scholarly journals The assessment of left ventricular myocardial work in patients with chronic heart failure receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
S Dobrovolskaya ◽  
M Saidova ◽  
A Safiullina ◽  
T Uskach ◽  
A Belevskaya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Cardiac Contractility ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Cardiac Contractility Modulation ◽  
Device Implantation ◽  
Echocardiographic Parameters ◽  
Global Work

Abstract Introduction A new non-invasive technology for the assessment of left ventricular myocardial work (LVMW) is based on speckle-tracking echocardiography and considers LV pressure. Changes in LVMW are described in patients with different cardiovascular diseases. In patients with chronic heart failure (CHF), LVMW is associated with long-term prognosis and favorable response to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Purpose To study echocardiographic parameters, including LVMW, in patients with CHF receiving cardiac contractility modulation therapy. Methods The study included 40 patients (31 men and 7 women) aged 60.5 [55.0; 66.0] years with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (NYHA class II or III) in combination with atrial fibrillation. Before implantation of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) device and 2, 6 and 12 months after, the patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography with an assessment of the main structural and functional parameters. Also, initially and after 12 months of CCM therapy, an assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS) and LVMW was performed (global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global wasted work, global work efficiency (GWE)). Results Initially, the patients included in the study had enlarged left heart chambers and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). CCM therapy was accompanied by significant increase in LVEF from 30.0 [26.5; 37.0]% before device implantation up to 34.4 [27.0; 40.0]% (p=0.016) after 2 months and up to 38.0 [30.5; 42.0]% (p<0.01) after 6 months of treatment. One year after device implantation, a significant increase in LVEF was maintained as compared with initial data (39 [31; 45]%, p<0.01). We also analyzed the dynamics of echocardiographic parameters depending on etiology of CHF (ischemic and non-ischemic). As in general group of patients regardless of CHF etiology there was a significant increase in LVEF, that reached maximum values after 12 months of therapy (36 [30; 42]% in group with ischemic etiology, p<0.01 and 37 [30; 45]% in group with non-ischemic etiology, p<0.01). The assessment of GLS before and 12 months after device implantation revealed no significant dynamics (−7 [−9; −4]% and −8 [−9; −5]%, p=0.93). However, we observed significant changes in LVMW: an increase in GWI from 429 [332; 744] to 635 [401; 815] mm Hg% (p=0.01) and GWE (from 73 [68; 79] to 74 [70; 87] %, p=0.02) due to an increase in GCW (from 791 [530; 1031] to 836 [708; 1109] mm Hg%, p=0.03). Conclusions A significant increase in LVEF, GWI and GWE in patients with CHF (NYHA class II or III) receiving CCM therapy indicates an improvement in LV systolic function and the effectiveness of CCM therapy. The modern echocardiographic technologies open great opportunities for detailed assessment of the effectiveness of treatment of patients with CHF, including the use of CCM devices. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Ministry of Health of Russian Federation

scholarly journals 164 Effect of cardiac contractility modulation therapy on myocardial work in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (Supplement_G) ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Masarone ◽  
Stefano De Vivo ◽  
Vittoria Errigo ◽  
Antonio D’ Onofrio ◽  
Giuliano D’Alterio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Contractility ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Contractility Modulation ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Constructive Work ◽  
Global Work ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Aims Cardiac contractility modulation therapy (CCMT) has been shown to reduce hospitalizations and to improve quality of life in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who remain symptomatic despite disease-modifying therapies. Strain imaging derived myocardial work (MW) is an emerging tool for evaluating left ventricular mechanics by incorporating systolic deformation and afterload burden in the analysis. To evaluate prospectively the impact of CCMT in HFrEF patients on MW derived parameters in relation to standard echocardiographic indices. Methods and results We recruited 12 HFrEF patients with indications to CCMT according to current clinical practice. A comprehensive echo-Doppler evaluation, including speckle tracking derived assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS), was performed before and after three months from the CCM device implantation. Parameters of MW such as global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW) global wasted work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE) were calculated according to standardized procedures. Median values (interquartile range) were compared for all those parameters from baseline and 3-month follow-up with Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for continuous variables. At three months from CCM implant an improvement of LVEF [from 32% (27–34) to 36% (29–39), P < 0.05], GLS [from 7.4% (6.2–11.2) to 9.9% (7.5–9.4), P < 0.05], GWI [from 461 mmHg (372–613) to 589 mmHg (413–696), P < 0.05], GCW [from 800 mmHg (620–930) to 970 mmHg (644–1009), P = 0.236], and GWE [from 73% (65–78) to 85% (78–87), P < 0.05] was observed, with a consistent reduction of GWW [from 161 mmHg (148–227) to 125 mmHg (101–188), P < 0.05]. We also found a positive correlation between the magnitude of LVEF improvement and the baseline values of GCW (r = 0.727, P = 0.011). Conclusions At 3 months, CCMT significantly improves standard and advanced left ventricular systolic function indices. This improvement is due to the increase of constructive work and a reduction of wasted work. In addition, the increase of left ventricular ejection fraction can be predicted by the global constructive work levels at baseline.

scholarly journals Comparison between Spironolactone and Eplerenone on LV Systolic Function in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 65-70
Author(s):  
Md Noornabi Khondokar ◽  
Khurshed Ahmed ◽  
Mohammad Ashraf Hossain ◽  
Rakibulh Rashed ◽  
Mohamed Mausool Siraj ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Systolic Function ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Group I ◽  
Lv Systolic Function

Background:Chronic heart failure (CHF) is the most common and prognostically unfavorable outcome of many diseases of the cardiovascular system. Clinical trials have demonstrated mortality and morbidity benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure. These studies have used either eplerenone or spironolactone as the MRA. Eplerenone is a selective aldosterone antagonist expected to have a lower incidence of hormonal side effects than spironolactone. The present study is designed to compare these two drugs in chronic heart failure patients as no head to head trial between these two drugs is found regarding improvement of systolic function, tolerability and safety. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of eplerenone and spironolactone on LV systolic function in patients with chronic heart failure in a single center. Methods:It was a randomized clinical trial single blind study. A total of 224 cases of chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and NYHA class III or IV were selected by random sampling, from July 2017 to June 2018. Each patient was randomly allocated into either of the two arms, and was continued receiving treatment with either spironolactone (Arm-I) or eplerenone(Arm-II). Each patient was evaluated clinically, biochemically and echocardiographically at the beginning of treatment (baseline) at 1 month and at the end of 6th month. Echocardiography was performed to find out change in left ventricular systolic function. Result: After 6 months of treatment, ejection fraction was found higher in the eplerenonearm (40.3 ± 6.5 versus 38.3 ± 4.6%; P < 0.05). Ejection fraction (EF) changes were 6.2% in eplerenone group and 4.1% in spironolactonearm. A significant reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume (21.9±2.5 in group I versus 14.9±5.7 in group II; P < 0.05) and left ventricular systolic diameter (48.7±4.0 in arm I versus 45.2±4.9 in arm II; P<0.05) occurred after 6 months of treatment. But no significant differences were observed in left ventricular end-diastolic volume (187.8±37.4 versus 184.5±33.9; P=0.101) and left ventricular diastolic diameter (60.1±4.5 versus 61.0±4.9; P=0.0818) between arms. Assessment of blood pressure six months after treatment shows, systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were improved in both arms but difference between two arms were statistically non-significant (p>0.05). Conclusion: In this study, the improvement in systolic function was more in eplerenone arm, which also had fewer adverse side effects when compared to spironolactone arm. So, it can be concluded that eplerenone can be advised in patient with chronic heart failure in addition to other drugs that are used to treat heart failure. University Heart Journal Vol. 16, No. 2, Jul 2020; 65-70

Proportion of Patients Eligible for Cardiac Contractility Modulation: Real-Life Data from a Single-Center Heart Failure Clinic

Cardiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Dávid Pilecky ◽  
Balázs Muk ◽  
Zsuzsanna Majoros ◽  
Dénes Vágány ◽  
Krisztina Kósa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Cardiac Contractility ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Treatment Optimization ◽  
Cardiac Contractility Modulation

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Based on recently published randomized controlled trials, cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) seems to be an effective device-based therapeutic option in symptomatic chronic heart failure (HF) (CHF). The aim of the current study was to estimate what proportion of patients with CHF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) &#x3c;50% could be eligible for CCM based on the inclusion criteria of the FIX-HF-5C trial. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Consecutive patients referred and followed up at our HF clinic due to HF with reduced or mid-range LVEF were retrospectively assessed. After a treatment optimization period of 3–6 months, the inclusion criteria of the FIX-HF-5C trial (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, 25% ≤ LVEF ≤45%, QRS &#x3c;130 ms, and sinus rhythm) were applied to determine the number of patients eligible for CCM. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of the 640 patients who were involved, the proportion of highly symptomatic patients in NYHA class III/IV decreased from 77.0% (<i>n</i> = 493) at baseline to 18.6% (<i>n</i> = 119) after the treatment optimization period (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). Mean LVEF increased significantly from 29.0 ± 7.9% to 36.3 ± 9.9% (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001), while the proportion of patients with 25% ≤ LVEF ≤45% increased from 69.7% (<i>n</i> = 446) to 73.3% (<i>n</i> = 469) (<i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). QRS duration was below 130 ms in 63.1% of patients, while 30.0% of patients had persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation. We found that the eligibility criteria for CCM therapy based on the FIX-HF-5C study were fulfilled for 23.0% (<i>n</i> = 147) of patients at baseline and 5.2% (<i>n</i> = 33) after treatment optimization. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This single-center cohort study showed that 5% of patients with CHF and impaired LVEF immediately after treatment optimization fulfilled the inclusion criteria of the FIX-HF-5C study and would be candidates for CCM.

scholarly journals PREDICTORS OF WEIGHT LOSS IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEART FAILURE AND REDUSED LEFT VENTRICULAR EJECTION FRACTION

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 3-11
Author(s):  
Kateryna Voitsekhovska ◽  
Leonid Voronkov
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Weight Loss ◽  
Chronic Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Vasodilator Response

Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a heterogeneous syndrome with a poor prognosis. Aim of the work – to define predictors of body weight (BW) loss in patients with CHF and a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Materials and methods. 120 patients with stable CHF and LVEF ≤35 %, II-IV NYHA class were examined. Patients were divided into two groups according to the value of BW loss for 6 months: the first group - loss of BW <6 %, the second - ≥ 6 %. Results. Out of the 120 patients who were studied, a BW loss of ≥ 6 % occurred in 59 (49.2 %) patients. According to the results of binary logistic regression, predictors of BW loss of ≥6 % in patients with CHF and LVEF ≤ 35 % were: age, coronary heart disease, anaemia, and the number of hospitalizations over the last year. People with poorer quality of life, bigger number of points on the Beck depression scale and DEFS, with lower levels of physical activity and worse endothelium-dependent vasodilator response; higher sizes of the right atrium, right ventricle, and pulmonary artery systolic pressure, E / E '. Higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP), uric acid are associated with a risk of losing BW≥6 %. Conclusions. Weight loss ≥ 6 % is observed in 49.2 % of patients with CHF and LVEF≤35 %. According to multivariate analysis, independent predictors of BW loss of ≥6 % in patients with CHF and LVEF≤35 % are age, CRP level, III-IV NYHA class, lower cholesterol levels, as well as lower rates of flow-dependent vasodilator response and hip circumference.

scholarly journals New Generation Cardiac Contractility Modulation Device—Filling the Gap in Heart Failure Treatment

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Tint ◽  
Roxana Florea ◽  
Sorin Micu
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Contractility ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Device Therapy ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Contractility Modulation ◽  
New Device ◽  
Wide Range

(1) Background: Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world. Despite substantial progress in its prevention and treatment, mortality rates remain high. Device therapy for HF mainly includes cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and the use of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Recently, however, a new device therapy—cardiac contractility modulation (CCM)—became available. (2) Aim: The purpose of this study is to present a first case-series of patients with different clinical patterns of HF with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), supported with the newest generation of CCM devices. (3) Methods and results: Five patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤ 35% and a New York Heart Association (NYHA) class ≥ III were supported with CCM OPTIMIZER® SMART IPGCCMX10 at our clinic. The patients had a median age of 67 ± 8.03 years (47–80) and were all males—four with ischemic etiology dilated cardiomyopathy. In two cases, CCM was added on top of CRT (non-responders), and, in one patient, CCM was delivered during persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). After 6 months of follow-up, the LVEF increased from 25.4 ± 6.8% to 27 ± 9%, and the six-minute walk distance increased from 310 ± 65.1 m to 466 ± 23.6 m. One patient died 47 days after device implantation. (4) Conclusion: CCM therapy provided with the new model OPTIMIZER® SMART IPG CCMX10 is safe, feasible, and applicable to a wide range of patients with HF.

scholarly journals Cardiac contractility modulation therapy in elderly patients with chronic heart failure: results of the 12-month follow-up

2021 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
I. A. Chugunov ◽  
K. V. Davtyan ◽  
A. H. Topchyan ◽  
N. A. Mironova ◽  
E. M. Gupalo
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Nyha Class ◽  
Cardiac Contractility ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Additional Treatment ◽  
Cardiac Contractility Modulation ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Aim. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cardiac contractility modulation (CCM) therapy in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).Methods. Sixteen patients older than 65 years old (median age 70 years) undergoing CCM Optimizer (Impulse Dynamics) device implantation due to HFrEF (NYHA class II - 9 (56%), III - 4 (25%), IV - 3 (19%)) were enrolled in this two-center observational study. Before implantation 6-minute walk test (6MWT), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) was performed on all patients, and NTproBNP levels were assessed. The follow-up duration was 12 months with 2, 6, 12-month follow-up visits. Control 6MWT, TTE and NTproBNP tests were performed at 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits.Results. Two patients died during follow-up due to HF decompensation. The remaining patients showed a significant improvement in 6MWT (350 m vs 402.5 m, p=0,01). We also noted a tendency towards the left ventricular EF improvement (33% vs 40%, p=0,2) and lower values of NTproBNP levels (1112 pg/ml vs 527 pg/ml, p=0,19).Conclusion. CCM therapy is a safe and efficient additional treatment option to manage elderly patients with HFrEF for reducing signs and symptoms of HF.

scholarly journals Cardiac Contractility Modulation in Patients with Heart Failure with Reduced Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

Hearts ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 156-169
Author(s):  
Francesco Giallauria ◽  
Alessandro Parlato ◽  
Anna Di Lorenzo ◽  
Crescenzo Testa ◽  
Antonio D’Onofrio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Contractility ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Contractility Modulation ◽  
Innovative Therapy

Cardiac contractility modulation is an innovative therapy conceived for the treatment of heart failure. It is a device-based therapy, employing multiple electrodes to deliver relatively high-voltage (~7.5 V) biphasic signals to the endocardium of the right ventricular septum, in order to improve heart failure symptoms, exercise capacity and quality of life. Multiple clinical and mechanistic studies have been conducted to investigate the potential usefulness of this technology and, as of now, they suggest that it could have a place in therapy and meet a relevant medical need for a specific sub-category of underserved heart failure patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. More studies are needed to further investigate its effect on outcomes such as mortality and rate of hospitalizations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document