scholarly journals The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
A W Kerrebrock ◽  
W Y Miyazaki ◽  
D Birnby ◽  
T L Orr-Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Null Alleles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Late Anaphase ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
In Trans ◽  
New Alleles ◽  
Meiosis I

Abstract The Drosophila mei-S332 gene acts to maintain sister-chromatid cohesion before anaphase II of meiosis in both males and females. By isolating and analyzing seven new alleles and a deficiency uncovering the mei-S332 gene we have demonstrated that the onset of the requirement for mei-S332 is not until late anaphase I. All of our alleles result primarily in equational (meiosis II) nondisjunction with low amounts of reductional (meiosis I) nondisjunction. Cytological analysis revealed that sister chromatids frequently separate in late anaphase I in these mutants. Since the sister chromatids remain associated until late in the first division, chromosomes segregate normally during meiosis I, and the genetic consequences of premature sister-chromatid dissociation are seen as nondisjunction in meiosis II. The late onset of mei-S332 action demonstrated by the mutations was not a consequence of residual gene function because two strong, and possibly null, alleles give predominantly equational nondisjunction both as homozygotes and in trans to a deficiency. mei-S332 is not required until after metaphase I, when the kinetochore differentiates from a single hemispherical kinetochore jointly organized by the sister chromatids into two distinct sister kinetochores. Therefore, we propose that the mei-S322 product acts to hold the doubled kinetochore together until anaphase II. All of the alleles are fully viable when in trans to a deficiency, thus mei-S332 is not essential for mitosis. Four of the alleles show an unexpected sex specificity.

scholarly journals SOLO: a meiotic protein required for centromere cohesion, coorientation, and SMC1 localization in Drosophila melanogaster

2010 ◽  
Vol 188 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rihui Yan ◽  
Sharon E. Thomas ◽  
Jui-He Tsai ◽  
Yukihiro Yamada ◽  
Bruce D. McKee
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes ◽  
Meiosis I ◽  
Novel Protein

Sister chromatid cohesion is essential to maintain stable connections between homologues and sister chromatids during meiosis and to establish correct centromere orientation patterns on the meiosis I and II spindles. However, the meiotic cohesion apparatus in Drosophila melanogaster remains largely uncharacterized. We describe a novel protein, sisters on the loose (SOLO), which is essential for meiotic cohesion in Drosophila. In solo mutants, sister centromeres separate before prometaphase I, disrupting meiosis I centromere orientation and causing nondisjunction of both homologous and sister chromatids. Centromeric foci of the cohesin protein SMC1 are absent in solo mutants at all meiotic stages. SOLO and SMC1 colocalize to meiotic centromeres from early prophase I until anaphase II in wild-type males, but both proteins disappear prematurely at anaphase I in mutants for mei-S332, which encodes the Drosophila homologue of the cohesin protector protein shugoshin. The solo mutant phenotypes and the localization patterns of SOLO and SMC1 indicate that they function together to maintain sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila meiosis.

scholarly journals Sister-chromatid misbehavior in Drosophila ord mutants.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1047-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Y Miyazaki ◽  
T L Orr-Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Cell Number ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Random Segregation ◽  
Egg Chambers ◽  
In Trans ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation ◽  
New Alleles ◽  
Chromosome Nondisjunction

Abstract In Drosophila males and females mutant for the ord gene, sister chromatids prematurely disjoin in meiosis. We have isolated five new alleles of ord and analyzed them both as homozygotes and in trans to deficiencies for the locus, and we show that ord function is necessary early in meiosis of both sexes. Strong ord alleles result in chromosome nondisjunction in meiosis I that appears to be the consequence of precocious separation of the sister chromatids followed by their random segregation. Cytological analysis in males confirmed that precocious disjunction of the sister chromatids occurs in prometaphase I. This is in contrast to Drosophila mei-S332 mutants, in which precocious sister-chromatid separation also occurs, but not until late in anaphase I. All three of the new female fertile ord alleles reduce recombination, suggesting they affect homolog association as well as sister-chromatid cohesion. In addition to the effect of ord mutations on meiosis, we find that in ord2 mutants chromosome segregation is aberrant in the mitotic divisions that produce the spermatocytes. The strongest ord alleles, ord2 and ord5, appear to cause defects in germline divisions in the female. These alleles are female sterile and produce egg chambers with altered nurse cell number, size, and nuclear morphology. In contrast to the effects of ord mutations on germline mitosis, all of the alleles are fully viable even when in trans to a deficiency, and thus exhibit no essential role in somatic mitosis. The ord gene product may prevent premature sister-chromatid separation by promoting cohesion of the sister chromatids in a structural or regulatory manner.

scholarly journals Multiple Subunits of the Caenorhabditis elegans Anaphase-Promoting Complex Are Required for Chromosome Segregation During Meiosis I

Genetics ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 160 (2) ◽  
pp. 805-813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward S Davis ◽  
Lucia Wille ◽  
Barry A Chestnut ◽  
Penny L Sadler ◽  
Diane C Shakes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rna Interference ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Anaphase Promoting Complex ◽  
Genetic Screens ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Interference Studies ◽  
Meiosis I

Abstract Two genes, originally identified in genetic screens for Caenorhabditis elegans mutants that arrest in metaphase of meiosis I, prove to encode subunits of the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C). RNA interference studies reveal that these and other APC/C subunits are essential for the segregation of chromosomal homologs during meiosis I. Further, chromosome segregation during meiosis I requires APC/C functions in addition to the release of sister chromatid cohesion.

scholarly journals Double or nothing: a Drosophila mutation affecting meiotic chromosome segregation in both females and males.

Genetics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 136 (3) ◽  
pp. 953-964 ◽  
Author(s):  
D P Moore ◽  
W Y Miyazaki ◽  
J E Tomkiel ◽  
T L Orr-Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Chromosome ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Aberrant Chromosome ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Meiotic Nondisjunction ◽  
Lethal Allele ◽  
Meiosis I

Abstract We describe a Drosophila mutation, Double or nothing (Dub), that causes meiotic nondisjunction in a conditional, dominant manner. Previously isolated mutations in Drosophila specifically affect meiosis either in females or males, with the exception of the mei-S332 and ord genes which are required for proper sister-chromatid cohesion. Dub is unusual in that it causes aberrant chromosome segregation almost exclusively in meiosis I in both sexes. In Dub mutant females both nonexchange and exchange chromosomes undergo nondisjunction, but the effect of Dub on nonexchange chromosomes is more pronounced. Dub reduces recombination levels slightly. Multiple nondisjoined chromosomes frequently cosegregate to the same pole. Dub results in nondisjunction of all chromosomes in meiosis I of males, although the levels are lower than in females. When homozygous, Dub is a conditional lethal allele and exhibits phenotypes consistent with cell death.

Homolog pairing and sister chromatid cohesion in heterochromatin in Drosophila male meiosis I

Chromosoma ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 120 (4) ◽  
pp. 335-351 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jui-He Tsai ◽  
Rihui Yan ◽  
Bruce D. McKee
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Male Meiosis ◽  
Homolog Pairing ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Meiosis I

scholarly journals Rec8p, a Meiotic Recombination and Sister Chromatid Cohesion Phosphoprotein of the Rad21p Family Conserved from Fission Yeast to Humans

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 3515-3528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandro Parisi ◽  
Michael J. McKay ◽  
Monika Molnar ◽  
M. Anne Thompson ◽  
Peter J. van der Spek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Sequence Similarity ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Specific Expression ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Prophase Nucleus ◽  
Chromosome Iii ◽  
Meiosis I

ABSTRACT Our work and that of others defined mitosis-specific (Rad21 subfamily) and meiosis-specific (Rec8 subfamily) proteins involved in sister chromatid cohesion in several eukaryotes, including humans. Mutation of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe rec8 gene was previously shown to confer a number of meiotic phenotypes, including strong reduction of recombination frequencies in the central region of chromosome III, absence of linear element polymerization, reduced pairing of homologous chromosomes, reduced sister chromatid cohesion, aberrant chromosome segregation, defects in spore formation, and reduced spore viability. Here we extend the description of recombination reduction to the central regions of chromosomes I and II. We show at the protein level that expression ofrec8 is meiosis specific and that Rec8p localizes to approximately 100 foci per prophase nucleus. Rec8p was present in an unphosphorylated form early in meiotic prophase but was phosphorylated prior to meiosis I, as demonstrated by analysis of the mei4mutant blocked before meiosis I. Evidence for the persistence of Rec8p beyond meiosis I was obtained by analysis of the mutantmes1 blocked before meiosis II. A human gene, which we designate hrec8, showed significant primary sequence similarity to rec8 and was mapped to chromosome 14. High mRNA expression of mouse and human rec8 genes was found only in germ line cells, specifically in testes and, interestingly, in spermatids. hrec8 was also expressed at a low level in the thymus. Sequence similarity and testis-specific expression indicate evolutionarily conserved functions of Rec8p in meiosis. Possible roles of Rec8p in the integration of different meiotic events are discussed.

scholarly journals Chromosome interaction over a distance in meiosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 150029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Brady ◽  
Leocadia V. Paliulis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Daughter Cell ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Physical Connection ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Random Segregation

The challenge of cell division is to distribute partner chromosomes (pairs of homologues, pairs of sex chromosomes or pairs of sister chromatids) correctly, one into each daughter cell. In the ‘standard’ meiosis, this problem is solved by linking partners together via a chiasma and/or sister chromatid cohesion, and then separating the linked partners from one another in anaphase; thus, the partners are kept track of, and correctly distributed. Many organisms, however, properly separate chromosomes in the absence of any obvious physical connection, and movements of unconnected partner chromosomes are coordinated at a distance. Meiotic distance interactions happen in many different ways and in different types of organisms. In this review, we discuss several different known types of distance segregation and propose possible explanations for non-random segregation of distance-segregating chromosomes.

scholarly journals A conserved activity for cohesin in bridging DNA molecules

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Gutierrez-Escribano ◽  
Matthew D. Newton ◽  
Aida Llauró ◽  
Jonas Huber ◽  
Loredana Tanasie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Dna Molecules ◽  
Chromosome Architecture ◽  
Physiological Conditions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Core Activity

AbstractEssential processes such as accurate chromosome segregation, regulation of gene expression and DNA repair rely on protein-mediated DNA tethering. Sister chromatid cohesion requires the SMC complex cohesin to act as a protein linker that holds replicated chromatids together (1, 2). The molecular mechanism by which cohesins hold sister chromatids has remained controversial. Here, we used a single molecule approach to visualise the activity of cohesin complexes as they hold DNA molecules. We describe a DNA bridging activity that requires ATP and is conserved from yeast to human cohesin. We show that cohesin can form two distinct classes of bridges at physiological conditions, a “permanent bridge” able to resists high force (over 80pN) and a “reversible bridge” that breaks at lower forces (5-40pN). Both classes of bridges require Scc2/Scc4 in addition to ATP. We demonstrate that bridge formation requires physical proximity of the DNA segments to be tethered and show that “permanent” cohesin bridges can move between two DNA molecules but cannot be removed from DNA when they occur in cis. This suggests that separate physical compartments in cohesin molecules are involved in the bridge. Finally, we show that cohesin tetramers, unlike condensin, cannot compact linear DNA molecules against low force, demonstrating that the core activity of cohesin tetramers is bridging DNA rather than compacting it. Our findings carry important implications for the understanding of the basic mechanisms behind cohesin-dependent establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome architecture.

scholarly journals Multiple determinants and consequences of cohesion fatigue in mammalian cells

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (15) ◽  
pp. 1811-1824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hem Sapkota ◽  
Emilia Wasiak ◽  
John R. Daum ◽  
Gary J. Gorbsky
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mammalian Cells ◽  
Dynamic Balance ◽  
Chromosome Instability ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Complete Separation ◽  
Common Source ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Pulling Forces

Cells delayed in metaphase with intact mitotic spindles undergo cohesion fatigue, where sister chromatids separate asynchronously, while cells remain in mitosis. Cohesion fatigue requires release of sister chromatid cohesion. However, the pathways that breach sister chromatid cohesion during cohesion fatigue remain unknown. Using moderate-salt buffers to remove loosely bound chromatin cohesin, we show that “cohesive” cohesin is not released during chromatid separation during cohesion fatigue. Using a regulated protein heterodimerization system to lock different cohesin ring interfaces at specific times in mitosis, we show that the Wapl-mediated pathway of cohesin release is not required for cohesion fatigue. By manipulating microtubule stability and cohesin complex integrity in cell lines with varying sensitivity to cohesion fatigue, we show that rates of cohesion fatigue reflect a dynamic balance between spindle pulling forces and resistance to separation by interchromatid cohesion. Finally, while massive separation of chromatids in cohesion fatigue likely produces inviable cell progeny, we find that short metaphase delays, leading to partial chromatid separation, predispose cells to chromosome missegregation. Thus, complete separation of one or a few chromosomes and/or partial separation of sister chromatids may be an unrecognized but common source of chromosome instability that perpetuates the evolution of malignant cells in cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document