P–669 “Follitropin”: A retrospective, observational study comparing the efficacy of follitropin alpha biosimilar therapy in different ovarian stimulation protocols: real-world data

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Polzikov ◽  
D Kamilova ◽  
M Ovchinnikova ◽  
E Mayasina ◽  
K Boyarsky ◽  
...  

Abstract Study question To investigate the therapeutic efficacy of follitropin alpha biosimilar therapy in nonselected patients undergoing IVF. Summary answer This large retrospective study demonstrated similar therapeutic efficacy for follitropin alpha biosimilar therapy in women who underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) using different protocols. What is known already Based on data from the last meta-analyses (Budani et al., 2020), follitropin alpha biosimilars showed similar efficacy and safety in randomized controlled trials aimed at proving the therapeutic equivalence in terms of oocytes retrieved in women undergoing OS. In most cases, normogonadotrophic patients were enrolled in such studies without any endocrine or ovarian disturbances. The absence of real-world data can be compensated by additional post-marketing studies aimed at investigating the efficacy of biosimilars in different OS protocols using antagonists and agonists of GnRH and OS with mixed gonadotropins. Study design, size, duration A retrospective, observational, anonymized cohort study conducted at 35 IVF clinics in Russia, named “FOLLITROPIN”, compared the efficacy of OS in 2020. The OS protocols analysed where follitropin alpha biosimilar (Primapur®) was applied for at least 5 days. All of the analysed subjects underwent OS using GnRH antagonist/agonist protocols, with no restrictions on the OS protocol or food supplements/vitamins. No inclusion or exclusion criteria were applied. Overall, 5484 OS protocols were analysed. Participants/materials, setting, methods The efficacy of 5484 OS protocols was calculated, and two subgroups were extracted: (1) mixed gonadotropin OS protocols (N = 2625) vs monotherapy with Primapur® (N = 2859); (2) GnRH antagonist OS (N = 2183) vs GnRH agonist (N = 676) using only Primapur®. Demographic and clinical characteristics: (1) Age 34.9±4.8 vs 32.9±4.7 (p < 0.001), BMI 23.9±4.7 vs 23.6±4.5 (p < 0.001), IVF attempt 1.4±0.7 vs 1.3±0.6 (p < 0.001); (2) Age 32.9±4.6 vs 33.1±4.9 (p = 0.449), BMI 23.7±4.6 vs 23.1±4.5 (p = 0.019), and IVF attempt 1.2±0.5 vs 1.4±0.9 (p < 0.001). Main results and the role of chance The total efficacy of OS with Primapur®: oocytes retrieved: 9.5±7.2, MII: 6.8±6.6, 2PN: 6.1±5.8, clinical pregnancy per ET (PR) 6 weeks after ET: 38.4%. Subgroup 1 analysis: oocytes retrieved: 8.6±6.8 vs 10.3±7.4 (p < 0.001), MII: 6.7±6.2 vs 7.7±6.9 (p < 0.001), 2PN: 5.8±5.2 vs 7.2±6.2 (p < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences between oocyte yields in mixed vs monotherapy protocols due to subgroup differences, including age, BMI and IVF attempts. No statistically significant differences were found for PR in subgroup 1: 39.3% [95% CI: 36.9–41.7%] vs 37.6% [95% CI: 35.3–39.8%] (p = 0.314). The major accompanying gonadotropin in the mixed protocol was menotropin (75% for mixed OS protocols). Subgroup 2 analysis: oocytes retrieved: 10.5±7.5 vs 9.6±7.0 (p = 0.032), MII: 7.6±6.9 vs 6.7±5.7 (p < 0.001), 2PN: 7.3±6.3 vs 5.7±5.0 (p < 0.001). There were statistically significant differences between oocyte yields in GnRH antagonist vs GnRH agonist monotherapy due to subgroup differences, including BMI and IVF attempts. No statistically significant differences were found for PR in subgroup 2: 37.9% [95% CI: 35.5–40.5%] vs 35.9% [95% CI: 30.8–41.1%] (p = 0.482). All medicines were well tolerated at the injection site, and no serious adverse reactions were reported. This large retrospective cohort study in a nonselected population demonstrated similar clinical efficacy for follitropin alpha biosimilar therapy. Limitations, reasons for caution The real-world patient data analysed in this study were representative, showing the ability of follitropin biosimilars to develop both folliculogenesis and clinical pregnancy in a nonselected population. Additional comparative studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of the biosimilars in patients with classified types of infertility causes, including unexplained infertility. Wider implications of the findings: In this study, we demonstrated the therapeutic efficacy of biosimilars in terms of oocyte yield and clinical pregnancy development in women undergoing different OS protocols. Further large-scale studies with known hormonal levels before and during OS, as well as the micro- and macronutrient status of both parents, are needed. Trial registration number None

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Sen Andrew Fang ◽  
Qiao Gao ◽  
Mong Li Lee ◽  
Wynne Hsu ◽  
Ngiap Chuan Tan

Abstract Background Clinical trials have demonstrated that either initiating or up-titrating a statin dose substantially reduce Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, statin adherence in actual practice tends to be suboptimal, leading to diminished effectiveness. This study aims to use real-world data to determine the effect on LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment rates, when selected statins are titrated in Asian patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study over a 5-year period, from April 2014 to March 2019 was conducted on a cohort of multi-ethnic adult Asian patients with clinical diagnosis of Dyslipidaemia in a primary care clinic in Singapore. The statins were classified into low-intensity (LI), moderate-intensity (MI) and high-intensity (HI) groups according to the 2018 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Blood Cholesterol Guidelines. Patients were grouped into “No statin”, “Non-titrators” and “Titrators” cohorts based on prescribing patterns. For the “Titrators” cohort, the mean percentage change in LDL-C and absolute change in LDL-C goal attainment rates were computed for each permutation of statin intensity titration. Results Among the cohort of 11,499 patients, with a total of 266,762 visits, there were 1962 pairs of LDL-C values associated with a statin titration. Initiation of LI, MI and HI statin resulted in a lowering of LDL-C by 21.6% (95%CI = 18.9–24.3%), 28.9% (95%CI = 25.0–32.7%) and 25.2% (95%CI = 12.8–37.7%) respectively. These were comparatively lower than results from clinical trials (30 to 63%). The change of LDL-C levels due to up-titration, down-titration, and discontinuation were − 12.4% to − 28.9%, + 13.2% to + 24.6%, and + 18.1% to + 32.1% respectively. The improvement in LDL-C goal attainment ranged from 26.5% to 47.1% when statin intensity was up-titrated. Conclusion In this study based on real-world data of Asian patients in primary care, it was shown that although statin titration substantially affected LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment rates, the magnitude was lower than results reported from clinical trials. These results should be taken into consideration and provide further insight to clinicians when making statin adjustment recommendations in order to achieve LDL-C targets in clinical practice, particularly for Asian populations.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. e040253
Author(s):  
Anna Jansana ◽  
Isabel Del Cura ◽  
Alexandra Prados-Torres ◽  
Teresa Sanz Cuesta ◽  
Beatriz Poblador-Plou ◽  
...  

IntroductionBreast cancer has become a chronic disease due to survival improvement and the need to monitor the side effects of treatment and the disease itself. The aim of the SURBCAN study is to describe comorbidity, healthcare services use and adherence to preventive recommendations in long-term breast cancer survivors and to compare them with those in women without this diagnosis in order to improve and adapt the care response to this group of survivors.Methods and analysisPopulation-based retrospective cohort study using real-world data from cancer registries and linked electronic medical records in five Spanish regions. Long-term breast cancer survivors diagnosed between 2000 and 2006 will be identified and matched by age and administrative health area with women without this diagnosis. Sociodemographic and clinical variables including comorbidities and variables on the use of health services between 2012 and 2016 will be obtained from databases in primary and hospital care. Health services use will be assessed through the annual number of visits to primary care professionals and to specialists and through annual imaging and laboratory tests. Factors associated with healthcare utilisation and comorbidities will be analysed using multilevel logistic regression models. Recruitment started in December 2018.Ethics and disseminationThis study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Parc de Salut Mar. The results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and will be presented at national and international scientific conferences and at patient associations.Trial registration numberThis protocol is registered in Clinical Trials.gov (identifier: NCT03846999).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document