scholarly journals Sister-chromatid misbehavior in Drosophila ord mutants.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 1047-1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
W Y Miyazaki ◽  
T L Orr-Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Cell Number ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Random Segregation ◽  
Egg Chambers ◽  
In Trans ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation ◽  
New Alleles ◽  
Chromosome Nondisjunction

Abstract In Drosophila males and females mutant for the ord gene, sister chromatids prematurely disjoin in meiosis. We have isolated five new alleles of ord and analyzed them both as homozygotes and in trans to deficiencies for the locus, and we show that ord function is necessary early in meiosis of both sexes. Strong ord alleles result in chromosome nondisjunction in meiosis I that appears to be the consequence of precocious separation of the sister chromatids followed by their random segregation. Cytological analysis in males confirmed that precocious disjunction of the sister chromatids occurs in prometaphase I. This is in contrast to Drosophila mei-S332 mutants, in which precocious sister-chromatid separation also occurs, but not until late in anaphase I. All three of the new female fertile ord alleles reduce recombination, suggesting they affect homolog association as well as sister-chromatid cohesion. In addition to the effect of ord mutations on meiosis, we find that in ord2 mutants chromosome segregation is aberrant in the mitotic divisions that produce the spermatocytes. The strongest ord alleles, ord2 and ord5, appear to cause defects in germline divisions in the female. These alleles are female sterile and produce egg chambers with altered nurse cell number, size, and nuclear morphology. In contrast to the effects of ord mutations on germline mitosis, all of the alleles are fully viable even when in trans to a deficiency, and thus exhibit no essential role in somatic mitosis. The ord gene product may prevent premature sister-chromatid separation by promoting cohesion of the sister chromatids in a structural or regulatory manner.

scholarly journals The Drosophila mei-S332 gene promotes sister-chromatid cohesion in meiosis following kinetochore differentiation.

Genetics ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 130 (4) ◽  
pp. 827-841 ◽  
Author(s):  
A W Kerrebrock ◽  
W Y Miyazaki ◽  
D Birnby ◽  
T L Orr-Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Late Onset ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Null Alleles ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Late Anaphase ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
In Trans ◽  
New Alleles ◽  
Meiosis I

Abstract The Drosophila mei-S332 gene acts to maintain sister-chromatid cohesion before anaphase II of meiosis in both males and females. By isolating and analyzing seven new alleles and a deficiency uncovering the mei-S332 gene we have demonstrated that the onset of the requirement for mei-S332 is not until late anaphase I. All of our alleles result primarily in equational (meiosis II) nondisjunction with low amounts of reductional (meiosis I) nondisjunction. Cytological analysis revealed that sister chromatids frequently separate in late anaphase I in these mutants. Since the sister chromatids remain associated until late in the first division, chromosomes segregate normally during meiosis I, and the genetic consequences of premature sister-chromatid dissociation are seen as nondisjunction in meiosis II. The late onset of mei-S332 action demonstrated by the mutations was not a consequence of residual gene function because two strong, and possibly null, alleles give predominantly equational nondisjunction both as homozygotes and in trans to a deficiency. mei-S332 is not required until after metaphase I, when the kinetochore differentiates from a single hemispherical kinetochore jointly organized by the sister chromatids into two distinct sister kinetochores. Therefore, we propose that the mei-S322 product acts to hold the doubled kinetochore together until anaphase II. All of the alleles are fully viable when in trans to a deficiency, thus mei-S332 is not essential for mitosis. Four of the alleles show an unexpected sex specificity.

scholarly journals Chromosome interaction over a distance in meiosis

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 150029 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Brady ◽  
Leocadia V. Paliulis
Keyword(s):  
Cell Division ◽  
Sex Chromosomes ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Daughter Cell ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Physical Connection ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Random Segregation

The challenge of cell division is to distribute partner chromosomes (pairs of homologues, pairs of sex chromosomes or pairs of sister chromatids) correctly, one into each daughter cell. In the ‘standard’ meiosis, this problem is solved by linking partners together via a chiasma and/or sister chromatid cohesion, and then separating the linked partners from one another in anaphase; thus, the partners are kept track of, and correctly distributed. Many organisms, however, properly separate chromosomes in the absence of any obvious physical connection, and movements of unconnected partner chromosomes are coordinated at a distance. Meiotic distance interactions happen in many different ways and in different types of organisms. In this review, we discuss several different known types of distance segregation and propose possible explanations for non-random segregation of distance-segregating chromosomes.

Getting through anaphase: splitting the sisters and beyond

2010 ◽  
Vol 38 (6) ◽  
pp. 1639-1644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel A. Oliveira ◽  
Kim Nasmyth
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Present Review ◽  
Cohesin Complex ◽  
Physical Separation ◽  
Cohesive Forces ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Pulling Forces ◽  
Random Segregation

Sister-chromatid cohesion, thought to be primarily mediated by the cohesin complex, is essential for chromosome segregation. The forces holding the two sisters resist the tendency of microtubules to prematurely pull sister DNAs apart and thereby prevent random segregation of the genome during mitosis, and consequent aneuploidy. By counteracting the spindle pulling forces, cohesion between the two sisters generates the tension necessary to stabilize microtubule–kinetochore attachments. Upon entry into anaphase, however, the linkages that hold the two sister DNAs must be rapidly destroyed to allow physical separation of chromatids. Anaphase cells must therefore possess mechanisms that ensure faithful segregation of single chromatids that are now attached stably to the spindle in a manner no longer dependent on tension. In the present review, we discuss the nature of the cohesive forces that hold sister chromatids together, the mechanisms that trigger their physical separation, and the anaphase-specific changes that ensure proper segregation of single chromatids during the later stages of mitosis.

scholarly journals THE GENETIC ANALYSIS OF A CHROMOSOME-SPECIFIC MEIOTIC MUTANT THAT PERMITS A PREMATURE SEPARATION OF SISTER CHROMATIDS IN DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER

Genetics ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 107 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-77
Author(s):  
Richard C Gethmann
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Genetic Analysis ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Crossover Frequency ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Males And Females ◽  
Chromosome Nondisjunction

ABSTRACT mei-G87 is a recessive meiotic mutant that increases second chromosome nondisjunction in both males and females. A significant proportion of the diplo-2 exceptions are equational. In females, diplo-2 reductional exceptions are usually noncrossovers, but, in equational exceptions, crossover frequency and distribution are the same as that found in the haplo-2 controls. The frequencies of nondisjunction are relatively low: 0.6% in females and 1.3% in males. Nondisjunction frequency is affected by environmental conditions (possibly humidity). The defect in mei-G87, as in other "second division" mutants, appears to be a failure to maintain sister-chromatid cohesion. mei-G87 increases nondisjunction of only the second chromosome. This may indicate either a weak mutant with only the second chromosome being sensitive enough to misbehave or it may indicate that chromosome-specific regions responsible for sister-chromatid cohesion exist.

scholarly journals Mutational Analysis of the Drosophila Sister-Chromatid Cohesion Protein ORD and Its Role in the Maintenance of Centromeric Cohesion

Genetics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. 1319-1331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon E Bickel ◽  
Dudley W Wyman ◽  
Terry L Orr-Weaver
Keyword(s):  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mutational Analysis ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Chromosome Loss ◽  
Male And Female ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Random Segregation ◽  
Kinetochore Function ◽  
Segregation Of Chromosomes

The ord gene is required for proper segregation of all chromosomes in both male and female Drosophila meiosis. Here we describe the isolation of a null ord allele and examine the consequences of ablating ord function. Cytologically, meiotic sister-chromatid cohesion is severely disrupted in flies lacking ORD protein. Moreover, the frequency of missegregation in genetic tests is consistent with random segregation of chromosomes through both meiotic divisions, suggesting that sister cohesion may be completely abolished. However, only a slight decrease in viability is observed for ord null flies, indicating that ORD function is not essential for cohesion during somatic mitosis. In addition, we do not observe perturbation of germ-line mitotic divisions in flies lacking ORD activity. Our analysis of weaker ord alleles suggests that ORD is required for proper centromeric cohesion after arm cohesion is released at the metaphase I/anaphase I transition. Finally, although meiotic cohesion is abolished in the ord null fly, chromosome loss is not appreciable. Therefore, ORD activity appears to promote centromeric cohesion during meiosis II but is not essential for kinetochore function during anaphase.

scholarly journals Genes Involved in Sister Chromatid Separation and Segregation in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Genetics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 453-470
Author(s):  
Sue Biggins ◽  
Needhi Bhalla ◽  
Amy Chang ◽  
Dana L Smith ◽  
Andrew W Murray
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Mitotic Spindle ◽  
Budding Yeast ◽  
Temperature Sensitive ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Marked Chromosome ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Abstract Accurate chromosome segregation requires the precise coordination of events during the cell cycle. Replicated sister chromatids are held together while they are properly attached to and aligned by the mitotic spindle at metaphase. At anaphase, the links between sisters must be promptly dissolved to allow the mitotic spindle to rapidly separate them to opposite poles. To isolate genes involved in chromosome behavior during mitosis, we microscopically screened a temperature-sensitive collection of budding yeast mutants that contain a GFP-marked chromosome. Nine LOC (loss of cohesion) complementation groups that do not segregate sister chromatids at anaphase were identified. We cloned the corresponding genes and performed secondary tests to determine their function in chromosome behavior. We determined that three LOC genes, PDS1, ESP1, and YCS4, are required for sister chromatid separation and three other LOC genes, CSE4, IPL1, and SMT3, are required for chromosome segregation. We isolated alleles of two genes involved in splicing, PRP16 and PRP19, which impair α-tubulin synthesis thus preventing spindle assembly, as well as an allele of CDC7 that is defective in DNA replication. We also report an initial characterization of phenotypes associated with the SMT3/SUMO gene and the isolation of WSS1, a high-copy smt3 suppressor.

scholarly journals SOLO: a meiotic protein required for centromere cohesion, coorientation, and SMC1 localization in Drosophila melanogaster

2010 ◽  
Vol 188 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rihui Yan ◽  
Sharon E. Thomas ◽  
Jui-He Tsai ◽  
Yukihiro Yamada ◽  
Bruce D. McKee
Keyword(s):  
Drosophila Melanogaster ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Early Prophase ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Mutant Phenotypes ◽  
Meiosis I ◽  
Novel Protein

Sister chromatid cohesion is essential to maintain stable connections between homologues and sister chromatids during meiosis and to establish correct centromere orientation patterns on the meiosis I and II spindles. However, the meiotic cohesion apparatus in Drosophila melanogaster remains largely uncharacterized. We describe a novel protein, sisters on the loose (SOLO), which is essential for meiotic cohesion in Drosophila. In solo mutants, sister centromeres separate before prometaphase I, disrupting meiosis I centromere orientation and causing nondisjunction of both homologous and sister chromatids. Centromeric foci of the cohesin protein SMC1 are absent in solo mutants at all meiotic stages. SOLO and SMC1 colocalize to meiotic centromeres from early prophase I until anaphase II in wild-type males, but both proteins disappear prematurely at anaphase I in mutants for mei-S332, which encodes the Drosophila homologue of the cohesin protector protein shugoshin. The solo mutant phenotypes and the localization patterns of SOLO and SMC1 indicate that they function together to maintain sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila meiosis.

scholarly journals Meiotic cohesin REC8 marks the axial elements of rat synaptonemal complexes before cohesins SMC1β and SMC3

2003 ◽  
Vol 160 (5) ◽  
pp. 657-670 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Eijpe ◽  
Hildo Offenberg ◽  
Rolf Jessberger ◽  
Ekaterina Revenkova ◽  
Christa Heyting
Keyword(s):  
Synaptonemal Complex ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Meiotic Prophase ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Synaptonemal Complexes ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Axial Element ◽  
Striking Contrast ◽  
Metaphase I

In meiotic prophase, the sister chromatids of each chromosome develop a common axial element (AE) that is integrated into the synaptonemal complex (SC). We analyzed the incorporation of sister chromatid cohesion proteins (cohesins) and other AE components into AEs. Meiotic cohesin REC8 appeared shortly before premeiotic S phase in the nucleus and formed AE-like structures (REC8-AEs) from premeiotic S phase on. Subsequently, meiotic cohesin SMC1β, cohesin SMC3, and AE proteins SCP2 and SCP3 formed dots along REC8-AEs, which extended and fused until they lined REC8-AEs along their length. In metaphase I, SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 disappeared from the chromosome arms and accumulated around the centromeres, where they stayed until anaphase II. In striking contrast, REC8 persisted along the chromosome arms until anaphase I and near the centromeres until anaphase II. We propose that REC8 provides a basis for AE formation and that the first steps in AE assembly do not require SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3. Furthermore, SMC1β, SMC3, SCP2, and SCP3 cannot provide arm cohesion during metaphase I. We propose that REC8 then provides cohesion. RAD51 and/or DMC1 coimmunoprecipitates with REC8, suggesting that REC8 may also provide a basis for assembly of recombination complexes.

scholarly journals Human securin proteolysis is controlled by the spindle checkpoint and reveals when the APC/C switches from activation by Cdc20 to Cdh1

2002 ◽  
Vol 157 (7) ◽  
pp. 1125-1137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Hagting ◽  
Nicole den Elzen ◽  
Hartmut C. Vodermaier ◽  
Irene C. Waizenegger ◽  
Jan-Michael Peters ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Chromosome Segregation ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Live Cell Imaging ◽  
Cell Imaging ◽  
Spindle Checkpoint ◽  
Cyclin B1 ◽  
Mutant Form ◽  
Exact Time ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Sister Chromatid Separation

Progress through mitosis is controlled by the sequential destruction of key regulators including the mitotic cyclins and securin, an inhibitor of anaphase whose destruction is required for sister chromatid separation. Here we have used live cell imaging to determine the exact time when human securin is degraded in mitosis. We show that the timing of securin destruction is set by the spindle checkpoint; securin destruction begins at metaphase once the checkpoint is satisfied. Furthermore, reimposing the checkpoint rapidly inactivates securin destruction. Thus, securin and cyclin B1 destruction have very similar properties. Moreover, we find that both cyclin B1 and securin have to be degraded before sister chromatids can separate. A mutant form of securin that lacks its destruction box (D-box) is still degraded in mitosis, but now this is in anaphase. This destruction requires a KEN box in the NH2 terminus of securin and may indicate the time in mitosis when ubiquitination switches from APCCdc20 to APCCdh1. Lastly, a D-box mutant of securin that cannot be degraded in metaphase inhibits sister chromatid separation, generating a cut phenotype where one cell can inherit both copies of the genome. Thus, defects in securin destruction alter chromosome segregation and may be relevant to the development of aneuploidy in cancer.

scholarly journals A conserved activity for cohesin in bridging DNA molecules

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pilar Gutierrez-Escribano ◽  
Matthew D. Newton ◽  
Aida Llauró ◽  
Jonas Huber ◽  
Loredana Tanasie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Molecule ◽  
Sister Chromatid ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Sister Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Dna Molecules ◽  
Chromosome Architecture ◽  
Physiological Conditions ◽  
Sister Chromatids ◽  
Chromatid Cohesion ◽  
Core Activity

AbstractEssential processes such as accurate chromosome segregation, regulation of gene expression and DNA repair rely on protein-mediated DNA tethering. Sister chromatid cohesion requires the SMC complex cohesin to act as a protein linker that holds replicated chromatids together (1, 2). The molecular mechanism by which cohesins hold sister chromatids has remained controversial. Here, we used a single molecule approach to visualise the activity of cohesin complexes as they hold DNA molecules. We describe a DNA bridging activity that requires ATP and is conserved from yeast to human cohesin. We show that cohesin can form two distinct classes of bridges at physiological conditions, a “permanent bridge” able to resists high force (over 80pN) and a “reversible bridge” that breaks at lower forces (5-40pN). Both classes of bridges require Scc2/Scc4 in addition to ATP. We demonstrate that bridge formation requires physical proximity of the DNA segments to be tethered and show that “permanent” cohesin bridges can move between two DNA molecules but cannot be removed from DNA when they occur in cis. This suggests that separate physical compartments in cohesin molecules are involved in the bridge. Finally, we show that cohesin tetramers, unlike condensin, cannot compact linear DNA molecules against low force, demonstrating that the core activity of cohesin tetramers is bridging DNA rather than compacting it. Our findings carry important implications for the understanding of the basic mechanisms behind cohesin-dependent establishment of sister chromatid cohesion and chromosome architecture.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document