scholarly journals Impact of canagliflozin in natriuretic peptides in patients with type 2 diabetes after hospitalization for acute heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Martin Dorado ◽  
R Gonzalez Manzanares ◽  
J.C Castillo Dominguez ◽  
J Lopez Aguilera ◽  
J Perea ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated to reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). We aimed to assess the changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) concentrations in a cohort of patients hospitalized for HF according to whether or not they received canagliflozin at discharge. Methods This cohort study included all patients with T2D admitted for HF from January 2017 to December 2019 in a single center. We excluded patients whose treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors were contraindicated (eGFR ≤45 ml/min/1.73 m2) and those who had other SGLT2 inhibitors than canagliflozin in their treatment at discharged. All patients had received a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure, including signs and symptoms of fluid overload and a concentration of NT-ProBNP of 1400 pg/mL at least. NT-ProBNP concentrations were collected at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after hospitalization with laboratory records if available. The aim of this study is to compare mean NT-ProBNP levels at hospital discharge and 3, 6 and 12 moths of follow-up in patients treated with and without canagliflozin. Results We included a total of 102 patients, 45 patients (44.1%) were prescribed canagliflozin and the remaining 57 (55.9%) were not prescribed any SGLT2 inhibitors (control group). There were no significant differences in clinical and comorbidities in both groups, except for age; slightly younger in the canagliflozin group (69,2±10,3 vs 73,2±11,1; p=0,04). Treatment at discharge was also similar, patients in the control group received more dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (21.1% vs 6.7%; p=0.04). Low rate of patients received sacubitril-valsartan (15,6%) in the canagliflozin group and 14% in the control group. More than a half of patients in both groups have HF with reduced ejection fraction. Mean levels of peptides were similar in both groups at hospital admission and discharge. During the first period of 3 months, we observed a decreased of NT-ProBNP concentration in both groups, but significantly inferior in canagliflozin group (p<0,001). At 6 and 12 months, NT-ProBNP levels were practically maintained in patients treated with canagliflozin, whereas levels in patients in the control group were increased. Difference in both groups at a 12 month-period was significantly superior (p=0,004), with a median reduction of concentration levels at discharge of 64.3% in the canagliflozin group and 15,8% in control group. There were no differences in patients with HF from those with reduced ejection fraction and preserved. Conclusions Canagliflozin therapy at discharge was associated with a significant reduction in NT-ProBNP concentration in patients with diabetes after hospitalization for HF. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. NT-ProBNP according to canagliflozin

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0261986
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Guowei Zhou ◽  
Yawei Zheng ◽  
Dan Lv ◽  
Xiangjun Zhu ◽  
...  

Introduction After stage 3 CKD, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events increased significantly. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the cardiovascular protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with stage 3/4 CKD with different baseline kidney function or underlying diseases. Method To identify eligible trials, we systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021. The primary cardiovascular outcome was defined as a combination of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. Baseline kidney functions (stage 3a CKD: eGFR45-59mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 3b CKD: eGFR30-44mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 4 CKD: eGFR<30mL/min per 1.73m2) and underlying diseases (Type 2 diabetes, heart failure (Preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) were used to stratify efficacy and safety outcomes. The results were subjected to a sensitivity analysis to ensure that they were reliable. Results In the present study, a total of eleven trials were included that involved a total of 27,823 patients with stage 3/4 CKD. The treatment and control groups contained 14,451 and 13,372 patients, respectively. In individuals with stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes by 26% (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.69–0.80], I2 = 0.00%), by 30% in patients with stage 3a CKD (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.59–0.84], I2 = 18.70%), by 23% in patients with stage 3b CKD (HR 0.77, [95% CI 0.66–0.90], I2 = 2.12%), and by 29% in patients with stage 4 CKD (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.53–0.96], I2 = 0.00%). The risk of primary outcomes was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.63–0.80], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with type 2 diabetes, by 28% (HR 0.72, [95% CI 0.56–0.93], I2 = 37.23%) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, by 21% (HR 0.79, [95% CI 0.70–0.89], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and by 25% (HR 0.75, [95% CI 0.64–0.88], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Conclusions For stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, and these benefits were consistent throughout the spectrum of different kidney functions, even in stage 4 CKD. There was no evidence of increased adverse outcomes across different baseline clinical complications, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.


Author(s):  
Matthew M. Y. Lee ◽  
Katriona J. M. Brooksbank ◽  
Kirsty Wetherall ◽  
Kenneth Mangion ◽  
Giles Roditi ◽  
...  

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, their effects on cardiac structure and function in HFrEF are uncertain. Methods: We designed a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the cardiac effects of empagliflozin in patients in NYHA functional class II to IV with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤40% and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Patients were randomized 1:1 to empagliflozin 10 milligrams once daily or placebo, stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years) and glycemic status (diabetes or prediabetes). The co-primary outcomes were change from baseline to 36 weeks in LV end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVi) and LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Secondary efficacy outcomes included other CMR measures (LVEDVi, LVEF), diuretic intensification, symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS)), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), B-lines on lung ultrasound and biomarkers (including NT-proBNP). Results: From April 2018 to August 2019, 105 patients were randomized: 77 (73.3%) male, mean age 68.7 [SD 11.1] years, 82 (78.1%) diabetes and 23 (21.9%) prediabetes, mean LVEF 32.5% [9.8%], and 81 (77.1%) NYHA II and 24 (22.9%) NYHA III. Patients received standard treatment for HFrEF. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced LVESVi by 6.0 (-10.8 to -1.2) ml/m 2 (p=0.015). There was no difference in LV GLS. Empagliflozin reduced LVEDVi by 8.2 (-13.7 to -2.6) ml/m 2 (p=0.0042) and reduced NT-proBNP by 28 (2 to 47) %, p=0.038. There were no between-group differences in other CMR measures, KCCQ-TSS, 6MWD or B-lines. Conclusions: The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced LV volumes in patients with HFrEF and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Favorable reverse LV remodeling may be a mechanism by which SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HF hospitalization and mortality in HFrEF. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT03485092.


2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Jensen ◽  
Morten Schou ◽  
Caroline Kistorp ◽  
Jens Faber ◽  
Tine W. Hansen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) is a useful biomarker in outpatients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to diagnose heart failure (HF). Elevated B-type natriuretic peptides are included in the definition of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but little is known about the prognostic value of including A-type natriuretic peptides (MR-proANP) in the evaluation of patients with T2D. Methods We prospectively evaluated the risk of incident cardiovascular (CV) events in outpatients with T2D (n = 806, mean ± standard deviation age 64 ± 10 years, 65% male, median [interquartile range] duration of diabetes 12 [6–17] years, 17.5% with symptomatic HFpEF) according to MR-proANP levels and stratified according to HF-status including further stratification according to a prespecified cut-off level of MR-proANP. Results A total of 126 CV events occurred (median follow-up 4.8 [4.1–5.3] years). An elevated MR-proANP, with a cut-off of 60 pmol/l or as a continuous variable, was associated with incident CV events (p < 0.001). Compared to patients without HF, patients with HFpEF and high MR-proANP (≥ 60 pmol/l; median 124 [89–202] pmol/l) and patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had a higher risk of CV events (multivariable model; hazard ratio (HR) 2.56 [95% CI 1.64–4.00] and 3.32 [1.64–6.74], respectively). Conversely, patients with HFpEF and low MR-proANP (< 60 pmol/l; median 46 [32–56] pmol/l) did not have an increased risk (HR 2.18 [0.78–6.14]). Conclusions Patients with T2D and HFpEF with high MR-proANP levels had an increased risk for CV events compared to patients with HFpEF without elevated MR-proANP and compared to patients without HF, supporting the use of MR-proANP in the definition of HFpEF from a prognostic point-of-view.


Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (22) ◽  
pp. 2591-2593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma A. Figtree ◽  
Karin Rådholm ◽  
Terrance D. Barrett ◽  
Vlado Perkovic ◽  
Kenneth W. Mahaffey ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document