559 Benzocaine-Lidocaine-Tetracaine (BLT) Cream Adverse Effects in Burn Patients: A Case Report and Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S129-S129
Author(s):  
Todd A Walroth ◽  
Michelle E Brown ◽  
Katelyn Gordon ◽  
Moises Martinez ◽  
Cortni Grooms ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Literature Review ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Published Data ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Wound ◽  
Lidocaine Concentration ◽  
Topical Lidocaine

Abstract Introduction Historically, BLT cream has been used at our burn center in laser procedures and tattoo removal with 6–8% lidocaine to improve tolerance of outpatient procedures. Recently, the laser BLT formulation (8%) has been trialed as an opioid-sparing alternative for managing pain during inpatient microneedling procedures. When utilizing this formulation for microneedling, the high percentage of lidocaine absorption may correlate with adverse central nervous system (CNS) effects. Methods A literature evaluation and retrospective chart review of burn patients receiving BLT cream for inpatient microneedling was performed. Results From January to June 2020, two elderly females (77 and 78 years old) received several doses of BLT cream during inpatient microneedling procedures with no documented adverse events attributed to the medication. A 68 year old male with a total body surface area (TBSA) of 8% reported dizziness shortly after he received BLT cream. Vitals were normal, but the patient was unable to focus his eyes or communicate clearly. Neurological exam revealed sluggish, pinpoint pupils. Patient remained disoriented with gargling and tongue thrusting though vitals remained stable. At this time, the remainder of the BLT cream was removed from the wound and his mentation returned to baseline within 90 minutes. No residual neurologic deficits occurred. No other potential causes were identified. Literature review revealed topical lidocaine can be absorbed systemically and cause CNS depression, confusion, and disorientation. Based on limited published data in healthy patients, it is recommended to use no more than 5% of topical lidocaine in large quantities, especially over raw surfaces or blistered areas. The amount of lidocaine systemically absorbed is linked to both the duration of application and the surface area over which it is applied. Using study data from lidocaine/prilocaine 2.5% cream and lidocaine patches, we explored a safer BLT formulation for burn patients as published data do not exist for this group. Conclusions Based on our review, we determined 2% to be the maximum lidocaine concentration to apply to a burn wound, 5% TBSA as the maximum surface area involved, and total exposure time limited to 30 minutes or less to reduce incidence of adverse effects. Specifically, formulations with a higher lidocaine concentration applied to a burn wound have the potential to result in untoward neurological deficits.

Prevalence of Psychiatric Disorders in Burn Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (11) ◽  
pp. 3389-3391
Author(s):  
Imran Khan ◽  
Taimur Khan ◽  
Shakil Asif ◽  
Syed Azhar Ali Kazmi ◽  
Subhan Ullah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Tertiary Care Hospital ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Burn Injuries ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Total Body

Background and Aim: Burn injuries patients generally suffer from various psychological and mental disorders especially in lower socio-economic groups. It can adversely affect their wellbeing and health. Proper consultation and clinical diagnosis need to be carried out on burns injuries patients from the early critical phase to rehabilitation phase recovery. The current study's aim was to determine the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in burn patients in a tertiary care hospital. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 82 attempted burn suicides, adult patients in Khattak Medical Center Peshawar, Khyber Teaching Hospital Peshawar and Divisional Headquarter hospital, Mirpur AJK for duration of six months from June 2020 to December 2020. All the patients admitted with suicides burns were of either gender and had ages above 15 years. The convenience technique was used for sampling. The patients’ demographic details such as psychiatric illness, self-immolation act motivation, burn injury depth, burn total body surface area, inhalation injury, hospitalization duration, and mortality was recorded on pre-designed proforma. Data analysis was carried out with SPSS version 20. Results: The mean age of all 82 patients was 28.9±5.2 with an age range of 14 to 55 years. Of the total, 66 (80.5%) were female while 16 (19.5%) were male. In this study, the most frequent suicidal attempt was made by the marital conflicted patients 50 (61%) followed by love affair failure 8 (9.7%). An overall mean of 53.6±19.6 was observed for total body surface area affected with a range of 15-100%. The hospital duration mean was 8.2±5.9 with a range of 1-38 days. Young, married, and rural area illiterate housewives were the most common self-inflicted/suicide burn injuries. The prime cause of such injuries was getting married. The mortality rate was found at 82.3%. Conclusion: Our study concluded that patient’s well-being and mental health could be severely affected by burn injuries. Prevalent depression was noted among severe burn injuries patients. Depression related to deformity could be prevented with early grafting, wound management, proper splinting, coping ability, intense physiotherapy, and long-term rehabilitation. Keywords: Burn; Depressed mood, Psychiatric morbidity, Posttraumatic stress disorder

524 Effectiveness of Burns Wound Cleansing by Comparison of Prewash and Post Wash Swab Reports

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_6) ◽  
Author(s):  
M A Sayed ◽  
S Jabeen ◽  
A Soueid
Keyword(s):  
Bacterial Load ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Wound Management ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Wound ◽  
Staph Aureus ◽  
Sex Type ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Burns Unit ◽  
Type Of Injury

Abstract Aim The main aim and objective were to optimise wound healing through infection prevention. This clinical audit aimed to investigate the effectiveness of burn wound cleansing in decreasing bacterial load by comparing pre-wash and post-wash swab results against local burn wound management and aseptic non touch technique (ANTT) guidelines. Method The audit was conducted retrospectively on children admitted to Burns Unit during August 2019, excluding resuscitation burn patients. Pre- and post-wash swabs taken on admission were included and the results obtained from Chameleon database. Data were collected on excel spread sheets including demographic variables such as age, sex, type of injury, percentage total body surface area (TBSA) and mechanism of injury. Data were analysed and results compiled. Results Fifty patients were admitted over a month period; amongst those 60% were male and 40% female of ages ranging from 5 months to 14 years. Scald (50%) was found to be the most common mode of injury followed by contact burn (36%) involving 0.30 to 9% TBSA. Among 50 patients, 30 (60%) showed no growth in pre-wash and 36 (72%) in post-wash swabs. However, 6% post-wash swabs that were initially negative later showed bacillus cereus, staph aureus, Enterobacter, and Acinetobacter. Similarly, another 4% post-wash swabs developed new microorganisms as compared to pre-wash swabs. Conclusions The most common bacteria colonising both pre- and post-wash swabs was staph aureus. Overall, cleansing had reduced the bacterial load significantly around 82% very effective. It is imperative to stick to local guidelines to reduce morbidity and mortality in burn patients.

scholarly journals Multimodal Analgesia and Discharge Opioid Requirements in Burn Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 963-966
Author(s):  
Michael Wright ◽  
Jin A Lee
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Multimodal Analgesia ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Area Burned ◽  
Total Body ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Analgesia in burn patients is challenging given the complexity of burn pain and prolonged need beyond hospital admission. Given the risks of opioids, the impact of multimodal analgesia postdischarge needs to be further elucidated in this population. This retrospective, single-center cohort study evaluated adult burn patients who were consecutively admitted to the burn service with at least 10% total body surface area burned and subsequently followed in the burn clinic between February 2015 and September 2018. Subjects were separated into two cohorts based on discharge pain regimens: multimodal and nonmultimodal. The primary outcome was the change in opioid requirements (measured in oral morphine equivalents) between discharge and first follow-up interval. Secondary outcomes included the classes of multimodal agents utilized and a comparison of opioid requirements between the last 24 hours of admission and discharge. A total of 152 patients were included for analysis, 76 in the multimodal cohort and 76 in the nonmultimodal cohort. The multimodal cohort was noted to have increased total body surface area burned and prolonged number of days spent in the intensive care unit at baseline; however, the multimodal cohort exhibited a more significant decrease in opioid requirements from discharge to first follow-up interval when compared with the nonmultimodal cohort (106.6 vs 75.4 mg, P = .039).

Timing of Flap Surgery in Acute Burn Patients Does Not Affect Complications

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 967-970
Author(s):  
David Perrault ◽  
Danielle Rochlin ◽  
Christopher Pham ◽  
Arash Momeni ◽  
Yvonne Karanas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Free Flaps ◽  
Stepwise Logistic Regression ◽  
Electrical Injury ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Wound ◽  
Burn Care ◽  
Flap Coverage

Abstract Pedicled and free flaps are occasionally necessary to reconstruct complex wounds in acute burn patients. Flap coverage has classically been delayed for concern of progressive tissue necrosis and flap failure. We aim to investigate flap complications in primary burn care leveraging national U.S. data. Acute burn patients with known % total body surface area(TBSA) were extracted from the Nationwide/National Inpatient Sample from 2002 to 2014 based on the International Classification of Disease (ICD) codes, ninth edition. Variables included age, sex, race, Elixhauser index, %TBSA, mechanism, inhalation injury, and location of burn. Flap complication was defined by ICD-9 procedure code 86.75, return to the operating room for flap revision. Multivariable analysis evaluated predictors of flap compromise using stepwise logistic regression with backward elimination. The weighted sample included 306,924 encounters of which 526 received a flap (0.17%). About 7.8% of flap encounters sustained electric injury compared to 2.7% of non-flap encounters (odds ratio [OR] 3.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.95–7.24, P < .001). The mean hospital day of the flap procedure was 10.1 (SD 10.7) days. Flap complications occurred in 6.4% of cases. The timing of flap coverage was not associated with complications. The only independent predictor of flap complication was electrical injury (OR 40.49, 95% CI 2.98–550.64, P = .005). Electrical injury was an independent predictor of flap complications compared to other mechanisms. Flap timing was not associated with return to surgery for complications. This suggests that the use of flaps is safe in acute burn care to achieve burn wound closure with an understanding that electrical injuries may warrant particular consideration to avoid failure.

scholarly journals Epidemiology and outcome of acute burn patients at a new dedicated burn centre in Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-29
Author(s):  
Budhi Nath Adhikari Sudhin ◽  
Sanjit Adhikari ◽  
Sushma Khatiwada
Keyword(s):  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Winter Season ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Permanent Disability ◽  
Total Body ◽  
Epidemiological Characteristics

Introduction: Burn injury remains one of the biggest health concerns in the developing world. It has been regarded as a formidable public health issue in terms of mortality, morbidity and permanent disability. We aim to provide an overview of the basic epidemiological characteristics of burn patients admitted at a dedicated burn center in Chitwan, Nepal. Methods: This was a retrospective, hospital-based observational study conducted at Chitwan Medical College Teaching Hospital (CMCTH) burn ward from September 2017 to August 2019. Patients’ records from admission/discharge book, admission/discharge summaries as well as patient’s individual files were reviewed to obtain the necessary data. Demographic data, clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes were statistically analyzed. Results: Among the 202 patients, the number of males slightly predominated that of females with a ratio of 1.02:1. The median age was 24 years, and the median total body surface area (TBSA) burned was 15%.  Children less than 10 years comprised one third of all patients while more than one fifth were elderly. The commonest etiological factor was flame burn, closely followed by scald. The mortality rate was 12.38% for the period under review. Majority of the patients spent less than 10 days on admission and around one fifth needed surgical intervention aimed at earlier coverage. Binary logistic regression analysis showed that age, Body Mass Index (BMI) and total body surface area (TBSA) burnt were the major predictors of burn mortality. Conclusions: The outcome of burn injuries is poor. Appropriate preventive & therapeutic measures need to be taken in terms of social education & provision of quality healthcare to reduce the incidence & improve the survival outcome of burn patients which should focus on children and elderly especially during the winter season.

Comparing the Effect of Gabapentin, Ketamine, Dexmedetomidine, and Entonox on Pain Control in Burn Wound Dressing

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simin Chaghazardi ◽  
Mohammadbagher Hedari ◽  
Shahrzad Bazargan-Hejazi ◽  
Reza Mohammadi ◽  
Alireza Ahmadi
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Adverse Reactions ◽  
Pain Treatment ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Hemodynamic Changes ◽  
Burn Wound ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Drug Of Choice ◽  
Hemodynamic Variables ◽  
Management Effects

Abstract This study aimed to evaluate differences in the experience of pain, nausea, and vomiting, as well as the hemodynamic parameters including heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) in burn patients across four pain treatment groups—i.e., gabapentin, ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and entonox. In a single blinded randomized comparative study, 25 burn patients with second- or third-degree burns between 20% and 50% of their body surface were assigned to different treatment groups by using block randomization, while keeping the investigator blind to the size of the block. We recorded demographics, the hemodynamics, adverse effects, and pain levels before the treatment and again 5, 10, 15, 30, 60, 120, 240, and 360 minutes postadministration of pain medication (after-treatment). Gabapentin ketamine, dexmedetomidine, and entonox had significant effects in treatment of pain in burn patients. Entonox had the best analgesic effect with the least adverse effects and hemodynamic changes. Gabapentin also had good pain management effects; however, it showed less desirable effects on hemodynamic variables. Entonox caused the least amount of hemodynamic changes and the least adverse reactions, but since the medication is delivered by a facemask it limited its application with our patients. Gabapentin offered good benefits but caused a gradual drop in BP and HR and had some unfavorable reactions. However, since it is administered orally and often is cheaper, it could be considered as the drug of choice.

861 Analgesia After Burns: A Case Series and Development of a Multimodal Analgesic Enhanced Recovery Pathway

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S268-S269
Author(s):  
Andrew m Mendelson ◽  
Yasmin Elkhashab ◽  
William Hughes ◽  
Eugene R Viscusi
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface Area ◽  
Body Surface ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Oral Morphine ◽  
Opioid Consumption ◽  
Management Service ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Total Body

Abstract Introduction Burn pain is grossly undertreated which may result in poorer outcomes including chronic pain, anxiety and persistent opioid use. Opioids are currently the mainstay of treatment with many burn patients receiving long term opioid management even in the context of the opioid crisis. We retrospectively reviewed the charts of burn patients admitted to our hospital to evaluate the impact of our multimodal pain management approach on overall opioid consumption. Methods Following IRB approval, a retrospective chart review of all patients with burn injuries over a one year period was performed. The Acute Pain Management Service was consulted for analgesic management for all patients. Patient data was collected from their electronic medical records on Epic HyperSpace and included total body surface area of burn, age and gender, length of hospital stay, amount of opioid usage throughout admission, average verbal numerical score for pain, and use of adjuvant analgesics was gathered. The amount of opioid usage was obtained from the chart and then converted to oral morphine equivalents (OME) using the CDC Prevention Conversion Chart. Results During the study period, eight patients met inclusion criteria. The average patient age was 42.5 years, with a mean of 26.8 % TBSA (Total body surface area) burn and mean length of stay of 23 days. Our pain pathway consisted of non-opioid analgesic adjuncts that were given around-the-clock with opioids used only on an as-needed basis. The nonopioid analgesics include acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS), gabapentin or pregabalin, and a ketamine infusion. Initial opioid consumption (on day of APMS consult) as well as median hospital day was compared to opioid consumption on day of discharge. Six out of eight patients showed a reduction in their oral morphine equivalent (OME) following APMS consult usage from day of admission with average 76 OME to 44.6 OME on day of discharge. Conclusions We were able to reduce patient’s opioid requirement in 6 out of 8 patients upon discharge. These findings suggest that a further more rigorous study is warranted to demonstrate the benefits of multimodal therapy in burn pain. Applicability of Research to Practice The multimodal approach to pain control for burn patients may possibly be able to reduce the overall opioid requirements and theoretically the opioid associated side effects.

Deep Learning Assisted Burn Wound Diagnosis (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Che Wei Chang ◽  
Feipei Lai ◽  
Mesakh Christian ◽  
Yu Chun Chen ◽  
Ching Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Learning ◽  
Total Body Surface Area ◽  
Ground Truth ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Burn Wound ◽  
Burn Wounds ◽  
Burn Victims ◽  
Step Procedure ◽  
Resuscitation Fluid ◽  
Total Body

BACKGROUND Accurate assessment of the percentage of total body surface area (%TBSA) of burn wounds is crucial in the management of burn patients. The resuscitation fluid and nutritional needs of burn patients, their need for intensive unit care, and probability of mortality are all directly related to %TBSA. It is difficult to estimate a burn area of irregular shape by inspection. Many articles have reported discrepancy in estimating %TBSA by different doctors. OBJECTIVE We propose a method, based on deep learning, for burn wound detection, segmentation and calculation of % TBSA on a pixel-to-pixel basis. METHODS A two-step procedure was used to convert burn wound diagnosis into %TBSA. In the first step, images of burn wounds were collected and labeled by burn surgeons and the dataset was then input into two deep learning architectures, U-Net and Mask R-CNN, each configured with two different backbones, to segment the burn wounds. In the second step, we collected and labeled images of hands to create another dataset, which was also input into U-Net and Mask R-CNN to segment the hands. The percentage of TBSA of the burn wounds was then calculated by comparing the pixels of mask areas on the images of the burn wound and hand of the same patient according to the rule of hand, which says that one’s hand accounts for 0.8% of TBSA. RESULTS A total of 2591 images of burn wounds were collected and labeled to form the burn-wound dataset. The dataset was randomly split into a ratio of 8:1:1 to form the training, validation, and testing sets. Four hundred images of volar hands were collected and labeled to form the hand dataset, which was also split into three sets using the same method. For the images of burn wounds, Mask R-CNN with ResNet101 had the best segmentation result with a Dice coefficient (DC) of 0.9496, while U-Net with ResNet101 had a DC of 0.8545. For the hand images, U-Net and Mask R-CNN had similar performance with a DC of 0.9920 and 0.9910, respectively. Lastly, we conducted a test diagnosis in a burn patient. Mask R-CNN with ResNet-101 had on average less deviation (0.115% TBSA) from the ground truth than burn surgeons. CONCLUSIONS This is one of the first studies to diagnose all depths of burn wounds and convert the segmentation results into %TBSA using different deep learning models. We aimed to assist medical staff in estimating burn size more accurately and thereby helping to provide precise care to burn victims.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document