Differential diagnosis of common presentations

Author(s):  
Punit S. Ramrakha ◽  
Kevin P. Moore ◽  
Amir Sam

Introduction 814 Systemic enquiry 815 Abdominal pain 1 816 Abdominal pain 2 818 Abdominal pain (referred) 819 Abdominal distension 819 Back pain 820 Blackouts 820 Breathlessness/dyspnoea 821 Chest pain 822 Chest pain (pleuritic) 822 Collapse 822 Confusion 823 Constipation 823 Cough 823 Cutaneous manifestations of internal malignancy ...

Author(s):  
Punit S. Ramrakha ◽  
Kevin P. Moore ◽  
Amir H. Sam

This chapter explores the differential diagnosis of common presentations, including abdominal pain and distension, back pain, blackouts and collapse, breathlessness and dyspnoea, chest pain, confusion, constipation, cough, cutaneous manifestations of internal malignancy, diarrhoea, dysphagia, falls, fever, fits and seizures, haematemesis and melaena, haematuria, haemoptysis, headache, hemiparesis, hoarseness, itching and pruritus, joint pain and swelling, leg swelling, muscle weakness, nausea and vomiting, palpitations, tremor, unconsciousness and reduced consciousness, weak legs, and wheeze.


2015 ◽  

This convenient handbook is a comprehensive guide to the evaluation and treatment of more than 80 signs and symptoms. It is organized alphabetically, and each entry includes history and physical examinations; causes; differential diagnosis; diagnostic procedures; treatment approaches including when to refer and when to admit; ongoing care and follow-up; and prevention. Contents include: Abdominal pain Anxiety Back pain Chest pain Depression Diarrhea and steatorrhea Dizziness and vertigo Fatigue and weakness Fever Headache Heart murmurs Jaundice Rash Red eye/pink eye Sleep disturbances Speech and language concerns Vomiting Wheezing And more!


2019 ◽  
pp. 259-272
Author(s):  
Beth B. Hogans

Chapter 15 addresses conditions that require prompt evaluation but are not generally in the group of conditions that are true emergencies. Included in this chapter are acute migraine, other severe nonemergent headaches, facial pain, severe low back pain, acute severe neuropathies such as shingles and diabetic amyotrophy, abdominal pain, and acutely painful muscle conditions requiring prompt attention, such as myositis and rhabdomyolysis. The differential diagnosis of headache with visual impairment is reviewed, as is the differential diagnosis of facial pain. Strategies for the evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment of atypical focal pains that can represent unusual presentations of common problems as well as uncommon conditions are discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nohelia Rojas Ferrer ◽  
María D Berenguer Romero ◽  
M. Cano Medina ◽  
Amparo de Fez Satores ◽  
Jorge Escandón Álvarez

Myeloid sarcoma, granulocytic sarcoma, chloroma or extramedullary myeloid leukemia, is an unusual tumor, with a dire prognosis. Up today, the clinical diagnosis continues to be extremely difficult due to the nonspecific symptoms. Histology, immunohistochemistry, and flow cytometry are valuable in the diagnose of the tumor, as well as in the differential diagnosis from multiple entities with different prognoses and treatments. We present 61-year-old men who presented with three days evolution abdominal pain, vomiting and abdominal distension. A diagnosis of adenocarcinoma was presumed. A final diagnosis of intestinal myeloid sarcoma without evidence of bone marrow infiltration was established. A review of the most relevant aspects of this disease is presented.


Blood ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 138 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 4184-4184
Author(s):  
Bhawna Rastogi ◽  
Sunita Rani ◽  
Meiko Mayuzumi ◽  
Rafael Razon ◽  
Rajani Singh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: L-glutamine (Endari ®) was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in July 2017 to reduce the acute complications of sickle cell disease (SCD) in adult and pediatric patients, aged 5 years and older. Data collected during the phase 2 and phase 3 trials demonstrated a rather mild adverse event profile at the approved doses (approximately 0.3 g/kg administered twice daily). The combined data from the clinical trials encompassed 187 patients assigned to the L-glutamine arm and 111 patients assigned to the placebo arm. The most common side effects observed were constipation, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, cough, pain in extremity, back pain, and chest pain. Since 2017, safety data for L-glutamine has been collected through several sources. Aim: To determine whether new safety concern signals for L-glutamine in the treatment of SCD have emerged over the post-marketing period since July of 2017. Methods: Individual case safety reports (ICSR) received from consumers, physicians, pharmacies, and other healthcare professionals that were processed in the global safety database in real time were reviewed. Continuous safety evaluations that were performed when evaluating ICSRs were collected. Additionally, signal management activities performed quarterly since July 2017, which included screening of literature and regulatory websites for the identification of potential safety information, were evaluated. Results: Overall, 1791 case reports were received with 2954 adverse events between July 07, 2017 (the date of approval) and July 06, 2021. A summary of frequently reported adverse events during the post-marketing phase is presented in Figure 1. No new safety concerns have been identified upon evaluation of these events, which has been performed on a quarterly basis from the approval date. Conclusion: Post-marketing surveillance data indicates that L-glutamine administered at approximately 0.3 g/kg twice daily is safe and well-tolerated. The most common side effects observed during clinical trials were constipation, nausea, headache, abdominal pain, cough, pain in extremity, back pain, and chest pain (Table 1). These same side effects have been observed in the post-marketing phase with the exception of "cough." Side effects reported during the post-marketing phase that were not reported in the clinical trials were abdominal discomfort, diarrhea, malaise, and pain. The majority of these reports were categorized as non-serious (Figure 1). Information pertaining to these events was limited or the event could be explained by the underlying condition or concomitant medication; therefore, these events were not considered to be new safety concerns. In summary, there were no new safety concerns identified with L-glutamine for the treatment of SCD in the post-marketing period. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Mayuzumi: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Razon: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Singh: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Goodrow: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Becerra: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Stark: Emmaus Medical, Inc: Current Employment. Niihara: Emmaus Lifesciences, Inc.: Current Employment.


Author(s):  
Salwa Dafa Allah Salih Mohammadeen ◽  
Amar F.Eldow ◽  
Rania Eisa Abdelmutalib ◽  
Sara galal osman hamza ◽  
Elnour Mohammed Elagib ◽  
...  

A middle-aged Sudanese woman has been presented complained about multiple joint pain, skin rash, chest pain, hair loss, severe abdominal pain associated with abdominal distension, bloody diarrhoea and vomiting. Lab investigation and computed tomography (CT) abdomen revealed the patient have an intussusception on top of SLE. The patient was treated


Abdominal distension 4 Abdominal pain 6 Alteration of behaviour 7 Alteration in bowel habit 9 Anaemia 10 Anaphylaxis 12 Angioedema 12 Anorexia 13 Anuria 14 Ataxia 15 Bradycardia 17 Breathlessness 18 Bruising 20 Calf swelling 21 Chest pain 22 Clubbing 25 Coma 26 Confusion 28...


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
K Watanabe ◽  
H Yoshino ◽  
T Takahashi ◽  
M Usui ◽  
K Akutsu ◽  
...  

Abstract   Both acute aortic dissection (AAD) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) present with chest pain and are life-threatening diseases that require early diagnosis and treatment for better clinical outcome. However, two critical diseases in the very acute phase are sometimes difficult to differentiate, especially prior to arrival at the hospital for urgent diagnosis and selection of specific treatment. The aim of our study was to clarify the diagnostic markers acquired from the information gathered from medical history taking and physical examination for discriminating AAD from AMI by using data from the Tokyo Cardiovascular Care Unit (CCU) Network database. We examined the clinical features and laboratory data of patients with AAD and AMI who were admitted to the hospital in Tokyo between January 2013 and December 2015 by using the Tokyo CCU Network database. The Tokyo CCU Network consists of >60 hospitals that fulfil certain clinical criteria and receive patients from ambulance units coordinated by the Tokyo Fire Department. Of 15,061 patients diagnosed as having AAD and AMI, 3,195 with chest pain within 2 hours after symptom onset (537 AAD and 2,658 AMI) were examined. The patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were excluded. We compared the clinical data of the patients with chest pain who were diagnosed as having AAD and AMI. The following indicators were more frequent or had higher values among those with AAD: female sex (38% vs. 20%, P<0.001), systolic blood pressures (SBPs) at the time of first contact by the emergency crew (142 mmHg vs. 127 mmHg), back pain in addition to chest pain (54% vs. 5%, P<0.001), history of hypertension (73% vs. 58%, P<0.001), SBP ≥150 mmHg (39% vs. 22%, P<0.001), back pain combined with SBP ≥150 mmHg (23% vs. 0.8%, P<0.001), and back pain with SBP <90 mmHg (4.5% vs. 0.1%, P<0.001). The following data were less frequently observed among those with AAD: diabetes mellitus (7% vs. 28%, P<0.001), dyslipidaemia (17% vs. 42%, P<0.001), and history of smoking (48% vs. 61%, P<0.001). The multivariate regression analysis suggested that back pain with SBP ≥150 mmHg (odds ratio [OR] 47; 95% confidence interval [CI] 28–77; P<0.001), back pain with SBP <90 mmHg (OR 68, 95% CI 16–297, P<0.001), and history of smoking (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38–0.63, P<0.001) were the independent markers of AAD. The sensitivity and specificity of back pain with SBPs of ≥150 mmHg and back pain with SBPs <90 mmHg for detecting AAD were 23% and 99%, and 4% and 99%, respectively. In patients with chest pain suspicious of AAD and AMI, “back pain accompanied by chest pain with SBP ≥150 mmHg” or “back pain accompanied by chest pain with SBP <90 mmH” is a reliable diagnostic marker of AAD with high specificity, although the sensitivity was low. The two SBP values with back pain are markers that may be useful for the ambulance crew at their first contact with patients with chest pain. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document