P–318 Short (seven days) versus conventional (fourteen days) estrogen priming in an artificial frozen embryo transfer cycle: a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Racca ◽  
S Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
D Panagiotis ◽  
L Boudry ◽  
S Mackens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Study question What is the impact of seven days versus fourteen days’ estrogen (E2) priming on the clinical outcome of frozen-embryo-transfer in artificially prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycles? Summary answer No significant difference in clinical/ongoing pregnancy rate was observed when comparing 7 versus 14 days of estrogen priming before starting progesterone (P) supplementation. What is known already One (effective) method for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer is hormone replacement therapy (HRT), a sequential regimen with E2 and P, which aims to mimic the endocrine exposure of the endometrium in a physiological cycle. The average duration of E2 supplementation is generally 12–14 days, however, this protocol has been arbitrarily chosen whereas, the optimal duration of E2 implementation remains unknown. Study design, size, duration This is a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and December 2020. Overall, 150 patients were randomized of whom 132 were included in the analysis after screening failure and drop-out. Participants/materials, setting, methods The included patients were randomized into one of 2 groups; group A (7 days of E2 prior to P supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P supplementation). Both groups received blastocyst stage embryos for transfer on the 6th day of vaginal P administration. Pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks of gestation. Main results and the role of chance Following the exclusion of drop-outs and screening failures, 132 patients were finally included both in group A (69 patients) or group B (63 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The positive pregnancy rate was 46.4% and 53.9%, (p 0.462) for group A and group B, respectively. With regard to the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistically significant difference was observed (36.2% vs 36.5% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.499). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate) were also comparable between the two arms for both PP and ITT analysis. Multivariable logistic regression showed that the HRT scheme is not associated with pregnancy rate, however, the P value on the day of ET is significantly associated with the pregnancy outcome. Limitations, reasons for caution This study was designed as a proof of principle trial with a limited study population and therefore underpowered to determine the superiority of one intervention over another. Instead, the purpose of the present study was to explore trends in outcome differences and to allow us to safely design larger RCTs. Wider implications of the findings: The results of this study give the confidence to perform larger-scale RCTs to confirm whether a FET-HRT can be performed safely in a shorter time frame, thus, reducing the TTP, while maintaining comparable pregnancy and live birth rates. Trial registration number NCT03930706

O-200 Frozen embryo transfer: Miscarriage rates depending on the starting day of intramuscular progesterone

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
N Kalhorpour ◽  
B Martin ◽  
O Kulski ◽  
J M Mayenga ◽  
I Grefenstette ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy ◽  
Miscarriage Rate ◽  
Ongoing Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Day Of Embryo Transfer

Abstract Study question Objective was to assess whether adjusting starting day of intramuscular progesterone the day of vaginal supplementation versus day of embryo transfer or later, might affect the outcome of the cycle. Summary answer additional injection of intramuscular progesterone the day of progesterone initiation or later, is not likely to be more effective on live birth and miscarriage rates. What is known already There is no consensus on the most effective method of endometrium preparation prior to FET. However, many studies report that high serum progesterone concentration during the implantation period is associated with optimal live birth rates. Adjusting progesterone treatment the day of embryo transfer seems to be too late and ineffective for rescuing low progesterone levels and should be done before. Study design, size, duration In this single center prospective study from October 2019 to november 2020, 239 patients undergoing hormonal replacement therapy protocol for frozen embryo transfer were randomly divided into two groups: additional injection of intramuscular progesterone the day of progesterone initiation or intramuscular progesterone the day of embryo transfer. We compare these results to our previous protocol beginning intramuscular progesterone day 22 of the treatment. Participants/materials, setting, methods Our frozen embryo transfer protocol consists to initiate GnRH agonist the day 1 of the cycle. After 14 days of estrogens, we introduce vaginal progesterone, prior to embryo transfer. Patients in group A received an additional injection of intramuscular progesterone the day of progesterone initiation. The group B received intramuscular progesterone the day of embryo transfer. For both, intramuscular injection of progesterone was followed every 3 days. Main results and the role of chance 239 patients were enrolled in this study, 125 in the group A and 114 in the group B. The ongoing pregnancy rate in the group A was 26.4 % and miscarriage rate 7.2%, not statistically different from ongoing pregnancy rate and miscarriage rate of women in the group B (22.81 %, p = 0.66/ 6.14%, p = 0.8). The ongoing pregnancy rate in the group D22 was 24.89 % et miscarriage rate 7.2%, not statistically different from ongoing pregnancy rate of women in the group A and B (p = 0.78 and p = 0.31). Limitations, reasons for caution The main limitation of our study is the lack of randomization for the group with additional progesterone IM on day 22. The study is actually followed to enroll more patients in 3 different groups. Wider implications of the findings This study tries to determine optimal adaptive management of hormonal replacement treatment for embryo transfer in patients with potential low progesterone values. Trial registration number no applicable

scholarly journals The Impact of the Depth of Embryo Replacement into the Uterine Cavity under Transabdominal Ultrasound Guidance on In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer Outcome

2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 38-44
Author(s):  
Mitko Ivanovski ◽  
Slavjanka Popovska
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Ultrasound Guidance ◽  
Uterine Cavity ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Transabdominal Ultrasound ◽  
Group A ◽  
Embryo Replacement ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Aim: The aim of the present study was to determine the importance of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity (upper or lower half endometrial cavity) on the implantation clinical pregnancy rates.Material and Methods: In this prospective observational were included 160 patients underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation followed by IVF/ICSI and embryo transfer. On the day of embryo transfer under direct transabdominal ultrasound guidance, the transfer catheter was advanced to a defined distance from the uterine fundus, up to the point estimated for transfer: 10 ± 2.5 mm (Group A) and 15 ± 2.5 mm (Group B).Results: In total, 160 patients, aged 24-42 years were included in the study. Overall clinical pregnancy rate were 41.2%. Analysis of our results demonstrated that pregnancy rate is significantly influenced by transfer distance from the fundus where the  pregnancy rate decreases from 48.7% in group B to 34.5%  in group A (p<0.05). There was not significantly difference in abortion rate between the two groups.Conclusion: In conclusion, our results suggest that depth of embryo replacement inside the uterine cavity may influence the pregnancy rates and should be considered as an important factor to improve the success of IVF cycles.

P–671 Dual Trigger(low adjuvant HCG4h after GnRHagonist trigger)have positive impact of overall embryo’s quality, implantation ,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in high-risk patients for OHSS

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Petanovsk. Kostova
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Birth Rates ◽  
High Risk Patients ◽  
Live Birth Rates ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Study question Study aim is to compare implantation,clinical pregnancy and livebirth rates between giving1500IU of hCG4hours after GnRHagonist,on trigger day or GnRHagonist as alone trigger with luteal support withHCG1500IU.35h later on OPUday. Summary answer Adjuvant doze of1500IUhCG4h after bolus of GnRHagonist on trigger day significantly improve quality of blastocyst,implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk ofOHSS. What is known already The use of GnRHagonist for final oocyte maturation in antagonist cycle significantly decrease the incidence of OHSS,but there have been studies showing lower pregnancy rates in patients triggered with GnRHagonist compared with hCG in autologous cycles,attributed to a defective luteal phase, especially in high–risk patients despite intensive luteal phase support.To improve the results of IVF,an alternative approach is adding a small bolus dose of hCG(1500IU)35h later,on the OPU day after GnRHagonist trigger which provides more sustained support for the corpus luteum.The question is does low doses of hCGgiven on the same day with GnRHagonist trigger is making better quality oocytes. Study design, size, duration Single center prospective longitudinal cohort study fromJanuary2017 to Decembar2019.The initial inclusion criteria were:women age≥18and≤39years,AMH≥3,3ng/ml and ≥12 antral follicles on basal ultrasound.Patients with history of OHSS and PCO are also included in the study.Patients with applied “freeze-all” technique with peak estradiol≥4000pg/ml on trigger day&gt;18oocytes on the OPU day,and recognized significant risk for developing OHSS were also included.The cumulative implantation,clinical pregnancy and live birth rates were analyzed,only in embryos from the same COS protocol in every patient. Participants/materials, setting, methods A total of 231 patients were entered for final analysis,who underwent a flexible antagonist protocol,ICSI and fresh or thawed ET on 3th(38.53%) or 5th( 61.47%)day in women’s autologous cycles.Patients were randomized in one of two groups: GroupA-Dual trigger group 1500IUof hCG 4h after GnRH agonist application on trigger day and GroupB –1500IU of HCG 35h later,on the OPU day.We used nonparametric and parametric statistical tests.Significant differences were considered all values ​​of p &lt; 0.05 Main results and the role of chance Both groups are homogenous regarding several variables:age,BMI,type of sterility,smoking status,AMH,PCO, spermogram.There is no significant difference between the two(AvsB)groups according to average number of retrieved oocytes(13.6 vs 14.6 p &gt; 0,05),M II oocytes(11.03 vs 11.99 p &gt; 0.05).The dual trigger group(A)had a higher fertility rate(69.99% vs 64.11% p &lt; 0,05)compared with GnRHagonist trigger group(B).There are no significant difference between groups(AvsB)according to cumulative average number of:transferred embryos(2.4vs2.5 p &gt; 0.05)TQE transfered on 3th day(1.5.vs 1.3.p&gt;0.05);transferred blastocyst(2.6 vs2.7 &gt;0.05);cryo embryos(2.5vs1.9 p &gt; 0.05),but there are significant difference according to cumulative implantation rate of transferred blastocyst in favor of group A(48.18% vs 33.89%p&lt;0.05).Analyzes of morphological characteristics of transferred blastocyst depicted in the order of degree of blastocyst expansion,inner cellular mass(ICM)and trofoectoderm(TE) and ranking overall blastocysts quality from“excellent”,“good”,“average” and “pore” ,shows that there are significantly more percentage of patient with embryo transfer of “excellent” or even one “excellent” blastocyst in group A (30.56%,31.94% vs 21.54%,23.08% p &lt; 0.05) in opposite of percentage of patients with embryo transfer with “poore “” blastocyst in group B (37.5% vs 46.15.%p&lt;0.05). Clinical pregnanacy rate (71.68% vs 50.84% p &lt; 0.05) , and live birth rate (60,18% vs 42,58% ), were significantly higher in group A. There were no cases of moderate or severe OHSS in both groups. Limitations, reasons for caution Dual trigger in GnRH antagonist protocols should be advocated as a safe approach but undetected high risk patients are reasons for caution for developing clinically significant OHSS. Wider implications of the findings: Adjuvant low dose of hCG on GnRHagonist trigger day improve clinical pregnancy and live birth rates without increasing the risk of clinically significant OHSS.Protocol of dual trigger and freezing all oocytes or embryos in patients with high risk of developing OHSS is promising technique in everyday practice. Trial registration number 8698

P–347 A comparative RCT of Intrauterine-GCSF versus Subcutaneous-GCSF in Thin Endometrium in IVF-ICSI Cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P C Jindal ◽  
M Singh
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Serum Levels ◽  
Abortion Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Thin Endometrium ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract Study question Does GCSF by intrauterine route leads to better result in the treatment of thin endometrium as compared to GCSF by the subcutaneous route, in IVF-ICSI Cycles? Summary answer Yes, GCSF by intrauterine route leads to better result in the treatment of thin endometrium as compared to subcutaneous-GCSF, in ART Cycles? What is known already GCSF, is a member of the colony stimulating factor family of cytokines and growth factors. GCSF receptors are expressed in high concentration on dominant follicle, particularly at preovulatory stage.The endometrium also shows an increased expression of these receptors. GCSF concentration rises in the follicular fluid at the same time. Serum levels of GCSF are found to be in direct correlation with levels of GCSF in follicular fluid. Serum levels increase progressively from the day the embryo-transfer to the day of implantation. GCSF has been found to be beneficial in patients with thin endometrium and recurrent implantation failure. Study design, size, duration This was a RCT conducted between 2018–2019. 30 patients with thin endometrium were enrolled in each group. In either group, GCSF was given if endometrium was less than 7mm on day 14, maximum of two doses were administered. Patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer were recruited in the study, after meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Primary outcome measured was increase in endometrium thickness and the secondary outcome was the clinical pregnancy rate and abortion-rate. Participants/materials, setting, methods 60 patients with thin endometrium were randomly divided into two groups. Group A: Inj. GCSF (300 mcg/1 ml) subcutaneously on Day 14 onwards alternate days for two doses. Group B: Inj. GCSF (300 mcg/1 ml) instilled slowly into the uterine cavity using an intrauterine insemination (IUI) catheter under USG guidance. Endometrial thickness was assessed after 48 h. If endometrial thickness was found to be &lt; 7 mm, a second infusion of GCSF was carried out. Main results and the role of chance In the subcutaneous group (group-A) the mean endometrial thickness before GCSF injection was 5.8 ± 0.6 mm and, after injection it increased to 6.9 ± 0.4 mm. Similarly, in the intrauterine group (group-B) the mean endometrial thickness before GCSF was 5.9 ± 0.7 which increased to a mean of 7.9 ± 0.5 after GCSF instillation. The difference between endometrial thickness before and after intrauterine infusion of GCSF was more than that in the subcutaneous group. In group-A, 08 patients conceived out of 30 patients ( clinical pregnancy rate 26.6%) and in group B 11 conceived out of 30 patients in whom GCSF was instilled intrauterine (pregnancy rate 36.6%). Thus, there was a difference in the clinical pregnancy rate in the two groups, the intrauterine group yielding a higher clinical pregnancy rate, but it was not statistically significant. Because of the thin endometrium, we found an abortion rate of 25% (2/8) in the subcutaneous-GCSF group, and an abortion rate of 18% (2/11) in the intrauterine GCSF group. Limitations, reasons for caution There are few potential limitations because of the small sample size. Confounders such as obesity, smoking and alcohol intake, presence of adenomyosis and endometriosis, were not taken into consideration. Though prevalence of obesity is usually low in Indian women. Habits of smoking and alcohol are exceedingly uncommon in Indian women. Wider implications of the findings: Use of GCSF plays an important role in management of patients of thin endometrium undergoing embryo transfer. It is an easily available and economical preparation in developing countries and the intrauterine instillation of GCSF can be easily practiced in an ART unit with good results in resistant thin endometrium patients. Trial registration number Not applicable

To trigger or not to trigger ovulation in a natural cycle for frozen embryo transfer: a randomized controlled trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
pp. 1073-1081
Author(s):  
S Mackens ◽  
A Stubbe ◽  
S Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
L Van Landuyt ◽  
A Racca ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Pregnancy Loss ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Natural Cycle ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Biochemical Pregnancy ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Abstract STUDY QUESTION Is the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) following a frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a natural cycle (NC) higher after spontaneous ovulation than after triggered ovulation [natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET) versus modified NC-FET]? SUMMARY ANSWER The CPR did not vary significantly between the two FET preparation protocols. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Although the use of FET is continuously increasing, the most optimal endometrial preparation protocol is still under debate. For transfer in the NC specifically, conflicting results have been reported in terms of the outcome following spontaneous or triggered ovulation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION In a tertiary hospital setting, subjects were randomized with a 1:1 allocation into two groups between January 2014 and January 2019. Patients in group A underwent an NC-FET, while in group B, a modified NC-FET was performed with a subcutaneous hCG injection to trigger ovulation. In neither group was additional luteal phase support administered. All embryos were vitrified-warmed on Day 3 and transferred on Day 4 of embryonic development. The primary outcome was CPR at 7 weeks. All patients were followed further until 10 weeks of gestation when the ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) was defined by the observation of foetal cardiac activity on ultrasound scan. Other secondary outcomes included biochemical pregnancy rate, early pregnancy loss and the number of visits, blood samples and ultrasonographic examinations prior to FET. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS A total of 260 patients (130 per study arm) were randomized, of whom 12 withdrew consent after study arm allocation. A total of 3 women conceived spontaneously before initiating the study cycle and 16 did not start for personal or medical reasons. Of the 229 actually commencing monitoring for the study FET cycle, 7 patients needed to be switched to a hormonal replacement treatment protocol due to the absence of follicular development, 12 had no embryo available for transfer after warming and 37 had a spontaneous LH surge before the ovulation trigger could be administered, although they were allocated to group B. Given the above, an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was performed taking into account 248 patients (125 in group A and 123 in group B), as well as a per protocol (PP) analysis on a subset of 173 patients (110 in group A and 63 in group B). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Demographic features were evenly distributed between the study groups, as were the relevant fresh and frozen ET cycle characteristics. According to the ITT analysis, the CPR and OPR in group A (33.6% and 27.2%, respectively) and group B (29.3% and 24.4%, respectively) did not vary significantly [relative risk (RR) 0.87, 95% CI (0.60;1.26), P = 0.46 and RR 0.90, 95% CI (0.59;1.37), P = 0.61, respectively]. Biochemical pregnancy rate and early pregnancy loss were also found to be not statistically significantly different between the groups. In contrast, more clinic visits and blood samplings for cycle monitoring were required in the NC-FET group (4.05 ± 1.39) compared with the modified NC-FET group (3.03 ± 1.16, P = &lt;0.001), while the number of ultrasound scans performed were comparable (1.70 ± 0.88 in group A versus 1.62 ± 1.04 in group B). The additional PP analysis was in line with the ITT results: CPR in group A was 36.4% versus 38.1% in group B [RR 1.05, 95% CI (0.70;1.56), P = 0.82]. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The results are limited by the high drop-out rate for the PP analysis in the modified NC-FET group as more than one-third of the subjects allocated to this group ovulated spontaneously before ovulation triggering. Nonetheless, this issue is inherent to routine clinical practice and is an important observation of an event that can only be avoided by performing a very extensive monitoring that limits the practical advantages associated with modified NC-FET. Furthermore, although this is the largest randomized controlled trial (RCT) investigating this specific research question so far, a higher sample size would allow smaller differences in clinical outcome to be detected, since currently they may be left undetected. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS This RCT adds new high-quality evidence to the existing controversial literature concerning the performance of NC-FET versus modified NC-FET. Based on our results showing no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the protocols, the treatment choice may be made according to the patient’s and treating physician’s preferences. However, the modified NC-FET strategy reduces the need for hormonal monitoring and may therefore be considered a more patient-friendly and potentially cost-effective approach. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No specific funding was available for this study. None of the authors have a conflict of interest to declare with regard to this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02145819. TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE 8 January 2014. DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLMENT 21 January 2014.

scholarly journals Uterus Size May Affect Reproductive Outcome in Women with Adenomyosis After Gnrh- Agonist Pretreatment Undergoing Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Xiong ◽  
Ruiyi Tang ◽  
Peng Wu ◽  
Zhengyi Sun ◽  
jingran zhen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Gnrh Agonist ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer

Abstract Background: GnRH-agonist is used to treat adenomyosis, but its efficacy in adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET) is unclear. Methods：The retrospective cohort study comprised 112 adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement undergoing the first FET circle. A long-term GnRH-a pretreatment was administered to 112 patients with uterine enlargement. These patients were divided into two groups according to the therapeutic effect: patients with a normal-size uterus after GnRH-a treatment (GN group) and patients with an enlarged uterus after GnRH-a treatment (GL group). Results：Not all patients can shrink their uterus to a satisfactory level. After receiving GnRH-a pretreatment, the uterus returned to normal size in 77% of patients (GN group), and 23% of patients had a persistently enlarged uterus (GL group). The pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, and live birth rate were significantly higher in the GN group than in the GL group. Controlling for the confounding factors, normal uterus size (odds ratio [OR] 4.50; P=0.03) and low body mass index (OR 3.13; P=0.03) affected the odds of achieving live birth. The cut-off value selected on the ROC curve of uterus volume after GnRH-a treatment for detecting live birth was 144.7Conclusions：GnRH-a pretreatment was associated with the regression of adenomyosis lesions and improved clinical pregnancy outcomes in the adenomyosis patients with uterine enlargement whose lesion are GnRH-a susceptible on FET cycles. However, about a quarter of patients may not be less responsive to GnRH-a and have poorer pregnancy outcomes, especially in overweight women.

scholarly journals EMBRYO GLUE AND CLINICAL PREGNANCY RATES IN ICSI EMBRYO TRANSFER CYCLES: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Salwa Fadhil ◽  
Mohammad Selman ◽  
Manal Al-Obaidi
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection ◽  
Pregnancy Rates ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Fresh Embryo Transfer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
A Prospective Study ◽  
Medium Group

Purpose: One of the reasons for failed implantation after transferring good quality embryos in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle is the failure of creation a viscid layer between the embryo and the endometrium. Many modifications have been made in embryo transfer medium to improve implantation and increase pregnancy rates such as adding albumin as a source of energy and adding hyaluronic acid in high concentrations such as in Embryo Glue medium: a human embryo transfer medium. To investigate whether the use of Embryo Glue had any effect on clinical pregnancy rates in intracytoplasmic sperm injection-fresh embryo transfer cycles. Methods: A prospective study included one hundred and twenty-eight infertile Iraqi women who were selected and subjected to a stimulation protocol in an intracytoplasmic sperm injection-fresh embryo transfer cycle. All patients were considered to be eligible for embryo transfer (no visible causes could prevent implantation) and only good quality embryos were transferred to them. Those women were divided randomly into two groups according to type of embryo transfer medium: group A: Embryo Glue medium. group B: Conventional medium. Then group A was subdivided according to age into:  AI (34 women with age < 35 years and represented 50.7%) AII (33 women with age ≥ 35 years and represented 49.3%) While group B was subdivided into:  BI (41women with age < 35 years and represented 67.3%)  BII (20 women with age ≥ 35 years and represented 32.7%). Results: Although there was no significant difference between all groups in causes of infertility, the pregnancy rate was significantly higher in subgroup AII (18 pregnant from 33 women) while only 5 patients became pregnant from 20 patients in subgroup BII.  In all women no more than four good quality embryos were transferred, and when total number of transferred embryos was significantly more in group B than group A (P=0.013), the significant increase in pregnancy rates was only observed in subgroup AII (P=0.048). Even though a highly significant difference in number of repeated implantation failure was in group A than group B (P=0.027), the pregnancy rates were significantly higher in group A (P=0.038). Conclusion: This study concluded that using Embryo Glue has a beneficial effect on old women and increase pregnancy rates, also it has a positive effect on pregnancy rates in repeated implantation failure and increases pregnancy rates even if the women is old.

scholarly journals Estimating the causal effect of embryo transfer day on clinical in vitro fertilization outcomes using propensity score matching

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Han-Chih Hsieh ◽  
Chun-I Lee ◽  
En-Yu Lai ◽  
Jia-Ying Su ◽  
Yi-Ting Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Implantation Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Day 5 Transfer

Abstract Background For women undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), the clinical benefit of embryo transfer at the blastocyst stage (Day 5) versus cleavage stage (Day 3) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and odds of live birth of Day 3 and Day 5 embryo transfer, and more importantly, to address the issue that patients were chosen to receive either transfer protocol due to their underlying clinical characteristics, i.e., confounding by indication. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 9,090 IVF cycles collected by Lee Women’s Hospital in Taichung, Taiwan from 1998 to 2014. We utilized the method of propensity score matching to mimic a randomized controlled trial (RCT) where each patient with Day 5 transfer was matched by another patient with Day 3 transfer with respect to other clinical characteristics. Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and odds of live birth were compared for women underwent Day 5 transfer and Day 3 transfer to estimate the causal effects. We further investigated the causal effects in subgroups by stratifying age and anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH). Results Our analyses uncovered an evidence of a significant difference in implantation rate (p=0.04) favoring Day 5 transfer, and showed that Day 3 and Day 5 transfers made no difference in both odds of live birth (p=0.27) and clinical pregnancy rate (p=0.11). With the increase of gestational age, the trend toward non-significance of embryo transfer day in our result appeared to be consistent for subgroups stratified by age and AMH, while all analyses stratified by age and AMH were not statistically significant. Conclusions We conclude that for women without strong indications for Day 3 or Day 5 transfer, there is a small significant difference in implantation rate in favor of Day 5 transfer. However, the two protocols have indistinguishable outcomes on odds of live birth and clinical pregnancy rate.

scholarly journals The exact synchronization timing between the cleavage embryo stage and duration of progesterone therapy-improved pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles: A cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Omidi ◽  
Iman Halvaei ◽  
Fatemeh Akyash ◽  
Mohammad Ali Khalili ◽  
Azam Agha-Rahimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Embryo Stage ◽  
Group B

Background: Synchronization between the embryonic stage and the uterine endometrial lining is important in the outcomes of the vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Objective: The aim was to investigate the effect of the exact synchronization between the cleavage stage of embryos and the duration of progesterone administration on the improvement of clinical outcomes in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Materials and Methods: 312 FET cycles were categorized into two groups: (A) day- 3 ET after three days of progesterone administration (n = 177) and (B) day-2 or -4 ET after three days of progesterone administration (n = 135). Group B was further divided into two subgroups: B1: day-2 ET cycles, that the stage of embryos were less than the administrated progesterone and B2: day-4 ET cycles, that the stage of embryos were more than the administrated progesterone. The clinical outcome measures were compared between the groups. Results: The pregnancy outcomes between groups A and B showed a significant differences in the chemical (40.1% vs 27.4%; p = 0.010) and clinical pregnancies (32.8% vs 22.2%; p = 0.040), respectively. The rate of miscarriage tended to be higher and live birth rate tended to be lower in group B than in group A. Also, significantly higher rates were noted in chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth in group A when compared with subgroup B2. Conclusion: Higher rates of pregnancy and live birth were achieved in day-3 ET after three days of progesterone administration in FET cycles. Key words: Endometrium, Embryo transfer, Pregnancy, Live birth, Progesterone.

scholarly journals Effects of artificial cycles with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist pretreatment on frozen embryo transfer outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052091847
Author(s):  
Qianrong Qi ◽  
Jin Luo ◽  
Yaqin Wang ◽  
Qingzhen Xie
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Pregnancy Outcomes ◽  
Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome ◽  
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone Agonist ◽  
Ovarian Syndrome

Objective This study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes between women receiving frozen embryo transfer (FET) with hormone replacement treatment (HRT) with and without gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) pretreatment. Methods All consecutive women undergoing HRT cycles (2936 cycles) or HRT with GnRHa pretreatment (HRT + GnRHa, 303 cycles) at our reproductive center between January 2015 and December 2017 were analyzed retrospectively. Results The average age was higher in the HRT + GnRHa compared with the HRT group (34.0 ± 4.8 vs. 31.3 ± 4.4). However, the pregnancy outcomes were comparable between the two groups. The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly increased in younger women (≤35 years) in the HRT + GnRHa group compared with the HRT group (56.8% vs. 48.7%), but the live birth rates were similar in the two groups (44.2% vs. 38.4%). The HRT + GnRHa protocol significantly increased the clinical pregnancy rate (55.6% vs. 43.2%) and live birth rate (43.5% vs. 33.5%) compared with the HRT group among women with endometriosis, and significantly decreased the abortion rate in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (3.1% vs. 16.4%). Conclusions GnRHa pretreatment may improve pregnancy outcomes in women with endometriosis and polycystic ovarian syndrome.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document