111 Burn Sepsis Screening Tool to Facilitate Diagnosis of Burn Sepsis

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S74-S75
Author(s):  
Kaitlyn Libraro ◽  
Palmer Bessey ◽  
Jamie Heffernan ◽  
James Gallagher

Abstract Introduction Sepsis following critical burn injury is an ominous development that can lead to death. Most patients will manifest a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), even without being septic. This may obscure the clinical recognition of developing sepsis and delay the initiation of effective treatment. We developed a burn sepsis screening tool (BSST) to facilitate the recognition of developing burn sepsis. The purpose of this study was to review the utility of that tool. Methods The BSST was based on several clinical signs, laboratory values, and changes in physiologic support modalities associated with sepsis. It consisted of nine parameters that could be scored as indicating or not indicating sepsis or not applicable. If three were positive, the patient was identified as septic, and a search for a septic source was undertaken and treatment initiated. The BSST was completed on patients judged to be critically ill during morning rounds over a period of nine months. The values were transcribed into a secure web database and analyzed using SAS 9.4. Results There were 593 individual encounters on 31 critically ill patients with burns and/or inhalation injury for which the BSST was completed. The mean age of the patients was 57 ± 4 years (Mean ± SEM), and the burn size was 24 ± 15 % TBSA. Eleven patients were women (36%) and 7 patients had inhalation injury (23%). The expected case fatality was 21 - 30% depending on the statistical model used. Six patients (19%) died. The length of stay was 64 ± 10 days and ranged from 3 to 267 days. A patient was judged to be septic in only 45 of the daily encounters (8.0 % ± 1.1). There were 21 instances of a new septic event made in 12 patients. Episode of sepsis separated by at least 5 days of no sepsis, were considered to be a new septic event. There was a substantial amount of data that was missing or not applicable. There were no significant differences in the septic parameters on days with new sepsis diagnosis when compared to the day prior, or compared to all encounters in patients that were never septic. Patients deteriorated acutely between BSST completions on only two occasions and both were stabilized. Conclusions The BSST was used consistently to help evaluate the daily status of critically ill burn injured patients. The expected case fatality of the group was moderately high, based on statistical models derived from the ABA Burn Registry. The observed outcome was as good as or better than predicted. Acute decompensation was rare. The BSST added daily administrative work to rounds, and the data recorded were often incomplete. Although the BSST did not demonstrate any single clinical feature that identified the transition from SIRS to sepsis, it did add structure and rigor to daily rounds. That contributed to the effectiveness of rounds, and it may have been responsible, in part, for the favorable outcomes.

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 140-151
Author(s):  
Jared S Folwell ◽  
Anthony P Basel ◽  
Garrett W Britton ◽  
Thomas A Mitchell ◽  
Michael R Rowland ◽  
...  

Burn patients are a unique population when considering strategies for ventilatory support. Frequent surgical operations, inhalation injury, pneumonia, and long durations of mechanical ventilation add to the challenging physiology of severe burn injury. We aim to provide a practical and evidence-based review of mechanical ventilation strategies for the critically ill burn patient that is tailored to the bedside clinician.


2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-204
Author(s):  
Shrikant Verma ◽  
Mohammad Abbas ◽  
Sushma Verma ◽  
Syed Tasleem Raza ◽  
Farzana Mahdi

A novel spillover coronavirus (nCoV), with its epicenter in Wuhan, China's People's Republic, has emerged as an international public health emergency. This began as an outbreak in December 2019, and till November eighth, 2020, there have been 8.5 million affirmed instances of novel Covid disease2019 (COVID-19) in India, with 1,26,611 deaths, resulting in an overall case fatality rate of 1.48 percent. Coronavirus clinical signs are fundamentally the same as those of other respiratory infections. In different parts of the world, the quantity of research center affirmed cases and related passings are rising consistently. The COVID- 19 is an arising pandemic-responsible viral infection. Coronavirus has influenced huge parts of the total populace, which has prompted a global general wellbeing crisis, setting all health associations on high attentive. This review sums up the overall landmass, virology, pathogenesis, the study of disease transmission, clinical introduction, determination, treatment, and control of COVID-19 with the reference to India.


Author(s):  
Mahmoud Ahmed Ebada ◽  
Ahmed Wadaa Allah ◽  
Eshak Bahbah ◽  
Ahmed Negida

: Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has affected more than seven million individuals in 213 countries worldwide with a basic reproduction number ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 and an estimated case fatality rate ranging from 2% to 7%. A substantial proportion of COVID-19 patients are asymptomatic; however, symptomatic cases might present with fever, cough, and dyspnoea or severe symptoms up to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Currently, RNA RT-PCR is the screening tool, while bilateral chest CT is the confirmatory clinical diagnostic test. Several drugs have been repurposed to treat COVID-19, including chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin, lopinavir/ritonavir combination, remdesivir, favipiravir, tocilizumab, and EIDD-1931. Recently, Remdesivir gained FDA emergency approval based on promising early findings from the interim analysis of 1063 patients. The recently developed serology testing for SARSCoV-2 antibodies opened the door to evaluate the actual burden of the disease and to determine the rate of the population who have been previously infected (or developed immunity). This review article summarizes current data on the COVID-19 pandemic starting from the early outbreak, viral structure and origin, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, discharge criteria, and future research.


2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S13-S14
Author(s):  
Sarah Zavala ◽  
Kate Pape ◽  
Todd A Walroth ◽  
Melissa A Reger ◽  
Katelyn Garner ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction In burn patients, vitamin D deficiency has been associated with increased incidence of sepsis. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of vitamin D deficiency in adult burn patients on hospital length of stay (LOS). Methods This was a multi-center retrospective study of adult patients at 7 burn centers admitted between January 1, 2016 and July 25, 2019 who had a 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) concentration drawn within the first 7 days of injury. Patients were excluded if admitted for a non-burn injury, total body surface area (TBSA) burn less than 5%, pregnant, incarcerated, or made comfort care or expired within 48 hours of admission. The primary endpoint was to compare hospital LOS between burn patients with vitamin D deficiency (defined as 25OHD < 20 ng/mL) and sufficiency (25OHD ≥ 20 ng/mL). Secondary endpoints include in-hospital mortality, ventilator-free days of the first 28, renal replacement therapy (RRT), length of ICU stay, and days requiring vasopressors. Additional data collected included demographics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, injury characteristics, form of vitamin D received (ergocalciferol or cholecalciferol) and dosing during admission, timing of vitamin D initiation, and form of nutrition provided. Dichotomous variables were compared via Chi-square test. Continuous data were compared via student t-test or Mann-Whitney U test. Univariable linear regression was utilized to identify variables associated with LOS (p < 0.05) to analyze further. Cox Proportional Hazard Model was utilized to analyze association with LOS, while censoring for death, and controlling for TBSA, age, presence of inhalation injury, and potential for a center effect. Results Of 1,147 patients screened, 412 were included. Fifty-seven percent were vitamin D deficient. Patients with vitamin D deficiency had longer LOS (18.0 vs 12.0 days, p < 0.001), acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring RRT (7.3 vs 1.7%, p = 0.009), more days requiring vasopressors (mean 1.24 vs 0.58 days, p = 0.008), and fewer ventilator free days of the first 28 days (mean 22.9 vs 25.1, p < 0.001). Univariable analysis identified burn center, AKI, TBSA, inhalation injury, admission concentration, days until concentration drawn, days until initiating supplementation, and dose as significantly associated with LOS. After controlling for center, TBSA, age, and inhalation injury, the best fit model included only deficiency and days until vitamin D initiation. Conclusions Patients with thermal injuries and vitamin D deficiency on admission have increased length of stay and worsened clinical outcomes as compared to patients with sufficient vitamin D concentrations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1853-1861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miriam Zacchia ◽  
Emanuela Marchese ◽  
Elena Martina Trani ◽  
Marianna Caterino ◽  
Giovanna Capolongo ◽  
...  

Abstract The primary cilium (PC) was considered as a vestigial organelle with no significant physiological importance, until the discovery that PC perturbation disturbs several signalling pathways and results in the dysfunction of a variety of organs. Genetic studies have demonstrated that mutations affecting PC proteins or its anchoring structure, the basal body, underlie a class of human disorders (known as ciliopathies) characterized by a constellation of clinical signs. Further investigations have demonstrated that the PC is involved in a broad range of biological processes, in both developing and mature tissues. Kidney disease is a common clinical feature of cilia disorders, supporting the hypothesis of a crucial role of the PC in kidney homoeostasis. Clinical proteomics and metabolomics are an expanding research area. Interestingly, the application of these methodologies to the analysis of urine, a biological sample that can be collected in a non-invasive fashion and possibly in large amounts, makes these studies feasible also in patients. The present article describes the most recent proteomic and metabolomic studies exploring kidney dysfunction in the setting of ciliopathies, showing the potential of these methodologies in the elucidation of disease pathophysiology and in the discovery of biomarkers.


Burns ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Walton N. Charles ◽  
Declan Collins ◽  
Sundhiya Mandalia ◽  
Kabir Matwala ◽  
Atul Dutt ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 780-788 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erin F. Barreto ◽  
Tejaswi Kanderi ◽  
Sara R. DiCecco ◽  
Arnaldo Lopez‐Ruiz ◽  
Janelle O. Poyant ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 184 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 11-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tina L Palmieri ◽  
James H Holmes ◽  
Brett Arnoldo ◽  
Michael Peck ◽  
Amalia Cochran ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Studies suggest that a restrictive transfusion strategy is safe in burns, yet the efficacy of a restrictive transfusion policy in massive burn injury is uncertain. Our objective: compare outcomes between massive burn (≥60% total body surface area (TBSA) burn) and major (20–59% TBSA) burn using a restrictive or a liberal blood transfusion strategy. Methods Patients with burns ≥20% were block randomized by age and TBSA to a restrictive (transfuse hemoglobin <7 g/dL) or liberal (transfuse hemoglobin <10 g/dL) strategy throughout hospitalization. Data collected included demographics, infections, transfusions, and outcomes. Results Three hundred and forty-five patients received 7,054 units blood, 2,886 in massive and 4,168 in restrictive. Patients were similar in age, TBSA, and inhalation injury. The restrictive group received less blood (45.57 ± 47.63 vs. 77.16 ± 55.0, p < 0.03 massive; 11.0 ± 16.70 vs. 16.78 ± 17.39, p < 0.001) major). In massive burn, the restrictive group had fewer ventilator days (p < 0.05). Median ICU days and LOS were lower in the restrictive group; wound healing, mortality, and infection did not differ. No significant outcome differences occurred in the major (20–59%) group (p > 0.05). Conclusions: A restrictive transfusion strategy may be beneficial in massive burns in reducing ventilator days, ICU days and blood utilization, but does not decrease infection, mortality, hospital LOS or wound healing.


2020 ◽  
Vol 98 (2) ◽  
pp. 137-141
Author(s):  
S. A. Avezov ◽  
S. M. Azimova ◽  
M. H. Abdulloev

Aims. We comparative investigated the frequency, precipitating factors, lifetimes and predictive factors of survival in patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) and acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Material and methods. We collected data from 310 hospitalized patients with LC. Patients divided into groups: 1 — patients with compensation of LC; 2 — patients with decompensation of LC, but without organ failure (OF) and 3 — patients with ACLF. Diagnostic criteria for ACLF based on consensus recommendations of EASL. Survival was assessed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Results. 48 patients with LC reported clinical signs of ACLF. 28-day mortality was in 4,8% of patients without ACLF and in 42,0% of patients with ACLF. 90-day mortality of patients with ACLF was 50% versus 11.6% in patients without ACLF. 6-month survival rate of patients with the development of acute decompensation with organ failure was only 33,3%. The lifetimes of patients with ACLF was only 136,65 ± 18,96 days. The predictive factors of survival of patients with LC and ACLF are: the number of organ failure, indicators of CLIF-SOFA and MELD, Child-Pugh score, degree of hepatic encephalopathy, leukocytosis, hyperbilirubinemia, hypercreatininemia and increased INR. Conclusion. The prevalence of ACLF in patients with LC is 15,5% and develops against a background of stable compensated or decompensated CP. The frequent trigger of ACLF is infection, which causes acute decompensation with the development of multiple organ failure and a high incidence of short-term mortality. The 28-day mortality rate in patients with ACLF was 8.7 times greater than the mortality rate in patients with decompensated LC without ACLF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document