P6206Death, debility, and destitution following recurrent myocardial infarction in older adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Levitan ◽  
B Poudel ◽  
H Zhao ◽  
V Bittner ◽  
M M Safford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Health Insurance ◽  
Recurrent Events ◽  
The United States ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Financial Strain ◽  
Recurrent Myocardial Infarction

Abstract Background Most prior research on outcomes among older adults with established cardiovascular diseases focuses on recurrent events and hospitalizations. However, older adults value financial security and functional independence in addition to these disease-focused metrics. Recurrent cardiovascular events may increase risk of long-term nursing home residence and financial strain. Purpose To compare the risk for death, debility (long-term residence in a nursing home), and destitution (eligibility for health insurance programs for impoverished individuals) among older adults with recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and controls. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative data from the United States Medicare program, a health insurance program for older adults. Among all patients who experienced a first overnight hospitalization with a discharge diagnosis of MI between 1 January 2007 and 30 June 2016, we identified patients with a recurrent MI hospitalization. Additionally, we selected controls from the same population of patients with MI, matched on calendar year of the initial MI and days since the initial MI. We included 194,481 patients aged 66 years and older with recurrent MI hospitalizations and 777,924 controls. Patients were followed for death, debility, and destitution until 31 December 2016. We used Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for sociodemographic factors, comorbidities, and healthcare utilization to compare patients with recurrent MI and matched controls. Results The average age of the population was 80.0 (standard deviation 8.3) years and 56.7% were women. Patients with recurrent MI were more likely to have a history of diabetes, chronic kidney disease, heart failure and peripheral artery disease than controls. The cumulative incidence of death, debility, and destitution were all higher among patients with recurrent MI than their matched controls (Figure). Comparing patients with recurrent MI to controls, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 2.11 (2.09–2.13) for death, 0.92 (0.89–0.94) for debility, and 1.34 (1.29–1.39) for destitution after multivariable adjustment. Death, debility, and destitution Conclusion Preventing recurrent MIs has the potential to reduce not only mortality but also destitution. Acknowledgement/Funding Amgen, Inc

Uitbraak COVID-19 in de verpleeghuiszorg

2020 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Nursing Homes ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Informal Caregivers ◽  
Rapid Review ◽  
Daily Routine ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Care Facilities

Long-term care for older adults is highly affect by the COVID-19 outbreak. The objective of this rapid review is to understand what we can learn from previous crises or disasters worldwide to optimize the care for older adults in long term care facilities during the outbreak of COVID-19. We searched five electronic databases to identify potentially relevant articles. In total, 23 articles were included in this study. Based on the articles, it appeared that nursing homes benefit from preparing for the situation as best as they can. For instance, by having proper protocols and clear division of tasks and collaboration within the organization. In addition, it is helpful for nursing homes to collaborate closely with other healthcare organizations, general practitioners, informal caregivers and local authorities. It is recommended that nursing homes pay attention to capacity and employability of staff and that they support or relieve staff where possible. With regard to care for the older adults, it is important that staff tries to find a new daily routine in the care for residents as soon as possible. Some practical tips were found on how to communicate with people who have dementia. Furthermore, behavior of people with dementia may change during a crisis. We found tips for staff how to respond and act upon behavior change. After the COVID-19 outbreak, aftercare for staff, residents, and informal caregivers is essential to timely detect psychosocial problems. The consideration between, on the one hand, acute safety and risk reduction (e.g. by closing residential care facilities and isolating residents), and on the other hand, the psychosocial consequences for residents and staff, were discussed in case of other disasters. Furthermore, the search of how to provide good (palliative) care and to maintain quality of life for older adults who suffer from COVID-19 is also of concern to nursing home organizations. In the included articles, the perspective of older adults, informal caregivers and staff is often lacking. Especially the experiences of older adults, informal caregivers, and nursing home staff with the care for older adults in the current situation, are important in formulating lessons about how to act before, during and after the coronacrisis. This may further enhance person-centered care, even in times of crisis. Therefore, we recommend to study these experiences in future research.

scholarly journals Person-Centered Health Care: An Approach That Integrates Acute and Long-Term Care

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 704-704
Author(s):  
Yuchi Young ◽  
Barbara Resnick
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Systems ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
World Population ◽  
Term Care ◽  
The Usa ◽  
Aged Society

Abstract The world population is aging. The proportion of the population over 60 will nearly double from 12% in 2015 to 22% in 2050. Global life expectancy has more than doubled from 31 years in 1900 to 72.6 years in 2019. The need for long-term care (LTC) services is expanding with the same rapidity. A comprehensive response is needed to address the needs of older adults. Learning from health systems in other countries enables health systems to incorporate best long-term care practices to fit each country and its culture. This symposium aims to compare long-term care policies and services in Taiwan, Singapore, and the USA where significant growth in aging populations is evidenced. In 2025, the aging population will be 20% in Taiwan, 20% in Singapore and 18 % in the USA. In the case of Taiwan, it has moved from aging society status to aged society, and to super-aged society in 27 years. Such accelerated rate of aging in Taiwan is unparalleled when compared to European countries and the United States. In response to this dramatic change, Taiwan has passed long-term care legislation that expands services to care for older adults, and developed person-centered health care that integrates acute and long-term care services. Some preliminary results related to access, care and patterns of utilization will be shared in the symposium. International Comparisons of Healthy Aging Interest Group Sponsored Symposium.

scholarly journals Family caregiving and place of death: Insights from cross-national analysis of the Harmonized End of Life Data

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Ailshire ◽  
Margarita Osuna ◽  
Jenny Wilkens ◽  
Jinkook Lee
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Family Caregiving ◽  
The United States ◽  
Place Of Death ◽  
Life Data ◽  
Cross National ◽  
At Home

Abstract Objectives Family is largely overlooked in research on factors associated with place of death among older adults. We determine if family caregiving at the end of life is associated with place of death in the United States and Europe. Methods We use the Harmonized End of Life data sets developed by the Gateway to Global Aging Data for the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We conducted multinomial logistic regression on 7,113 decedents from 18 European countries and 3,031 decedents from the United States to determine if family caregiving, defined based on assistance with activities of daily living, was associated with death at home versus at a hospital or nursing home. Results Family caregiving was associated with reduced odds of dying in a hospital and nursing home, relative to dying at home in both the United States and Europe. Care from a spouse/partner or child/grandchild was both more common and more strongly associated with place of death than care from other relatives. Associations between family caregiving and place of death were generally consistent across European welfare regimes. Discussion This cross-national examination of family caregiving indicates that family-based support is universally important in determining where older adults die. In both the United States and in Europe, most care provided during a long-term illness or disability is provided by family caregivers, and it is clear families exert tremendous influence on place of death.

Improving psychotropic medication use among persons with dementia

2016 ◽  
Vol 28 (10) ◽  
pp. 1587-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donovan T. Maust
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Nursing Home ◽  
Psychotropic Medication ◽  
Medication Use ◽  
The United States ◽  
Black Box ◽  
Community Settings ◽  
Limited Evidence

The use of psychotropic medication among persons with dementia (PWD) both in nursing home (Wetzels et al., 2011) and community settings (Maust et al., 2016) far exceeds what might be expected based on their limited evidence for benefit (Kales et al., 2015). This relatively high use persists despite years of evidence about the potential harms associated with their use in older adults generally and PWD in particular (e.g. Wang et al., 2001; Schneider et al., 2005). However, the solution to relatively high psychotropic use is not to end all psychotropic use, as there are individual patients for whom use of such medication is appropriate. For example, a policy that defines all antipsychotic use as inappropriate may simply lead to increased use of alternatives with even less evidence of benefit, as suggested by the response to antipsychotics’ black box warning in the United States (Kales et al., 2011).

Associations of Pain Characteristics with Long-term Trajectories of Physical Capacity among Older Adults in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 589-590
Author(s):  
Kushang Patel ◽  
Zachary Marcum ◽  
Elizabeth Phelan ◽  
Bobby Jones ◽  
Sean Rundell
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
The United States ◽  
Physical Capacity ◽  
Pain Characteristics

scholarly journals Patterns of Long-Term Prescription Opioid Use Among Older Adults in the United States: A Study of Medicare Administrative Claims Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 1;24 (1;1) ◽  
pp. 31-40
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Claims Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Prescription Opioid ◽  
Administrative Claims ◽  
Medicare Beneficiaries ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Opioid Prescription ◽  
Administrative Claims Data

BACKGROUND: Long-term opioid therapy was prescribed with increasing frequency over the past decade. However, factors surrounding long-term use of opioids in older adults remains poorly understood, probably because older people are not at the center stage of the national opioid crisis. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the annual utilization and trends in long-term opioid use among older adults in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Data from Medicare-enrolled older adults. METHODS: This study utilized a nationally representative sample of Medicare administrative claims data from the years 2012 to 2016 containing records of health care services for more than 2.3 million Medicare beneficiaries each year. Medicare beneficiaries who were 65 years of age or older and who were enrolled in Medicare Parts A, B, and D, but not Part C, for at least 10 months in a year were included in the study. We measured annual utilization and trends in new long-term opioid use episodes over 4 years (2013–2016). We examined claims records for the demographic characteristics of the eligible individuals and for the presence of chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), cancer, and other comorbidities. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2016, administrative claims of approximately 2.3 million elderly Medicare beneficiaries were analyzed in each year with a majority of them being women (~56%) and white (~82%) with a mean age of approximately 75 years. The proportion of all eligible beneficiaries with at least one new opioid prescription increased from 6.64% in 2013, peaked at 10.32% in 2015, and then decreased to 8.14% in 2016. The proportion of individuals with long-term opioid use among those with a new opioid prescription was 12.40% in 2013 and 10.20% in 2016. Among new long-term opioid users, the proportion of beneficiaries with a cancer diagnosis during the study years increased from 13.30% in 2013 to 15.67% in 2016, and the proportion with CNCP decreased from 30.25% in 2013 to 27.36% in 2016. Across all years, long-term opioid use was consistently high in the Southern states followed by the Midwest region. LIMITATIONS: This study used Medicare fee-for-service administrative claims data to capture prescription fill patterns, which do not allow for the capture of individuals enrolled in Medicare Advantage plans, cash prescriptions, or for the evaluation of appropriateness of prescribing, or the actual use of medication. This study only examined long-term use episodes among patients who were defined as opioid-naive. Finally, estimates captured for 2016 could only utilize data from 9 months of the year to capture 90-day long-term-use episodes. CONCLUSIONS: Using a national sample of elderly Medicare beneficiaries, we observed that from 2013 to 2016 the use of new prescription opioids increased from 2013 to 2014 and peaked in 2015. The use of new long-term prescription opioids peaked in 2014 and started to decrease from 2015 and 2016. Future research needs to evaluate the impact of the changes in new and long-term prescription opioid use on population health outcomes. KEY WORDS: Long-term, opioids, older adults, trends, Medicare, chronic non-cancer pain, cancer, cohort study

scholarly journals Underrepresentation of Adults and Older Adults With Disabilities in Behavioral Clinical Trials: A Scoping Review

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 644-644
Author(s):  
Susan Stark ◽  
Marian Keglovits ◽  
Sandra Espín Tello
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Scoping Review ◽  
People With Disabilities ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Condition ◽  
Research Strategies ◽  
Behavioral Studies ◽  
Behavioral Trials

Abstract A lack of evidence-based interventions for people aging with long-term physical disabilities exists. To examine the exclusion of people with disabilities in behavioral clinical trials, a scoping review was conducted. ClinicalTrials.gov was searched for interventional behavioral studies from the United States completed from 2008–2018, with results focused on adults (18–64) and older adults (65+). In total, 158 clinical trials were included. In 129 articles, health conditions were excluded 697 times. Seventy-one clinical trials excluded at least one health condition with strong justification, 11 with poor justification, and 115 without justification. There is strong evidence that people with disabilities are excluded from behavioral clinical trials, often without justification. To help close this gap, our presentation will discuss how translational research strategies, focused on adapting existing EB behavioral trials, can be used to increase the availability of interventions that address the needs of individuals aging with and into long-term disabilities. Part of a symposium sponsored by the Lifelong Disabilities Interest Group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document