P0788HEALTHCARE RESOURCE UTILIZATION AND COSTS IN A DAPA-CKD-LIKE POPULATION USING A CONTEMPORARY US HEALTHCARE COHORT

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tope Olufade ◽  
Lois Lamerato ◽  
Juan Jose Garcia Sanchez ◽  
Like Jiang ◽  
Joanna Huang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health System ◽  
Healthcare System ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization

Abstract Background and Aims Recent studies have shown an association between Sodium Glucose Co-Transporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) class of drugs and lower healthcare costs compared with other glucose lowering therapy, in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients mainly as a result of reduced rates of cardiovascular and other T2D-associated outcomes. The DAPA-CKD Trial (A study to evaluate the effect of dapagliflozin on renal outcomes and CV mortality in patients with CKD) is the first SGLT-2i renal outcomes trial to test the efficacy and safety of an SGLT-2i, dapagliflozin, in patients with CKD with and without T2D. The objective of this study is to assess the healthcare resource utilization and cost in a “DAPA-CKD-like population” (eGFR 25-75ml/min/1.73m2 and UACR 200-5000mg/g) using a contemporary US healthcare system. Method Data from the Henry Ford Health System (HFHS) were used to identify persons with CKD stages 2 through 4 between 2006 and 2016 (based on eGFR labs) and patients were followed through 2018. Persons with no confirmatory eGFR > 90 days from index date, death within 30 days, history of renal transplant, and evidence of renal replacement therapy, or progression to CKD stage 5 during the baseline period (6 months pre or post index date) were excluded. Inpatient admissions, inpatient days, emergency department encounters, and ambulatory care encounters with primary care, specialty care and overall were assessed. Cumulative utilization was evaluated for all patients and evaluation based on the follow-up time. Patients were censored on date of death, last contact with the Health System or at December 31st, 2018. The utilization rates are the total observed utilization divided by follow-up time and reported as an annual rate. Billing records for all care with HFHS were used to estimate costs. Results 6,557 patients (mean age 62.9 years, 46.2% male) met the eligibility criteria and are included in the study cohort. The population was stratified by UACR (0-<30, 30–199, 200–5,000mg/g). The DAPA-CKD-like population (200-5000mg/g) was associated with significantly higher annualized per-patient healthcare costs, $39,222/yr (UACR 200-5000mg/g) vs. $19,547/yr (UACR <30mg/g). This increased healthcare utilization was predominantly driven by increased acute care, including hospital admissions, inpatient days and emergency department visits. Persons in the highest UACR category were almost three times more likely to have a hospital admission compared to the lowest UACR (rates 0.55/year vs. 0.20/year, respectively; see Figure below). Persons in the lowest UACR category had more primary care visits per year compared with those with highest UACR (5.81 vs 5.21). In contrast, the highest number of outpatient specialist visits per year was reported for the DAPA-CKD-like population (7.55 vs. 6.74). Conclusion This analysis of a contemporary US healthcare system demonstrated that there exists a high disease burden in the DAPA-CKD-like population as seen by the substantial increase in healthcare resource utilization and costs compared to other cohorts of patients with a lower UACR. These results highlight the need for innovative therapies to improve patient outcomes in this population.

Evaluation of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Among Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia after Disease Progression

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 3573-3573
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Jay Lin ◽  
Lisa R Siegartel ◽  
Melissa Lingohr-Smith ◽  
Brandy Menges ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Baseline Period ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Outpatient Prescription

Abstract Introduction: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been shown to be efficacious for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, resistance, lack of response, or intolerance may occur, resulting in disease progression. There is a paucity of evidence quantifying the real-world healthcare burden of patients with CML progression. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the economic consequences of patients with CML progression using a real-world database analysis. Methods: Patients (≥18 years of age) with at least 1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient (≥30 days apart) diagnoses of CML were identified from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare healthcare claims databases between January 1, 2007 and June 30, 2015. CML patients were grouped into 2 study cohorts, those with evidence of disease progression and those without. Patients with CML progression were identified by the presence of claims for acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-like or acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL)-like chemotherapy treatments, based on the guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (version 1.2016), or a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). For patients with progression, the first date of such a claim was defined as the index. For patients without evidence of progression, a random date after the first CML diagnosis was identified as the index date. In order to increase accuracy of detecting progression, patients with other cancers, including AML and ALL, documented prior to the first recorded diagnosis of CML were excluded from the study. Patients were required to have continuous medical and prescription insurance coverage during the 12 months prior to the index date (baseline period). Demographics and clinical characteristics were evaluated during the baseline period. Healthcare resource utilization, including hospitalizations, outpatient medical services, and outpatient prescription drug usage, and the associated costs were captured during the baseline period and a variable follow-up period, lasting ≥1 day and up to 1 year, and compared among study cohorts. All costs were inflation adjusted to 2015 cost level. Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to further compare the incremental costs of CML patients with vs. without progression while adjusting for various factors. Results: Of the overall identified CML study population, 587 (7%) experienced disease progression and 7,504 did not. A greater percentage of male than female patients had evidence of disease progression and CML patients with progression had more comorbidities, as measured by Charlson Comorbidity Index, than those without progression (Table 1). Approximately 31% of CML patients with progression were treated with HSCT at the index date, while 69% were treated with chemotherapy (Table 1). During the baseline period, mean total healthcare costs, including costs for hospitalizations, outpatient medical service costs, and outpatient prescription costs were significantly greater for CML patients with vs. without progression ($143,778 vs. $53,143, p<0.001). During the follow-up, mean total annual healthcare costs, costs for hospitalizations, and outpatient medical service costs, were substantially greater for patients with vs. without progression; however, costs for outpatient prescription drugs were less (Table 2). When patient characteristics were taken into consideration with a GLM, the incremental costs for CML patients with vs. without progression were $270,925 (CI: $235,290, $311,958, p<0.001); when an additional GLM model was used, in which the baseline healthcare costs of CML patients were added as a covariate, the incremental costs for patients with vs. without progression were $136,308 (CI: $119,223, $155,841, p<0.001). Conclusions: The healthcare burden, in terms of healthcare resource utilization and costs, of patients with CML progression is substantial. Healthcare providers and payers need to consider various strategies to minimize the rate of CML progression. Disclosures Elias: Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy. Lin:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Novosys Health: Employment. Siegartel:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment. Lingohr-Smith:Novosys Health: Employment. Menges:Novosys Health: Employment. Makenbaeva:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Employment, Equity Ownership.

scholarly journals Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma: Differences between Patients Treated First-Line with Ibrutinib or Bendamustine + Rituximab

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3549-3549
Author(s):  
Debra Irwin ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Kathleen Wilson ◽  
Gerard Hoehn ◽  
Erika Szabo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Real World ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
First Line

Abstract OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine real-world differences in healthcare resource utilization of indolent non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (iNHL) patients treated with first-line ibrutinib monotherapy (IM) or first-line bendamustine + rituximab (BR) combination therapy using U.S. administrative claims data. METHODS: The MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify patients aged 18 years or older with commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance plans based on their first prescription (index date) of either IM or BR therapy between 02/01/2014 and 08/30/2017. Patients were required to be diagnosed with iNHL and be treatment naïve, as well as be continuously enrolled (CE) for 6 months prior to and at least 30 days following the index date. All-cause and iNHL-related healthcare resource utilization (e.g., inpatient admission (IP) and emergency room (ER) visits) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up period from the index date among the subset of patients with 12 months of continuous enrollment and reported per-patient per-month (PPPM). Statistical differences in the distribution of IP and ER visits between the IM versus BR therapy groups were estimated using chi-squared test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 1,544 iNHL patients were identified, with 207 patients in the IM cohort and 1,337 patients in the BR cohort. The IM cohort was significantly older (mean = 68.3 years; SD = 11.8) then the BR cohort (mean age = 62.1 years; SD = 11.1). The proportion of females was significantly (p<.05) lower in the IM cohort (36%) relative to the BR cohort (49%). The two cohorts did not differ in comorbidity as assessed by National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index score (IM=0.7 vs. BR=0.8, p=0.40). The results of the comparisons between the two groups with 12 months of follow-up (IM = 110; BR = 745) are provided in Table 1. For all-cause healthcare utilization, the proportion of IM patients experiencing at least one IP admission was significantly higher than the BR cohort as were the PPPM number of admissions. The proportion of patients with at least one ER visit was similar in the IM and BR cohorts. However, the average PPPM number of ER visits was significantly higher in the IM cohort relative to the BR cohort. A similar pattern was found for the iNHL-related healthcare utilization variables with one exception. The proportion of patients with at least one iNHL-related ER visit was significantly higher in the IM relative to the BR cohort. Conclusions: The current study examined differences in healthcare utilization among iNHL-patients treated in a front-line setting with either ibrutinib or BR combination therapy. Results indicated that not only did more ibrutinib patients experience an IP admission and ER visits, including both all-cause and iNHL-related, but they also experienced more repeat admissions and ER visits. These real-world findings highlight the importance of considering the healthcare resource utilization of iNHL patients which may be associated with their first-line therapy. Disclosures Irwin: Teva: Consultancy. Zhang:Teva: Consultancy. Wilson:Teva: Consultancy. Hoehn:Teva: Employment. Szabo:Teva: Employment. Tang:Teva: Employment.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with Venous Thromboembolism Recurrence in Patients with Cancer

Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 4734-4734
Author(s):  
Alok A. Khorana ◽  
Keith R. McCrae ◽  
Dejan Milentijevic ◽  
Jonathan Fortier ◽  
François Laliberté ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Equity Ownership ◽  
Recurrent Vte

Abstract Introduction: Patients with cancer are not only at a high risk for developing primary but also recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE). These events lead to increased burden of cancer management and healthcare costs. It was estimated that all-cause health care costs for cancer patients with VTE were $30,538/patient higher than in those without VTE (Khorana, 2013). To our knowledge, very little information exists on cost of VTE recurrence among cancer patients. The objective of this study was to analyze resource utilization and costs of patients with cancer experiencing a VTE recurrence using a large claims database. Methods: Medical and pharmacy claims from the Humana Database between 1/1/2013 and 05/31/2015 were analyzed. Newly diagnosed cancer patients with a first VTE diagnosis occurring after their first cancer diagnosis and with ≥1 dispensing of an anticoagulant agent within 7 days after their VTE diagnosis, were selected. Baseline characteristics were evaluated during the 6 month period prior to the index VTE. VTE recurrences were defined as hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of VTE. Patients were classified into two groups: patients who experienced a VTE recurrence and patients who did not. Resource utilization and costs were evaluated for the entire follow up period, starting with the initiation of the anticoagulant therapy until whichever was earlier, end of eligibility or end of data. Healthcare resource utilization evaluated included number of hospitalizations, hospitalization days, emergency room (ER) visits, and outpatient visits. All-cause and VTE-related healthcare resource utilization was evaluated. Comparisons between patients with a VTE recurrence and patients without a VTE recurrence were performed using rate ratios (RR) and statistical differences between groups as well as 95% confidence intervals [95% CI] were calculated using Poisson regression models. All-cause and VTE-related healthcare costs were evaluated in per-patient-per-year (PPPY) and compared using mean cost difference. Results: A total of 2,428 newly diagnosed cancer patients who developed VTE and were treated with anticoagulants were identified. Of these, 413 (17.1%) experienced recurrent VTE during the follow up period. Patients who developed recurrent VTE and those who did not were similar in terms of age, gender, race, and region. No statistically significant differences between groups were observed in Charlson comorbidity index or in selected comorbidities during the 6 month baseline period. However, more patients with recurrent VTE recurrence had their index VTE documented during a hospitalization (61.3% vs. 55.4%, p=0.03). Patients with a VTE recurrence had significantly more ER and outpatient visits at baseline compared to those without recurrence, but no statistically significant difference was observed in baseline total healthcare costs ($29,352 vs. $27,955, p=0.44, respectively). The mean follow-up was similar between groups: 9.6 months for patients experiencing a VTE recurrence and 9.3 months for patients without a VTE recurrence (p=0.4059). Patients with a VTE recurrence had higher all-cause resource utilization rates (RRs; 95% CI) compared to patients without a VTE recurrence (hospitalization [2.37; 2.23 - 2.52], hospitalization days [2.64; 2.57 - 2.72], ER visits [1.62; 1.48 - 1.76], and outpatient visits [1.26; 1.24 - 1.28]). The rates of VTE-related hospitalization and VTE-related hospitalization days were close to $30,000 higher in patients with a VTE recurrence (Figure 1). The all-cause healthcare costs were $84,708 PPPY in patients with a VTE recurrence compared to $44,903 in patients without a VTE recurrence. The difference was mainly explained by lower VTE-related hospitalization costs (Figure 2). Conclusion: This real-world claims analysis showed that cancer patients with recurrent VTE consume significantly more healthcare resources. Total healthcare costs were nearly 2-fold higher in cohort with than in cohort without VTE recurrence. Close to 75% of the total cost difference was associated with VTE recurrence. VTE-related costs were ~4-fold higher in cohort with than in cohort without VTE recurrence. Reducing VTE recurrence in patients with cancer could lead to substantial healthcare cost savings. Figure 1 VTE-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization Figure 1. VTE-Related Healthcare Resource Utilization Figure 2 VTE-Related Healthcare Costs, PPPY Figure 2. VTE-Related Healthcare Costs, PPPY Disclosures Khorana: Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bayer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Consultancy, Honoraria; Halozyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Leo: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria. McCrae:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Milentijevic:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Employment, Equity Ownership. Fortier:Janssen Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Laliberté:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Crivera:Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Raritan, New Jersey: Employment, Equity Ownership. Lefebvre:Janssen Scientific Affairs: Research Funding. Schein:Johnson & Johnson: Employment, Equity Ownership, Other: Own in excess of $10,000 of J&J stock.

scholarly journals Real-World Healthcare Resource Utilization in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Lymphoma: Differences between Patients Treated with Ibrutinib or Bendamustine + Rituximab

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548
Author(s):  
Debra Irwin ◽  
Lu Zhang ◽  
Kathleen Wilson ◽  
Gerard Hoehn ◽  
Erika Szabo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Utilization ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Real World ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Similar Proportion ◽  
First Line ◽  
The Difference

Abstract OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the real-world differences in healthcare resource utilization in chronic lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL) patients treated with either first-line ibrutinib monotherapy (IM) or first-line bendamustine + rituximab (BR) therapy using U.S. administrative claims data. METHODS: The MarketScan® Research Databases were used to identify patients aged 18 years or older with commercial or Medicare supplemental insurance plans based on their first prescription (index date) of either IM or BR therapy between 02/01/2014 and 08/30/2017. Patients were required to be diagnosed with CLL and be treatment naïve, as well as be continuously enrolled (CE) for 6 months prior to and at least 30 days following the index date. All-cause and CLL-related healthcare resource utilization (e.g., inpatient admission (IP) and emergency room (ER) visits) were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up period from the index date among the subset of patients with 12 months of continuous enrollment and were reported per-patient per-month (PPPM). Statistical differences in the distribution of IP and ER visits between the IM versus BR therapy groups were estimated using chi-squared test for categorical variables and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A total of 1,886 CLL patients were identified, with 1,157 patients in the IM cohort and 729 patients in the BR cohort. The IM cohort was significantly older (mean = 69.3 years; SD = 11.6) then the BR cohort (mean age = 66.4 years; SD = 9.8). There was a similar proportion of females (IM = 36%; BR = 32%), and no significant difference in the National Cancer Institute Comorbidity Index score was observed between the two cohorts (IM=0.9 vs BR=0.8, p=0.34). The results of the comparisons between the two groups with 12 months of follow-up (IM = 589; BR = 436) are provided in Table 1. For all-cause healthcare utilization, the proportion of patients experiencing at least one IP admission and the PPPM number of admissions was significantly higher in the IM cohort compared to the BR cohort. The proportion of patients with at least one ER visit was higher in the IM than in the BR cohort, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, the PPPM number of ER visits was significantly higher in the IM cohort. A similar pattern was found for the CLL-related healthcare utilization variables with two exceptions. First, the average length of stay (ALOS) per CLL-related IP admission was significantly longer for the IM than BR cohort; whereas, ALOS per all-cause IP admission was longer for the IM cohort, but the difference was not significantly different. Second, while patients in the IM cohort experienced more CLL-related ER visits, they were not significantly higher in the IM cohort than in the BR cohort. Conclusions: The current study examined differences in healthcare utilization during a 12 month period among CLL-patients initially treated in a front-line setting with either ibrutinib or BR combination therapy. Results indicated that not only did more ibrutinib patients experience an IP admission and ER visits, both all-cause and CLL-related, but they also experienced more repeat admissions and ER visits. These real-world findings highlight the importance of considering the healthcare resource utilization of CLL patients which may be associated with their first-line therapy. Disclosures Irwin: Teva: Consultancy. Zhang:Teva: Consultancy. Wilson:Teva: Consultancy. Hoehn:Teva: Employment. Szabo:Teva: Employment. Tang:Teva: Employment.

Treatment adherence, healthcare resource utilization, and costs in patients with gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GI NETs).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 337-337 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beilei Cai ◽  
Michael Broder ◽  
Eunice Chang ◽  
Jessie Tingjian Yan ◽  
Al Bowen Benson
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Adherence ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
First Year ◽  
Office Visits ◽  
Second Year ◽  
Pharmacologic Treatments

337 Background: This study aimed to assess treatment adherence, healthcare resource utilization and costs in patients with GI NETs who initiated pharmacologic treatments. Methods: In 2 US commercial claims databases, patients ≥18 years with ≥1 inpatient or ≥2 outpatient claims for GI NETs were identified. The first claim for pharmacologic treatments (e.g. somatostatin analogues [SSAs], cytotoxic chemotherapy [CC], targeted therapy) following diagnosis and between 7/1/2009 and 12/31/2013 was defined as the index date. A 6-month clean period before index date and a 6-month pre- and a ≥1-year post-index enrollment were required. Proportion of days covered (PDC) was calculated during the follow up period. Outcomes were reported separately for patients with 1 and 2 years of post-index enrollment. Descriptive statistics including means, standard deviations, and frequencies and percentages for continuous and categorical data, respectively, were reported. Results: Of 1,322 patients with 1-year of follow-up, 847 initiated SSAs, 397 CC, 35 targeted therapies, 2 interferon, and 41 various combinations. Due to sample sizes, remaining results focus only on SSAs and CC. Mean PDC (SD) was 0.669 (0.331) for SSAs and 0.466 (0.236) for CC; SSA users had 20.5 (13.5) office visits and 0.59 (1.03) hospitalizations, CC users had 30.5 (19.8) and 0.89 (1.45) office visits and hospitalizations respectively; total annual cost for SSA-treated patients during the 1st year was $99,691 (82,423) and $134,912 (116,078) for CC. Among 685 patients with 2 years of follow-up, the annual mean costs in the second year were $8,071 and $58,944 lower than the first year for SSAs and CC, respectively. Conclusions: In this descriptive non-comparative study, we reported the resource utilization and costs associated with different treatment therapies. Overall, costs were higher in the first year than in the second year. This 2-database study offers new information on the magnitude and trends in the cost of pharmacologically treated GI NETs. Additional research with a larger sample size would be needed to better understand real-world utilization and costs for GI NET patients treated with different pharmacological therapies.

Healthcare Resource Utilization and Healthcare Costs of COVID-19 Patients in A Tertiary Care Public Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study in Thailand

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (12) ◽  
pp. 1953-1958
Keyword(s):  
Linear Regression ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Linear Regression Models ◽  
Personal Protection Equipment ◽  
Objective Health

Objective: Health care costs (HCCs) are a significant concern in developing countries. The authors investigated the healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and HCCs for patients with COVID-19 based on disease severity and infection site. Materials and Methods: The authors reviewed data from the electronic medical records of COVID-19 patients admitted to the present study hospital between January 2020 and April 2020. The authors used comorbidities and patient characteristics as covariates. Analyses were conducted using simple linear regression and generalized linear regression models with a log-link and gamma distribution. Results: Two hundred two patients had confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. Total costs per patient were 6,626 USD (756 to 45,586). Personal protection equipment costs were the most significant cost for COVID-19 patients with a mean of 3,778 USD. The mean treatment cost per patient was 326 USD. Patients with severe symptoms and lower respiratory tract infection (LRI) had a higher cost and resource utilization value before and after adjusting for covariates. Conclusion: COVID-19 patients with severe symptoms and LRI had higher HCRU. Length of stay, severity of symptoms, and LRI were associated with higher cost of treatment. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; Healthcare resource utilization; Healthcare costs; Thailand

scholarly journals Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs Associated with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease

10.36469/9889 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 63-74
Author(s):  
Christopher M. Blanchette ◽  
Şerban R. Iorga ◽  
Aylin Altan ◽  
Jerry G. Seare ◽  
Ying Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Polycystic Kidney Disease ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Polycystic Kidney ◽  
Stage 4 ◽  
Ckd Stage ◽  
Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney

Background: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD), a hereditary nephropathy, eventually leads to end-stage renal disease (ESRD), typically by mid-life. Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess real-world healthcare resource utilization and cost among commercially insured (COM) and Medicare Advantage (MAPD) ADPKD patients in addition to the cost profile by chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ADPKD (two or more claims) with ≥30 days of continuous medical and pharmacy benefits and no evidence of autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease were selected (Optum Research Database and Impact National Benchmarking Database: 1/1/06–8/31/12). Plan and patient paid healthcare costs and resource utilization per patient per month (PPPM) were described in total and by insurance type. CKD stage was established based on serum creatinine laboratory values or dialysis-related codes. Adjusted, CKD stage-specific costs were predicted for 4 years using regression models. Results: Of the 36,253,096 patients in the databases (1/1/06-8/31/12), 5,051 had evidence of ADPKD. Following exclusion criteria, 4,356 COM and 468 MAPD ADPKD patients remained. Total healthcare resource utilization and costs were high, and costs increased substantially from CKD stage 1–5. PPPM healthcare costs were 37% for ADPKD management and 52% for dialysis services. Predicted 4-year healthcare costs by CKD stage were $40,164 (stage 1), $33,397 (stage 2), $42,686 (stage 3), $148,402 (stage 4), and $207,548 (stage 5). Conclusions: Healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with ADPKD were substantial, irrespective of payer type, and primarily driven by CKD stage. Of the total healthcare costs, 88% were ADPKD- and dialysis-related. Most impactful was the spike in predicted cost when patients progressed from CKD stage 3 to stage 4 (by 348%) after multivariate adjustment. These stage 4–associated costs are primarily due to ultimate progression into stage 5 and ESRD within the 4-year time frame.

scholarly journals Analysis of Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs after the Initiation of Biologic Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn’s Disease

10.36469/9791 ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sue Perera ◽  
Shibing Yang ◽  
Marni Stott-Miller ◽  
Joanne Brady
Keyword(s):  
Ulcerative Colitis ◽  
Crohn’S Disease ◽  
Crohn's Disease ◽  
Resource Utilization ◽  
Healthcare Resource ◽  
Healthcare Resource Utilization ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Outpatient Visits ◽  
Ed Visits

Background: This retrospective cohort study aimed to describe and quantify healthcare resource utilization and costs for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn’s disease (CD) following initiation of biologic therapy. Methods: Resource utilization and costs were analyzed at baseline and 1- and 2-years after initiating a biologic. Data were extracted from a US administrative health insurance claims database for adults ≥18 years. Eligible patients were continuously enrolled in a health plan with medical and pharmacy benefits for ≥12 months prior to, and 12 months (primary analysis) or 24 months (secondary analysis) after index date (biologic initiation). Results: In total, 4864 and 2692 patients with UC, and 8910 and 5227 patients with CD were identified in the 1- and 2-year follow-up cohorts, respectively. Of 1-year follow-up cohort patients, 45% received the same biologic initiated at index for ≥1 year. Infliximab and adalimumab were the most commonly initiated biologics in patients with UC or CD. The highest proportion of patients who continued with the same biologic after 1-and 2-years had initiated therapy with infliximab for both indications (although at the 1-year follow-up for CD, the highest proportion continued to use natalizumab, but this was a small sample [n=15]). Generally, the proportion of patients having inpatient admissions and emergency department (ED) visits decreased after receiving the same biologic for 1 year compared with baseline, although the proportion having outpatient visits did not change. Mean per patient all-cause costs for inpatient hospitalizations, ED visits and outpatient visits decreased for patients with UC or CD who received the same biologic for 1 year, while mean pharmacy costs per patient increased. Conclusions; This descriptive analysis shows that although biologics effectively reduced inpatient and ED resource utilization and corresponding costs in patients with UC and CD, total management costs increased, driven by increased pharmacy costs.

scholarly journals Comparison of Real-world Outcomes Between Patients Treated with Tapentadol ER or Oxycodone CR

10.36469/9905 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 221-232
Author(s):  
Mike Durkin ◽  
Jacqueline Pesa ◽  
Jessica Lopatto ◽  
Rachel Halpern ◽  
Damon Van Voorhis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Emergency Department Visit ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Index Date ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Pain Patients

Background: The objective of this study was to compare health care utilization and costs between matched cohorts of chronic pain patients treated with the opioids tapentadol extended release (ER) or oxycodone controlled release (CR). Methods: This retrospective study used claims data from the Optum Research Database. Commercial and Medicare Advantage adult patients with ≥1 prescription fill for oxycodone CR or tapentadol ER between September 1, 2011 and September 30, 2012 were eligible. The date of the first observed oxycodone CR or tapentadol ER claim was the index date. Patients had continuous health plan enrollment for 6 months before and after the index date, ≥ 90 days supply of opioid therapy, and no index drug claims in the preindex period. Patients were propensity score matched in a 1:2 ratio (tapentadol ER : oxycodone CR). Results: The attributes of the matched cohorts (1,120 tapentadol ER and 2,240 oxycodone CR patients) appeared similar. In the 6 month post-index period, lower proportions of the tapentadol ER cohort than the oxycodone CR cohort had ≥1 inpatient stay (14.6% versus 20.5%; p&lt;0.001) and ≥1 emergency department visit (33.4% versus 37.5%; p=0.021). The tapentadol ER compared with the oxycodone CR cohort had higher mean pharmacy costs ($4,263 versus $3,694; p &lt;0.001), lower mean inpatient costs ($3,625 versus $6,309; p&lt;0.001), and lower mean total healthcare costs ($16,510 versus $19,330; p=0.004). Conclusions: During follow-up, total mean healthcare costs were lower among tapentadol ER patients than oxycodone CR patients, and tapentadol ER patients were less likely to have an inpatient admission or emergency department visit.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document