Mortality and cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillation in primary prevention

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (8) ◽  
pp. 1224-1233
Author(s):  
Matthieu Gras ◽  
Arnaud Bisson ◽  
Alexandre Bodin ◽  
Julien Herbert ◽  
Dominique Babuty ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Total Study Population ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Life Study ◽  
Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Aims  Cardiac resynchronization therapy with (CRTD) or without (CRTP) defibrillator is recommended in selected patient with systolic chronic heart failure and wide QRS. There is no guideline firmly indicating choice between CRTP and CRTD in primary prevention, particularly in older patients. Methods and results  Based on the French administrative hospital-discharge database, information was collected from 2010 to 2017 for all patients implanted with CRTP or CRTD in primary prevention. Outcome analyses were undertaken in the total study population and in propensity-matched samples. During follow-up (913 days, SD 841, median 701, IQR 151–1493), 45 697 patients were analysed (CRTP 19 266 and CRTD 26 431). Incidence rate (%patient/year) of all-cause mortality was higher in CRTP patients (11.6%) than in CRTD patients (6.8%) [hazard ratio (HR) 1.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.63–1.76, P < 0.001]. After propensity-matched analyses, mortality of patients over 75 years old with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) was not different with CRTP and CRTD (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80–1.09, P = 0.39). The CRTP patients under 75 years old with NICM had a higher mortality than CRTD patients (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.03–1.45, P = 0.02). Mortality rate was also higher with CRTP than with CRTD irrespectively of age in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (<75 years old: HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.37, P = 0.01; ≥75 years old: HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.22, P = 0.003). Conclusion  In this real-life study, CRTD was associated with a significantly lower all-cause mortality than CRTP in patients with ICM and in patients with NICM under 75 years old. Patients over 75 years old with NICM did not have lower mortality with primary prevention CRTD implantation.

All-cause mortality and cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillation in primary prevention

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Bisson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Prevention ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Ischemic Cardiomyopathy ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Total Study Population ◽  
Life Study ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Study Population

Abstract Aims Cardiac resynchronization therapy with (CRTD) or without (CRTP) defibrillator is recommended in selected patient with systolic chronic heart failure and wide QRS. There is no guideline firmly indicating choice between CRTP and CRTD in primary prevention, particularly in older patients. Methods Based on the French administrative hospital-discharge database, information was collected from 2010 to 2017 for all patients implanted with CRTP or CRTD in primary prevention. Outcomes analyses were undertaken in the total study population and in propensity-matched samples. Results A total of 45,697 patients were analyzed (19,266 with CRTP and 26,431 with CRTD). The nationwide numbers of implantations increased between 2010 and 2017 (+29.6% for CRTD, +28.8% for CRTP). Proportion of CRTP implantation over CRTD remained similar over these years. During follow up (913 days, SD 841, median 701, IQR 151–1493), incidence rate (%patient/year) of all-cause mortality was higher in CRTP (11.6%) than in CRTD patients (6.8%) (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.70, 95% CI 1.63–1.76, p<0.001). After propensity-matched analyses, mortality of patients over 75 years-old with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) was not different with CRTP and CRTD (HR 0.93, 95% CI 0.80–1.09, p=0.39). CRTP patients under 75 yo with NICM had a higher mortality than CRTD patients (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.37, p=0.01). Mortality rate was also higher with CRTP than with CRTD irrespectively of age in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) (<75 yo: HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.04–1.33, p<0.01; ≥75 yo: HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.08–1.37, p=0.01). Conclusion This real-life study gives up-to-date information about unselected patients implanted with CRTP and CRTD in primary prevention, and provides additional data which may help physicians choosing between CRTP and CRTD at the time of implantation. Benefit of CRTD seemed clear for all-cause mortality in patients with ICM and in patients with NICM under 75 yo. Patients over 75 yo with NICM seemed less likely to benefit from primary prevention CRTD implantation. Event free curves for mortality outcomes Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

scholarly journals Exploring sex-specific patterns of mortality predictors among patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy: a machine learning approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Tokodi ◽  
A Behon ◽  
E.D Merkel ◽  
A Kovacs ◽  
Z Toser ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Sex Differences ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Funding Source ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Test Set ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Mortality Predictors

Abstract Background The relative importance of variables explaining sex differences in outcomes is scarcely explored in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Purpose We sought to implement and evaluate machine learning (ML) algorithms for the prediction of 1- and 3-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing CRT implantation. We also aimed to assess the sex-specific differences and similarities in the predictors of mortality using ML approaches. Methods A retrospective registry of 2191 CRT patients (75% males) was used in the current analysis. ML models were implemented in 6 partially overlapping patient subsets (all patients, females or males with 1- or 3-year follow-up data available). Each cohort was randomly split into a training (80%) and a test set (20%). After hyperparameter tuning with 10-fold cross-validation in the training set, the best performing algorithm was also evaluated in the test set. Model discrimination was quantified using the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUC) and the associated 95% confidence intervals. The most important predictors were identified using the permutation feature importances method. Results Conditional inference random forest exhibited the best performance with AUCs of 0.728 [0.645–0.802] and 0.732 [0.681–0.784] for the prediction of 1- and 3-year mortality, respectively. Etiology of heart failure, NYHA class, left ventricular ejection fraction and QRS morphology had higher predictive power in females, whereas hemoglobin was less important than in males. The importance of atrial fibrillation and age increased, whereas the relevance of serum creatinine decreased from 1- to 3-year follow-up in both sexes. Conclusions Using advanced ML techniques in combination with easily obtainable clinical features, our models effectively predicted 1- and 3-year all-cause mortality in patients undergoing CRT implantation. The in-depth analysis of features has revealed marked sex differences in mortality predictors. These results support the use of ML-based approaches for the risk stratification of patients undergoing CRT implantation. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in very old patients: The insync/insync ICD Italian registries

Heart Rhythm ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (5) ◽  
pp. S66
Author(s):  
Maurizio Lunati ◽  
Maurizio Gasparini ◽  
Luigi Padeletti ◽  
Giulio Molon ◽  
Massimo Tritto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Very Old ◽  
Very Old Patients

scholarly journals Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients with Hypothyroidism and Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
MEI YANG ◽  
Xuping Li ◽  
John C. Morris III ◽  
Jinjun Liang ◽  
Abhishek J. Deshmukh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Therapy Outcomes ◽  
Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Therapy ◽  
Cardioverter Defibrillator ◽  
All Cause Mortality

Abstract Background Hypothyroidism is known to be associated with adverse clinical outcomes in heart failure. The association between hypothyroidism and cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes in patients with severe heart failure is not clear. Methods The study included 1,316 patients who received cardiac resynchronization therapy between 2002 and 2015. Baseline demographics and cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes, including left ventricular ejection fraction, New York Heart Association class, appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy, and all-cause mortality, were collected from the electronic health record. Results Of the study cohort, 350 patients (26.6%) were classified as the hypothyroidism group. The median duration of follow-up was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 1.7-6.2). Hypothyroidism was not associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality in patients receiving CRT for heart failure. The risk of appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy significantly increased in association with increased baseline thyroid -stimulating hormone level in the entire cohort (hazard ratio, 1.23 per 5mIU/L increase; 95% CI, 1.01-1.5; P=0.04) as well as in the hypothyroid group (hazard ratio, 1.44 per 5mIU/L increase; 95% CI, 1.13-1.84; P=0.004). Conclusions CRT improves cardiac function in hypothyroid patients. The ventricular arrhythmic events requiring ICD therapies are associated with baseline TSH level, which might be considered as an important biomarker to stratify the risk of sudden death for patients with heart failure and hypothyroidism.

scholarly journals Underlying causes of under-utilization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in real-world heart failure settings

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Choha ◽  
J Henrysson ◽  
E Thunstrom ◽  
M Fu ◽  
C Basic
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Real World ◽  
Angiotensin Receptor Blockers ◽  
Real Life ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Underlying Causes

Abstract Background Despite well-established effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure (HF), it remained significantly under-utilized. The underlying causes are still not well described. Aim To investigate how many patients with HF were eligible for CRT and determine underlying causes why CRT was abstained for these patients in real life settings. Methods Retrospective review of medical data was carried out in all patients hospitalized for newly diagnosed HF from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2019. Patients were identified from the local university hospital register with three afiliations by use of international classification of disease (ICD)-10 codes I50.0-I50.9. Medical journals, including electrocardiograms and echocardiograms, were reviewed. The indication for CRT was evaluated three months after mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) were initiated as addition to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor /angiotensin-receptor blockers and beta-blocker treatment according to European guidelines for heart failure from 2016. Follow-up was minimum one year and up to two years after HF diagnosis. Results In 3456 patients with HF, 642 (18.6%) were patients hospitalized for new onset of HF with ejection fraction (EF) <40%. Out of those, 104 (16.2%) patients were excluded because of incomplete medical record as a result of referral to primary care. Finally, 538 were included in this study. Overall, 163 patients (30.3%) met CRT criteria with 22.5%, 2.6%, 1.9% complying with recommendation IA, IIA, IIB respectively, and 3.9% had more than 50% right ventricular pacing. Only 52 (9.7%) of patients received CRT with mean age 69.3±11.5 years, and 69.2% men and EF 31.9% ± 7.6. In all these patients with HF eligible for CRT, no difference was found in baseline data including hypertension, ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation, valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, stroke, cancer and renal failure nor medical treatment between those received CRT and those without CRT. Among underlying causes of under-utilization of CRT, 24.3% were due to multiple concomitant comorbidities, 4.5% due to patient's own wish, 12.5% due to other reasons such as socioeconomic problems and 58.6% with unknown reasons. Mortality rates were 20.7% in patients without treatment with CRT compared with 7.7% in those who received CRT (p=0.037). Conclusion In this real world HF cohort, 1/3 patients were eligible for CRT treatment. However only 1/3 received CRT and 58.6% had no contraindication but did not receive CRT, which emphasize urgent need for structured implementation methods for device treatment in patients with HF. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

scholarly journals 77 Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in very old patients: the InSync/InSync ICD Italian registries

EP Europace ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 11-11
Author(s):  
A. Achilli ◽  
M. Lunati ◽  
M. Gasparini ◽  
M. Landolina ◽  
F. Turreni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Old Patients ◽  
Very Old ◽  
Very Old Patients

Abstract 13242: Insulin Treated Patients With Diabetes Derive Reduction in Mortality From Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - Results From the Madit-Crt in Trial Experience

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Szepietowska ◽  
Valentina Kutyifa ◽  
Martin H Ruwald ◽  
Scott D Solomon ◽  
Anne-Christine H Ruwald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
Risk Reduction ◽  
Insulin Treatment ◽  
Cardiac Resynchronization ◽  
Reverse Remodeling ◽  
Diabetic Patients ◽  
Resynchronization Therapy ◽  
All Cause Mortality ◽  
Patients With Diabetes

Methods: We aimed to analyze the risk for death and HF and the effect of CRT on HF/death in diabetic patients with or without insulin treatment compared to none diabetic population. The study comprised 1278 patients with left bundle branch block in the MADIT-CRT trial with an average follow-up of 3.3y. We used time dependent survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards regression method. Results: In ICD arm patients with diabetes receiving insulin treatment had 2.4-fold higher risk of all-cause mortality (p=0.008), and 2.2-fold higher risk of HF (p<0.001) when compared to non diabetic patients, and 2.8-fold higher risk of death (p=0.01), and 1.6-fold higher risk of HF (p=0.06) when compared to patients with diabetes not treated with insulin. Treatment with CRT-D was associated with a significant 75% risk reduction in all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR ] 0.25; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08-0.77; p=0.016) in patients with diabetes receiving insulin. Noteworthy, during the 3-year follow-up, reduction in all-cause mortality was not observed in patients not treated with insulin or in patients with no diabetes (interaction p-value=0.038). Significant risk reduction in HF and in HF/death after CRT treatment was observed across all three investigated groups. There were not significant differences in left ventricular reverse remodeling after CRT-D among diabetic patients with or without insulin treatment compared to the nondiabetic population. Conclusions: Patients with insulin treated diabetes derive significant reduction in mortality and heart failure after implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy. Patients with diabetes and no insulin and patient without diabetes benefit from CRT by reduction of HF events.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document