scholarly journals SP500BIOIMPEDANCE SPECTROSCOPY BEFORE AND AFTER ASCITES PUNCTURE IN PATIENTS WITHOUT RENAL REPLACEMENT THERAPY: POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR USE OF THE BODY COMPOSITION MONITOR IN PERITONEAL DIALYSIS PATIENTS?

2017 ◽  
Vol 32 (suppl_3) ◽  
pp. iii297-iii297
Author(s):  
Amrei Simon ◽  
Benjamin Schairer ◽  
Carolin Berner ◽  
Lorenzo Signorini ◽  
Matthäus Ernstbrunner ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Emanuelle Barbara Dias Tomaz ◽  
Plínio Trabasso ◽  
Gabriela Jorge Trigo Alves ◽  
Rodrigo Bueno de Oliveira

Peritonitis is one of the most common complications of the population with chronic kidney disease on peritoneal dialysis. The most frequent etiological agents are bacteria and fungi, the latter being responsible for 2 to 5% of the total cases of this type of infection. Fungal peritonitis is severe and its occurrence requires immediate removal of the catheter and transfer of renal replacement therapy for hemodialysis. The present study aimed to retrospectively study the risk factors and clinical outcomes of patients at the Centro Integrado de Nefrologia (CIN) of the Hospital das Clínicas da UNICAMP, who presented bacterial or fungal peritonitis, comparing them to peritoneal dialysis patients who did not present peritonitis.


2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
pp. 519-526
Author(s):  
Michael S. Balzer ◽  
Christian Clajus ◽  
Gabriele Eden ◽  
Frank Euteneuer ◽  
Hermann G. Haller ◽  
...  

Background Peritoneal dialysis (PD) incidence and prevalence in Germany are low compared with hemodialysis (HD), an underachievement with multifactorial causes. Patient perspectives on renal replacement therapy (RRT) choice play a growing role in research. To date, and to the best of our knowledge, the importance of bioethical dimensions in the context of RRT choice has not been analyzed. The aim of this multicenter questionnaire study was to delineate differences in patient perspectives of PD vs HD in terms of bioethical dimensions, thus helping nephrologists target potential PD candidates more efficiently. Methods A total of 121 stable outpatients from 2 tertiary care hospitals and 4 dialysis clinics were surveyed for bioethical dimensions (“autonomy,” “beneficence,” “non-maleficence,” “justice,” and “trust”) with ranking and Likert scale items. Inclusion criteria were RRT > 3 months, age ≥ 18 years, and sufficient cognitive and language skills. Results A surprisingly high percentage of patients felt excluded from the RRT choice process. Peritoneal dialysis patients were more critical of RRT. They used more versatile information sources on RRT, whereas HD patients were mainly informed by their nephrologist. Peritoneal dialysis patients felt more often dissatisfied with RRT than HD patients and had less trust in their co-patients. However, PD patients felt less autonomy impairment regarding body integrity, fluid balance, and dialysis in general. Conclusions Our study demonstrates that PD patients showed more scrutiny of their situation as patients, especially their co-patients. Their treatment empowered them toward feeling more autonomous than HD patients. These new insights into patient perspectives on RRT choice might facilitate modality choice for nephrologists.


2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (10) ◽  
pp. 2316-2318
Author(s):  
Paweł Żebrowski ◽  
Jacek Zawierucha ◽  
Wojciech Marcinkowski ◽  
Tomasz Prystacki ◽  
Inga Chomicka ◽  
...  

The epidemic with the new SARS-CoV-2 virus poses a serious threat to patients treated with renal replacement therapy. Besides clinical risk factors (such as numerous comorbidities, immune disorders), dialysis patients are additionally exposed to the virus through regular stays for several hours in a dialysis center and ambulance journeys. In such an epidemiological situation, it seems that peritoneal dialysis and home hemodialysis are good alternatives for treatment. Currently available telemedicine and medical technologies allow for effective renal replacement therapy also outside dialysis centers. Thanks to this, it is possible to limit the stay of patients in a medical facility to clinically justified situations. For this reason, increasing the number of patients treated with peritoneal dialysis, which is carried out at home and without contact with medical personnel, seems to be a good solution. Enabling patients to undergo home hemodialysis treatment, nowadays unavailable in Poland and establishing it as a guaranteed benefit in the health care system will enable renal replacement therapy to be adapted to the clinical condition and the need for isolation.


PEDIATRICS ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. 819-823
Author(s):  
Nancy A. Bishof ◽  
Thomas R. Welch ◽  
C. Frederic Strife ◽  
Frederick C. Ryckman

Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration is a form of renal replacement therapy whereby small molecular weight solutes and water are removed from the blood via convection, alleviating fluid overload and, to a degree, azotemia. It has been used in many adults and several children. However, in patients with multisystem organ dysfunction and acute renal failure, continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration alone may not be sufficient for control of azotemia; intermittent hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis may be undesirable in such unstable patients. Recently, the technique of continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration has been used in many severely ill adults. We have used continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration in four patients at Children's Hospital Medical Center. Patient 1 suffered perinatal asphyxia and oliguria while on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients 2 and 4 both had Burkitt lymphoma and tumor lysis syndrome. Patient 3 had septic shock several months after a bone marrow transplant. All had acute renal failure and contraindications to hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. A blood pump was used in three of the four patients, while spontaneous arterial flow was adequate in one. Continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration was performed for varying lengths of time, from 11 hours to 7 days. No patient had worsening of cardiovascular status or required increased pressor support during continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration. The two survivors (patients 2 and 4) eventually recovered normal renal function. Continuous arteriovenous hemodiafiltration is a safe and effective means of renal replacement therapy in the critically ill child. It may be ideal for control of the metabolic and electrolyte abnormalities of the tumor lysis syndrome.


Author(s):  
Marcela Lara Mendes ◽  
Camila Albuquerque Alves ◽  
Laudilene Cristina Rebello Marinho ◽  
Dayana Bitencourt Dias ◽  
Daniela Ponce

2017 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 128-132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tibor Fülöp ◽  
Lajos Zsom ◽  
Mihály B. Tapolyai ◽  
Miklos Z. Molnar ◽  
Sohail Abdul Salim ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Buckenmayer ◽  
Lotte Dahmen ◽  
Joachim Hoyer ◽  
Sahana Kamalanabhaiah ◽  
Christian S. Haas

Abstract Background: The erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is a simple laboratory diagnostic tool for estimating systemic inflammation. It remains unclear, if renal function affects ESR, thereby compromising its validity. This pilot study aims to compare prevalence and extent of ESR elevations in hospitalized patients with or without kidney disease. In addition, the impact of renal replacement therapy (RRT) modality on ESR was determined.Methods: In this single-center, retrospective study, patients were screened for ESR values. ESR was compared in patients with and without renal disease and/or RRT. In addition, ESR was correlated with other inflammatory markers, the extent of renal insufficiency and clinical characteristics.Results: A total of 203 patients was identified, showing an overall elevated ESR in the study population (mean 51.7±34.6 mm/h). ESR was significantly increased in all patients with severe infection, active vasculitis or cancer, respectively, independent from renal function. Interestingly, there was no difference in ESR between patients with and without kidney disease or those having received a prior renal transplant or being on hemodialysis. However, ESRD patients treated with peritoneal dialysis presented with a significantly higher ESR (78.3±33.1 mm/h, p<0.001), while correlation with other inflammatory markers was not persuasive.Conclusions: We showed that ESR: (1) does not differ between various stages of renal insufficiency; (2) may be helpful as a screening tool also in patients with renal insufficiency; and (3) is significantly increased in ESRD patients on peritoneal dialysis per se, while it seems not to be affected by hemodialysis or renal transplantation (see graphical abstract as supplementary material).


2018 ◽  
Vol 143 (12) ◽  
pp. 863-870
Author(s):  
Jan Galle ◽  
Jana Reitlinger

AbstractIn renal replacement therapy, different methods are available: hemodialysis (HD), peritoneal dialysis (PD), and kidney transplantation (KTx). In addition, variants can be used: HD as a home HD or center HD, PD as a conventional PD or automated (cycler) PD, KTx as a potentially short-term predictable living donation or conventional donor kidney donation. The patient and his familiar or caring environment must be informed accordingly. This means first of all: information about which procedures of kidney replacement therapy are possible and can be offered. Then the specific risks associated with each procedure should be elucidated (e. g. HD and shunt bleeding, PD and peritonitis, KTx and infections/neoplasias). This necessarily includes a structured documentation of the educating center/doctor about the communicated information and decisions taken.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document