scholarly journals A cytogenetic and genetic characterization of a group of closely linked second chromosome mutations that suppress position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 130 (2) ◽  
pp. 333-344 ◽  
Author(s):  
D A Sinclair ◽  
A A Ruddell ◽  
J K Brock ◽  
N J Clegg ◽  
V K Lloyd ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromosome 2 ◽  
Var Genes ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromosome Mutations ◽  
Male Specific ◽  
Dose Dependent ◽  
Var Gene

Abstract Characterization of a group of dominant second chromosome suppressor of position-effect variegation (PEV) (Su(var)) mutants has revealed a variety of interesting properties, including: maternal-effect suppression of PEV, homozygous lethality or semilethality and male-specific hemizygous lethality, female infecundity, acute sensitivity to the amount of heterochromatin in the cell and sensitivity to sodium butyrate. Deficiency/duplication mapping and complementation tests have revealed that eight of the mutants define at least two genes in section 31 of the left arm of chromosome 2 and they suggest that a ninth corresponds to an additional nonessential Su(var) gene within or near this region. The effects of specific deficiencies and a duplication on PEV indicate that the expression of one or more of the Su(var) genes in this region of the chromosome is dose-dependent, i.e., capable of haplo-abnormal suppression and triplo-abnormal enhancement. Interestingly, the appearance of certain visible phenotypes among a subset of the mutants suggests that they may possess antimorphic properties. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that two of these Su(var) genes encode structural components of heterochromatin. We also report that two previously isolated mutants located in 31E and 31F-32A act as recessive suppressors of PEV.

scholarly journals Recombinogenic Effects of Suppressors of Position-Effect Variegation in Drosophila

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 609-621
Author(s):  
Thomas Westphal ◽  
Gunter Reuter
Keyword(s):  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Heterochromatic Region ◽  
Crossing Over ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromosome 2 ◽  
Additive Effects ◽  
Suppressor Mutations ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Meiotic Nondisjunction

Abstract Compact chromatin structure, induction of gene silencing in position-effect variegation (PEV), and crossing-over suppression are typical features of heterochromatin. To identify genes affecting crossing-over suppression by heterochromatin we tested PEV suppressor mutations for their effects on crossing over in pericentromeric regions of Drosophila autosomes. From the 46 mutations (28 loci) studied, 16 Su(var) mutations of the nine genes Su(var)2-1, Su(var)2-2, Su(var)2-5, Su(var)2-10, Su(var)2-14, Su(var) 2-15, Su(var)3-3, Su(var)3-7, and Su(var)3-9 significantly increase in heterozygotes or by additive effects in double and triple heterozygotes crossing over in the ri-pp region of chromosome 3. Su(var)2-201 and Su(var) 2-1401 display the strongest recombinogenic effects and were also shown to enhance recombination within the light-rolled heterochromatic region of chromosome 2. The dominant recombinogenic effects of Su(var) mutations are most pronounced in proximal euchromatin and are accompanied with significant reduction of meiotic nondisjunction. Our data suggest that crossing-over suppression by heterochromatin is controlled at chromatin structure as well as illustrate the possible effects of heterochromatin on total crossing-over frequencies in the genome.

Suppressors of position-effect variegation in Drosophila melanogaster affect expression of the heterochromatic gene light in the absence of a chromosome rearrangement

Genome ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 495-503 ◽  
Author(s):  
N J Clegg ◽  
B M Honda ◽  
I P Whitehead ◽  
T A Grigliatti ◽  
B Wakimoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Chromosomal Rearrangements ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Centromeric Heterochromatin ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Gene Products ◽  
Affect Expression ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Heterochromatic Genes ◽  
Var Gene

Suppressors of position-effect variegation (Su(var)s) in Drosophila melanogaster are usually studied in the presence of chromosomal rearrangements, which exhibit variegated expression of euchromatic genes moved near to, or heterochromatic genes moved away from, centromeric heterochromatin. However, the effects of Su(var) mutations on heterochromatic gene expression in the absence of a variegating re-arrangement have not yet been defined. Here we present a number of results which suggest that Su(var) gene products can interact to affect the expression of the light gene in its normal heterochromatic location. We initially observed that eye pigment was reduced in several Su(var) double mutants; the phenotype resembled that of light mutations and was more severe when only one copy of the light gene was present. This reduced pigmentation could be alleviated by a duplication for the light gene or by a reduction in the amount of cellular heterochromatin. In addition, the viability of most Su(var) double mutant combinations tested was greatly reduced in a genetic background of reduced light gene dosage, when extra heterochromatin is present. We conclude that Su(var) gene products can affect expression of the heterochromatic light gene in the absence of any chromosomal rearrangements. However, it is noteworthy that mutations in any single Su(var) gene have little effect on light expression; we observe instead that different pairings of Su(var) mutations are required to show an effect on light expression. Interestingly, we have obtained evidence that at least two of the second chromosome Su(var) mutations are gain-of-function lesions, which also suggests that there may be different modes of interaction among these genes. It may therefore be possible to use this more sensitive assay of Su(var) effects on heterochromatic genes to infer functional relationships among the products of the 50 or more known Su(var) loci.Key words: heterochromatin, chromatin, gene interactions.

scholarly journals Characterization of sequences associated with position-effect variegation at pericentric sites in Drosophila heterochromatin

Chromosoma ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 107 (5) ◽  
pp. 277-285 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane E. Cryderman ◽  
Matthew H. Cuaycong ◽  
Sarah C. R. Elgin ◽  
Lori L. Wallrath
Keyword(s):  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Drosophila Heterochromatin

scholarly journals Cytogenetic analysis of the echinoid (ed), dumpy (dp) and clot (cl) region in Drosophila melanogaster

1988 ◽  
Vol 51 (3) ◽  
pp. 197-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
János Szidonya ◽  
Gunter Reuter
Keyword(s):  
Position Effect ◽  
Heat Sensitivity ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
X Rays ◽  
Structural Part ◽  
Suppressor Function ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Dose Dependent ◽  
Tandem Duplications ◽  
Dominant Suppressor

SummaryThe chromosomal region surrounding the ed, dp and cl genes has been studied cytogenetically (24–26 on 2L chromosome). It contains three Minutes and a haplo-sterile function. For isolation of deficiencies and mutations these haplo-insufficient functions were covered by an insertional translocation of 24D4-25F2 into the X chromosome, or by tandem duplications. 112 lethal and visible mutations induced by EMS and X-rays have been localized by deficiency mapping to 20 subregions. They specify 42 loci in a 48 band interval consistent with the notion that most of the bands encode a single lethal function. The dp, DTS, tkv and suppressor/enhancer loci for position-effect variegation were studied in detail. A dominant suppressor function was localized within the structural part of the dp complex. New non-conditional lethals have been isolated for the DTS locus. Complementation analysis with the previously identified dominant heat-sensitive alleles places the site for heat sensitivity in the middle of the locus. Two haplo-abnormal enhancers of position-effect variegation were localized in the region 25F2–26A1. A triplo-abnormal suppressor function maps to 26B2–5; 26B9. The dose-dependent functions of these loci were studied by the use of deficiencies and duplications.

scholarly journals HISTONE GENE MULTIPLICITY AND POSITION EFFECT VARIEGATION IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Genetics ◽  
1983 ◽  
Vol 105 (2) ◽  
pp. 327-344
Author(s):  
Gerald D Moore ◽  
Donald A Sinclair ◽  
Thomas A Grigliatti
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Sex Chromosome ◽  
Current Knowledge ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Histone Gene ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromosome 2 ◽  
Gene Complex ◽  
Position Effects ◽  
Effect Variegation

ABSTRACT The histone genes of wild-type Drosophila melanogaster are reiterated 100–150 times per haploid genome and are located in the segment of chromosome 2 that corresponds to polytene bands 39D2-3 to E1-2. The influence of altered histone gene multiplicity on chromatin structure has been assayed by measuring modification of the gene inactivation associated with position effect variegation in genotypes bearing deletions of the 39D-E segment. The proportion of cells in which a variegating gene is active is increased in genotypes that are heterozygous for a deficiency that removes the histone gene complex. Deletions that remove segments adjacent to the histone gene complex have no effect on the expression of variegating genes. Suppression of position effect variegation associated with reduction of histone gene multiplicity applies to both X-linked and autosomal variegating genes. Position effects exerted by both autosomal and sex-chromosome heterochromatin were suppressible by deletions of the histone gene complex. The suppression was independent of the presence of the Y chromosome. A deficiency that deletes only the distal portion of the histone gene complex also has the ability to suppress position effect variegation. Duplication of the histone gene complex did not enhance position effect variegation. Deletion or duplication of the histone gene complex in the maternal genome had no effect on the extent of variegation in progeny whose histone gene multiplicity was normal. These results are discussed with respect to current knowledge of the organization of the histone gene complex and control of its expression.

scholarly journals The effect of modifiers of position-effect variegation on the variegation of heterochromatic genes of Drosophila melanogaster.

Genetics ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 128 (4) ◽  
pp. 785-797 ◽  
Author(s):  
M G Hearn ◽  
A Hedrick ◽  
T A Grigliatti ◽  
B T Wakimoto
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Chromosome 2 ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Regulatory Requirements ◽  
Expression Of Genes ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Type Gene ◽  
Heterochromatic Genes

Abstract Dominant modifiers of position-effect variegation of Drosophila melanogaster were tested for their effects on the variegation of genes normally located in heterochromatin. These modifiers were previously isolated as strong suppressors of the variegation of euchromatic genes and have been postulated to encode structural components of heterochromatin or other products that influence chromosome condensation. While eight of the modifiers had weak or no detectable effects, six acted as enhancers of light (lt) variegation. The two modifiers with the strongest effects on lt were shown to also enhance the variegation of neighboring heterochromatic genes. These results suggest that the wild-type gene products of some modifiers of position-effect variegation are required for proper expression of genes normally located within or near the heterochromatin of chromosome 2. We conclude that these heterochromatic genes have fundamentally different regulatory requirements compared to those typical of euchromatic genes.

scholarly journals Position Effect Variegation in natural populations not explained by common variation in known modifiers

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keegan J. P. Kelsey ◽  
Andrew G. Clark
Keyword(s):  
Natural Variation ◽  
Allelic Variation ◽  
Position Effect ◽  
Natural Populations ◽  
Chromatin State ◽  
Position Effect Variegation ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
Var Genes ◽  
Effect Variegation ◽  
Active Promoter

ABSTRACTChanges in chromatin state may drive changes in gene expression, and it is of growing interest to understand the population genetic forces that drive differences in chromatin state. Here, we use the phenomenon of position effect variegation (PEV), a well-studied proxy for chromatin state, to explore the genetic architecture of natural variation in factors that modify chromatin state. While previous mutation screens have identified over 150 suppressors and enhancers of PEV, it remains unknown to what extent allelic variation in these modifiers mediates inter-individual variation in chromatin state. Is natural variation in PEV mediated by segregating variation in known Su(var) and E(var) genes, or is the trait polygenic, with many variants mapping elsewhere in the genome? We designed a mapping study that directly answers this question and suggests that the bulk of the variance in PEV does not map to genes with prior annotated impact to PEV. Instead, we find enrichment of top P-value ranked associations that suggest impact to active promoter and transcription start site proximal regions. This work provides a quantitative view of the role naturally segregating autosomal variants play in modifying PEV, a phenomenon that continues to shape our understanding of chromatin state and epigenetics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document