Integrative Nursing Management of Anxiety

2018 ◽  
pp. 221-239
Author(s):  
Pamela Lusk ◽  
Michelle Kahn-John
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Management ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Nursing Management ◽  
Emotional Wellbeing ◽  
Patient Centered

Anxiety is a sense of perceived threat to one’s physical safety or emotional wellbeing, and symptoms are experienced in body, mind, and spirit. This chapter focuses on anxiety as a normal reaction to stressors—external, internal, or existential. Everyone experiences anxiety, both trait anxiety and state anxiety at multiple points in their lives; however, prolonged and severe symptoms of anxiety can evolve into a clinical form of anxiety, such as generalized anxiety disorder, panic disorder, or posttraumatic stress disorder. This chapter reviews assessment of anxiety, including evidence-based screening measures and the patient-centered interview. Symptom identification and management incorporating integrative nursing principles are presented, including patient self-management strategies as well as provider-directed treatment options. In clinical decision-making for anxiety symptom management, concordance with the patient in establishing a treatment plan is emphasized. A case study highlights a patient-centered and culturally sensitive approach to the management of anxiety.

Integrative Nursing and Symptom Management

2014 ◽  
pp. 187-199
Author(s):  
Debbie Ringdahl
Keyword(s):  
Symptom Management ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Symptom Relief ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Nursing Interventions ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Integrative Health ◽  
Therapeutic Value ◽  
Whole Person

The principles of integrative nursing are reintroduced within the context of clinical decision making. Nursing interventions aimed at symptom relief support and facilitate whole person healing by using a range of approaches and evidence-based healing modalities. The integrative nurses assess mindbodyspirit while attending to physiologic systems and their interactions with the whole person. The focus on healing instead of curing shifts priorities and problem solving to include a wider range of treatment options. Increased use of integrative health modalities expands treatment options but also reminds nurses of the therapeutic value and healing potential of touch, comfort, and presence. Operationalizing integrative nursing principles requires “pragmatic idealism,” a task well suited to a profession invested in both the art and science of healing.

Chronic limb ischaemia: case study and clinical literature review

2021 ◽  
Vol 30 (14) ◽  
pp. 846-851
Author(s):  
Liz Farrington ◽  
Gerri Mortimore
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Lifestyle Changes ◽  
Care Plan ◽  
Limb Ischaemia ◽  
Clinical Literature ◽  
Artery Disease

This article will discuss chronic limb ischaemia as the result of peripheral artery disease (PAD) using a case study. The patient's concurrent diagnosis of metastases meant clinical decision making was complex and treatment options were limited. PAD is the third most common clinical presentation of atherosclerosis after coronary artery disease and stroke. Although advances in radiological technology and biochemical screening offer the potential for earlier intervention and improved survival rates for patients with PAD, a review of the evidence suggests that commitment to more conservative approaches, such as exercise therapy and health promotion, could have more sustainable, longer-term benefits for patients with chronic limb ischaemia. The therapeutic nature of the nurse–patient relationship makes nurses ideally placed for encouraging lifestyle changes and signposting to support services. Active participation from the patient is imperative for any potential modifications, which should be individualised as part of a holistic care plan, to ensure patient engagement and compliance. Therefore emphasis should remain on the management and prevention of modifiable risk factors, for which the nurse's role is an integral part to ensure success.

scholarly journals PALM: Patient-centered Treatment Ranking via Large-scale Multivariate Network Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Duan ◽  
Jiayi Tong ◽  
Lifeng Lin ◽  
Lisa D Levine ◽  
Mary D Sammel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Large Scale ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Multiple Outcomes ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Joint Inference ◽  
Treatment Comparisons

AbstractThe growing number of available treatment options have led to urgent needs for reliable answers when choosing the best course of treatment for a patient. As it is often infeasible to compare a large number of treatments in a single randomized controlled trial, multivariate network meta-analyses (NMAs) are used to synthesize evidence from existing trials of a subset of the available treatments, where outcomes related to both efficacy and safety are considered simultaneously. However, these large-scale multiple-outcome NMAs have created challenges to existing methods due to the increasingly complexity of the unknown correlation structures between different outcomes and treatment comparisons. In this paper, we proposed a new framework for PAtient-centered treatment ranking via Large-scale Multivariate network meta-analysis, termed as PALM, which includes a parsimonious modeling approach, a fast algorithm for parameter estimation and inference, a novel visualization tool for comparing treatments with multivariate outcomes termed as the star plot, as well as personalized treatment ranking procedures taking into account the individual’s considerations on multiple outcomes. In application to an NMA that compares 14 treatment options for labor induction over five modalities, we provided a comprehensive illustration of the proposed framework and demonstrated its computational efficiency and practicality. Our analysis leads to new insights on comparing these 14 treatment options based on joint inference of multiple outcomes that cannot be obtained from univariate NMAs, and novel visualizations of evidence to support patient-centered clinical decision making.

Management of thoracic aortic lesions - the future is endovascular

VASA ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (3) ◽  
pp. 163-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weidenhagen ◽  
Bombien ◽  
Meimarakis ◽  
Geisler ◽  
A. Koeppel
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Aorta ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Traumatic Rupture ◽  
Descending Thoracic Aorta ◽  
New Treatment ◽  
Aneurysm Dissection

Open surgical repair of lesions of the descending thoracic aorta, such as aneurysm, dissection and traumatic rupture, has been the “state-of-the-art” treatment for many decades. However, in specialized cardiovascular centers, thoracic endovascular aortic repair and hybrid aortic procedures have been implemented as novel treatment options. The current clinical results show that these procedures can be performed with low morbidity and mortality rates. However, due to a lack of randomized trials, the level of reliability of these new treatment modalities remains a matter of discussion. Clinical decision-making is generally based on the experience of the vascular center as well as on individual factors, such as life expectancy, comorbidity, aneurysm aetiology, aortic diameter and morphology. This article will review and discuss recent publications of open surgical, hybrid thoracic aortic (in case of aortic arch involvement) and endovascular repair in complex pathologies of the descending thoracic aorta.

Consent, Refusal, and Waivers in Patient-Centered Dysphagia Care: Using Law, Ethics, and Evidence to Guide Clinical Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 453-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Horner ◽  
Maria Modayil ◽  
Laura Roche Chapman ◽  
An Dinh
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Public Policy ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Legal Advice ◽  
Medical Context

PurposeWhen patients refuse medical or rehabilitation procedures, waivers of liability have been used to bar future lawsuits. The purpose of this tutorial is to review the myriad issues surrounding consent, refusal, and waivers. The larger goal is to invigorate clinical practice by providing clinicians with knowledge of ethics and law. This tutorial is for educational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.MethodThe authors use a hypothetical case of a “noncompliant” individual under the care of an interdisciplinary neurorehabilitation team to illuminate the ethical and legal features of the patient–practitioner relationship; the elements of clinical decision-making capacity; the duty of disclosure and the right of informed consent or informed refusal; and the relationship among noncompliance, defensive practices, and iatrogenic harm. We explore the legal question of whether waivers of liability in the medical context are enforceable or unenforceable as a matter of public policy.ConclusionsSpeech-language pathologists, among other health care providers, have fiduciary and other ethical and legal obligations to patients. Because waivers try to shift liability for substandard care from health care providers to patients, courts usually find waivers of liability in the medical context unenforceable as a matter of public policy.

Clinical decision making in spastic bilateral CP – Planning interventions using clinical gait analysis: A case study

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. S37
Author(s):  
M. Alvela ◽  
M. Bergmann ◽  
M.-L. Ööpik ◽  
Ü. Kruus ◽  
K. Englas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Gait Analysis ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Clinical Gait Analysis

scholarly journals Shared clinical decision-making experiences in nursing: a qualitative study

BMC Nursing ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen-Fang Chung ◽  
Pao-Yu Wang ◽  
Shu-Chuan Lin ◽  
Yu-Hsia Lee ◽  
Hon-Yen Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Nursing Education ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Sociocultural Factors ◽  
Patient Centered ◽  
Clinical Nursing

Abstract Background Shared decision making (SDM) is a patient-centered nursing concept that emphasizes the autonomy of patients. SDM is a co-operative process that involves information exchange and communication between medical staff and patients for making treatment decisions. In this study, we explored the experiences of clinical nursing staff participating in SDM. Methods This study adopted a qualitative research design. Semistructured interviews were conducted with 21 nurses at a medical center in northern Taiwan. All interview recordings were transcribed verbatim. Content analysis was performed to analyze the data. Results The findings yielded the following three themes covering seven categories: knowledge regarding SDM, trigger discussion and coordination, and respect of sociocultural factors. Conclusions The results of this study describe the experiences of clinical nursing staff participating in SDM and can be used as a reference for nursing education and nursing administrative supervisors wishing to plan and enhance professional nursing SDM in nursing education.

scholarly journals My Client Knows That He's About to Stutter: How Can We Address Stuttering Anticipation during Therapy with Young People Who Stutter?

2018 ◽  
Vol 39 (04) ◽  
pp. 356-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hope Gerlach ◽  
Naomi Rodgers ◽  
Patricia Zebrowski ◽  
Eric Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Young People ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Hypothetical Case ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Goal Development ◽  
Internal Experience

AbstractStuttering anticipation is endorsed by many people who stutter as a core aspect of the stuttering experience. Anticipation is primarily a covert phenomenon and people who stutter respond to anticipation in a variety of ways. At the same time as anticipation occurs and develops internally, for many individuals the “knowing” or “feeling” that they are about to stutter is a primary contributor to the chronicity of the disorder. In this article, we offer a roadmap for both understanding the phenomenon of anticipation and its relevance to stuttering development. We introduce the Stuttering Anticipation Scale (SAS)—a 25-item clinical tool that can be used to explore a client's internal experience of anticipation to drive goal development and clinical decision making. We ground this discussion in a hypothetical case study of “Ryan,” a 14-year-old who stutters, to demonstrate how clinicians might use the SAS to address anticipation in therapy with young people who stutter.

Aortoiliac Reconstruction

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark K. Eskandari ◽  
Michael J Nooromid
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Preoperative Evaluation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Surgical Techniques ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortobifemoral Bypass ◽  
Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease ◽  
Atherosclerotic Occlusive Disease ◽  
Aortoiliac Reconstruction

This review outlines the preoperative evaluation, clinical decision making, and surgical treatment options for patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease. It also details the open surgical techniques for the treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease and reviews endovascular treatment options. The discussion of treatment options includes the potential complications and expected outcomes, as well as steps that can be taken to optimize surgical results. Key words: aortobifemoral bypass, aortoiliac reconstruction, atherosclerotic occlusive disease, endovascular reconstruction, femoral endarterectomy, iliac angioplasty, iliac stenting, peripheral vascular disease 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document