scholarly journals Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with stage 3/4 CKD: A meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. e0261986
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Guowei Zhou ◽  
Yawei Zheng ◽  
Dan Lv ◽  
Xiangjun Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Outcomes ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Stage 4

Introduction After stage 3 CKD, the risk of adverse cardiovascular events increased significantly. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate the cardiovascular protective effect of SGLT2 inhibitors in patients with stage 3/4 CKD with different baseline kidney function or underlying diseases. Method To identify eligible trials, we systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021. The primary cardiovascular outcome was defined as a combination of cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization due to heart failure. Baseline kidney functions (stage 3a CKD: eGFR45-59mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 3b CKD: eGFR30-44mL/min per 1.73m2, stage 4 CKD: eGFR<30mL/min per 1.73m2) and underlying diseases (Type 2 diabetes, heart failure (Preserved ejection fraction or reduced ejection fraction), atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease) were used to stratify efficacy and safety outcomes. The results were subjected to a sensitivity analysis to ensure that they were reliable. Results In the present study, a total of eleven trials were included that involved a total of 27,823 patients with stage 3/4 CKD. The treatment and control groups contained 14,451 and 13,372 patients, respectively. In individuals with stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes by 26% (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.69–0.80], I2 = 0.00%), by 30% in patients with stage 3a CKD (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.59–0.84], I2 = 18.70%), by 23% in patients with stage 3b CKD (HR 0.77, [95% CI 0.66–0.90], I2 = 2.12%), and by 29% in patients with stage 4 CKD (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.53–0.96], I2 = 0.00%). The risk of primary outcomes was reduced by 29% (HR 0.71, [95% CI 0.63–0.80], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with type 2 diabetes, by 28% (HR 0.72, [95% CI 0.56–0.93], I2 = 37.23%) in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, by 21% (HR 0.79, [95% CI 0.70–0.89], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, and by 25% (HR 0.75, [95% CI 0.64–0.88], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Conclusions For stage 3/4 CKD, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly decreased the risk of primary cardiovascular outcomes, and these benefits were consistent throughout the spectrum of different kidney functions, even in stage 4 CKD. There was no evidence of increased adverse outcomes across different baseline clinical complications, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.

scholarly journals Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists and Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (12) ◽  
pp. 1205-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Shahzeb Khan ◽  
Gregg C. Fonarow ◽  
Darren K. McGuire ◽  
Adrian F. Hernandez ◽  
Muthiah Vaduganathan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Receptor Agonists ◽  
Sodium Glucose Cotransporter ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide ◽  
Glucagon Like Peptide 1

With worsening epidemiological trends for both the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and heart failure (HF) worldwide, it is critical to implement optimal prevention and treatment strategies for patients with these comorbidities, either alone or concomitantly. Several guidelines and consensus statements have recommended glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors as add-ons to lifestyle interventions with or without metformin in those at high atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk. However, these recommendations are either silent about HF or fail to differentiate between the prevention of HF in those at risk versus the treatment of individuals with manifest HF. Furthermore, these documents do not differentiate among those with different HF phenotypes. This distinction, even though important, may not be critical for sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors in view of the consistent data for benefit for both atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease– and HF-related outcomes that have emerged from the regulatory-mandated cardiovascular outcome trials for all sodium-glucose cotransporter type 2 inhibitors and the recent DAPA-HF trial (Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction)demonstrating the benefit of dapagliflozin on HF-related outcomes in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction with or without T2DM. However, the distinction may be crucial for glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and other antihyperglycemic agents. Indeed, in several of the new statements, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are suggested treatment not only for patients with T2DM and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, but also in those with manifest HF, despite a lack of evidence for the latter recommendation. Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists may be appropriate to use in patients at risk for HF, mechanistic insights and observations from randomized trials suggest no clear benefit on HF-related outcomes and even uncertainty regarding the safety in those with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Conversely, theoretical rationales suggest that these agents may benefit patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction. Considering that millions of patients with T2DM have HF, these concerns have public health implications that necessitate the thoughtful use of these therapies. Achieving this aim will require dedicated trials with these drugs in both patients who have HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction with T2DM to assess their efficacy, safety, and risk-benefit profile.

scholarly journals Impact of canagliflozin in natriuretic peptides in patients with type 2 diabetes after hospitalization for acute heart failure

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Martin Dorado ◽  
R Gonzalez Manzanares ◽  
J.C Castillo Dominguez ◽  
J Lopez Aguilera ◽  
J Perea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Acute Decompensated Heart Failure ◽  
Signs And Symptoms ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction

Abstract Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have demonstrated to reduce the risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D). We aimed to assess the changes in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-ProBNP) concentrations in a cohort of patients hospitalized for HF according to whether or not they received canagliflozin at discharge. Methods This cohort study included all patients with T2D admitted for HF from January 2017 to December 2019 in a single center. We excluded patients whose treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors were contraindicated (eGFR ≤45 ml/min/1.73 m2) and those who had other SGLT2 inhibitors than canagliflozin in their treatment at discharged. All patients had received a primary diagnosis of acute decompensated heart failure, including signs and symptoms of fluid overload and a concentration of NT-ProBNP of 1400 pg/mL at least. NT-ProBNP concentrations were collected at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after hospitalization with laboratory records if available. The aim of this study is to compare mean NT-ProBNP levels at hospital discharge and 3, 6 and 12 moths of follow-up in patients treated with and without canagliflozin. Results We included a total of 102 patients, 45 patients (44.1%) were prescribed canagliflozin and the remaining 57 (55.9%) were not prescribed any SGLT2 inhibitors (control group). There were no significant differences in clinical and comorbidities in both groups, except for age; slightly younger in the canagliflozin group (69,2±10,3 vs 73,2±11,1; p=0,04). Treatment at discharge was also similar, patients in the control group received more dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors (21.1% vs 6.7%; p=0.04). Low rate of patients received sacubitril-valsartan (15,6%) in the canagliflozin group and 14% in the control group. More than a half of patients in both groups have HF with reduced ejection fraction. Mean levels of peptides were similar in both groups at hospital admission and discharge. During the first period of 3 months, we observed a decreased of NT-ProBNP concentration in both groups, but significantly inferior in canagliflozin group (p&lt;0,001). At 6 and 12 months, NT-ProBNP levels were practically maintained in patients treated with canagliflozin, whereas levels in patients in the control group were increased. Difference in both groups at a 12 month-period was significantly superior (p=0,004), with a median reduction of concentration levels at discharge of 64.3% in the canagliflozin group and 15,8% in control group. There were no differences in patients with HF from those with reduced ejection fraction and preserved. Conclusions Canagliflozin therapy at discharge was associated with a significant reduction in NT-ProBNP concentration in patients with diabetes after hospitalization for HF. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. NT-ProBNP according to canagliflozin

scholarly journals Effects of SGLT2 Inhibitors on Renal Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Dan Lv ◽  
Xiangjun Zhu ◽  
Ping Wei ◽  
Yuan Gui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Renal Outcomes ◽  
Underlying Diseases

Introduction: The effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) were initially demonstrated in recent trials. However, the magnitude of renal benefits for CKD patients with different baseline features and underlying diseases remains unclear.Method: We systematically searched the Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases from inception to April 15, 2021 to identify eligible trials. The primary outcome was a composite of worsening kidney function, end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), or renal death. Efficacy and safety outcomes were stratified by baseline features, such as type 2 diabetes, heart failure, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, proteinuria, and renal function.Results: A total of nine studies were included. These studies included 25,749 patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)&lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 12,863 patients with urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) &gt;300 mg/g. SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of the primary renal outcome by 30% in patients with eGFR&lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 0.70, [95% CI 0.58–0.83], I2 = 0.00%) and by 43% in patients with UACR &gt; 300 mg/g (HR 0.57, [95% CI 0.48–0.67], I2 = 16.59%). A similar benefit was observed in CKD patients with type 2 diabetes. SGLT2 inhibitors had no clear effects on renal outcomes in patients with eGFR&lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2 combined with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (HR 0.74, [95% CI 0.51–1.06], I2 = 0.00%). However, they reduced the risk of major renal outcomes by 46% (HR 0.54, [95% CI 0.38–0.76], I2 = 0.00%) in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and macroalbuminuria (defined as UACR &gt; 300 mg/g). SGLT2 inhibitors did not significantly reduce the risk of major renal outcomes in CKD patients with heart failure (eGFR&lt;60 mL/min/1.73 m2: HR 0.81, [95% CI 0.47–1.38], I2 = 0.00%; UACR &gt; 300 mg/g: HR 0.66, [95% CI 0.41–1.07], I2 = 0.00%). SGLT2 inhibitors showed consistent renal benefits across different levels of eGFR (P interaction = 0.48).Conclusion: SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of the primary outcome in CKD patients. However, for patients with different features and underlying diseases, there exists differences in the renal protective effect.

Dapagliflozin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with Type 2 diabetes

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 77-88
Author(s):  
Dalal Y Al-Bazz ◽  
John PH Wilding
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Glucose Lowering ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
The Relationship

The relationship between cardiovascular disease, heart failure (HF) and Type-2 diabetes (T2DM) is widely recognized. Cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials are required for all new glucose-lowering agents to confirm safety with respect to CV risk. CV outcome trials with SGLT2i inhibitors have shown CV benefit, with reductions in major CV events and HF. This review focuses on the DECLARE-TIMI 58 trial with dapagliflozin in T2DM, which showed noninferiority for major adverse cardiovascular events and reduction in hospitalization for HF and associated CV mortality in a broad range of patients with T2DM. The DAPA-HF trial of dapagliflozin in people with HF with reduced ejection fraction with and without T2DM confirms benefits for those with HF.

scholarly journals Effect of Empagliflozin on Left Ventricular Volumes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes, or Prediabetes, and Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (SUGAR-DM-HF)

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew M. Y. Lee ◽  
Katriona J. M. Brooksbank ◽  
Kirsty Wetherall ◽  
Kenneth Mangion ◽  
Giles Roditi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitor ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Sglt2 Inhibitors ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
B Lines

Background: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors reduce the risk of heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, their effects on cardiac structure and function in HFrEF are uncertain. Methods: We designed a multicenter randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to investigate the cardiac effects of empagliflozin in patients in NYHA functional class II to IV with a left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction ≤40% and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Patients were randomized 1:1 to empagliflozin 10 milligrams once daily or placebo, stratified by age (<65 and ≥65 years) and glycemic status (diabetes or prediabetes). The co-primary outcomes were change from baseline to 36 weeks in LV end-systolic volume indexed to body surface area (LVESVi) and LV global longitudinal strain (LV GLS) measured using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). Secondary efficacy outcomes included other CMR measures (LVEDVi, LVEF), diuretic intensification, symptoms (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Total Symptom Score (KCCQ-TSS)), 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), B-lines on lung ultrasound and biomarkers (including NT-proBNP). Results: From April 2018 to August 2019, 105 patients were randomized: 77 (73.3%) male, mean age 68.7 [SD 11.1] years, 82 (78.1%) diabetes and 23 (21.9%) prediabetes, mean LVEF 32.5% [9.8%], and 81 (77.1%) NYHA II and 24 (22.9%) NYHA III. Patients received standard treatment for HFrEF. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin reduced LVESVi by 6.0 (-10.8 to -1.2) ml/m 2 (p=0.015). There was no difference in LV GLS. Empagliflozin reduced LVEDVi by 8.2 (-13.7 to -2.6) ml/m 2 (p=0.0042) and reduced NT-proBNP by 28 (2 to 47) %, p=0.038. There were no between-group differences in other CMR measures, KCCQ-TSS, 6MWD or B-lines. Conclusions: The SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin reduced LV volumes in patients with HFrEF and type 2 diabetes or prediabetes. Favorable reverse LV remodeling may be a mechanism by which SGLT2 inhibitors reduce HF hospitalization and mortality in HFrEF. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov Unique Identifier: NCT03485092.

scholarly journals MR-proANP and incident cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes with and without heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesper Jensen ◽  
Morten Schou ◽  
Caroline Kistorp ◽  
Jens Faber ◽  
Tine W. Hansen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Natriuretic Peptides ◽  
Continuous Variable ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Reduced Ejection Fraction ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Definition Of

Abstract Background Mid-regional pro-atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) is a useful biomarker in outpatients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) to diagnose heart failure (HF). Elevated B-type natriuretic peptides are included in the definition of HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) but little is known about the prognostic value of including A-type natriuretic peptides (MR-proANP) in the evaluation of patients with T2D. Methods We prospectively evaluated the risk of incident cardiovascular (CV) events in outpatients with T2D (n = 806, mean ± standard deviation age 64 ± 10 years, 65% male, median [interquartile range] duration of diabetes 12 [6–17] years, 17.5% with symptomatic HFpEF) according to MR-proANP levels and stratified according to HF-status including further stratification according to a prespecified cut-off level of MR-proANP. Results A total of 126 CV events occurred (median follow-up 4.8 [4.1–5.3] years). An elevated MR-proANP, with a cut-off of 60 pmol/l or as a continuous variable, was associated with incident CV events (p < 0.001). Compared to patients without HF, patients with HFpEF and high MR-proANP (≥ 60 pmol/l; median 124 [89–202] pmol/l) and patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) had a higher risk of CV events (multivariable model; hazard ratio (HR) 2.56 [95% CI 1.64–4.00] and 3.32 [1.64–6.74], respectively). Conversely, patients with HFpEF and low MR-proANP (< 60 pmol/l; median 46 [32–56] pmol/l) did not have an increased risk (HR 2.18 [0.78–6.14]). Conclusions Patients with T2D and HFpEF with high MR-proANP levels had an increased risk for CV events compared to patients with HFpEF without elevated MR-proANP and compared to patients without HF, supporting the use of MR-proANP in the definition of HFpEF from a prognostic point-of-view.

scholarly journals Metabolic syndrome in patients with type 2 diabetes and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a post hoc analyses of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
João Pedro Ferreira ◽  
Subodh Verma ◽  
David Fitchett ◽  
Anne Pernille Ofstad ◽  
Sabine Lauer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Metabolic Syndrome ◽  
Trial Registration ◽  
World Health ◽  
Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease ◽  
Renal Outcomes ◽  
Outcome Trial

Abstract Background Patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are at greater cardiovascular risk than those with T2D without MetS. In the current report we aim to study the characteristics, cardio-renal outcomes and the effect of empagliflozin in patients with MetS enrolled in the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial. Methods A total of 7020 patients with T2D and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease were treated with empagliflozin (10 mg or 25 mg) or placebo for a median of 3.1 years. The World Health Organization MetS criteria could be determined for 6985 (99.5%) patients. We assessed the association between baseline MetS and multiple cardio-renal endpoints using Cox regression models, and we studied the change in the individual component over time of the MetS using mixed effect models. Results MetS at baseline was present in 5740 (82%) patients; these were more often white and had more often albuminuria and heart failure, had lower eGFR and HDL-cholesterol, and higher blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference, and triglycerides. In the placebo group, patients with MetS had a higher risk of all outcomes including cardiovascular death: HR = 1.73 (95% CI 1.01–2.98), heart failure hospitalization: HR = 2.64 (95% CI 1.22, 5.72), and new or worsening nephropathy: HR = 3.11 (95% CI 2.17–4.46). The beneficial effect of empagliflozin was consistent on all cardio-renal outcomes regardless of presence of MetS. Conclusions A large proportion of the EMPA-REG OUTCOME population fulfills the criteria for MetS. Those with MetS had increased risk of adverse cardio-renal outcomes. Compared with placebo, empagliflozin improved cardio-renal outcomes in patients with and without MetS. Trial registration Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT 01131676

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document