replaced high caloric food stimuli, and (3) neutral stimuli from low caloric food stimuli. This resulted in three separate attentional bias scores for each task. These reaction time results were then correlated. The pictorial visual probe task was administered a second time 14-days later to assess test-retest reliability.Results: Regardless of the scoring use, lexical attentional bias scores were minimal, suggesting minimal attentional bias. Pictorial task attentional bias scores were larger, suggesting greater attentional bias. The correlation between the various scores was relatively small (r = 0.13–0.20). Similarly, test-retest reliability for the pictorial task was poor regardless of how the test was scored (r = 0.20–0.41).Conclusion: These results suggest that at least some of the variation in findings across attentional bias studies could be due to differences in the way that attentional bias is measured. Future research may benefit from either combining eye-tracking measurements in addition to reaction times.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document