Assessing risk of prosthetic joint infection

Author(s):  
Umraz Khan ◽  
Graeme Perks ◽  
Rhidian Morgan-Jones ◽  
Peter James ◽  
Colin Esler ◽  
...  

This chapter discusses assessing the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and includes discussion on high-risk patients (classified by age, skin colour, extracellular matrix, cellular turnover, diabetes, obesity, rheumatoid arthritis, previous periarticular fractures and skin disorders). The aim is to allow the practitioner to identify high-risk patient attributes that can be positively influenced such that the risk of PJI is reduced. There are some patients with more than one risk factor and, as such, every effort must be made to reduce each even if there is a marginal gain in each. Delaying elective surgery until the risks of PJI are reduced must be encouraged but must be balanced with alleviating patient symptoms.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 297-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher J. DeFrancesco ◽  
Michael C. Fu ◽  
Cynthia A. Kahlenberg ◽  
Andy O. Miller ◽  
Mathias P. Bostrom

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Namrata Singh ◽  
Rajeshwari Nair ◽  
Michihiko Goto ◽  
Martha L Carvour ◽  
Ryan Carnahan ◽  
...  

AbstractBackgroundTreatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) often involves immune-suppressive therapies. Concern for recurrent prosthetic joint infection (PJI) in RA patients might be high and could reduce use of joint implantation in these patients. We aimed to evaluate the risk of recurrence of PJI in RA patients compared with osteoarthritis (OA) patients by utilizing a large health care system.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted for a Staphylococcus aureus PJI who underwent debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or 2-stage exchange (2SE) between 2003 and 2010 at 86 Veterans Affairs Medical Centers. Both RA patients and the comparison group of osteoarthritis (OA) patients were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, codes. All index PJI and recurrent positive cultures for S. aureus during 2 years of follow-up were validated by manual chart review. A Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compare the time to recurrent PJI for RA vs OA.ResultsIn our final cohort of 374 veterans who had either DAIR or 2SE surgery for their index S. aureus PJI, 11.2% had RA (n = 42). The majority of the cohort was male (97.3%), and 223 (59.6%) had a methicillin-susceptible S. aureus PJI. RA patients had a similar risk of failure compared with OA patients, after adjusting for covariates (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.48–1.37).ConclusionsPrior diagnosis of RA does not increase the risk of recurrent S. aureus PJI. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effect of different RA therapies on outcomes of episodes of PJI.


2006 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 216-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. F. Berbari ◽  
D. R. Osmon ◽  
M. C. T. Duffy ◽  
R. N. W. Harmssen ◽  
J. N. Mandrekar ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 59 (12) ◽  
pp. 1713-1720 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim Bongartz ◽  
Christine S. Halligan ◽  
Douglas R. Osmon ◽  
Megan S. Reinalda ◽  
William R. Bamlet ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 542-547
Author(s):  
Yuji Hirano ◽  
Toshihisa Kojima ◽  
Yasuhide Kanayama ◽  
Tomone Shioura ◽  
Masatoshi Hayashi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 100-B (6) ◽  
pp. 749-754 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. G. Partridge ◽  
C. Winnard ◽  
R. Townsend ◽  
R. Cooper ◽  
I. Stockley

AimsThe aim of this study was to establish the diagnostic accuracy of culture of joint aspirate with and without saline injection-reaspiration.Patients and MethodsThis is a retrospective analysis of 580 hip and knee aspirations in patients who were deemed to have a moderate to high risk of infection, and who subsequently proceeded to revision arthroplasty over a period of 12 years. It was carried out at a large quaternary referral centre where preoperative aspiration is routine.ResultsFluid was aspirated primarily in 313 (54%) cases and after saline injection-reaspiration of a ‘dry tap’ in 267 (46%) cases. Overall sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic aspirate were 84% (78% to 89%) and 85% (81% to 88%), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity of saline injection-reaspiration after ‘dry tap’ were 87% (79% to 92%) and 79% (72% to 84%) compared with 81% (71% to 88%) and 90% (85% to 93%) for direct aspiration.ConclusionPreoperative joint aspiration and culture is a sensitive and specific test for the confirmation of diagnosis in patients at a moderate to high risk of prosthetic joint infection. Culture of saline injection-reaspiration also provides accurate diagnostic information in the event of a ‘dry tap’. Both methods allow susceptibility testing of relevant organisms and are therefore able to guide perioperative antibiotic therapy. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2018;100-B:749–54.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document