O-200 Frozen embryo transfer: Miscarriage rates depending on the starting day of intramuscular progesterone

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kalhorpour ◽  
B Martin ◽  
O Kulski ◽  
J M Mayenga ◽  
I Grefenstette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Day Of Embryo Transfer

Abstract Study question Objective was to assess whether adjusting starting day of intramuscular progesterone the day of vaginal supplementation versus day of embryo transfer or later, might affect the outcome of the cycle. Summary answer additional injection of intramuscular progesterone the day of progesterone initiation or later, is not likely to be more effective on live birth and miscarriage rates. What is known already There is no consensus on the most effective method of endometrium preparation prior to FET. However, many studies report that high serum progesterone concentration during the implantation period is associated with optimal live birth rates. Adjusting progesterone treatment the day of embryo transfer seems to be too late and ineffective for rescuing low progesterone levels and should be done before. Study design, size, duration In this single center prospective study from October 2019 to november 2020, 239 patients undergoing hormonal replacement therapy protocol for frozen embryo transfer were randomly divided into two groups: additional injection of intramuscular progesterone the day of progesterone initiation or intramuscular progesterone the day of embryo transfer. We compare these results to our previous protocol beginning intramuscular progesterone day 22 of the treatment. Participants/materials, setting, methods Our frozen embryo transfer protocol consists to initiate GnRH agonist the day 1 of the cycle. After 14 days of estrogens, we introduce vaginal progesterone, prior to embryo transfer. Patients in group A received an additional injection of intramuscular progesterone the day of progesterone initiation. The group B received intramuscular progesterone the day of embryo transfer. For both, intramuscular injection of progesterone was followed every 3 days. Main results and the role of chance 239 patients were enrolled in this study, 125 in the group A and 114 in the group B. The ongoing pregnancy rate in the group A was 26.4 % and miscarriage rate 7.2%, not statistically different from ongoing pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate of women in the group B (22.81 %, p = 0.66/ 6.14%, p = 0.8). The ongoing pregnancy rate in the group D22 was 24.89 % et miscarriage rate 7.2%, not statistically different from ongoing pregnancy rate of women in the group A and B (p = 0.78 and p = 0.31). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of our study is the lack of randomization for the group with additional progesterone IM on day 22. The study is actually followed to enroll more patients in 3 different groups. Wider implications of the findings This study tries to determine optimal adaptive management of hormonal replacement treatment for embryo transfer in patients with potential low progesterone values. Trial registration number no applicable

P–318 Short (seven days) versus conventional (fourteen days) estrogen priming in an artificial frozen embryo transfer cycle: a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Racca ◽  
S Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
D Panagiotis ◽  
L Boudry ◽  
S Mackens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Study question What is the impact of seven days versus fourteen days’ estrogen (E2) priming on the clinical outcome of frozen-embryo-transfer in artificially prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycles? Summary answer No significant difference in clinical/ongoing pregnancy rate was observed when comparing 7 versus 14 days of estrogen priming before starting progesterone (P) supplementation. What is known already One (effective) method for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer is hormone replacement therapy (HRT), a sequential regimen with E2 and P, which aims to mimic the endocrine exposure of the endometrium in a physiological cycle. The average duration of E2 supplementation is generally 12–14 days, however, this protocol has been arbitrarily chosen whereas, the optimal duration of E2 implementation remains unknown. Study design, size, duration This is a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and December 2020. Overall, 150 patients were randomized of whom 132 were included in the analysis after screening failure and drop-out. Participants/materials, setting, methods The included patients were randomized into one of 2 groups; group A (7 days of E2 prior to P supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P supplementation). Both groups received blastocyst stage embryos for transfer on the 6th day of vaginal P administration. Pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks of gestation. Main results and the role of chance Following the exclusion of drop-outs and screening failures, 132 patients were finally included both in group A (69 patients) or group B (63 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The positive pregnancy rate was 46.4% and 53.9%, (p 0.462) for group A and group B, respectively. With regard to the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistically significant difference was observed (36.2% vs 36.5% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.499). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate) were also comparable between the two arms for both PP and ITT analysis. Multivariable logistic regression showed that the HRT scheme is not associated with pregnancy rate, however, the P value on the day of ET is significantly associated with the pregnancy outcome. Limitations, reasons for caution This study was designed as a proof of principle trial with a limited study population and therefore underpowered to determine the superiority of one intervention over another. Instead, the purpose of the present study was to explore trends in outcome differences and to allow us to safely design larger RCTs. Wider implications of the findings: The results of this study give the confidence to perform larger-scale RCTs to confirm whether a FET-HRT can be performed safely in a shorter time frame, thus, reducing the TTP, while maintaining comparable pregnancy and live birth rates. Trial registration number NCT03930706

P–254 The outcome of artificial reproductive technologies (ART) cycles with transfer of frozen-thawed blastocysts depending on whether expanded on day 5 or day 6

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Polumiskova ◽  
S Tevkin ◽  
M Shishimorova ◽  
T Jussubaliyeva
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Positive Outcome ◽  
Reproductive Technologies ◽  
Endometrial Receptivity ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Preimplantation Genetic Testing ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Study question Is there a difference in ART cycle results after frozen embryo transfer (FET), depending on whether blastocysts were cryopreserved on day 5 or 6? Summary answer There’s no statistical difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), life birth rate (LBR), miscarriage rate (MR) between embryos frozen on day 5 and 6. What is known already Currently, opinions differ regarding this topic. Previous studies demonstrated no difference in ongoing pregnancy rates between embryos frozen on day 5 (group A) or day 6 (group B) after FET. However, metanalysis (2019) suggested higher CPR and LBR after transferring embryos from group A rather than group B. It has also been established that ovarian stimulation leads to endometrial changes that result in deleterious effects on the implantation window and endometrial receptivity. Consequently, fresh transfers were excluded. Due to hormonal priming of endometrial receptivity, the same pregnancy outcomes should be expected with frozen-thawed blastocysts (day 5 vs 6). Study design, size, duration Retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 2015 and December 2018 with selected group of patients under 40 years of age. Group A consisted of 2275 cryotransfers of blastocyst expanded on day 5; group B included 170 cryotransfers of blastocyst on day 6. Both groups had an average of 1,52 embryos transferred per patient. Participants/materials, setting, methods Embryos were vitrified and warmed with Cryotop method (Kitazato, BioPharma). Blastocysts were scored according to Gardner and Schoolcraft grading system. Only expanded on day or 6 blastocysts of excellent and good (AA, AB, BA, BB) quality were selected. The embryos were cultured in CSC medium (Irvine Scientific) for 2–4 hours prior intrauterine transfer. The cycles with donor gametes, surrogacy and preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) were excluded. Statistical validity was assessed by Pearson’s chi-squared test. Main results and the role of chance The rates of the CPR, the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and the LBR between group A and B were 50,8% (1157/2275) vs 46,5% (79/170) (p = 0,26), 37,4% (852/2275) vs 37,0% (63/170) (p = 0,91), 36,5% (832/2275) vs 35,2% (60/170) (p = 0,73) respectively and no significant differences were found in each category. Moreover, similarly there were no significant differences in the miscarriage rate 26,0% (301/1157) and 21,5% (17/79) (p = 0,37) as well Limitations, reasons for caution The study is limited due to uneven distribution of patients in both groups and by a low number of participants. The grading of blastocysts’ quality is also subjected to a human factor. Wider implications of the findings: This study confirms that frozen-thawed blastocysts do not seem to exhibit a difference in the CPR, OPR, LBR and MR whether they were expanded on day 5 or day 6. The cryopreservation of day 6 blastocyst can increase the chances of the patient for the positive outcome. Trial registration number Not applicable

To trigger or not to trigger ovulation in a natural cycle for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1073-1081
Author(s):  
S Mackens ◽  
A Stubbe ◽  
S Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
L Van Landuyt ◽  
A Racca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Natural Cycle ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Biochemical Pregnancy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) following a frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a natural cycle (NC) higher after spontaneous ovulation than after triggered ovulation [natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET) versus modified NC-FET]? SUMMARY ANSWER The CPR did not vary significantly between the two FET preparation protocols. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Although the use of FET is continuously increasing, the most optimal endometrial preparation protocol is still under debate. For transfer in the NC specifically, conflicting results have been reported in terms of the outcome following spontaneous or triggered ovulation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In a tertiary hospital setting, subjects were randomized with a 1:1 allocation into two groups between January 2014 and January 2019. Patients in group A underwent an NC-FET, while in group B, a modified NC-FET was performed with a subcutaneous hCG injection to trigger ovulation. In neither group was additional luteal phase support administered. All embryos were vitrified-warmed on Day 3 and transferred on Day 4 of embryonic development. The primary outcome was CPR at 7 weeks. All patients were followed further until 10 weeks of gestation when the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was defined by the observation of foetal cardiac activity on ultrasound scan. Other secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy rate, early pregnancy loss and the number of visits, blood samples and ultrasonographic examinations prior to FET. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 260 patients (130 per study arm) were randomized, of whom 12 withdrew consent after study arm allocation. A total of 3 women conceived spontaneously before initiating the study cycle and 16 did not start for personal or medical reasons. Of the 229 actually commencing monitoring for the study FET cycle, 7 patients needed to be switched to a hormonal replacement treatment protocol due to the absence of follicular development, 12 had no embryo available for transfer after warming and 37 had a spontaneous LH surge before the ovulation trigger could be administered, although they were allocated to group B. Given the above, an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed taking into account 248 patients (125 in group A and 123 in group B), as well as a per protocol (PP) analysis on a subset of 173 patients (110 in group A and 63 in group B). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Demographic features were evenly distributed between the study groups, as were the relevant fresh and frozen ET cycle characteristics. According to the ITT analysis, the CPR and OPR in group A (33.6% and 27.2%, respectively) and group B (29.3% and 24.4%, respectively) did not vary significantly [relative risk (RR) 0.87, 95% CI (0.60;1.26), P = 0.46 and RR 0.90, 95% CI (0.59;1.37), P = 0.61, respectively]. Biochemical pregnancy rate and early pregnancy loss were also found to be not statistically significantly different between the groups. In contrast, more clinic visits and blood samplings for cycle monitoring were required in the NC-FET group (4.05 ± 1.39) compared with the modified NC-FET group (3.03 ± 1.16, P = <0.001), while the number of ultrasound scans performed were comparable (1.70 ± 0.88 in group A versus 1.62 ± 1.04 in group B). The additional PP analysis was in line with the ITT results: CPR in group A was 36.4% versus 38.1% in group B [RR 1.05, 95% CI (0.70;1.56), P = 0.82]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The results are limited by the high drop-out rate for the PP analysis in the modified NC-FET group as more than one-third of the subjects allocated to this group ovulated spontaneously before ovulation triggering. Nonetheless, this issue is inherent to routine clinical practice and is an important observation of an event that can only be avoided by performing a very extensive monitoring that limits the practical advantages associated with modified NC-FET. Furthermore, although this is the largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating this specific research question so far, a higher sample size would allow smaller differences in clinical outcome to be detected, since currently they may be left undetected. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This RCT adds new high-quality evidence to the existing controversial literature concerning the performance of NC-FET versus modified NC-FET. Based on our results showing no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the protocols, the treatment choice may be made according to the patient’s and treating physician’s preferences. However, the modified NC-FET strategy reduces the need for hormonal monitoring and may therefore be considered a more patient-friendly and potentially cost-effective approach. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No specific funding was available for this study. None of the authors have a conflict of interest to declare with regard to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02145819. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 8 January 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 21 January 2014.

scholarly journals A concise infertility work-up results in fewer pregnancies

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
J A M Hamilton ◽  
J W van der Steeg ◽  
C J C M Hamilton ◽  
J P de Bruin
Keyword(s):  
Success Rate ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Semen Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Work Up

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is pregnancy success rate after a concise infertility work-up the same as pregnancy success rate after the traditional extensive infertility work-up? SUMMARY ANSWER The ongoing pregnancy rate within a follow-up of 1 year after a concise infertility work-up is significantly lower than the pregnancy success rate after the traditional and extensive infertility work-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Based on cost-effectiveness studies, which have mainly focused on diagnosis, infertility work-up has become less comprehensive. Many centres have even adopted a one-stop approach to their infertility work-up. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION We performed a historically controlled cohort study. In 2012 and 2013 all new infertile couples (n = 795) underwent an extensive infertility work-up (group A). In 2014 and 2015, all new infertile couples (n = 752) underwent a concise infertility work-up (group B). The follow-up period was 1 year for both groups. Complete follow-up was available for 99.0% of couples in group A and 97.5% in group B. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS The extensive infertility work-up consisted of history taking, a gynaecological ultrasound scan, semen analysis, ultrasonographic cycle monitoring, a timed postcoital test, a timed progesterone and chlamydia antibody titre. A hysterosalpingography (HSG) was advised routinely. The concise infertility work-up was mainly based on history taking, a gynaecological ultrasound scan and semen analysis. A HSG was only performed if tubal pathology was suspected or before the start of IUI. Laparoscopy and hormonal tests were only performed if indicated. Couples were treated according to the diagnosis with either expectant management (if the Hunault prognostic score was >30%), ovulation induction (in case of ovulation disorders), IUI in natural cycles (in case of cervical factor), IUI in stimulated cycles (if the Hunault prognostic score was <30%) or IVF/ICSI (in case of tubal factor, advanced female age, severe male factor and if other treatments remained unsuccessful). The primary outcomes were time to pregnancy and the ongoing pregnancy rates in both groups. The secondary outcomes were the number of investigations, the distribution of diagnoses made, the first treatment (started) after infertility work-up and the mode of conception. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE The descriptive data, such as age, duration of infertility, type of infertility and lifestyle habits, in both groups were comparable. In group A, more than twice the number of infertility investigations were performed, compared to group B. An HSG was made less frequently in group B (33% versus 42%) and at a later stage. A Kaplan–Meier curve shows a shorter time to pregnancy in group A. Also, a significantly higher overall ongoing pregnancy rate within a follow-up of 1 year was found in group A (58.7% versus 46.8%, respectively, P < 0.001). In group A, more couples conceived during the infertility work-up (14.7% versus 6.5%, respectively, P < 0.05). The diagnosis cervical infertility could only be made in group A (9.3%). The diagnosis unexplained infertility differed between groups, at 23.5% in group A and 32.2% in group B (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This was a historically controlled cohort study; introduction of bias cannot be ruled out. The follow-up rate was similar in the two groups and therefore could not explain the differences in pregnancy rate. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Re-introduction of an extensive infertility work-up should be considered as it may lead to higher ongoing pregnancy rates within a year. The therapeutic effects of HSG and timing of intercourse may improve the fertility chance. This finding should be verified in a randomized controlled trial. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No funding was obtained for this study. No conflicts of interest were declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

P–151 Correlation between the first euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst embryo transfer (FBT) and the subsequent euploid FBT outcome originating from the same cohort of oocytes

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Abalı ◽  
F K Boynukalın ◽  
M Gültomruk ◽  
Z Yarkiner ◽  
M Bahçeci
Keyword(s):  
Regression Analysis ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Pregnancy Outcome ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate

Abstract Study question Does the outcome of the first euploid frozen-thawed blastocyst embryo transfer affect the subsequent euploid FBT originating from the same cohort of oocytes? Summary answer The clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy rate of the subsequent FBT are higher if a clinical pregnancy was attained in the first euploid FBT. What is known already Numerous factors including patient, cycle and embryological characteristics affect the outcome of an IVF treatment cycle. There is no data available whether the outcome of euploid FBT has an impact on the outcome of the subsequent euploid FBT of embryos originating from the same cohort of retrieved oocytes. Study design, size, duration The study enrolled cycles preimplantation genetic test for aneuploidy (PGT-A) performed between January 2016 and July 2019 at the Bahceci Fulya IVF Center. A total of 1051 patients with single euploid FBT were evaluated and resulted live birth (n = 589, live birth rate (LBR): 56%(589/1051)), miscarriage (n = 100, miscarriage rate (MR): 14.5% (100/689)) and no clinical pregnancy (n = 362, 34,4%, (362/1051)). 159 FBT after the first single euploid FBT originating from the same cohort of oocytes were analyzed. Participants/materials, setting, methods Second euploid FBT cycle after first FBT with a clinical pregnancy were compared to frozen-thawed cycles after a without a pregnancy. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to adjust for potential confounders including female age, body mass index, embryo quality, day of embryo frozen, number previous failed attempt, number of previous miscarriage, endometrial thickness, outcome of the first euploid FBT. Main results and the role of chance The pregnancy outcome from the first euploid FBT in the study group was resulted live birth (25.1%, (40/159)), miscarriage (15.7%, (25/159)) and no clinical pregnancy (59.1%, (94/159). The pregnancy outcome of the subsequent euploid embryo transfer from the same oocyte cohort was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR): (67.3%, (107/159) ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) (52.2% (83/159) and MR (22.4%, (24/107)). The CPR in the subsequent euploid FBT was 80% (52/65) among patients who achieved a clinical pregnancy in the first euploid FBT and 58.5% (55/94) of those who did not (p = 0.0045). The OPR in the subsequent euploid FBT was 64.6% (42/65) among patients who achieved a clinical pregnancy in first euploid FBT and 43.6% (41/94) of those who did not (p = 0.009). On a multivariate regression analysis, clinical pregnancy in the first euploid FBT was a significant independent predictor for a pregnancy in the subsequent FBT transfer (p = 0.003). Limitations, reasons for caution The limitation of the study is in the retrospective nature of the study. As the PGT-A strategy significantly decreases number of transferable embryos, the sample size of the study is limited. Wider implications of the findings: Identifying predictive factors for the success of euploid FBT is important. These can help physicians while counseling patients regarding the outcome of the previous euploid FBT. Trial registration number NA

P–252 The correlation of first cleavage and blastulation timing to the euploid status of embryos after PGT-A

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Timotheou ◽  
T Chartomatsidou ◽  
K Kostoglou ◽  
E Papa ◽  
C Ioakeimidou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Time Lapse ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Success Rates ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group B ◽  
Mean Time

Abstract Study question To examine the correlation of first cleavage and blastulation timing on euploidy rates in IVF cycles after PGT-A. Summary answer The timing of blastulation is observed earlier in the euploid embryos. What is known already Embryo evaluation is one of the most critical processes that affect the clinical outcome in IVF cycles. Conventional morphologic assessment and morphokinetic assessment using time lapse technology are performed in order to select the embryo with the higher implantation potential to be transferred. It is stated that embryos with faster developmental potential, especially early forming blastocysts, show increased euploidy rate and higher implantation potential. Study design, size, duration This study includes ICSI/PGT-A treatments completed between May 2018 and December 2019. 117 blastocysts were biopsied and their euploidy status was analyzed by NGS. These embryos resulted from 32 different ICSI treatments. PGT-A was performed due to: a) repeated IVF failure, b) advanced maternal age, c) recurrent pregnancy loss.ICSI was implemented in all cases and blastocysts were vitrified awaiting the genetic results. Single euploid blastocyst transfer followed and clinical pregnancy rate was monitored. Participants/materials, setting, methods Based on the genetic results, the biopsied embryos were divided into two categories; group A representing the euploid embryos and group B the aneuploid embryos. The timing of 1st cleavage and the timing of blastulation, by means of forming a blastocoel, were investigated and compared between the two groups. The rate of early blastocysts in the two groups was also analysed. Early blastocysts are considered those formed at 96h ±2 of embryo culture post ICSI. Main results and the role of chance After the genetic analysis of the biopsied embryos, 37 blastocysts were included in group A-Euploid embryos and 80 blastocysts in group B-Aneuploid embryos. The mean time of the 1st cleavage division was similar between the two groups, with marginally no statistical significance (group A-euploid:25.9h, group B-aneuploid: 26.9h ,p>0.05). Regarding the blastulation time, it was achieved earlier in group A-Euploid, at a mean time of 102.6h, compared to the mean time of 106h in group B-Aneuploid (p < 0.05). Between the cohort of the Euploid embryos (group A), there was a higher rate of early blastulating embryos, compared to the cohort of aneuploid embryos (Group B) (24% VS 17.5%), although it was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). After transferring 1 euploid blastocyst, the ongoing pregnancy rate was monitored in 76.5%, independently of the 1stcleavage and blastulation time of the transferred embryo. Limitations, reasons for caution Further investigation in larger randomized studies is required, as only a limited number of cases were included in this study. Further analysis of the ongoing pregnancy rate between the euploid blastocysts, depending on other morphokinetic parameters would be of paramount significance, as well. Wider implications of the findings: High clinical pregnancy rates observed independently of the analyzed time points, indicate high success rates obtained after PGT-A/NGS. Additionally, success rates show that trophectoderm biopsy is not hazardous for the embryo viability, if performed properly. Concluding, genetic testing combined with time-lapse microscopy may provide further information to improve IVF outcomes. Trial registration number N/A

P–404 Low serum progesterone on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer is associated with a diminished ongoing pregnancy rate in hormonal replacement therapy cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
C Maignien ◽  
B Mathilde ◽  
B Valérie ◽  
C Ahmed ◽  
C Charles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Replacement Therapy ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Blastocyst Transfer ◽  
Progesterone Level ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Hormonal Replacement

Abstract Study question Is there a relationship between progesterone levels on the day of frozen blastocyst transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) cycles? Summary answer Women undergoing HRT-frozen embryo transfer with progesterone levels≤9.76ng/ml on the day of blastocyst transfer had a significantly lower OPR than those with progesterone levels>9.76 ng/ml. What is known already The importance of serum progesterone levels around the time of frozen embryo transfer (FET) is a burning issue, in view of the growing number of FET worldwide. However, the optimal range of serum progesterone levels is not clearly determined and discrepancies arise from the current literature. Study design, size, duration: Observational cohort study with 915 patients undergoing HRT-FET at a tertiary care university hospital, between January 2019 and March 2020. Participants/materials, setting, methods Patients undergoing single autologous blastocyst FET under HRT using exogenous estradiol and vaginal micronized progesterone for endometrial preparation. Women were only included once during the study period. The serum progesterone level was measured in the morning of the FET, in a single laboratory. The primary endpoint was OPR beyond pregnancy week 12. Statistical analysis was conducted using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Main results and the role of chance Mean serum progesterone level on the day of FET was 12.90 ± 4.89 ng/ml). The OPR was 35.5% (325/915) in the overall population. Patients with a progesterone level ≤ 25th percentile (≤9.76ng/ml) had a significantly lower OPR and a higher miscarriage rate (MR) compared with women with progesterone level over Centile 25 (29.6% versus 37.4%; p = 0.033 and 34.8% versus 21.3%; p = 0.008, respectively). After adjustment for the potential confounders in a multivariate analysis, a serum progesterone level ≤ 9.76 ng/ml on the day of FETand FET of a Day 6-blastocyst (versus Day 5-blastocyst) were found as independent risks factor of lower OPR. Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of our study is linked to its observational design. Extrapolation of our results to other laboratories, or other routes and/or doses of administering progesterone also needs to be validated. Wider implications of the findings: This study suggests that a minimum serum progesterone level is needed to optimize reproductive outcomes in autologous blastocyst FET, in HRT-cycles. Further studies are needed to evaluate if modifications of progesterone routes and/or doses may improve pregnancy chances, in an approach to individualize the management of ART patients. Trial registration number NA

scholarly journals The exact synchronization timing between the cleavage embryo stage and duration of progesterone therapy-improved pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles: A cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Omidi ◽  
Iman Halvaei ◽  
Fatemeh Akyash ◽  
Mohammad Ali Khalili ◽  
Azam Agha-Rahimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Embryo Stage ◽  
Group B

Background: Synchronization between the embryonic stage and the uterine endometrial lining is important in the outcomes of the vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Objective: The aim was to investigate the effect of the exact synchronization between the cleavage stage of embryos and the duration of progesterone administration on the improvement of clinical outcomes in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Materials and Methods: 312 FET cycles were categorized into two groups: (A) day- 3 ET after three days of progesterone administration (n = 177) and (B) day-2 or -4 ET after three days of progesterone administration (n = 135). Group B was further divided into two subgroups: B1: day-2 ET cycles, that the stage of embryos were less than the administrated progesterone and B2: day-4 ET cycles, that the stage of embryos were more than the administrated progesterone. The clinical outcome measures were compared between the groups. Results: The pregnancy outcomes between groups A and B showed a significant differences in the chemical (40.1% vs 27.4%; p = 0.010) and clinical pregnancies (32.8% vs 22.2%; p = 0.040), respectively. The rate of miscarriage tended to be higher and live birth rate tended to be lower in group B than in group A. Also, significantly higher rates were noted in chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth in group A when compared with subgroup B2. Conclusion: Higher rates of pregnancy and live birth were achieved in day-3 ET after three days of progesterone administration in FET cycles. Key words: Endometrium, Embryo transfer, Pregnancy, Live birth, Progesterone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document