scholarly journals Clinical features and long-term prognosis of patients with congestive heart failure taking tolvaptan: a comparison between preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
T Seki ◽  
Y Kubota ◽  
J Matsuda ◽  
Y Tokita ◽  
Y Iwasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Long Term Prognosis ◽  
Stratified Analysis

Abstract Background There were few reports which investigated the clinical benefit of long-term use of tolvaptan (TLV) for heart failure (HF). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term prognosis of patients administrated TLV for more than 1 year in the HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Method In a total of 591 consecutive patients who were admitted to our hospital and administered TLV for HF between 2011 and 2018, we retrospectively enrolled 147 patients who were administered TLV for more than 1 year. The patients were classified into 2 groups, the HFpEF group (n=77, 52.4%) and the HFrEF group (n=70, 47.6%), and clinical backgrounds and long-term prognosis were examined. Furthermore, we performed stratified analysis based on the response to TLV defined by urine osmolality (The responder group n=40, the non-responder group n=52). Results The HFpEF group was significantly older (77.7±9.2 vs. 71.3±11.5 years, P<0.01) and included more female (41.6 vs. 21.4%, P<0.01) compared with the HFrEF group. Other baseline characteristics were not different between the two groups. During the average 2.7 years follow up, the HFpEF group showed significantly lower all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality compared to the HFrEF group (24.7 vs. 38.6%, Log-Rank P=0.014, 13.0 vs. 25.7%, Log-Rank P=0.007, respectively). Univariate analysis revealed that male, HFpEF, serum creatinine changes from baseline (ΔCre) were the factors correlated with all-cause mortality (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.02 – 4.40, P=0.045, HR 0.48, 95% CI 0.26 - 0.87, P=0.016 and HR 1.50, 95% CI 1.00 - 2.24, P=0.049, respectively). According to multivariate analysis, HFpEF was the independent influencing factor of all-cause mortality (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.23 - 0.86, P=0.017). Stratified analysis revealed that in the non-responder group all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the HFpEF group than in the HFrEF group (24.2% vs 48.3%, P=0.049). Conclusion Long-term administration of TLV maybe more beneficial for HFpEF compared with HFrEF. This tendency was remarkable at non-responder group. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals Clinical features and long-term prognosis of patients with congestive heart failure taking tolvaptan: a comparison of patients with preserved and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Toshiki Seki ◽  
Yoshiaki Kubota ◽  
Junya Matsuda ◽  
Yukichi Tokita ◽  
Yu-ki Iwasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Long Term Prognosis

AbstractFew studies have investigated the clinical benefit of the long-term use of tolvaptan (TLV) for heart failure (HF). This study evaluated the long-term prognosis of patients administered TLV for > 1 year among patients who had HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and those who had HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Overall, 591 consecutive patients were admitted to our hospital and administered TLV for HF between 2011 and 2018. We retrospectively enrolled 147 patients who were administered TLV for > 1 year. We divided them into the HFpEF group (n = 77, 52.4%) and the HFrEF group (n = 70; 47.6%). Their clinical backgrounds and long-term prognosis were examined. Compared with the patients in the HFrEF group, the patients in the HFpEF group were significantly older and included more women. Moreover, the HFpEF group showed significantly lower all-cause mortality (38.6% vs. 24.7%; log-rank, P = 0.014) and cardiovascular mortality during the average 2.7-year follow-up. Univariate analysis revealed that all-cause mortality was correlated with male sex, HFpEF, and changes in serum creatinine levels from baseline. Multivariate analysis revealed that HFpEF was an independent influencing factor for all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.23–0.86; P = 0.017). Long-term administration of TLV may be more beneficial for HFpEF than for HFrEF.

scholarly journals Digoxin is Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation without Concomitant Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maciej Tysarowski ◽  
Rafael Nigri ◽  
Brijesh Patel ◽  
Giselle A Suero-Abreu ◽  
Balaji Pratap ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice and is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke and death. Digitalis has been used for more than 200 years to treat heart conditions, including AF, and its use remains controversial due to uncertain long-term morbidity and mortality. Methods: We conducted a cohort study of hospitalized patients with AF assessing the effects of digoxin on long-term all-cause mortality. Patients were divided into two groups: with and without heart failure (HF). We performed multivariable Cox regression analysis to assess hazard ratios (HR) for all-cause mortality depending on digoxin treatment and used propensity score matching to adjust for differences in background characteristics between treatment groups. Results: Among 2179 consecutive patients hospitalized with AF, the median age was 73 ± 14, and 52.5% of patients were male, 49% had HF, and 18.8% were discharged on digoxin. Median left ventricular ejection fraction in the whole cohort was 60 (IQR 40-65). Among patients with HF, 34.5% had preserved, 17.3% had mid-range and 48.1% had reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. The mean follow-up time was 3 ± 2.05 years. In patients without HF there was a statistically significant increased mortality in the digoxin subgroup after propensity score matching (HR = 2.23, 95% CI 1.42-3.51, p < 0.001). In contrast, in patients with HF, there was no difference in mortality between the treatment groups (p = 0.92). Conclusions: Digoxin use in our study was associated with increased mortality in patients with AF and without concomitant HF.

scholarly journals Systolic blood pressure and outcome in patients admitted with acute heart failure: a pooled analysis from 4 randomized clinical trials

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
J Grand ◽  
K Miger ◽  
A Sajadieh ◽  
L Kober ◽  
C Torp-Pedersen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Short And Long Term

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: Foundation. Main funding source(s): The Danish Heart Foundation Background In acute heart failure (AHF), low systolic blood pressure (SBP) has been associated with poor outcome. Less is known of the risk related to normal versus elevated SBP and interaction with left ventricular ejection fraction. Purpose The aim of the present study was to assess the association between baseline SBP and short- and long-term outcome in a large cohort of AHF-patients. Methods A pooled cohort of four randomized controlled trials investigating the vasodilator serelaxin versus placebo in patients admitted with AHF and an SBP from 125 to 180 mmHg. Endpoints were 180-day all-cause mortality and a short-term composite endpoint (worsening heart failure, all-cause mortality or hospital readmission for HF through Day 14). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was categorized into HFrEF (&lt;40%) and HFpEF (= &gt;40%). Multivariable Cox regression was used and adjusted for age, sex, baseline body mass index, HFrEF, serum estimated glomerular filtration rate, allocated treatment (placebo/serelaxin), diabetes mellitus, ischemic heart disease, and atrial fibrillation/flutter. Measurements and Main Results A total of 10.533 patients with a mean age of 73 (±12) years and median SBP of 140 (130-150) mmHg were included within mean 8.2 hours from admission. LVEF was assessed in 8493 (81%), and of these, 4294 (51%) had HFrEF. Increasing SBP as a continuous variable was inversely associated with 180-day mortality (HRadjusted: 0.93 [0.88-0.98], p = 0.004 per 10 mmHg increase) and with the composite endpoint (HRadjusted: 0.90 [0.85-0.95], p &lt; 0.0001 per 10 mmHg increase). A significant interaction was observed regarding LVEF, revealing that SBP was not associated with mortality in patients with HFpEF  (HRadjusted: 1.01 [0.94-1.09], p = 0.83 per 10 mmHg increase), but SBP was associated with increased mortality in HFrEF (HRadjusted: 0.80 [0.73-0.88], p &lt; 0.001 per 10 mmHg increase) (Figure). Conclusions Elevated SBP is independently associated with favorable short- and long-term outcome in AHF-patients. The association between SBP and mortality was, however, not present in patients with preserved LVEF. Abstract Figure. Survival plots by SBP and LVEF

Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan Combined with Dapagliflozin on Long-Term Cardiac Mortality in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Angiology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 000331972110473
Author(s):  
Umut Karabulut ◽  
Kudret Keskin ◽  
Dilay Karabulut ◽  
Ece Yiğit ◽  
Zerrin Yiğit
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Cardiac Mortality ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Neprilysin Inhibitor

The angiotensin receptor–neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) sacubitril/valsartan and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor dapagliflozin have been shown to reduce rehospitalization and cardiac mortality in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We aimed to compare the long-term cardiac and all-cause mortality of ARNI and dapagliflozin combination therapy against ARNI monotherapy in patients with HFrEF. This retrospective study involved 244 patients with HF with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II–IV symptoms and ejection fraction ≤40%. The patients were divided into 2 groups: ARNI monotherapy and ARNI+dapagliflozin. Median follow-up was 2.5 (.16–3.72) years. One hundred and seventy-five (71.7%) patients were male, and the mean age was 65.9 (SD, 10.2) years. Long-term cardiac mortality rates were significantly lower in the ARNI+dapagliflozin group (7.4%) than in the ARNI monotherapy group (19.5%) ( P = .01). Dapagliflozin [Hazard Ratio (HR) [95% Confidence Interval (CI)] = .29 [.10–.77]; P = .014] and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [HR (95% CI) = .89 (.85–.93); P < .001] were found to be independent predictors of cardiac mortality. Our study showed a significant reduction in cardiac mortality with ARNI and dapagliflozin combination therapy compared with ARNI monotherapy.

4181Prognosis of patients with mid-range left ventricular ejection fraction treated with PCI: insight from the global leaders study

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P Chichareon ◽  
R Modolo ◽  
N Kogame ◽  
M Tomaniak ◽  
E Teiger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stent Thrombosis ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Heart failure with mid-range ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction between 40 to 49%) was introduced in the 2016 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for heart failure. The prognosis of the mid-range of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was less well assessed in patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Purpose We aimed to assess the 2-year outcomes of patients with mid-range ejection fraction (LVEF between 40 to 49%) after PCI compared with reduced LVEF (<40%) and preserved LVEF (≥50) in the GLOBAL LEADERS study. Methods The GLOBAL LEADERS study was a multicenter, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of two antiplatelet strategies in all-comers patients undergoing PCI with biolimus-A9 eluting stent. Patients with available information of LVEF were eligible in the present analysis. Patients were classified according to their LVEF into three groups; preserved (LVEF ≥50), mid-range (LVEF 40–49%) and reduced (LVEF <40%) left ventricular ejection fraction. Clinical outcomes at 2 years after PCI were compared among three groups in the multivariable Cox regression analysis. The primary outcome of present study was all-cause mortality at 2 years after PCI. The secondary outcomes were patient-oriented composite endpoint (POCE). Individual components of the composite endpoint, definite or probable stent thrombosis and bleeding academic research consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 were also reported. Results Out of 15968 patients included in the GLOBAL LEADERS study, information of LVEF was available in 15008 patients (93.99%); 12,128 patients (80.81%) were in the group of preserved LVEF, 1,737 patients (11.57%) were in the mid-range LVEF group and 1,143 patients (7.62%) were in the reduced LVEF group. The risk of all-cause mortality and POCE at 2 years were significantly different among the three groups. In an adjusted model, compared with the group of preserved LVEF, the hazard ratio for the all-cause mortality at 2 years rose from 1.89 (95% CI, 1.46–2.45) to 3.72 (95% CI, 2.95–4.70) in the group of mid-range and reduced LVEF respectively. Similar rises were observed for the POCE at 2 years from 1.27 (95% CI, 1.11–1.44) in the group of mid-range LVEF to 1.63 (95% CI, 1.42–1.87) in the group of reduced LVEF. The risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and definite or probable stent thrombosis in patients with mid-range LVEF was not different from patients with reduced LVEF (see figure). A similar risk of revascularization was observed among the three groups. Outcomes among three LVEF categories Conclusion Patients with mid-range LVEF undergoing PCI had a different prognosis from patients with reduced LVEF and preserved LVEF in term of survival and composite ischemic endpoints at 2 years.

scholarly journals Prognostic impacts of changes in left ventricular ejection fraction in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction

Open Heart ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. e001112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akiomi Yoshihisa ◽  
Yu Sato ◽  
Yuki Kanno ◽  
Mai Takiguchi ◽  
Tetsuro Yokokawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Event ◽  
Troponin I ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
All Cause Mortality

BackgroundIt has been reported that recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is associated with better prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced EF (rEF). However, change of LVEF has not yet been investigated in cases of HF with preserved EF (HFpEF).Methods and resultsConsecutive 1082 HFpEF patients, who had been admitted to hospital due to decompensated HF (EF >50% at the first LVEF assessment at discharge), were enrolled, and LVEF was reassessed within 6 months in the outpatient setting (second LVEF assessment). Among the HFpEF patients, LVEF of 758 patients remained above 50% (pEF group), 138 patients had LVEF of 40%–49% (midrange EF, mrEF group) and 186 patients had LVEF of less than 40% (rEF group). In the multivariable logistic regression analysis, younger age and presence of higher levels of troponin I were predictors of rEF (worsened HFpEF). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the cardiac event rate of the groups progressively increased from pEF, mrEF to rEF (log-rank, p<0.001), whereas all-cause mortality did not significantly differ among the groups. In the multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis, rEF (vs pEF) was not a predictor of all-cause mortality, but an independent predictor of increased cardiac event rates (HR 1.424, 95% CI 1.020 to 1.861, p=0.039).ConclusionAn initial assessment of LVEF and LVEF changes are important for deciding treatment and predicting prognosis in HFpEF patients. In addition, several confounding factors are associated with LVEF changes in worsened HFpEF patients.

scholarly journals The subclinical hypothyroid state might predict 30-day readmission in patients admitted with acute heart failure syndrome and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 175394472097774
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saad ◽  
Andrisael Garcia Lacoste ◽  
Pooja Balar ◽  
Aiyi Zhang ◽  
Timothy J. Vittorio
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Hospital Readmission ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Left Ventricular Ejection ◽  
Ventricular Ejection Fraction ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Introduction: Thyroid hormone (TH) has an essential role on the functional capability of cardiac muscle with its gene modulation and induction of vasodilatory effects. There is considerable evidence to suggest the role of TH in patients with acute coronary syndrome, but less is known about its prognostic role in heart failure (HF) patients. We aim to evaluate the association between subclinical hypothyroid state (SCHS) and event rates including 30-day all-cause and HF readmission in patients with an index hospitalization for acute HF syndrome (AHFS). Methodology: A retrospective chart review analysis of 2335 patients admitted with the diagnosis of AHFS between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2017 was conducted. SCHS was defined as thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) level >4.50 mIU/L with a normal thyroxine (T4) level. Patients with pre-existing thyroid disease or receiving thyroid replacement therapy were excluded. HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) was defined as left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) >40% and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) was defined as having LVEF ⩽40%. Percentage of 30-day, 3-month and 6-month all-cause readmission and mortality rates were calculated in both cohorts of AHFS (HFpEF and HFrEF) with and without SCHS. Results: The mean age of the 2335 AHFS population was 65 (±14.8) years. Of the 2335 patients admitted with AHFS, 1228 (52.6%) patients were found to have HFrEF and 1107 (47.4%) with HFpEF. There were 170 (7.3%) patients with AHFS found to have SCHS. There were more males than females (54% versus 46%). The percentage of hospital readmission within 30 days was higher for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFrEF group (42% versus 30%, p = 0.001). Hospital readmission within 30 days for patients with SCHS compared with those without SCHS in the HFpEF group did not differ (36.5% versus 31%, p = 0.47). Additionally, all-cause mortality was higher among patients with SCHS compared with patients without SCHS in the HFrEF group (18.7% versus 7.0%, p < 0.001). All-cause mortality was found similar in both arms of the HFpEF group (9.5% versus 7.7%, p = 0.73). Conclusion: During an index hospital admission for AHFS, SCHS was an independent predictor of readmission in 30 days in patients with HFrEF but not in patients with HFpEF. Additionally, it was related to adverse outcome such as all-cause mortality in HFrEF patients but not in HFpEF patients. Further studies regarding the concept of tissue thyroid and the potential for a therapeutic target are warranted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document