scholarly journals PSVII-12 Effect of planting method on forage production of annual ryegrass and stocker performance

2019 ◽  
Vol 97 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. 298-299
Author(s):  
Guillermo Scaglia
Keyword(s):  
Annual Ryegrass ◽  
Animal Performance ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Grazing Season ◽  
Planting Methods ◽  
No Till ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Planting Method

Abstract Different planting methods are alternatives for early grazing and/or extend the grazing season of winter pastures. The objective was to evaluate different planting methods on forage and animal performance. In three consecutive years, ryegrass cv. ‘Marshall’ was conventionally planted (33 kg seed/ha), and no-till and broadcast planted on a bermudagrass stand on nine 1.33 ha pastures (3 replicates/treatment). Urea was split applied at a rate of 40 units of N/ha on d 40 after planting and on d 40 after grazing started. Each pasture was continually stocked with five steers (245 ± 12 kg initial BW). Grazing started when ryegrass was at least 25 cm tall and 1,600 kg DM/ha. In the conventional planted pastures, steers were moved out (to a ryegrass pasture) when ground was too soft, returning to experimental pastures when grazing conditions were appropriate. Forage production was greater (P < 0.05) for conventional and no-till (2,800 and 2,389 kg DM/ha) than for broadcast pastures (1,770 kg DM/ha). Planting method and yr affected (P < 0.03) start of grazing. Conventional and no-till planting started 51 and 49 d earlier than broadcasted. In 2 yr, rainfall delayed by 17 d the start of grazing in the conventional planted pastures. Grazing days was greater (P < 0.01) for no-till (95 d) than conventional and broadcast planting (61 and 49 d, respectively). While on experimental pastures, ADG was similar (P = 0.08) between treatments. Due to the difference in grazing days, production per ha was greater (P < 0.01) for no-till (450 kg/ha) than for broadcast and conventional (199 and 241 kg/ha, respectively). No-tilled pastures offered better grazing environment while broadcast pastures had the disadvantages of slow germination and less forage production. Greater number of grazing days on no-tilled pastures allowed for better animal performance and dilution of input costs.

scholarly journals Stocking Rate and Energy Supplementation Effects on Replacement Beef Heifers Grazing Annual Ryegrass

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Guillermo Scaglia
Keyword(s):  
Lolium Multiflorum ◽  
Weather Conditions ◽  
Annual Ryegrass ◽  
Stocking Rate ◽  
Animal Performance ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Year Effect ◽  
Randomized Design ◽  
Energy Supplementation ◽  
Stocking Rates

The development of breeding heifers is a critical point in the beef cattle enterprise. The effect of stocking rate and supplementation strategy at high stocking rate were evaluated on Brahman influenced heifers (BW = 250±3.6 kg) continuously stocked on annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum Lam. cv. ‘Nelson’) with the following treatments in a completely randomized design with 3 replicates: 1) LOW stocking rate (2.5 heifers/ha); 2) MED stocking rate (5.0 heifers/ha); 3) HIGH stocking rate (7.5 heifers/ha); 4) High stocking rate + 1% BW of ground corn (HIGH+C); and 5) High stocking rate + 1% BW of soybean hulls (HIGH+SBH). Dry matter intake was greater (P = 0.03) for heifers in LOW and MED, while those in HIGH, regardless receiving supplement or not, were the lowest. Heifers grazing LOW and MED did not differ (P = 0.06) in ADG. Supplemented heifers and those in MED produced the most beef per unit of land; however MED and HIGH were not significantly different. Grazing days was greater for LOW and supplemented heifers. There was a year effect for ADG, beef production, and grazing days which were smaller in year 1; however years 2 and 3 were not different (P > 0.05) between them except in production per hectare. Lower stocking rates allowed for appropriate BW gains. Level of supplementation affected DMI from ryegrass, replacing it and affecting animal performance. Weather conditions had an impact on forage production, hence affecting animal performance. Supplementation programs must consider level and type of energy supplement used.

Influence of Planting Stock Clove Size, Nitrogen Rate, and Planting Method on Elephant Garlic Production

HortScience ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 517f-518
Author(s):  
Jeanine M. Davis
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rates ◽  
Ground Level ◽  
Winter Survival ◽  
Nitrogen Rate ◽  
Planting Stock ◽  
Mild Winter ◽  
Allium Ampeloprasum ◽  
Planting Methods ◽  
Planting Method ◽  
Nitrogen Rates

To produce large elephant garlic (Allium ampeloprasum L.) bulbs in the southeastern United States, stock cloves must be planted in the fall. During extremely cold winters, however, winter survival rates can be very low. A 2-year study was undertaken to examine practices to increase winter survival rates. Two clove sizes (≤20 g or >20 g), three nitrogen rates (112, 224, and 336 kg/ha), and three planting methods (flat, mulched, and hilled) were tested in a RCB design with four replications. For all planting methods, cloves were set in a shallow trench and covered with soil to ground level. This was also the flat treatment. For the mulched treatment, 7 cm of straw was spread on top. For the hilled treatment, soil was mounded 10 to 15 cm high over the ground level. Cloves were planted in early October and harvested in mid-June. Use of large planting stock cloves increased winter survival rates during the harsh winter, but had no effect during the mild winter. Both years, winter survival was reduced with the flat treatment. Yields of marketable bulbs were 4 to 5 times higher when >20 g cloves were planted than when ≤20 g cloves were used. Nitrogen rate and planting method had no effect on yields. The >20 g cloves also produced larger bulbs than the smaller cloves. Of the three planting methods, the flat treatment produced the smallest bulbs. Bulbs were much larger following the mild winter than the harsh winter.

Corn Forage Production in No‐Till and Conventional Tillage Double‐Cropping Systems 1

1977 ◽  
Vol 69 (4) ◽  
pp. 635-638 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. R. Nelson ◽  
R. N. Gallaher ◽  
M. R. Holmes ◽  
R. R. Bruce
Keyword(s):  
Cropping Systems ◽  
Conventional Tillage ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Double Cropping ◽  
No Till

Weed Control with Reduced Rates of Chlorimuron Plus Metribuzin and Imazethapyr in No-Till Narrow-Row Soybean (Glycine max)

1998 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-36 ◽  
Author(s):  
William G. Johnson ◽  
Jeffrey S. Dilbeck ◽  
Michael S. Defelice ◽  
J. Andrew Kendig
Keyword(s):  
Glycine Max ◽  
Weed Control ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Weed Suppression ◽  
Crop Response ◽  
Soybean Production ◽  
No Till ◽  
Giant Foxtail ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Narrow Row

Field studies were conducted at three locations in 1993 and 1994 to evaluate weed control and crop response to combinations of glyphosate, metolachlor, 0.5 X and 1 X label rates of chlorimuron plus metribuzin applied prior to planting (PP), and 0.5 X and 1 X label rates of imazethapyr applied early postemergence (EPOST) or postemergence (POST) in no-till narrow-row soybean production. Giant foxtail densities were reduced with sequential PP followed by (fb) EPOST or POST treatments. Large crabgrass was reduced equivalently with all herbicide combinations involving chlorimuron plus metribuzin PP fb imazethapyr. Common cocklebur control was variable but was usually greater with treatments that included imazethapyr. Ivyleaf morningglory densities were not reduced with any herbicide combinations. Sequential PP fb EPOST or POST treatments tended to provide slightly better weed suppression than PP-only treatments, but the difference was rarely significant. Soybean yields with treatments utilizing 0.5 X rates were usually equal to 1 X rates.

Cattle Foraging Behavior in Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula)-Infested Rangeland

1987 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
pp. 314-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodney G. Lym ◽  
Donald R. Kirby
Keyword(s):  
Warm Season ◽  
Economic Loss ◽  
Leafy Spurge ◽  
High Density ◽  
Euphorbia Esula ◽  
Low Density ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Grazing Season ◽  
Grazing Cattle ◽  
Early Fall

Leafy spurge causes economic loss by reducing both herbage production and use. Herbage use by grazing cattle in various densities of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esulaL. #3EPHES) was evaluated over a 3-yr period in North Dakota. Forage production and disappearance were estimated in four density classes of leafy spurge. Use of cool- and warm-season graminoids, forbs, and leafy spurge was estimated during the middle and the end of each grazing season. Cattle used 20 and 2% of the herbage in the zero and low density infestations, respectively, by mid-season. Moderate and high density infestations were avoided until the milky latex in leafy spurge disappeared in early fall, and herbage availability in zero and low density infestations declined. Herbage use in moderate and high density infestations increased to an average of 46% by the end of the grazing season compared to 61% in zero and low density infestations. An annual herbage loss of at least 35% occurred in pasture infested with 50% density or more of leafy spurge.

scholarly journals Bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flueggé): Overview and Pasture Management

EDIS ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 (4) ◽  
pp. 10
Author(s):  
Marcelo Wallau ◽  
Joao Vendramini ◽  
Jose Dubeux ◽  
Ann Blount
Keyword(s):  
Nutritive Value ◽  
Original Version ◽  
Paspalum Notatum ◽  
Animal Performance ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Pasture Management

This 10-page document discusses bahiagrass forage cultivars, forage production, nutritive value, animal performance, planting, pasture renovation, management, and more. Written by Marcelo Wallau, Joao Vendramini, José Dubeux, and Ann Blount, and published by the UF/IFAS Agronomy Department, revised July 2019. https://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/ag342 Original version: Newman, Yoana, Joao Vendramini, and Ann Blount. 2010. “Bahiagrass (Paspalum Notatum): Overview and Management”. EDIS 2010 (4). https://journals.flvc.org/edis/article/view/118607.

An Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Soyabean Planting Methods in the Central Province of Zambia

1990 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. S. Chanda ◽  
M. Bezuneh ◽  
P. T. Gibson ◽  
F. J. Olsen ◽  
R. E. Hudgens
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Present Method ◽  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Central Province ◽  
Planting Methods ◽  
Small Scale Farmers ◽  
Planting Method ◽  
New Crop ◽  
New Cultivars

SUMMARYSoyabean (Glycine max) is a relatively new crop for small-scale farmers in Zambia which has been adopted following the introduction of new cultivars, greater opportunity to obtain credit, easier marketing and an attractive guaranteed price. However, low yields limit production partly due to the lack of a planting method that establishes optimal populations. The present method is to plough and plant in the same operation, dribbling the seed behind the ox-plough. This often leads to uneven depth of planting, and hence to poor seedling emergence and erratic stands. Alternative planting techniques evaluated on farmers' fields for three seasons (1985/86–1987/88) suggest that farmers should replace their practice of planting behind the plough with either hand seeding following a plough–harrow operation or the use of a modified ox-drawn planter (Taparia).

An Agronomic and Economic Evaluation of Soyabean Planting Methods in the Central Province of Zambia

1990 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 441-445
Author(s):  
K. S. Chanda ◽  
M. Bezuneh ◽  
P. T. Gibson ◽  
F. J. Olsen ◽  
R. E. Hudgens
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Present Method ◽  
Seedling Emergence ◽  
Small Scale ◽  
Central Province ◽  
Planting Methods ◽  
Small Scale Farmers ◽  
Planting Method ◽  
New Crop ◽  
New Cultivars

SUMMARYSoyabean (Glycine max) is a relatively new crop for small-scale farmers in Zambia which has been adopted following the introduction of new cultivars, greater opportunity to obtain credit, easier marketing and an attractive guaranteed price. However, low yields limit production partly due to the lack of a planting method that establishes optimal populations. The present method is to plough and plant in the same operation, dribbling the seed behind the ox-plough. This often leads to uneven depth of planting, and hence to poor seedling emergence and erratic stands. Alternative planting techniques evaluated on farmers' fields for three seasons (1985/86–1987/88) suggest that farmers should replace their practice of planting behind the plough with either hand seeding following a plough–harrow operation or the use of a modified ox-drawn planter (Taparia).

The effects of level of winter feeding and buffer-feeding during the grazing season on the milk production of January/February calving dairy cows.

1997 ◽  
Vol 1987 ◽  
pp. 29-29
Author(s):  
C.S. Mayne ◽  
S.C.P. Woodcock ◽  
A.J. Clements
Keyword(s):  
Dairy Cows ◽  
Milk Production ◽  
Animal Performance ◽  
High Animal ◽  
Grazing Season ◽  
Grazing Dairy Cows ◽  
Winter Feeding

Buffer-feeding of grazing dairy cows, by allowing cows access to forage for a few hours each day, has been widely advocated as a means of maintaining high animal performance whilst enabling efficient sward utilization. However, in practice, responses to buffer-feeding with January/February calving cows have been extremely variable. The objective of this study was to examine if part of the variability in response could be explained by differences in the level of nutrition during the winter feed period.

Implications of Spatio-Temporal Variation in Forage Production and Utilization for Animal Productivity in Extensive Grazing Systems.

1998 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
DA Roshier ◽  
HI Nicol
Keyword(s):  
Temporal Variation ◽  
Management Practice ◽  
Animal Production ◽  
Forage Production ◽  
Forage Availability ◽  
Typical Experiment ◽  
Grazing Systems ◽  
Spatio Temporal ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Plant Animal Interactions

In this paper we examine patterns of utilisation at the level of individual plants and forage availability at the paddock scale on five commercial sheep grazing properties that all experienced drought during the course of the study. Specifically, patterns of forage availability and pasture utilisation in large paddocks are examined against the assumptions of established models of animal productivity and grazing management practice. Forage resources in the rangelands can have dynamics independent of stock density and are not distributed evenly in time or space. Therefore, the extrapolation of known plant-animal interactions across scales is questionable and it is yet to be demonstrated how measures of animal productivity on small trial paddocks relate to production outcomes in large paddocks. A model is proposed for understanding animal production outcomes that incorporates variation in both pasture biomass and stock density. The scales, both spatial and temporal, at which pastoralists and scientists integrate ecological and animal productivity information usually differ. The understanding that each holds of the processes that limit animal productivity and the relationships between different elements of the production system is a product of the perspective from which they view the system. It is concluded that the difference between the 'scale of exploitation' and the scale at which heterogeneity is sufficient for survival of livestock is probably crucial to determining animal production outcomes in grazing systems subject to a high degree of temporal variation in forage availability. In these systems it seems reasonable to suggest that grazing experiments that vary the 'spatial scale of exploitation' while maintaining stock density constant may give as many insights into the limitations on animal productivity as the more typical experiment that only varies stock density. Key words: grazing models, animal productivity, heterogeneity, scale, utilisation, forage availability, stocking rates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document