Semiautomated Method for Total Nitrogen in Fertilizers
Abstract A semiautomated method (SAM) for total nitrogen in fertilizers has been developed which parallels the official first action semiautomated method for crude protein in feeds, 7.B05–7.B11. The SAM is simple, accurate, precise, flexible, rapid, and requires a minimum of laboratory space. Nitrate was reduced and organic nitrogen materials were digested by the sulfuric-salicylic acid chemistry in the block digestor. The nitrogen, as ammonia, in the digestate was determined automatically at the rate of 40 samples/hr with the automated ammonia analysis system. A small amount of CuSO4, (33 mg/sample) as the SAM digestion catalyst gave total recovery of organic nitrogen in fertilizer. Repeated analyses by the SAM and the AOAC official final action comprehensive nitrogen method (CNM) were made on Magruder fertilizer check samples, liquid and suspension fertilizers, and bulk blended commercial fertilizer materials. Average per cent nitrogen in liquid and suspension samples was higher by the SAM than by the CNM when sample weights similar to those for solid fertilizer were used. The precision of the SAM on liquids also agreed closely with that by the CNM. The only limitation of the semiautomated method was for fertilizer samples containing a Cl/NO3 ratio greater than 0.75 w/w. The SAM recoveries on 3 samples with very high Cl/NO3 ratios wert 94.1–99.1% of those by the CNM. Precision was also less than on any other samples. The average per cent nitrogen found for all experimental samples was 14.68 by the SAM and 14.67 by the CNM. The average relative standard deviation (RSD) for all 22 samples was 1.06% by the SAM and 0.74% by the CNM. When 3 samples with high Cl/NO3 ratios (>0.75) were excluded, the average per cent nitrogen was 15.77 (CNM) and 15.81 (SAM); respective RSDs were 0.68 and 0.65% for the SAM and CNM, respectively. A comparison of results on 405 commercial fertilizer samples by both methods showed an average difference (SAM — CNM) of + 0.017% nitrogen and aver age relative difference of 1.23%.