scholarly journals The exact synchronization timing between the cleavage embryo stage and duration of progesterone therapy-improved pregnancy rates in frozen embryo transfer cycles: A cross-sectional study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marjan Omidi ◽  
Iman Halvaei ◽  
Fatemeh Akyash ◽  
Mohammad Ali Khalili ◽  
Azam Agha-Rahimi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Group A ◽  
Embryo Stage ◽  
Group B

Background: Synchronization between the embryonic stage and the uterine endometrial lining is important in the outcomes of the vitrified-warmed embryo transfer (ET) cycles. Objective: The aim was to investigate the effect of the exact synchronization between the cleavage stage of embryos and the duration of progesterone administration on the improvement of clinical outcomes in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Materials and Methods: 312 FET cycles were categorized into two groups: (A) day- 3 ET after three days of progesterone administration (n = 177) and (B) day-2 or -4 ET after three days of progesterone administration (n = 135). Group B was further divided into two subgroups: B1: day-2 ET cycles, that the stage of embryos were less than the administrated progesterone and B2: day-4 ET cycles, that the stage of embryos were more than the administrated progesterone. The clinical outcome measures were compared between the groups. Results: The pregnancy outcomes between groups A and B showed a significant differences in the chemical (40.1% vs 27.4%; p = 0.010) and clinical pregnancies (32.8% vs 22.2%; p = 0.040), respectively. The rate of miscarriage tended to be higher and live birth rate tended to be lower in group B than in group A. Also, significantly higher rates were noted in chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and live birth in group A when compared with subgroup B2. Conclusion: Higher rates of pregnancy and live birth were achieved in day-3 ET after three days of progesterone administration in FET cycles. Key words: Endometrium, Embryo transfer, Pregnancy, Live birth, Progesterone.

scholarly journals Strengthened luteal phase support for patients with low serum progesterone on the day of frozen embryo transfer in artificial endometrial preparation cycles: a large-sample retrospective trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyuan Gao ◽  
Jing Ye ◽  
Hongjuan Ye ◽  
Qingqing Hong ◽  
Lihua Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Low Serum

Abstract Background Low serum progesterone on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET) is associated with diminished pregnancy rates in artificial endometrium preparation cycles, but there is no consensus on whether strengthened luteal phase support (LPS) benefits patients with low progesterone on the FET day in artificial cycles. This single-centre, large-sample retrospective trial was designed to investigate the contribution of strengthened LPS to pregnancy outcomes for groups with low progesterone levels on the FET day in artificial endometrium preparation cycles. Methods Women who had undergone the first artificial endometrium preparation cycle after a freeze-all protocol in our clinic from 2016 to 2018 were classified into two groups depending on their serum progesterone levels on the FET day. Routine LPS was administered to group B (P ≥ 10.0 ng/ml on the FET day, n = 1261), and strengthened LPS (routine LPS+ im P 40 mg daily) was administered to group A (P < 10.0 ng/ml on the FET day, n = 1295). The primary endpoint was the live birth rate, and the secondary endpoints were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and neonatal outcomes. Results The results showed that the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly lower in group A than in group B (48.4% vs 53.2%, adjusted risk ratio (aRR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.68, 0.96), whereas miscarriage rates were similar between the two groups (16.0% vs 14.7%, aRR 1.09, 95% CI 0.77, 1.54). The live birth rate was slightly lower in group A than in group B (39.5% vs 43.3%, aRR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70, 1.0). Birthweights and other neonatal outcomes were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). Conclusions The results indicated that the serum progesterone level on the FET day was one of the risk factors predicting the chances of pregnancy in artificial endometrium preparation cycles, and strengthened LPS in patients with low progesterone on the FET day might help to provide a reasonable pregnancy outcome in artificial cycles, although further prospective evidence is needed to confirm this possibility.

scholarly journals Strengthen Luteal Phase Support for the Patients With Low Serum Progesterone on the Day of Embryo Transfer in Artificial Endometrial Preparation Cycles: a Large-sample Retrospective Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongyuan Gao ◽  
Jing Ye ◽  
Hongjuan Ye ◽  
Qingqing Hong ◽  
Lihua Sun ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Luteal Phase ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Serum Progesterone ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
Low Serum

Abstract Background: The low serum progesterone (P) on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET) is associated with diminished pregnancy rates in artificial endometrium preparation cycles using vaginal micronized P, but it is no consensus whether the strengthened luteal phase support (LPS) for the patients with low P on the FET day in artificial cycles is beneficial. A single centric, large-sample retrospective trial was aimed to investigate the contribution of strengthened LPS to the pregnancy outcomes for the groups of low P levels on the FET day in artificial endometrium preparation cycles.Methods: Women who had undergone first artificial cycle for endometrium preparation after freeze-all in our clinic during 2016 and 2018 were classified into two groups depending on the serum P levels on the FET day, routine LPS was administered for group B (P ≥10.0ng/ml on the FET day, n=1261) and strengthened LPS (routine LPS+ im P 40mg daily) for group A (P <10.0 ng/ml on the FET day, n=1295), the primary endpoint was the live birth rate and secondary endpoints were clinical pregnancy, miscarriage and neonatal outcomes.Results: The results showed the clinical pregnancy rate in group A was lower than group B (48.4% vs 53.2%, aRR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68, 0.96), the miscarriage rate was similar between the two groups (16.0% vs 14.7%, aRR 1.09, 95%CI 0.77, 1.54). The live birth rate was slightly lower than group B (39.5% vs 43.3%, aRR 0.84, 95%CI 0.70, 1.0). The birthweights and other neonatal outcomes were found no difference between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusions: The strengthened LPS for the section of patients of low P levels on the FET day might help to have a reasonable pregnancy outcome, although the live birth rate was slightly lower than the groups with normal serum P levels on the FET day and usage of routine LPS. Trial registration: no available.

The effect of assisted hatching on frozen embryo transfer live birth rate and clinic trends

2016 ◽  
Vol 106 (3) ◽  
pp. e141
Author(s):  
J. Knudtson ◽  
C. Failor ◽  
J. Gelfond ◽  
T.A. Chang ◽  
R.S. Schenken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Assisted Hatching

P–318 Short (seven days) versus conventional (fourteen days) estrogen priming in an artificial frozen embryo transfer cycle: a randomised controlled trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Racca ◽  
S Santos-Ribeiro ◽  
D Panagiotis ◽  
L Boudry ◽  
S Mackens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Transvaginal Ultrasound ◽  
Clinical Pregnancy ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Study question What is the impact of seven days versus fourteen days’ estrogen (E2) priming on the clinical outcome of frozen-embryo-transfer in artificially prepared endometrium (FET-HRT) cycles? Summary answer No significant difference in clinical/ongoing pregnancy rate was observed when comparing 7 versus 14 days of estrogen priming before starting progesterone (P) supplementation. What is known already One (effective) method for endometrial preparation prior to frozen embryo transfer is hormone replacement therapy (HRT), a sequential regimen with E2 and P, which aims to mimic the endocrine exposure of the endometrium in a physiological cycle. The average duration of E2 supplementation is generally 12–14 days, however, this protocol has been arbitrarily chosen whereas, the optimal duration of E2 implementation remains unknown. Study design, size, duration This is a single-center, randomized, controlled, open-label pilot study. All FET-HRT cycles were performed in a tertiary centre between October 2018 and December 2020. Overall, 150 patients were randomized of whom 132 were included in the analysis after screening failure and drop-out. Participants/materials, setting, methods The included patients were randomized into one of 2 groups; group A (7 days of E2 prior to P supplementation) and group B (14 days of E2 prior to P supplementation). Both groups received blastocyst stage embryos for transfer on the 6th day of vaginal P administration. Pregnancy was assessed by an hCG blood test 12 days after FET and clinical pregnancy was confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound at 7 weeks of gestation. Main results and the role of chance Following the exclusion of drop-outs and screening failures, 132 patients were finally included both in group A (69 patients) or group B (63 patients). Demographic characteristics for both groups were comparable. The positive pregnancy rate was 46.4% and 53.9%, (p 0.462) for group A and group B, respectively. With regard to the clinical pregnancy rate at 7 weeks, no statistically significant difference was observed (36.2% vs 36.5% for group A and group B, respectively, p = 0.499). The secondary outcomes of the study (biochemical pregnancy, miscarriage and live birth rate) were also comparable between the two arms for both PP and ITT analysis. Multivariable logistic regression showed that the HRT scheme is not associated with pregnancy rate, however, the P value on the day of ET is significantly associated with the pregnancy outcome. Limitations, reasons for caution This study was designed as a proof of principle trial with a limited study population and therefore underpowered to determine the superiority of one intervention over another. Instead, the purpose of the present study was to explore trends in outcome differences and to allow us to safely design larger RCTs. Wider implications of the findings: The results of this study give the confidence to perform larger-scale RCTs to confirm whether a FET-HRT can be performed safely in a shorter time frame, thus, reducing the TTP, while maintaining comparable pregnancy and live birth rates. Trial registration number NCT03930706

P–677 Endometrial thickness, endometrial preparation protocol and number of euploid embryos transferred, significantly impact the live birth in frozen embryo transfer cycles

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Liñá. Tegedor ◽  
I Elkhatib ◽  
A Abdala ◽  
A Bayram ◽  
K Ab. Ali ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Endometrial Thickness ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Frozen Embryo Transfer ◽  
Endometrial Preparation ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Ploidy Status

Abstract Study question Is the live birth rate (LBR) in euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles affected by the endometrial thickness (EMT)? Summary answer A significantly higher LBR was observed in patients with an endometrial thickness of at least 7.5mm (46.24% vs. 54.63%) What is known already Parameters assessing the endometrium prior planning a FET include endometrial thickness, pattern and blood flow. The impact of the endometrial thickness on ART outcomes is controversial, with conflicting results published. A recent meta-analysis evaluated whether EMT could predict pregnancy outcomes and suggested that lower EMT was associated with lower incidence of clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR) and LBR. Due to heterogeneity of parameters evaluated between different publications, where embryos with unknown ploidy status were transferred, in conjunction with variability of stimulation protocols and the number of embryos transferred, the real effect of the EMT was difficult to infer. Study design, size, duration This was a two-center retrospective observational study including a total of 1522 euploid FET cycles between March 2017 and March 2020 at ART Fertility Clinics Muscat, Oman and Abu Dhabi, UAE. Participants/materials, setting, methods Trophectoderm biopsies were analyzed with Next Generation Sequencing (NGS). Vitrification/warming of blastocysts was performed using Cryotop method (Kitazato). EMT was measured by vaginal ultrasound prior initiating the progesterone administration (± 1 day) and LBR was recorded. Multivariate analysis was performed between LB outcomes and median EMT while controlling for confounding factors. Main results and the role of chance A total of 1522 FET cycles were analyzed: 975 single embryo transfer (SET) and 547 double embryo transfer (DET). The mean age of the patients was 33.38 years with a mean BMI of 27.1 kg/m2. FET were performed in EMT ranging from 3 to 15 mm and 50.52% resulted in a live birth. Though potentially all ranges of EMT were associated with LB, the median EMT in patients with LB was significantly higher than the median EMT of patients without LB (7.6mm vs. 7.4mm; p &lt; 0.001). The dataset was stratified into two groups based on the median EMT (7.5mm): &lt; 7.5mm (n = 744 cycles) and ≥ 7.5mm (n = 778 cycles). A significantly higher live birth rate was observed in ≥ 7.5mm group (46.24% vs. 54.63%. p = 0.0012). In multivariate analysis, EMT, FET endometrial preparation protocol, and number of embryos transferred were the main parameters influencing the chance to achieve LB: OR 1.10 [1.01–1.19], p &lt; 0.015 for the EMT; OR 1.84 [1.47–2.30], p &lt; 0.0001 for Natural Cycle protocol and OR 1.55 [1.25–1.93], p &lt; 0.0001 for DET. Intercept 0.18 [0.07–0.44] p &lt; 0.0002. Female age did not reach significance: OR 1.02 [1.00–1.04], p = 0.056. Limitations, reasons for caution Besides the retrospective nature of the study, the inter-observer variability in EMT assessment between different physicians is a limitation. The physician and embryologist performing the embryo transfer could not been standardized due to the multicenter design of the study. Wider implications of the findings: The EMT in FET may influence the LBR and should be considered as an important factor for the success of embryo transfer cycles. Whether these results can be extrapolated to fresh embryo transfer and to blastocysts with unknown ploidy status, needs further investigation. Trial registration number Not applicable

Laparoscopic Ablation of Endometriosis in Infertile Patients: A Retrospective Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-57
Author(s):  
Fortunato Genovese ◽  
Maria Cristina Teodoro ◽  
Gabriella Rubbino ◽  
Marco Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Giuseppe Zarbo
Keyword(s):  
Pregnancy Rate ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Birth Rate ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Fertility Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth Rate ◽  
Cumulative Live Birth ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B

Purpose Even at the early stage endometriosis, may be associated with infertility, whose treatment, which is not always straightforward, is often controversial. This study intends to determine the effectiveness of laparoscopic ablation of lesions at an early stage. Methods The charts of 250 women suffering from infertility, admitted from July 1998 to December 2008 to the obstetric and gynecologic departments of Vittorio Emanuele and Santo Bambino hospitals in Catania were reviewed. Among these women, 97 patients (38.8%) affected by stage 1 and 2 endometriosis were found and divided into 2 groups of 53 (A) and 44 (B) patients. According to the approach of the surgeon, group A patients underwent laparoscopic ablation of endometriotic lesions with or without adesiolysis, while group B patients only had diagnostic laparoscopy. Cumulative pregnancy rate, cumulative live birth rate, monthly fertility rate and outcome of pregnancies (miscarriages and live birth), developed within the first year soon after laparoscopy, were determined in each group. Results This study shows that, according to the literature, laparoscopic systematic destruction of minimal and mild stage endometriotic lesions, improves the cumulative pregnancy rate (49.1% in group A versus 22.7% in group B) and cumulative live birth rate (39.6% in group A versus 18.2% in group B) in selected patients. However, this type of intervention, by itself, does not normalize the monthly fertility rate that remains low in both groups (4.1% in group A and 1.9% in group B). Conclusions This study suggests that laparoscopic treatment of minimal-mild endometriotic lesions is a valid therapeutic option because it improves the fertility rate, even if it does not completely resolve the reduced fertility.

P–564 Analysis of efficiency and outcomes of assisted reproductive technology (ART) programs after embryo transfer with a low-level of mosaicism

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Shishimorova ◽  
S Tevkin ◽  
T Jussubaliyeva
Keyword(s):  
Embryo Transfer ◽  
Live Birth ◽  
Live Birth Rate ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Art Programs ◽  
Low Level ◽  
Mosaic Embryo ◽  
Group A ◽  
Group B ◽  
High Level

Abstract Study question How does embryo transfer with a low-level of mosaicism affect the success of ART programs, pregnancy, and live birth in comparison with euploid embryo transfer? Summary answer The transfer of mosaic embryos results in the delivery of a healthy baby however significantly decreases the outcome of ART programs and live birth rate. What is known already Present methods of preimplantation genetic testing of aneuploidy (PGT-A) allow detecting a mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells at the blastocyst stage with high accuracy. Such embryos are classified as mosaics with varying levels according to the guidelines of the International Society for Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGDIS). Numerous sources describe that number of mosaic embryos can vary from 4 to 22%. Several publications report that mosaic embryos can lead to successful pregnancies and healthy childbirth, but with a lower frequency and higher rates of pregnancy loss compared to euploid embryos. Nevertheless, the effect of mosaicism on ART outcomes remains controversial. Study design, size, duration It has been analyzed 2506 embryos from 648 patients undergoing the ART program with PGT-A at the Institute of Reproductive Medicine for 2018 - 2019. Embryos after PGT-A were classified as euploid, aneuploid, and having mosaicism of less than 40% as low level and more than 40% as high level following PGDIS guidelines. Patients of (group A) were transferred 467 single euploid embryos, and 43 patients (group B) underwent single low-level mosaic embryo transfer. Participants/materials, setting, methods The embryos on day 5 or 6 were graded by Gardner Scoring System. Approximately 5–10 TE cells were biopsied from good quality blastocysts and subsequently vitrified. PGT-A was performed utilizing an array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) (Agilent). The transfer of mosaic embryos was performed in the absence of an alternative, only after medical genetic counseling with a risk explanation and the subsequent signing of an informed agreement. Statistical tests processed by Pearson’s chi-squared test. Main results and the role of chance Of all analyzed embryos, the proportion of euploid embryos was 48.6% (n = 1002), the total number of mosaics was 18.6% (n = 384) and aneuploid ones were 32.8% (n = 676). Depending on the level of mosaicism, the ratio between embryos with low-level mosaicism (≤40%) / high-level (≥40%) was 38.3% / 61.7%, respectively. According to the study, there was a significant decrease in the indicator of clinical pregnancy rate after embryo transfer with a low-level of mosaicism of 44.1% versus 63.2% transferred euploid embryo (р&lt;0,01), however, despite an increase losses pregnancy in the group B (26.3%) there was no significant difference (p = 0.16) in comparison with the control group (15.4%). The live birth rate (LBR) significantly decreased (p &lt; 0.001) after the transfer of the mosaic embryo by 32.5%, while in the control group the indicator was 53.9%. In all cases, after the transfer of the mosaic embryo, healthy babies were born. There were 2 cases of high-level mosaic embryo transfer as a result of which pregnancy did not occur. According to the survey, about 70% of patients agree to replant mosaic embryos, 20% are ready to go to the new program, and 10% cannot make a decision. Limitations, reasons for caution The number of patients in group B was significantly lower than in group A. Not enough cases of embryo transfer with a high-level of mosaicism. Wider implications of the findings: The current study might help to develop and to select a more appropriate strategy for transfer mosaic embryos. The next series of studies should focus on obstetric and neonatal outcome data from mosaic embryo transfer to gain a better understanding of the chromosomal and physiological health of children. Trial registration number Not applicable

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document